يعضولا نوناقلا و يملاسلإا هقفلا نيب ةيعيرشتلا تانراقملا (
ةيليصأت ةسارد )
The Legislative Comparisons Between The Islamic Jurisprudence and Secular Law
بلاطلا /
ينارمحلا دمحم نب ديعس نب دمحم
مولعلاو بادلآا يف هاروتكدلا ةجرد لينل مدقم ثحب ةيناسنلإا
( ةيملاسلإا تاساردلاو ةعيرشلا /
ةيئاضقلا تاساردلا )
فارشإ
د . يطفنلا رماع يفطل
ةيملاسلإا تاساردلاو ةعيرشلا مسق يف كراشملا ذاتسلأا
ةيناسنلإا مولعلاو بادلآا ةيلك زيزعلا دبع كلملا ةعماج
ةدج - ةيدوعسلا ةيبرعلا ةكلمملا
( ٠٤٤١ /
٠٤٤٠ ـه
)
صلختسملا
ثحبت ثيح نم ،يعضولا نوناقلاو يملاسلإا هقفلا نيب ةيعيرشتلا تانراقُملا عوضوم يف ةلاسرلا هذه
ليصأتلا كلذل ةحراشلا تاقيبطتلا ضعبب ةعوفشم ،ةماهلا ةيفرعملا ةيلمعلا هذهل ليصأتلا .
ةيرظن لوصف ةثلاثو يديهمت لصف ،لوصف ةعبرأو ةمّدقم ىلع ةلاسرلا هذه تلمتشا دقو .
يف تحّضو دقو مهأو ،اهنع ثحبلا اذه هب زيمتي امو ،ةقباسلا تاساردلاو ،ثحبلا اذه ةيمهأ ةمّدقملا
هتّطُخ مث ،ثحبلا جهنمو ،ثحبلا ءانثأ ينتهجاو يتلا تابوعصلا .
نوناقلا ىلإ هترظنو هقفلا فقومو ،يعضولا نوناقلابو ،يملاسلإا هقفلاب دارملا تنّيب يديهمتلا لصفلا يفو ناقلا ةرظنو ،يعضولا يحلطصمب دارملا ّمث ،هيلإ يعضولا نو
( ةنراقملا ) و ( عيرشتلا .)
يف ،يليصأت يفرعم ماظن يف اهكبس ربع ،ةيعيرشتلا تانراقملا ةيلمع ليصأت يف تأدب لولأا لصفلا يفو وه ملع ةروص (
ةيعيرشتلا تانراقُملا ملع )
،ةرشعلا ئدابملا ةيرظن هيلع تقّبطو ،لصفلا اذه هل تصّصخ ،
اهركتبا يتلا انؤاهقُف
- مهنع يضرو للها مهمحر -
يف ثحبلا مث ،ةيعيرشتلا تانراقملا ملع فيرعتب تأدبف ،
،يعرشلا همكحو ،هرداصمو ،همساو ،هعضاوو ،هلضفو ،مولعلا ةيقب ىلإ هتبسنو ،هنم ةدئافلاو ،هعوضوم هلئاسمو .
راطإ لخاد كلذو ،اهرّوطتلو ةيعيرشتلا تانراقُملل تخّرأ يناثلا لصفلا يفو راطإ لخاد ّمث ،يملاسلإا هقفلا
نيب ًلاصاف ،يعضولا نوناقلاو يملاسلإا هقفلا نيب عماجلا يفرعملا لقحلا راطإ لخاد مث ،يعضولا نوناقلا رملأا اذه تعدتسا ةيعوضوم بابسلأ كلذو ،هدعب ام نيبو ،يرجهلا رشع ثلاثلا نرقلا فصتنم لبق ام .
ذه لئاسم حيضوت يف تعرش ثلاثلا لصفلا يفو نيمسق ىلإ مسقنت يتلاو ،ملعلا ا
:
لّولأا : لئاسم سمخ يف لّثمتت يتلاو ،يه ثيح نم ةيعيرشتلا ةنراقملاب ةقّلعتُملا لئاسملا :
،ةنراقملا ناكرأ
يعرشلا اهمكحو ،اهجهانمو ،اهرداصمو ،اهعاونأو .
يناثلا : ت يتلاو ،ةيعيرشتلا ةنراقملا نم ةدافتسلاا ةيفيكب ةقّلعتملا لئاسملا لئاسم عبرأ نّمضت
: لقن
ةيعيرشتلا مظنلا ديحوتو ،ةنراقملا تاعيرشتلا زرفو ،ةيعيرشتلا تاجتنملا ةعانصو ،ةنراقملا تاعيرشتلا ةنراقملا .
اذه نم ةدافتسلاا ديرم مدخت ةدّدعتم سراهفب ةعوبتم ،اهيلإ تلّصوت يتلا جئاتنلا مهأب ثحبلا تمتخ مث ثحبلا .
The Legislative Comparisons Between The Islamic Jurisprudence and Secular Law
(Fundemental Study)
By Mohamed Saeed Alhomrani
A theises submitted for the requirements of the Doctor of Philosophy Judicial Studies
Supervied By Dr.Lotfi Amer AlNafti
Associated Professor at Shari'a and Islamic Studies Department
FACULTY OF Arts and Humanities Studies KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY
JEDDAH - SAUDI ARABIA
2018 - 2019
Abstract:
This study investigates the legislative comparisons between Islamic jurisprudence and ordinance laws, in terms of rooting this important knowledge process, supported by some applications that explain such rooting.This study consists of introduction and four chapters, an introductory chapter and three theoretical chapters. The introduction includes: The research importance and the literature review, and what is the characteristic of this research compared to other researches in this field, and the most important difficulties faced by the researcher, and finally included the research methodology and research plan. In the introductory chapter, explains the meaning of Islamic jurisprudence, ordinance law, the position of jurisprudence and its view on ordinance law, and the rules of the ordinance law, and the meaning of the terms (comparison) and (legislation). In the first chapter, the researcher began to ordinate the process of legislative comparisons by integrating them into a knowledge-based rooting system in the form of (legislative comparison science). This chapter was devoted to this issue and then applied the ten principles that created by our jurisprudents – May God mercy be upon them – Then started defining the Legislative comparisons science, and studying the subject and its benefits, and its relation with the rest of other sciences and advantages, and who put it, and its name, sources, legitimate rule and issues. The second chapter includes the legislative comparisons and their development, within the framework of Islamic jurisprudence, and then within framework of the ordinance law, and then within the framework of comprehensive wide field of knowledge between Islamic jurisprudence and the ordinance law, detailed as in between the middle and after the thirteenth century of Hjjrah, for objective reasons implying discussing of the issue. In the third chapter, researcher began to show the issues of this science, which is divided into two parts:First: The issues related to the legislative comparison in terms of and represented into five issues: The elements of the comparison, their types, sources, methods, and legal rules.Second: The issues of how to use the legislative comparison, which includes four issues: The transfer of comparative legislation, the manufacture of legislative products, the classification of the comparative legislations, and the consolidation of the comparative legislative systems. In the end of the research listed the most important findings of this research, followed by multiple biographies and indexes serving those who want to benefit from this research.
