Hydrothermal liquefaction versus catalytic
hydrodeoxygenation of a bioethanol production stillage residue to platform chemicals: A comparative study
Item Type Article
Authors Hita, I.;Ghoreishi, S.;Santos, J. I.;Barth, T.;Heeres, H. J.
Citation Hita, I., Ghoreishi, S., Santos, J. I., Barth, T., & Heeres, H. J. (2020). Hydrothermal liquefaction versus catalytic
hydrodeoxygenation of a bioethanol production stillage residue to platform chemicals: A comparative study. Fuel Processing Technology, 106654. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106654
Eprint version Post-print
DOI 10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106654
Publisher Elsevier BV
Journal Fuel Processing Technology
Rights NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Fuel Processing Technology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing,
corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Fuel Processing Technology, [, , (2020-11-10)] DOI: 10.1016/
j.fuproc.2020.106654 . © 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Download date 2023-12-01 20:58:41
Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10754/666028
Supporting information for:
Hydrothermal liquefaction versus catalytic hydrodeoxygenation of a bioethanol production stillage residue to platform chemicals:
a comparative study
I. Hitaa,d*, S. Ghoreishib, J.I. Santosc, T. Barthb, H.J. Heeresa*
aChemical Engineering Department, ENTEG, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG, Groningen, The Netherlands
bDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bergen, Allegaten 41, N-5007 Bergen, Norway.
cDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), PO Box 644- 48080, Bilbao, Spain
dKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology, KAUST Catalysis Center (KCC), Multiscale Reactor Engineering, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
* Corresponding authors: [email protected], [email protected]
Stillage+FA +solvent
Solvolysis Gas
products
Char+adsorbed organic products
Aqueous phase
Filtration
EtAc+THF
Liquid products
Extraction
Extraction
Char Filtration
Organic products+solvents
Drying, solvent evaporation
Organic products
EtAc+THF
Scheme S1. Schematic overview of hydrothermal liquefaction workup
BPS/HTL oil + Catalyst
Hydrotreatment Gas
products
Product oil + solids + catalyst
Aqueous
phase Organic oil
Organic products adsorbed on the solids + catalyst
Filtration DCM soluble
products
Acetone soluble products Filtration
Solids
Solids + catalyst DCM
Acetone
Scheme S2. Schematic overview of hydrotreatment workup
FTIR analysis was used to obtain further insights into the structural features of the BPS. The pronounced band at 3334 cm-1 corresponds to the O-H stretching vibration in aromatic and aliphatic structures, while the band at 2926 cm-1 is attributable to C-H vibrations in CH2 and CH3 groups. A shoulder at 1710 cm-1 is also observed, corresponding to C=O bonds in carboxylic acids, conjugated aldehydes or ketones [1,2]. Aromatic skeletal vibrations are present from the bands at 1591, 1507 and 1422 cm-1. Characteristic guaiacyl (G) unit bands are observed at 1268 and 913 cm-1, while syringyl (S) unit bands were absent [3,4]. The band at 1163 cm-1 is assigned to antisymmetric C-O stretching of ester groups, which might be indicative of the presence of ester-linked acids [5]. On the other hand, intense bands corresponding to polysaccharide structures in the 1029-1100 cm-1 range are also observed, hence proving an important presence of residual (hemi)cellulose material derived from the bioethanol production. Specifically, the highly intense band at 1029 cm-1 is characteristic of the C-O stretching vibration of cellulose [6].
4000 3600 3200 2800 2400 2000 1600 1200 800
1055 1029
1455 1422
1507
1710 1591 1268 11631101 913
2926
Wavenumber (cm-1)
3334
G unit bands
Sugars
Figure S1. FTIR spectra with the most representative bands for the BPS
Table S1. Composition of the gas products (% mol) obtained in the hydrotreatment of the BPS at different conditions
375-Ru 410-Ru 410-Pd 450-Ru 450-Pd
Carbon dioxide 23.8 24.0 24.2 23.6 25.9
Carbon monoxide 1.1 1.9 2.2 1.0 1.7
Ethylene <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Ethane 1.5 2.4 2.5 3.8 4.4
Propylene <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Propane 0.9 1.4 1.5 2.2 2.0
Methane 28.2 17.6 10.0 30.0 14.8
Hydrogen 44.6 52.8 59.5 39.5 51.1
Table S2. Elemental composition (%) of the BPS residue, direct HDO organic products, liquified oils from HTL and the oils upgraded through the 2-step HTL-HDO approach
Oxygen removal (%)
C H O N S From BPS From HTL oil
BPS 47.9 5.2 46.3 0.6 <0.01
Oils from direct HDO of BPS
375-Ru 84.2 8.4 6.3 1.1 <0.01 86.4
410-Ru 85.0 8.6 5.5 1.1 <0.01 88.2
410-Pd 85.2 8.3 5.4 1.0 <0.01 88.3
450-Ru 85.2 9.2 4.3 1.2 <0.01 90.7
450-Pd 86.1 9.4 3.9 0.6 <0.01 91.7
Liquified oils from HTL
HTL1 69.3 7.3 22.9 0.5 <0.01 50.6
HTL2 75.6 7.9 15.8 0.7 <0.01 65.9
HDO-upgraded products from the HTL1 oil
410-Ru 84.4 9.0 6.2 0.4 <0.01 73.1
410-Pd 84.3 9.3 5.9 0.5 <0.01 74.5
450-Ru 84.9 8.3 6.4 0.5 <0.01 72.1
450-Pd 78.0 8.6 6.0 0.4 <0.01 73.8
HDO-upgraded products from the HTL2 oil
375-Ru 83.2 9.3 7.2 0.3 <0.01 54.4
410-Ru 84.5 9.0 6.1 0.5 <0.01 61.4
410-Pd 84.7 9.3 5.5 0.6 <0.01 65.5
Figure S2. GCxGC-FID chromatogram of typical lignin-derived oil, where compuds are classified on a chemical nature criteria as: (1) cyclic alkanes, (2) linear alkanes, (3) aromatics, (4) ketones, (5) naphthalenes, (6) guaiacols, (7) alkylphenolics and (8) catechols.
100 1000 10000
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
220-240 g mol-1 290-310 g mol-1
GC detectables
Relative RID Intensity
Molecular weight (g mol-1)
375 - Ru 410 - Ru 410 - Pd 450 - Ru 450 - Pd 430 g mol-1
Figure S3. Molecular weight distributions of the oils obtained from the direct hydrotreatment of the BPS
100 1000 10000 0.0
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Relative RID intensity
Molecular weight (g mol-1)
HTL1 410-Ru 410-Pd 450-Ru 450-Pd HTL2 375-Ru 410-Ru 410-Pd
GC detectables
840 g mol-1 420 g mol-1
310 g mol-1
240-270 g mol-1 210-220 g mol-1
Figure S4. Molecular weight distributions of the oils obtained from the hydrotreatment of the HTL oils derived from the BPS.
Figure S5. 13C NMR spectra for the HTL oils
REFERENCES
[1] J.I. Santos, U. Fillat, R. Martin-Sampedro, I. Ballesteros, P. Manzanares, M. Ballesteros, M.E. Eugenio, D. Ibarra, Lignin-enriched fermentation residues from bioethanol production of fast-growing poplar and forage sorghum, BioResources. 10 (2015) 5203–5214.
[2] F. Hu, S. Jung, A. Ragauskas, Pseudo-lignin formation and its impact on enzymatic hydrolysis, Bioresour. Technol. 117 (2012) 7–12.
[3] S. Constant, H.L.J. Wienk, A.E. Frissen, P.D. Peinder, R. Boelens, D.S. Van Es, R.J.H. Grisel, B.M.
Weckhuysen, W.J.J. Huijgen, R.J.A. Gosselink, P.C.A. Bruijnincx, New insights into the structure and composition of technical lignins: A comparative characterisation study, Green Chem. 18 (2016) 2651–
2665.
[4] I. Hita, H.J. Heeres, P.J. Deuss, Insight into structure–reactivity relationships for the iron-catalyzed hydrotreatment of technical lignins, Bioresour. Technol. 267 (2018) 93–101.
[5] R. Sun, X.F. Sun, S.Q. Wang, W. Zhu, X.Y. Wang, Ester and ether linkages between hydroxycinnamic acids and lignins from wheat, rice, rye, and barley straws, maize stems, and fast-growing poplar wood, Ind. Crops Prod. 15 (2002) 179–188.
[6] A.M. da Costa Lopes, K.G. João, D.F. Rubik, E. Bogel-Łukasik, L.C. Duarte, J. Andreaus, R. Bogel- Łukasik, Pre-treatment of lignocellulosic biomass using ionic liquids: Wheat straw fractionation, Bioresour. Technol. 142 (2013) 198–208.