Deanship of Quality and Academic Accreditation 1440/1441
Alumni Satisfaction Survey of
Physical therapy and health rehabilitation Program
Academic year 1441/1442
This analysis is prepared based on a survey designed specifically to analyze the feedbacks from Employer in Physical therapy and health rehabilitation program for the academic year 1441/1442. The survey includes six aspects as follows:
The first aspect: Qualities and Abilities
The second aspect: The level of program preparation for you in the following Program Learning Outcomes
The third aspect: The level of importance of these Learning Outcomes to your employment experience
The total number of Alumni responding to this survey (sample size) were 31 This survey uses the five-point scale (Likert scale). In addition, the mean and rotation are calculated for each statement and all the three aspects. The range of the approval level is determined based on the weighted average as follows:
Weighted average value Position (degree of agreement)
Less than 1.80 Very Low (V. Low)
From 1.80 to less than 2.60 Low
From 2.60 to less than 3.40 Average
From 3.40 to less than 4.20 High
Greater than or equal to 4.20 Very High (V. High)
In order to verify the truth and stability of the phrases in each axis, the truth and stability scale (Alpha Cronbach) is verified on the ten aspects of the survey as follows:
Truth and stability coefficient of the questionnaire:
Theme Titles of the themes of the questionnaire Number of items in each theme
Alpha Cronbach reliability coefficient
First Qualities and Abilities
120.553
Second
The level of program preparation for you in the following Program Learning Outcomes
13
0.815
third The level of importance of these Learning
Outcomes to your employment experience
40.714
Where the scale is showing the truth and stability of all aspects of the survey. The
following is showing the summary of the survey results and analysis:
First theme: Qualities and Abilities
Statement Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
Disagree % of agreement
Weighte d Average
Degree of agreement
n % n % N % n % n %
1. I acquired scientific knowledge during the
field training period 4 16 20 64 7 20 0 0 0 0 80 3.9 High
2. I gained technical skills for field work. 7 20 20 64 4 16 0 0 0 0 84 4.2 Very High
3. I acquired skills to work within a team 4 16 20 64 7 20 0 0 0 0 80 3.9 High
4. Field training helped me develop and
refine my personality 7 20 20 64 4 16 0 0 0 0 84 4.2 Very High
5.
My supervisor explained to me during the first meeting the concept of Field training,
its importance and objectives 4 16 20 64 7 20 0 0 0 0 80 3.9 High
6. My supervisor has full knowledge about
the training content 7 20 20 64 4 16 0 0 0 0 84 4.2 Very High
7. My supervisor was interested in my
progress 4 16 20 64 7 20 0 0 0 0 80 3.9 High
8.
My supervisor communicates with me regularly about the progress of field
training 7 20 20 64 4 16 0 0 0 0 84 4.2 Very High
9.
My supervisor interacts with me quickly and effectively to solve any problems
related to my training 4 16 20 64 7 20 0 0 0 0 80 3.9 High
10. All information is available to join the field
training 7 20 20 64 4 16 0 0 0 0 84 4.2 Very High
11. I found the necessary information to join
the field training through Blackboard 4 16 20 64 7 20 0 0 0 0 80 3.9 High
12. I received the necessary information to
join the field training from the supervisor 7 20 20 64 4 16 0 0 0 0 84 4.2 Very High
82% 4.2 Very High
The summarized results in the above table show the overall weighted mean is 4.2 which mean that the degree of satisfaction is “Very High
Second Theme: The level of program preparation for you in the following Program Learning Outcomes
Statement
Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
Disagree % of agreement
Weighte d Average
Degree of agreement
n % n % n % n % n %
1. The training institution has the potential to
help me complete the training 4 16 20 64 7 20 0 0 0 0 80 3.9 High
2.
The selected Field Experience
organizations are specialized in the same
fields of my specialization 7 20 20 64 4 16 0 0 0 0 84 4.2 Very High
3. The training institution facilities can be
utilized to perform activities and programs 4 16 20 64 7 20 0 0 0 0 80 3.9 High
4.
The training institution seeks to provide an appropriate atmosphere that will help me
to perform my work correctly 7 20 20 64 4 16 0 0 0 0 84 4.2 Very High
5. I am very satisfied with my training
institution 4 16 20 64 7 20 0 0 0 0 80 3.9 High
6.
The evaluation process was carried out immediately after the end of the training period
7 20 20 64 4 16 0 0 0 0 84 4.2 Very High
7. The evaluation rubrics were clear and
announced 4 16 20 64 7 20 0 0 0 0 80 3.9 High
8. There is consistency between training
objectives and evaluation process 7 20 20 64 4 16 0 0 0 0 84 4.2 Very High
9. The evaluation process was transparent
and fair 4 16 20 64 7 20 0 0 0 0 80 3.9 High
10. I am very satisfied with the evaluation
process 7 20 20 64 4 16 0 0 0 0 84 4.2 Very High
82.4% 4.12
The summarized results in the above table show the overall weighted mean is 4.12 which mean that the degree of satisfaction is “high
Third Theme: The level of importance of these Learning Outcomes to your employment experience
Statement
Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
Disagree % of agreement
Weighte d Average
Degree of agreement
n % n % n % n % n %
1.
My supervisor taught me the most important risks to consider before starting the training
7 20 20 64 4 16 0 0 0 0 84 4.2 Very High
2.
Thanks to my Field supervisor, I learned about the risks that can been countered at the training site and how to avoid them
7 20 20 64 4 16 0 0 0 0 84 4.2 Very High
3.
The training institution provides the necessary tools and equipment for security and safety
7 20 20 64 4 16 0 0 0 0 84 4.2 Very High
4.
I feel very satisfied with the level of safety and security within the training institution
7 20 20 64 4 16 0 0 0 0 84 4.2 Very High
84 4.2 Very High
The summarized results in the above table show that only88.4% The overall weighted mean is 4.2 which mean that the degree of satisfaction is
“Very high” overall.
Proposed plans for improvement:
Statements Items for
Improvement All items in all themes scored “high” or above therefore there is no proposed plan for improvement for any item.
Action Plan Table
No. Recommendations Actions
Assessment Mechanism or Criteria
Responsible
Person Start
Date Completion Date
1
Continued evaluation of the opinion of employers
To continue the
evaluation of the opinion of the interns on the quality of the
program
Survey to interns
The internship committee
1.9.2021 16.6.2022
Action Plan Analysis (List the strengths and recommendations for improvement of the Action Plan).
Action Plan Progress Report
1. Progress on Implementation of Previous Year’s Action Plans Actions Planned
Planned Completi on Date
Person Responsible
Comp leted
If Not Complete, Give Reasons Proposed action
Identification of the
objectives from the start of internship
July 2021
Intern supervisors
yes
Describe the goals, rights and rules to the intern during internship period
July 2021
Internship committee
partial Internship booklet is completed
The supervising consultant
will discuss the points listed in the evaluation with the intern.
July 2021
the head of internship committee in the training institutions and
supervising consultant
yes
