The Relationship between Practice Confidence and Job Efficiency of Tax Audit Officer of Bangkok Area Revenue Office
23
Nalinee Domhorm* AukkaradejChaveerug2and SalakjitNinlaphay3
&'
!"#$%&'($) +&,,#-((
#').$'/0(.#-(0/$$% '&"'$ 1,4 (((!#5%&%,5((046(.#-(0/$$% '&
"'$ /268!'&,4, 04694+ $)(($ "6:
!!$ "6:$(+&,,#-(4';'&4
"+& ,'/4$<64,$)'(((#').$
'/1 (.,4#5046$% =,/ '#-($%&+
404,$<#-(, 4#').$ 4$<),4&,,
#-( $%&, 4#16"++9#
( :
&,,#-(#').$'/(.#-(*(#??1' 6(? (:@:(? '
* Master student, Master of Business Administration, Mahasarakham Business School, Mahasarakham University
2 :(? '
2 Lecturer, Mahasarakham Business School, Mahasarakham University
3 64+;F:(? '
3 Assistant, Mahasarakham Business School, Mahasarakham University
Abstract
This research aimed to examine the relationship between practice confidence and job efficiency of tax audit officer of Bangkok area revenue office. Questionnaires were used as a tool for collecting data from 268 tax audit officer. The statistics used for analyzing the collected data were multiple correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis. The result showed that practice confidence in aspect of good attitude, commitment to works and knowledge development had positive relationships with and impacts on job efficiency. Therefore, the tax audit officer should apply the results as a guideline for determining a working direction in order to support and develop efficient working performance, leading to maximized benefits for firms.
Keywords :
Practice Confidence, Job Efficiency, Tax Audit Officer of Bangkok Area Revenue Office1. )
( 9++#5.= %44, 4("094($<
++%& ("$<++%&4'/, 4(" $4+0+0
$4(%(#+I$$$:", 2559 : 5(9WXY 594+,(
!%+("#5'$'&":+'&"":+&0Y (" ,, ZYZ($<+9+ " Y/#5+&'&4, 4/?("::
0("'&04'/+WY&&04(/(",9#$<, 464!
','/$&0Y +#1, 4;Y+04(ZY(#54:+
("'&+'/:$.,("')$0.$4,
#((4( '&$%&'/, 4(" ,5,$4,'/94+5
;.$ (": + %(".$'&!#-(4&,94+
#').$+#5$% ='&/?+#-(, 4#(/5("#4 0 I 0($, 2554 : 104 - 128X
&,,#-(IPractice Confidence) (" &,,#5$% =
#5.',0(",++&04(#(.,94+:++
$;";Y F!WY&'&("'&!,'/94#-('&(
!#5("'&&,6:(".$#5#('&/?+&, +$&$',, 4"+&9+ &9 (#�.$4 I 0($, 2554 : 119X("'&&,,!'$60#-(,!:+`
+&,#564'&+.,("+ ' 64!046#5$% =$
&(&'ȴ(".$44?9+'4!+"##564
"+&6+94(/5I,:, 2543 : 212X '&'/, 464#-(&,,
#-(94 4#(3 494+';'&IGood AttitudeX"+& ,'/
(Commitment to WorksX$<64,IKnowledge Development) (Hale, 2002 : 4) 1 64#-("::+,(65'/, 4#-('&#').$+64#-('&9+
"::044WY&$)#-( 4'&'&94(( '/, 4("!"#
#16"++64#-(#').$'/
#').$'/IJob Efficiency) #5 ,/?0/9#6+("/5 0/#5'&+$,' ,4(?4 44
$,+6494 4$<#').$'/0("%&("#5#
/?0/0, 4/9#6+#')#').$+40 %
?4 400Y (#').$0(",/$<'&94'&"%'&
("$<, 464!',#-($&0Y ,4) %''/
'&494#5'&":.$#5'&+$,1 #%'"+,4+$4 I,:, 2543 : 84XWY&#').$'/#(6+ 3 494+'/%&!%94 (Reliable) /5' (Timeliness) 94=IStandardized) ($, 2549 : 30) '/+#').$Y#5&/?# Y&/ (/6+?(10 ' ,#"(+4!94#(,0+0 Y"+$<
#').$+#5((#56#)I '"10')), 2543 : 196-197)
(.#-(ITax Audit OfficerX0$#564#-(,(4'&4,4 64!',#-(4(..,4/(/(
4'&(64.'ȴ#('&6+,6,%&+`'&&04(5(.+
.$ 046%&((/.(,(/(.#54$%&, 4(5(
.#59#+!64.$04'5.(!49++, 4 .4#-(
#'&94;Y (046$%&/+64(((?%(#4
#(#(" &( .$%&, 4+.#59# / '/'&(( $%&, 4/#59##4 ')'&/ # '/+' .,.' % +$%&, 4+%')0 , 4&(04'5+(" % +'&&04' , 4(4, 4/#Y /4.+64#(,6$%&404,,1(0+!Y04
'&&04, 464#(!/)".9#,''&!64 94 4'&'&#-( 5+(.#-(#5 Y&,//?0'/(6/ ((
5(., 4("#4 '& +/ I$, 2558 : #;$X "'&+04464Y,;Y$) +&,,#-((
#').$'/0(.#-(0/$$% '&"'$ 1
!"#$%&'(+&,,#-($)(#').$'/ %9+ +9 WY&'/5((046(.#-(0/$$% '&"'$ $)'&
94!/9#,4#5',4&,,#-((#').$'/
0(.#-(0/$$% '&"'$ , +%&`0=(
WY&+$<#').$'/,+9#
2. % '!%!'*+,- '
,;Y &,,#-(!6/ , 4#5#$)(
#').$'/!"#044!"#(,94
/
0%&, +,
2.1 )3Practice Confidence)
&,,#-(IPractice Confidence) !Y64Y,('&%&+
!#-((.949+,&'&9+!'/94#!'&64&(.
$%&$<"+&,'/4?("#+`4 5,4 ",
#&0464,#-(!$Y&$,4#? '&0Y
#-(94IHale,2002: 4)#(4
2.1.1 ';'&IGood AttitudeX !Y64Y&,,;.$0(, 4 64%ȴY'(0("'&+.$4+`(%%4'&
64 046'&/#5$%&, 4!'/'&94(( /5#5&'&9+! 594 2.1.2"+& ,'/ICommitment to worksX !Y!Y , ((,'/ 4'&(.#-(4$((&9++'4+#?
(64&(.'(.!/64,4,4#? '"+' //,,#-(+`, 4/5"+#4 '&/ #-(#').$
2.1.3$<64,IKnowledge DevelopmentX !Y$<;.$0 ' +,:$#(#"ZYZ$&$664'4.ZY'
!,(., 4!64++%&4;Y 64 +64+`
64(,#-('/, 4!#-(94+#').$#4 '& 94#5
#1+64%&
)(TPC) 1.4';'&(GA)
2. 4"+& ,'/(CM) 3. 4$<64, (KD)
)3TJE) 1.4'/%&!%94 (RL) 2.4/5' (TL) 3. 494= (SD)
2.2 )3Job Efficiency)
#').$'/IJob EfficiencyX !Y#-(4(.0!
#('&94(( ,4'1104+/#-(
1,4'$+# #16"/5!"#
!6494=''&/ ($,2549 : 30) #(4
2.2.1'/%&!%94IReliableX !Y#-(4(.('Y 046'&%&!%94/046'&!64$$#-(.,4#5#;'W0 64/ %04/,`'&'/, 4#-(0+%&!%!(94' 9+
/,(.'&'/, 49+(#5
2.2.2 /5'ITimelinessX !Y!#-('&94(( #') /5'&/ !64'/'&5#5#"('+/9#,4,,4 +`
2.2.3 '&94=IStandardizedX !Y'&(.0
!#(!64(4(!4' #:":.$=0 (,'#-(!6404/ +, 4#-(("!"#1,44'",
#-(#
'&+044 594+&,,#-(+#').$'/
Y =94
$- '
:
&,,#-($)'(((#').$'/
3. !&% '
3.1 +,!%,",$'
#"++ISample Population) '&,4,94+(.#-(0 /$$% '&"'$ /407I$, 2558 :1)%&%'&,4,5((
04694+(((!16494+(((!'9#:/407((9##"++
' 94((((!(('&(4+#5(((!'&!64(!4' 268 ((
#5((465.85 1,+(((!'9#: ((0(((!
4((+4420Y!%+(94(Aaker, Kumar, and Day, 2001) 3.2 &$7+
&,,#-(WY&!/#534/1504 1)4';
'&#(4/!/5041("!Y64Y'&+, 4'&'&94((
%&&,;.$0&4$%&/9##(,4,#-(, 4#').$9#
!Y$"+&490#? ,4#(:,'/, 4#').$&0Y
'/'"+'%&&,!0, 4/?+4(' +#5(( 3X4$<64,#(4/!/5041("!Y$<
&($+/&/ #4 ,'/+ !(6:,4 '11';+(#-(!Y6464&?$%&$<'$&
!,'/, 4&0Y
#').$'/WY&!/#(4#(34/2104 1)4'/%&!%94#(4/!/7041("!Y/(/?0 /046$<'!,/046'/#-(94!64 '+ ":2X4/5'#(4/!/ 7041("!Y!
,( %%4!#-('&94(( , 4/5#4 '&/ 94 3)494=#(4/!/7 041("!Y6404,,
!#-(94+!644(#4 '&/ 9494+#').$
#-(#5'&(64(((?$%&+
3.3 $7%""&
64'('&1+$:% 04/!64&? + //#5041,4'Item-total Correlation WY&&,,#-(+//
(r) 6+ +0.463–0.815#').$'/+//Ir) 6+ +0.373–0.956WY&
4( Fayers and Machin (2000 : 72-79)'&++'(+//+0.4#5+'&
(94+95Pemberton (1951: 499-504X94/+!Y4+///&+0.4++
+0.25#5+'&(94 +%&&0(((! (Reliability test)1,4+#')
(Alpha CoefficientX)( (Cronbach)WY&&,,#-(,+4+#')
6+ +0.831–0.874#').$'/,+494+#')6+ + 0.891–0.962WY&4(Nunnally (1978: 245X'&+++%&&0%&%'&++0.70
#5+'&(94
3.4 9!;*'
64,4 !!(($ "6:'($) +&, ,#-((#').$'/10(.#-(0/$$% '&
"'$ WY&094
Job Efficiency = ߚ + ߚଵ GA + ߚଶ CM + ߚଷ KD + ߝ
4. <,,'+,'
)1 $)0&,,#-((#').$'/1 0(.#-(0/$$% '&"'$
+ TJE GA CM KD VIF
9 3.40 3.64 3.80 3.75 S.D. 0.571 0.444 0.500 0.468 TJE - Ϭ.ϱϵϬ* 0.612* 0.561*
GA - 0.735* 0.615* 2.254
CM - 0.716* 2.880
KD - 2.126
* /?'!'&( 0.05
1 $(+#+4$) %#5 Multicollinearity 64 Y'/'(Multicollinearity 1,4+VIF #-++VIF 0#&,,#-(
+ +2.126–2.880 WY&+4+10 +#$)'/, 49+#? %&
$)., +#IBlack, 2006 : 585)
)2 '($)0#')!!(#').$'/1
0(.#-(0/$$% '&"'$
t p-Value
>
9&9'
,&%,"
-
+'&Ia) 0.044 0.240 0.183 0.855 ';'& 0.342 0.089 3.839* <0.0001
"+& ,'/ 0.308 0.090 3.437* 0.001
$<64, 0.250 0.082 3.041* 0.003 F=68.254 p<0.0001 Adj R2=0.430
* /?'!'&( 0.05
2 $(+1) &,,#-(4';'&$)'(
((#').$'/1,4'/%&!%944/5'4 94=%& ';#5(64YY%& 5WY&#
+&,& Y&' ,'('(' &$64 64Y + 14'&+, 4
$, Y&0Y ';'&,'/0(",#5&'&9+!(494 +/50' '/, 464#-("0,'/4!4(",';
'&,'/'/, 4(" &,,#-(6WY&'&("%&&,
!0!#-(94+#').$ +, 4'/+%&!%
/594='&/ !4(.#-(4 ';(,'/WY#/?4+!$<, 4%%4 "+&,
#4 4,,00Y 9+$4("#64Y'&+ ":+`94 4(0Selvanathan (2015 : Abstract)$(+$&!,'/$) (+#').$.$0$1';0$/?+ +.=,
#(#"":.$'/0 +, 4#5;2X&,,#-(4"+&
,'/$)'(((#').$'/14'/%&!%94 4/5'%& , #5&/?,'/'"+WY&4#(9#4"+&
'"+'' ,'&64'/, 404,!Y+'40%& '"+''9++'4+"#+`'&
#-($4#? , 4/5+, 4(" ;.$$&0Y ,#-(!
'&=!Y(('/'&+%&!%!94/5'&/
4(0Leung : (2016 : Abstract)$(+:'&0Y +'/
06404+#:++49++"+&,'/'&(""+&,'/+
+%&'/, 4(+'/, 4#-(4 ,'"+'"+&,'/
+$&+/,#:++4+, 4#').$'/$&0Y 3X&, ,#-(4$<64,$)'(((#').$'/
1,4'/%&!%94494= %&((,'&94((
%((,#4 0#5&'&('('/?,4/5, 40Y (1'4 , 4 5+(.#-(!4, 4":.$#').$WY&4#5
$<$%&, 464&('&#-(;Y"404($+"050+/&
'/'((+, 4'/+%&!%94'&='&/
WY&4(0 0($(2554: 86X++$</#54$<
46#)#5$<,+'&944$<4)#5$<
4,#??';6,"#
5. *% + ' +,0'; '
5.1 *% + '
5.1.1;Y$) +&,,#-((#').$'/0 (.'&/ +6+(#-(6+,$% '&%&0#';9'$%&, 4'(!Y 5 0(./ +%&4/046'&949# #('($%&, 464'&&0494'(/9#
#(#", 4#').$'/$&0Y
5.1.2 ;Y$) %#4%&`'&+#').$'/+!
,#(#-(4Y&,(:#54$%&;Y#'&'/, 4#').$
'/$&0Y
5.1.3 ;Y#%&'&9+,+#').$,'/+":.$#-(
#-(;.$,'/#54$%&!/9#,4#5046,$<(", 4#-(94+
#').$
5.1.4 ;Y!Y#? "#'&+&,,#-($%',
#(#"490, 4'/'&#').$&0Y
5.1.5 $&)5((046(((!1(!((Y$%&, 494046 5'&!64+, 4#').$#')6"
5.2 0'; '
5.2.1 (.#-(0/$$% '&"'$ , 4/?
(';'&1'&("464Y'(+.$4+`(%%4'&
64 046'&/#5$%&, 4!'/'&94(( /5+, 4#').$'/
5.2.2 (.#-(0/$$% '&"'$ , 4/?
("+& ,'/ 1!Y ,((,'/ 4'&(.
#-(4$ ((&9++'4+#? '"+'//,,#-(
+`, 4/5
5.2.3 (.#-(0/$$% '&"'$ , 4/?
($<64,1$<;.$0' +,:ZYZ$&$664 '4.++%&'/, 4!#-(94+#').$#4 '& 94#5
#1+64%&
5.2.4 (.#-(0/$$% '&"'$ , 4/?
(#').$'/,'"494+4'/%&!%94/5'94=
$%&, 4#-(+%&!%!(94/5'&/ '+/9#,4, ,1,44'",#-(94'&!64(!4#16"+
5.2.5 (.#-(0/$$% '&"'$ , 4/?
($<#').$'/WY&!%#5 ,/?,$<094=
4$<('/0(",
6. $<,'
!"#'&;Y$) +&,,#-((#').$
'/0(.#-(0/$$% '&"'$ ;Y$(+
&,,#-( 4';'&4"+& ,'/4$<64,
$)'(((#').$'/1 (.,4#5046
$% =,/ '$%&+404,$<#-(, 4#').$ 4
$<),4&,,#-( $%&, 4#16"++9#
%*
$. (2557X ."'$
$$$:"(2559X !!"##$4%&222559, https://sites.google.com/site/potarticle/02
'"10')). (2543X%"%!#&'("(& " : '"10'))
,:. (2543X ! ($$ '&4). "'$: $&'$$$.
$;. (2549). )!"##'*)+ ($$ '& 4). "'$: 9'<$:.
0($ (2554X,-!#&$ '(": ;6 %%9'.
Aaker, D. A., Kumar, V., & Day, G. S. (2001). Marketing research. New York : John Wiley & Sons.
Black, Ken. (2006XBusiness statistics for contemporary decision making. USA : John Wiley & Son.
Fayers P. M., & Machin, D. (2000XQuality of life: Assessment, analysis and interpretation. Chichester : John Wiley & Sons.
Hale, B. (2002). Building self–confidence. London : Sport coach UK.
Leung, M., Yu, J., & Chong, M. (2016). Effects of stress and commitment on the performance of construction estimation participants in Hong Kong. Journal of Construction Engineering &
Managemen. 142, 1-10.
Nunnally J.C. (1978XPsychometric Theory. New York : McGraw-Hill.
Pemberton A. J. (1951). Note on a suggested index of item validity : The U-L Index. Journal of Educational Psychology. 42(8), 499-504.
Selvanathan, M. (2015). The effects of employees' attitude on excellent work quality among malaysian government employees towards customers' satisfaction. Global Management Journal, 7, 14-26.