• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

financial history

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "financial history"

Copied!
758
0
0

Teks penuh

Financial Markets 3 • Market Boom 3 • Raising All Boats 4 • IPO Price Surge 5 • Structured Financing 7 • Collateralized Debt Obligations 8 • New Instruments 9 • Commodity Futures. The aftermath of this collapse is described, including Enron's bankruptcy proceedings, the prosecution of Enron officials, and Enron's role in the California energy crisis. This book is a history of the massive financial scandals that occurred in the still nascent twenty-first century, but this story actually begins with the recession in the event that led to the defeat of the current president, George H.W.

These attacks were followed by another firestorm in the form of a financial scandal at Enron Corp., the seventh largest company in the United States. Congress responded with legislation in the form of the Sarbanes-Oxley Corporate Reform Act of 2002. That statute created a new oversight body for the accounting profession: the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB or "Peekaboo" as it is called by its opponents). .

These events revealed profound flaws in the regulatory system and corporate governance reforms imposed on companies as a remedy.

The Stock Market Bubble

The SEC created a special unit called the Office of Internet Enforcement to pursue those complaints and assigned 200 lawyers and analysts to this "cyber force." The SEC filed twenty-three cases against forty-four individuals in October 1998 for activities involving Internet fraud. Organized crime was involved in manipulating the stock price of HealthTech International Inc. Even worse, executives at Enron and many other companies began to "manage" and "smooth" earnings to ensure that their company exactly met the "consensus" of analysts. expectations every quarter.

Bush noted that it appeared that Khodorkovsky had been "convicted before a fair trial." The affair did much to undermine the confidence of foreign investors in Russian companies. After leaving Washington, Lay began working at Florida Gas Corp., the only major owner of natural gas pipelines in peninsular Florida. Enron's executives certainly did well as a result of the rise in the company's stock price.

That proposal was abandoned after it was determined that such cooperation would require Enron to disclose Fastow's involvement in its financial statements filed with the SEC because Fastow's status as a company officer made him a "related person." The SEC has long been concerned that related party deals were not negotiated fairly, were often unfavorable to the company's shareholders, and were often used to hide losses and other problems. With the money it received from investors, Marlin I bought 67 percent of Atlantic Water Trust - the new owner of Azurix. Each downgrade of Enron's credit rating posed a threat to Enron's key source of working capital—the commercial paper market, which involves the issuance of short-term unsecured debt by large corporations like Enron.

Regarding the Raptor and Rhythms transactions approved by the board, the Powers report concluded: "It appears that many of its members did not understand those transactions—the economic rationale, the consequences and the risks.”29 Although a federal judge later ruled that the board had no liability to shareholders, several Enron outside directors agreed to pay. The superseding indictment also named two additional defendants: Ben Glisan Jr., the former Enron treasurer (who pleaded guilty to the charges and was the first Enron official to actually go to prison), and Dan Boyle, the former Enron- vice president for Global Finance. . Lay stated that "We have record operating and financial results," that "The balance sheet is strong," and that his "personal belief is that Enron stock is an incredible bargain at current prices." Lay further gave employees the "impression" that he had increased his holdings of Enron stock over the previous two months.

He also told the credit rating agency that Enron and Arthur Andersen had "cleaned up" the company's books and that there would be no more write-offs. As a result of this bit of legerdemain, “Enron's key credit ratios increased significantly.”20 As the bankruptcy examiner noted, “the prepayment technique was a powerful tool that Enron used to maintain investment grade.”21 Enron rejected Arthur Andersen's proposal, that the effect of prepayment transactions be disclosed on Enron's financial statements. Enron was accused of "gaming" the California energy market with deals that exploited regulatory inefficiencies in that market.

Those purchases would be made with funds generated from revenue bonds amounting to $12.5 billion — the largest government bond issuance in history until California subsequently surpassed that amount. But she's the one who couldn't figure out how to vote on the butterfly ballot [in Florida that was confusing and resulted in Al Gore's challenge for the 2000 presidential election]. Bob: You know – you know – you know, Grandma Millie, she's the one Al Gore is fighting for, you know.

Full Disclosure

When the NYSE asked for financial information, a major railroad company responded that it “does not make a report” and “does not publish statements.” The New York Times published an editorial against speculators in 1877, proposing that company directors should be subjected to an “effective and independent inspection calculated to do.” Nevertheless, Franklin Roosevelt waged a class struggle, pitting the poor against the rich and against business by claiming to support the "forgotten man at the bottom of the economic pyramid."7 Of course, Roosevelt was drawing on a theme that had long sounded political. , saying at one point, “The country is going through a replay of Jackson's battle with the Bank of the United States. Franklin Roosevelt attacked the Wall Street financiers with loud denunciations, including claims that the "practices of the unscrupulous money changers are indicted in the court of public opinion, rejected by the hearts and minds of the people," and that "the money changers have fled from their high seats in the temple of our civilization.

The draft legislation was largely drafted over the weekend by four members of the New Deal's "brain fund": Felix Frankfurter, a Harvard law professor and future Supreme Court justice, and three of his Harvard aides, James Landis, Benjamin Cohen and Tommy ("Cork") Corcoran . As Felix Frankfurter acknowledged, the Securities Act of 1933, in mandating disclosure of internal corporate affairs, sought to influence corporate governance with an “in terror” effect on corporate executives and underwriters.21 In an article in Fortune magazine that supported passage of the Securities Act, Frankfurter asserted: “The existence of bonuses, exorbitant commissions and salaries, priority lists, and the like may all be open secrets among those in the know, but there are few who know. Although Harvey Pitt, chairman of the SEC during the Enron crisis, described the MD&A as "the cornerstone of our corporate disclosure system,"30 management often used the MD&A disclosure requirement to divulge numbers and apologize. for deficits and problems, thus obscuring the real numbers.

1 stipulates: “The examination must be conducted by a person or persons with adequate technical training as. While broad principles such as "substance over form" are often subject to the GAAP rule-based approach, even in those cases where there is some authority under a GAAP rule for a particular accounting position that is inconsistent with the economic substance of the transaction Both the accounting profession and the courts have recognized that GAAP compliance alone is not sufficient if the resulting financial statements do not "reasonably represent in all material respects" the financial position, results of operations and cash flows in the financial statements. in accordance with GAAP.36. This process was called 'charging and discharging'. The Treasury or its representative contested each bill, and the sheriff was liable for any deficiencies in the bills that were not proven.

DeAngelis' failure in 1963 crippled the New York Produce Exchange and two brokerage firms, Ira Haupt and J.R. The stock market was rocked by this massive fraud and was further disrupted when President Kennedy was assassinated in the midst of that scandal, which closed. the NYSE. In 1957, the SEC noted in one of its Accounting Series releases that “the responsibility of the public accountant is not only to the client who pays his fee, but also to investors, creditors and others who may rely on the financial statements which he certifies. .”56 This was an impossible position for auditors; that's for sure. The commission concluded that the "tone at the top" in the management of public companies was the decisive factor in ensuring the integrity of financial statements.

Despite the Treadway Commission's focus on management responsibility, increased public attention to financial statements and accounting standards widened "the 'expectation gap'—the gap between what was feared to be the public's perception of the auditor's role and the auditor's role in reality." 57 This gap was widened by the SEC's continued false claims that auditors assured investors of full disclosure about their investments in public companies. Private lawsuits brought claims against Touche Ross & Co., the auditors for Weis, for failing to detect this fraud.60 The case reached the Supreme Court, which ruled that the registration requirements of the federal securities laws did not support such an action. against an accounting firm.61 This ruling was a victory for the industry but did little to stem the growing tidal wave of lawsuits against accountants. Citing a congressional committee, the Supreme Court noted that "'the use of various accounting tricks and reduced capital standards masked the industry's deteriorating financial condition.

With all the professional talent involved (both accounting and legal)" why didn't at least one professional "blow the whistle to stop the overreach that occurred in this case."69 Accounting firms paid $800 million in legal fees to defend themselves against lawsuits. arising from the S&L crisis in 1992 alone.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait