AKKAK KPI reference number: KPI-P- 01: Percentage of achieved indicators of the objectives of the operational plan of the Program. NCAAA KPI Reference Number: KPI-P- 03: Student Evaluation of Course Quality in the Men's and Women's Program.
KPI-P04
Reasons: Some students stumbled into the program and did not complete the program within the prescribed period, and this is due to some reasons, such as lack of commitment to the curriculum, lack of contact with the academic advisor, some students are alienated. The results show that the number of students entering the program and completing the first year increased compared to the last academic year.
KPI-P05
Effects: Increase in the index of the number of first-year students who continue their academic year 43. Advantages; the average number of students who successfully completed the first year for the academic year 43 has improved in the last year.
KPI-P06
The performance of students in the national professional exams for the academic year 43 has not been established. Weak points: The progress of students in the national professional exams for the academic year 43 has not been recorded.
KPI-P07
Graduates’ employability
KPI-07
Enrolment in postgraduate programs
The number of graduates enrolled in the postgraduate program of the program increased in the actual year (7%) compared to 3.65% of the previous year. However, the number of women employed is increasing compared to the past year, is a result of the increase in society's awareness of the importance and positive impact of women and their ability to contribute to society. Effect : Increases the number of postgraduate students employed and the increase in enrollment in postgraduate studies.
Database of alumni including all data on their employment and enrollment in postgraduate studies. NCAAA KPI Reference Number: KPI-P-08: Average Number of Students per Class in the Male and Female Program.
KPI-P08 In Class
The results show that the average number of students in the class of the academic year is 43 (15) less than that of the last year 42 (21). Causes: the increase in classroom availability in year 43 leads to the decrease in the ratio. More efforts should be made by the institute to reduce the number of students in the class and/or increase the number of classrooms.
The result above shows that the employers' evaluation of the biology education graduate skills at university level. The results show that the employers' evaluation of the program's graduates in the current academic year 43 is higher than the previous academic year 42.
KPI-09
Measurement method: The application of a questionnaire to evaluate the employers' effectiveness of the program's graduates on a scale from five levels in an annual survey. Furthermore, the actual KPI value is higher than the target one; therefore it is decided to increase the value of the new target for the next academic year 1444. Reasons: Increase the efficiency of program graduates and their coverage of most requirements and areas of the labor market and increase employers' satisfaction with the efficiency of program graduates.
The results show the appropriateness of the students' assessment of the services offered increases in the assessment during the academic year 43 compared to 42. Reasons: As a result of the further improvement of the quality of the services offered to the students and consequently the higher satisfaction of the students with the services offered to them .
KPI-P10
Measurement method: applying a questionnaire to evaluate student satisfaction with the services offered in the program on a five-level scale in an annual survey. Continues to improve the quality of service, requirements that help the student to progress in the program are available. Method of measurement: The student/teacher ratio in the biology programme. Ratio of students/teachers in the programme=.
KPI-P11
In addition, it is clear that in the women's section the benchmark is higher (22:1) than the target. During last year's observation, it was observed that the ratio of students to teaching staff was recorded at 17:1. Compared to the target value, it is observed that the actual value is slightly higher than the target (12:1).
Reasons: Increase the number of students enrolled in the program and the termination of contract with a number of faculty members leading to a higher indicator. The college management should plan an appropriate student-teaching staff ratio depending on the students' admission rate, especially in the female section of Biology department.
KPI-P12 Prof
KPI-P12 Associate Prof
KPI-P12 Assistant Prof
Percentage of the distribution of teaching staff in terms of scientific rank =
As regards the percentage distribution of teaching staff by gender, the actual values are balanced. The results of the distribution of the percentage of faculty members according to scientific title, mainly in professor (7.7%) up to the current academic year 43, show an increase compared to the last year 42. Causes: As a result of the departure of no. of faculty members in male work, the percentage of professors increased.
Effect: Increasing the distribution of faculty staff in the scientific rank, especially in professors. Method of measurement: Percentage of the number of faculty members who leave the program for reasons other than retirement age.
KPI-P13
More incentives should be given to the faculty members like special increments, and special allowances to attract more faculty. Effect: Increases the number of deviations from the program and therefore has to be compensated with a new teaching staff. Obtaining regular feedback from the teaching staff regarding their job satisfaction to correct their issues and promote the sense of ownership among the faculty members.
No termination of contract with faculty members and work to attract top qualified and talent. Reasons: As a result of increasing the faculty members' awareness for the scientific activity and the improvement of research facilities in the department.
KPI-P14
The results show an increase in the number of teaching staff members who have at least one publication referred to during the current year. Also, the number is higher than the target and also in the external standard. Improving research facilities and increasing the number of funded projects can increase the value of this indicator.
KPI-P15
The results clearly show an increase in the number of publications referred to in influential international journals per full-time equivalent teaching staff in the academic year 43 compared to 42. Formation of research groups and activities within the program and between related programs to create a more culture strong cooperation. The results show large increases in the number of citations in refereed journals for full-time equivalent faculty members in academic year 43 compared to 42.
Reasons: As the published scientific research is of a high scientific quality and published in open access journals with a high impact factor, leading to a higher index.
KPI-P16
The high rate of scientific citations for members' research is an indication of the importance of the scientific value of published research to faculty members. All professors have personal accounts on scientific literature curation and research platforms such as Scopus, Google Scholar, Research gate, Publons, ORCID, etc. Encouraging faculty staff to develop research work and research groups to increase the citation rate to achieve the goal.
KPI-P17
Implementation of a questionnaire to assess beneficiary satisfaction with learning resources on a five-point scale in an annual survey. The results show an increased rate (4.14) of the beneficiaries' assessment of learning resources during the academic year 43 compared to 42 and reached the target (4) and the external standard (4.15). Reasons: Increase beneficiaries' awareness of learning resources and facilitate interaction with the program's digital library and various learning resources.
Surveys are conducted regularly, which enables a consistent evaluation of library and media resources. Striving for a higher level of satisfaction of beneficiaries regarding learning resources and providing suggestions for improvements.
KPI-P18
Measure: The number of research group projects received by faculty members in the program annually. The results show that the number of research projects that close the target and that.
KPI-P19
It is clear that most of the faculty members have obtained funding for research projects from Jouf University. Working on increasing the number of research projects, submitting proposals, setting up a proposal bank and implementing the right projects. It is clear that approximately the percentage of students increased in the actual year compared to the previous year and the target year.
The value of the index increased due to the end of the coronavirus pandemic, the return of attendance and the encouragement of students to engage in extracurricular activities. According to the tradition and customs of Al Jouf city, students are allowed to go to the field and participate in extra activities while no.
KPI-P20
In addition, the biology program does its utmost to organize many activities in the women's section. Effect: Increase in student participation in extracurricular activities compared to target. NCAAA KPI Reference Number: KPI-P-24: Beneficiary satisfaction with the program's vision, mission, and objectives.
Method of measurement: Application of a questionnaire to survey the opinion of the beneficiaries on a five-level scale every year. The results of this KPI were collected from the survey related to the beneficiaries, this indicator was achieved with a fairly good percentage as the current standard was 4.3 which is higher than the target and last year 42.
KPI-P-21
Reasons: continuous awareness and regular survey of the beneficiaries about the programme's target, vision and mission. The percentage of satisfaction of beneficiaries with the vision, mission of the Biology program has greatly increased. NCAAA KPI Reference Number: KPI-P-22: Percentage of Student's Graduation Projects Related to Environment.
KPI-P22
Reasons: Due to consistency with national, regional and university issues; in relation to the environment.
Action plan
Cases needing specialized psychological support are referred to the academic counseling center or Al-Amal Psychiatric Hospital.
Action Plan Progress Report
