Removals of aqueous sulfur dioxide and hydrogen sulfide using CeO2-NiAl-LDHs coating activated
carbon and its mix with carbon nano-tubes
Item Type Article
Authors Li, Jing;Chen, Fangping;Jin, Guanping;Feng, Xiaoshuang;Li, Xiaoxuan
Citation Li, J., Chen, F. P., Jin, G.-P., Feng, X.-S., & Li, X.-X. (2015).
Removals of aqueous sulfur dioxide and hydrogen sulfide using CeO2-NiAl-LDHs coating activated carbon and its mix with carbon nano-tubes. Colloids and Surfaces A:
Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 476, 90–97.
doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.03.026 DOI 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.03.026
Publisher Elsevier BV
Journal Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
Download date 2023-12-03 17:31:58
Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10754/564189
ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
jo u r n al ho me p ag e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / c o l s u r f a
Removals of aqueous sulfur dioxide and hydrogen sulfide using CeO 2 -NiAl-LDHs coating activated carbon and its mix with carbon nano-tubes
Jing Li
a, Fang Ping Chen
a, Guan-Ping Jin
a,∗, Xiao-Shuang Feng
b, Xiao-Xuan Li
aaAnhuiKeyLabofControllableChemicalReaction&MaterialChemicalEngineering,SchoolofChemistryandChemicalEngineering, HefeiUniversityofTechnology,Hefei230009,China
bDivisionofPhysicalSciencesandEngineering,KingAbdullahUniversityofScienceandTechnology(KAUST),Thuwal23955-6900,SaudiArabia
h i g h l i g h t s
•Mixture of activated carbon and nano-tuabes support with good adsorptionandconduction.
•NiAl/layered double hydroxide catalyst-sorbent.
•CeO2isusedasapromoterinredox reactions.
•Ce-doped NiAl/layered dou- ble hydroxide/activated carbon catalyst-sorbents.
•Removalof aqueous sulfur dioxide andhydrogensulfideusingadsorp- tionandelectrochemicalmethod.
g r a p h i c a l a b s t r a c t
a r t i c l e i n f o
Articlehistory:
Received29December2014
Receivedinrevisedform14March2015 Accepted19March2015
Availableonline26March2015
Keywords:
Sulfurdioxide Hydrogensulfide Catalyst-sorbent Layereddoublehydroxides Activatedcarbon
a b s t r a c t
Ce-dopedNiAl/layereddoublehydroxidewascoatedatactivatedcarbonbyureahydrolysismethod (CeO2-NiAl-LDHs/AC)inonepot,whichwascharacterizedbyX-raydiffraction,infraredspectra,field emissionscanningelectronmicroscopeandelectrochemicaltechniques.CeO2-NiAl-LDHs/ACshowsgood uptakeforaqueoussulfurdioxide(483.09mg/g)andhydrogensulfide(181.15mg/g),respectivelyat 25◦C.Meanwhile,theelectrochemicalremovalsofaqueoussulfurdioxideandhydrogensulfidewere respectivelyinvestigatedatthemixofCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/ACandcarbonnano-tubesmodifiedhomed paraffin-impregnatedelectrode.Bothsulfurdioxideandhydrogensulfidecouldbeeffectivelyoxidized tosulfuricacidat1.0Vinalkalineaqueoussolution.
©2015ElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.
∗Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+8655162901450;fax:+8655162901450.
E-mailaddress:[email protected](G.-P.Jin).
1. Introduction
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S)and sulfur dioxide(SO2)oftencome fromprocessstreamsofindustryproduction,processingandrefin- ingoffossilfuels[1,2].Emissionsofthesecompoundscouldform http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.03.026
0927-7757/©2015ElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.
acidrainanddestructtheozonelayer[3].Besides,H2Sisacor- rosivegas towardspipelines and equipment,as wellas one of main poisons for many industry catalysts [4]. Therefore, their treatmentsaresignificantintermsofindustry,environmentand humanhealth.Amongvarioustreatmentmethodsincludingoxi- dation[2,4,5],reduction [6],adsorption[1,3,7]andprecipitation [8],boththeoxidationandadsorptionareeffectiveways.Many metalbasedoxidecatalystssuchastitanium[9],chromium[10], iron[11]andvanadium[12–14]wereproposedfortheselective oxidationofH2Stoelementalsulfur.Butthedeactivationforthe catalystslosttreatmentefficiencyandeconomicadvantage.Mean- whileactivatedcarbon wasusedasadsorbent for H2Sand SO2
removals[15,16].Furthersomecatalyst-sorbentsformedbyacti- vatedcarbonandmetaloxidesincludingV[12],Mn[17],Fe,Co,Ni, CeandCu[18]weredevelopedtoenhancetheremovalsRecent reports showedthat layereddouble hydroxides(LDHs) suchas Ni/Al-LDHs[1,19],CeO2/MgAl-LDHs[20] andMgFeAl-LDHs [21]
arebettercatalyst-sorbentsforSO2andH2Sremovals.Buttheir micronsizescouldresultindifficultiesinregenerationandsepara- tion.Moreover,ceriumoxide(CeO2)isusedasapromoterinvarious redoxreactionsdue toitsreducibility andhighoxygenstorage capacity[16,22].Therefore,Ce-dopedNiAl-LDHs/activatedcarbon compositemaybeapromisingcatalyst-sorbentfortheremovals, buttherehasnotbeenanyreportuptonow.
On the other hand, electrochemical oxidation treatment offers an environmentally attractive method to remove SO2 and H2S [23–33,6,34,11,35–37]. Many researches have related the redox of SO2 and oxidation of H2S (sulfide) [23]. SO2
couldbeoxidized tosulfuric acid[24],andreduced toelemen- tal sulfur [23] or polysulfides [25]. The oxidation product of H2S (S2−) could be elemental sulfur [27–29,11], SO32− [30,33]
or a mix of S, S22− and SO42− [32]. The electrode materi- als involved in carbon [24], Pt [23,25], Au [31] Ti/Ta2O5-IrO2 [32], V2O5 [27], B [29], [SbVO(CHL)2]Hex [30], ferrocyanide [6], cobalt pentacyanonitrosylferrate [34], Fe and Ti mix metal oxide[11],2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol [33],N,N-diphenyl-p- phenylenediamine[35],2-(4-fluorophenyl)indole-modifiedxero- gel [36] and hematoxylin [37]. Since the removals could be performedatatmospherictemperature,atmosphereandaqueous, thesemakeelectrochemicalmethodveryattractivecandidatesfor theremovalsofaqueoussulfurdioxideandhydrogensulfide.
In this work,Ce-dopedNiAl-LDHs/activated carboncompos- ite (CeO2-NiAl-LDHs/AC) was prepared by ureamethod in one pot. The removals of aqueous SO2 and H2S were respectively investigatedbyadsorptionandelectro-oxidationmethodsusing CeO2-NiAl-LDHs/AC and itsmix with carbon nano-tubesmodi- fiedparaffin-impregnatedelectrode(CeO2-NiAl-LDHs/NAC/WGE).
Here,carbonnano-tubes(CNTs)couldimprovetheconductivityof CeO2-NiAl-LDHs/AC.
2. Experiment
2.1. Chemicalsandapparatus
Activated carbon (AC) was obtainedfrom Hengxin Environ- mentalProtectionMaterialCompanyofHuaibeiCity(HuaibeiCity, China).Carbonnanotubes(CNTs)werepurchasedfromSunNan- otech.Co.Ltd.ofChinaandweresynthesizedbycatalyticdecompo- sitionofCH4onaNiMgOcatalyst.Ni(NO3)2·6H2O,Al(NO3)3·9H2O, Ce(NO3)3·6H2O andall otherchemicalswere ChemicalReagent CompanyofShanghaiproducts(China,Shanghai).Doublydistilled waterwasusedtoprepareallsolutions.
All electrochemical experiments were performed with a CH660Belectrochemicalworkstation(Chenhua,Shanghai,China).
Aconventionalthree-electrodeelectrochemicalsystemwasused
forallelectrochemicalexperiments,whichconsistedofahomed paraffin-impregnatedelectrode (WGE),atwisted platinumwire counter electrode, and a saturated calomel reference electrode (SCE).AllpotentialsreportedareversusSCE.Fieldemissionscan- ningelectron microscope(FE-SEM) imageswere obtainedona JSM-600 field emission scanning electron microanalyser (JEOL, Japan).X-raydiffraction(XRD)dataofthesampleswerecollected using a RigakuD/MAX-rB diffractometerwith Cu Karadiation.
Infraredspectra(IR)weremeasuredatIR200(NicoletAmerica).
2.2. PreparationofCeO2-Ni-Al/LDHs/AC
AC was firstly coated with tetraoxalyl ethylenediamine melamineresintoadheretheLDHs(labeledMFT/AC)[38].10g ACwasimpregnatedin 100mLof mixedacidsolutionof nitric acidandperchlorateacid(7:3).Themixedsolutionwasultrason- icallyagitatedfor7htoformcarboxyl-activatedcarbon;theAC waswashedwithdistilledwatertoneutralpH,anddriedinvac- uumat100◦Cwith4h.In100mLflask,the5gACwerequickly addedin50mL1mMethylenediamine.Ethylenediaminemodified ACcouldbeobtainedwithamidationreactionoradsorption.Itwas centrifuged,washedwithacetoneanddistilledwater,anddried invacuumat40◦Cin6h.5gethylenediaminemodifiedACwas quicklyputin50mLaqueoussolutionincluding1.5gtetraoxalyl ethylenediamineand1.8gmelamine,20mL15%formaldehydeand 0.1gsodiumdodecylsulfatewithdippingof4h,finallytetraoxalyl ethylenediaminemodifiedmelamineresincouldbeevenlycoated atthesurfaceofACunderultrasonicof1hat25◦C. Itwascol- lected,washedthoroughlywithhotwater,coldwater,ethanoland acetone,anddriedinvacuum(signedMFT/AC).
CeO2-NiAl/LDHs/AC was prepared by urea hydrolysis method [1]. 50.0mL of a solution (M2+/M3+=2, Al3+/Ce3+=4, Ni2++Al3++Ce3+=0.06M,urea/M=4) wasprepared. 3gMFT/AC wasvacuumedin4htodecreaseinnerpressure,andquicklyputin thesolution.MFT/ACcouldbefullydippedinthesolutionwithless timeunderanaidofpressureatmospherein1h.Thenthemixture wasaddedintoathree-neckflaskandstirredat298K.Theflask wassoakedinanoilbathpreviouslyheatedat363Ktostartthe hydrolysisreaction.Thereactionwasstoppedbyquenchingitin acold-waterbathafter48hunderstirring.Theresultingmaterial waswashedseveraltimeswithdeionizedwater,anddriedat323K (labeledasCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/AC).
2.3. SpecificsurfaceareaandporepropertiesofAC
Thespecificsurfaceareaandporestructureofthecarbonsam- plesweredeterminedbyN2 adsorption–desorptionisothermsat 77K(MicrometricsASAP2020system)afterbeingvacuum-dried at100◦Covernight.Thespecificsurfaceareaswerecalculatedby theconventionalBET(Brunauer–Emmett–Teller)method.Thepore sizedistribution(PSD)plotswererecordedfromtheadsorption branchoftheisothermbasedontheBarrett–Joyner–Halenda(BJH) model.
2.4. Batchofadsorptionstudiesofaqueoussulfurdioxideand hydrogensulfide
Batchexperimentsincludedadsorptionequilibriumisotherm, adsorptionkineticandtemperaturewereperformed.Thepurpose wastoinvestigatetheuptakeofthecompositetowardsaqueous sulfurdioxideandhydrogensulfide.
Sulfurdioxide(hydrogensulfide)aqueoussolutionswerepre- paredbyaddingadequateamountsofsolidNa2SO3(Na2S)orby injectingacertainvolumeofanSO2(H2S)+0.5MHC1O4solution intothetestsolution[23].Forthedeterminationoftheamount H2S(SO2)intheliquidsample,anexcessamountofiodinewas
Fig.1.SEMofAC(A,inset),CeO2-NiAl/LDHs/AC(A)and(B),mixofCeO2-NiAl/LDHs/ACwithcarbonnano-tubes(C).
addedtoreactwithH2S(SO2)inanacidsolution.Theamountof excessiodinewasdeterminedbytitrationusingsodiumthiosul- fate(starchasindicator)[2,37].Thedeterminationbasedfollowing reactions(1)–(3).
I2+S2−↔S+2I−; (1)
2I2+4SO32−↔ 3SO42−+4I−; (2) I2+S2O32−↔ S4O62−+I−. (3) 2.5. Electrochemicaloxidationofaqueoussulfurdioxideand hydrogensulfide
AfterCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/ACwasgroundintopowder,itwasmixed withcarbonnano-tubs(CNTs)toimprovetheconductivity.1gmix- turewasdispersedin25mLethanoland0.5wt.%nafionwithan aidofultrasonicagitationtogivetheblacksuspension.WGEwas polishedstep-by-steptoamirror-likefinishwithfinewetemery paper(grainsize400,800),followedbysonicationinethanoland waterfor 15min,respectively. Aftercleaning, 30L suspension wasdirectlycastatWGEandevaporatedinthesolventatroom temperature(labeledasCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/NAC/WGE).
Electrochemical oxidation of aqueous sulfur dioxide(hydro- gensulfide)wasinvestigatedusingcyclicvoltammograms(CVs) orpotentiostaticmethodatCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/NAC/WGE in0.1M NaOH.Alltheelectrochemical experimentswerecarried out at roomtemperatureinN2atmosphere.
3. Resultanddiscussion
3.1. CharacterizationofCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/AC
Fig.1showsFE-SEMofAC(A,inset),CeO2-NiAl/LDHs/AC(A)and (B)andmixofCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/ACwithcarbonnano-tubes(C).The originACgivesaroughandporoussurfaceinFig.1A,inset.After CeO2-NiAl-LDHs/ACwascoatedatAC,itcouldbereadilyseenthat petal-likestructureswithmanycavitiesevenlydistributedatthe surfaceofACinFig.1AandB.MeanwhileCNTscouldbeobserved inmixofCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/ACwithcarbonnano-tubesinFig.1C.
Fig.2showsXRDpatternsofAC(a)andCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/AC(b).
Thecharacteristicpeakat23◦matchestoACincurvea.Ahighly crystallineLDHphasecouldbeseenincurveb,the(003),(006), (009),(110)and(113)diffractionpeaks,whichareevidencesfor thelayeredstructure[34],appearat11.2◦,23.8◦,34.9◦,60.3◦and 62.2◦,respectively.Furthermore,otherpeaks,locatedat2≈28◦, 35◦(overlapwiththeLDHs),48◦and57◦correspondtothe(111), (200),(220)and(311)reflectionofCeO2incubicfluoritestructure [41].Thus,ahighlycrystallineCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/ACwasacquired.
Fig.3 showsFT-IRspectrumsofacidtreated AC(a),MFT/AC (b) and CeO2-NiAl-LDHs/AC (c). In curvea, the carbonyl(C O)
stretchat1630cm−1 couldbeseenatacidtreatedAC.Incurve b, the peak at 1630cm−1 matches to carbonyl (C O) stretch;
1389–1296cm−1 and 871cm−1 relate to melamine, which are caused by the framework vibration and the out-of-plane ring deformation;3317cm−1,1630cm−1,1430cm−1,1156cm−1 and 717cm−1 could betraced back to tetraoxalyl ethylenediamine, whichareduetotheN–Hstretchattachedtoethylenebridgeand N-Hbendbridginginthesecondaryamine(3413cm−1,1455cm−1 and717cm−1),N–C O(1156cm−1)andtheC Oand–OHinCOOH (1630cm−1,1430cm−1)[38].Incurvec,abroadadsorptionband around3440cm−1relatestotheO–Hstretchingvibrationsofinter- layerwatermoleculesandhydroxylgroupsofhydrotalcitelayers.
Theabsorptionbandat1380cm−1 is attributedtotheantisym- metric stretching vibrationsof interlayer carbonategroup [39].
ThischaracteristicpeakindicatesthatanionsofLDHsconsistof carbonatebesidesthehydroxylions.Theabsorptionbandatnear 1630cm−1isoriginatedbythebendingmodeofinterlayerwater moleculesand M–OHvibration inthebrucite-likelayers ofthe LDHs,respectively [40].In thelow-frequencyregion,thebands at975cm−1,786cm−1areascribedtothelatticevibrationmodes attributedtoM–OandO–M–Ovibrations[16,22,41].
60 40
20 0 600 1200 1800
*CeO2
∗ ∗ ∗
intensity (a.u.)
2θ (degree)
003 006 009 110 113∗
a b
Fig.2.XRDpatternsofAC(a)andCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/AC(b).
800 1600 2400 3200 54 60 66 72
78 c
b
Transmittance%
Wavenumbers (cm-1)
717
14301630
3317 1630 1156
3440 13801630 975 786
a
Fig.3.FT-IRspectrumsofacidtreatedAC(a),MFT/AC(b)andCeO2-NiAl/LDHs/AC (c).
Table1
SpecificsurfaceareaandporepropertiesofAC,MFT/ACandCeO2-NiAl/LDHs/AC.
Sample Specificsurface
area(m2/g)
Porevolume (cm3/g)
Averagepore diameter(nm)
aAC 743.19 0.063 4.65
MFT/AC 333.13 0.055 3.76
CeO2-NiAl/LDHs/AC 110.12 0.045 2.74
aAcidtreatedcoalactivecharcoal.
300 200 100 0
0 140 280 420
9 6 3 0 0 40 80 120
-1 q t / mg⋅g
t / h -1 q t / mg⋅g
t / min
Fig.4.EffectoftimeontheadsorptioncapacitiesofSO2andH2SatCeO2-NiAl- LDHs/ACfrominitialconcentration0.1M.
The physical and textural properties of CeO2-NiAl-LDHs/AC were furtherinvestigated and theresults weresummarized in Table1.Theaverageporesizesof27.38Aiscomparativetoori- ginAC and MFT/ACwithobvious decrease; thesurface areaof 110.12m2g−1 for CeO2-NiAl-LDHs/AC is significantly decreased compared tothat ofAC andMFT/AC. Theseillustrated thatthe CeO2-NiAl-LDHsprobablycoatedattheoutandinnersurfaceof AC.
3.2. Abatchadsorptionexperiments
Inordertoinvestigatetheabsorptionpropertyofthecompos- ite,batchadsorptionexperimentswereperformed.Theuptakesof aqueoussulfurdioxideandhydrogensulfidewereinvestigatedat CeO2-NiAl-LDHs/ACwith0.1Minitialconcentration,respectively.
Adsorptionkinetics: AsshowninFig.4,theeffects ofcontact timeontheadsorptioncapacities ofaqueoussulfurdioxideand hydrogensulfide were illustrated atthe composite from initial concentration0.1Mat25◦C.Theremovalsincreaserapidlyatthe initialstageofadsorption.Maximumadsorptioncapacitiesrespec- tively reachwithin 3hfor SO2 and 4hfor H2S. These are due tothedecreaseofadsorptionsitesatCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/AC,which graduallyinteractedwiththem.In present experiments,SO2 of 462.4mgg−1andH2Sof116.8mgg−1wereadsorbedatCeO2-NiAl- LDHs/ACin4h.
Twokinetic models such aspseudo-first-order and pseudo- second-orderareabletointerprettherateandmechanismofeach
adsorptionprocess.Thepseudo-first-ordermodelwasdescribed empiricallybyLagergrenEq.(4)andtheoreticallybyAzizianEq.
(5).
log(qe1−qt)=logqe1− k1t
2.303 (4)
t qt = 1
k2q2e2+ t qe2
(5)
where qe is the amount adsorbed at equilibrium, qm is the maximum adsorption capacity of the adsorbent, t is adsorp- tion time, k1 and k1 are the pseudo-first-order constant and pseudo-second-order constant. The pseudo-first-order constant (k1), pseudo-second-order constant (k2), and linear correlation coefficient(R2)werelistedinTable2.Thepseudo-second-order modelseemstobestdescribetheadsorptionkineticsofSO2and H2S.Whenthepseudo-second-ordermodelisthebestfitforthe experimentaldata,thesorptionmechanisminvolveschemisorp- tion.
Adsorptionisotherms:Theequilibriumdatawereanalyzedusing theLangmuir,Freundlich,Temkin,andDubinin–Radushkevichin Eqs.(6)–(9)equilibriummodelsinordertoobtainthebestfitting isotherm.
Ce
qe = 1 KLqm+ Ce
qm
(6)
lnqe=lnKF+1
n lnCe (7)
qe=RTlnkt
bt +RTlnCe
bt
(8)
lnqe=lnqD−2BDRTln(1+1/Ce) (9) whereKListheLangmuirisothermparameter,KFistheFreundlich isothermparameter,bt andkt areTemkinisothermparameters, RisthegasconstantandTistheabsolutetemperature.qeisthe amountadsorbedatequilibrium,qmisthemaximumadsorption capacityoftheadsorbent,andnistheheterogeneityparameterof theadsorbentsurface.BDisrelatedtothefreeenergyofsorptionper moleofthesorbate,andqDistheDubinin–Radushkevichisotherm constantrelatedtothedegreeofsorbatesorptionbythesorbent surface.TheadsorptionisothermsforSO2andH2Satdifferenttem- peraturesareshowninFig.5,andthecorrespondingparametersof adsorptionisothermsarepresentedinTable3.Theresultsindicate thattheLangmuirisothermsarewellfittodescribetheSO2and H2SadsorptionequilibriaatCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/AC.Inpresentresults, themaximumadsorptioncapacities(qm)are483.09–510.20mgg−1 forSO2,and181.15–197.23mgg−1forH2Srespectively,whilethe temperaturevariesfrom25◦Cto45◦C.Themaximumadsorbed capacitiesareincreasedastheadsorptionsystemtemperaturerose, whichmeanthattheincreaseinenergyfavoredtheadsorptionat
Table2
Parametersofthepseudofirst-orderandpseudosecond-orderfortheadsorptionsofaqueousSO2andH2SatCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/AC.
InitialC(mM) qe,exp(mg/g) Pseudo-first-order-constant Pseudo-second-order-constant
qe1,cal(mg/g) k1(g/mgh) R2 qe2,cal(mg/g) K2(g/mgh) R2
SO32− 20 391.2 1229.1 0.0314 0.958 568.2 1.78E−05 0.973
40 405.6 1112.9 0.0307 0.972 552.5 2.25E−05 0.983
60 424.0 1038.7 0.0302 0.955 558.7 2.54E−05 0.988
80 442.4 1124.7 0.0308 0.973 568.2 2.78E−05 0.995
100 462.4 793.8 0.0284 0.981 581.4 2.99E−05 0.992
S2− 20 104.64 274.7 0.932 0.965 146.4 0.00257 0.982
40 106.24 296.8 0.979 0.975 146.2 0.00273 0.984
60 108.8 282.8 0.967 0.943 142.2 0.00342 0.992
80 112.64 243.3 0.906 0.967 139.3 0.00442 0.997
100 116.8 210.5 0.905 0.981 156.9 0.00279 0.986
75 50 25
0 40 80 120 160 B
qe / mg/g
Ce / mM 75
50 25 0
0 150 300 450 A
qe/ mg/g
C / mM
Fig.5.AdsorptionisothermofSO2(A)andH2S(B)atdifferenttemperatures(25◦C,•35◦C,and45◦C;–Langmuir,---Freundlich).
Table3
DifferentmodelparametersfortheadsorptionofaqueousSO2andH2SatCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/AC.
T(◦C) SO2 H2S
qm(mg/g) KL(L/mM) R2 qm(mg/g) KL(L/mM) R2
Langmuir 25 483.09 0.07 0.999 181.15 0.023 0.989
35 502.51 0.10 0.998 186.91 0.037 0.990
45 510.20 0.15 0.997 197.23 0.047 0.993
T(◦C) SO2 H2S
1/n KF R2 1/n KF R2
Freundlich 25 0.44517 65.85 0.986 0.6159 8.61 0.982
35 0.38581 92.32 0.988 0.50175 16.16 0.994
45 0.31486 130.58 0.992 0.49485 19.46 0.993
T(◦C) SO2 H2S
kt(L/mg) bt(kJ/mol) R2 kt(L/mg) bt(kJ/mol) R2
Temkin 25 0.025 24.38 0.994 0.048 65.95 0.985
35 0.032 26.22 0.990 0.055 68.12 0.983
45 0.041 30.67 0.986 0.065 63.42 0.985
T(◦C) SO2 H2S
qD(mg/g) BD(mol2/kJ2) R2 qD(mg/g) BD(mol2/kJ2) R2
Dubinin–Radushkevich 25 407.04 0.001089 0.979 136.24 0.00304 0.989
35 426.75 0.000709 0.968 132.35 0.001396 0.953
45 435.48 0.000388 0.953 150.38 0.001228 0.959
thesurfaceofCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/AC,andthesorptionprocesshasan endothermiccharacter.
Thermodynamicsofadsorption:TheAdsorptionthermodynamic parametersincludingGibbsfree energychange(G◦),enthalpy change(H◦)andentropychange(S◦)werecalculatedtoeval- uatethethermodynamicfeasibilityand thespontaneousnature of the adsorption process. The thermodynamic constants were obtainedfromEq.(10).
lnKL=−G RT =−H
RT +S
R (10)
whereG◦isthechangeinfreeenergy(kJ/mol),H◦isthechange in enthalpy (kJ/mol), S◦ is the change in entropy (J/(molK)), T is the absolute temperature in kelvin, R is the gas constant (8.314×10−3J/(molK)),andKisthethermodynamicequilibrium constant.ThevaluesofH◦andS◦werecalculatedfromtheslope andinterceptoftheplotoflnKversus1/T.Thethermodynamic parametersfortheadsorptionarepresentedinTable4.Thepositive valueofH◦ confirmstheendothermicnatureoftheadsorption process,whilethepositiveS◦valuesuggestsanincreaseinthe randomnessatthesolid/solutioninterfaceduringtheadsorptionof
SO2andH2SatCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/AC.Thereforetheuptakeincreases withtheincreaseintemperature.
3.3. Electrochemicaloxidationofaqueoussulfurdioxideand hydrogensulfide
Fig.6shows theCVs of0.1Maqueous sulfurdioxideat rel- ativematerialsin0.1MNaOH.InFig.6A, apairofredoxpeaks (0.35/0.60V) correspond to the conversion between Ni(OOH) and Ni(OH)2 at CeO2-NiAl-LDHs/NAC/WGE in 0.1M NaOH (b)
Table4
ThermodynamicparametersofaqueousSO2 andH2SadsorptionatCeO2-NiAl- LDHs/AC.
T(K) G(kJ/mol) H(kJ/mol) S(Jmol−1K−1)
SO2 298 −10.53 29.99 135.91
308 −11.79 29.99 135.62
318 −13.25 29.99 135.93
H2S 298 −8.29 28.24 114.84
308 −9.55 28.24 118.80
318 −10.18 28.24 120.78
0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
0.4 0.2
0.0 -0.2 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
10.0 7.5 5.0 2.5 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
i/ mA
E / V vs. SCE a b A c
i / mA
E / V vs. SCE ab
c B d
i/ mA
E / V vs. SCE C
i / mA
t / min D
Fig.6. (A)CVsofSO2atWGE(a)andCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/NAC/WGE(c).Curveb:CVofCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/NAC/WGEin0.1MNaOH.(B)CVsofSO2atWGE(a),CNTs/WGE (b),CeO2-NiAl-LDHs/WGE(c)andCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/NAC/WGE(d).(C)OxidationpeakcurrentsofSO2dependonconcentrationpotentialinconcentrationtime5min.(D) OxidationpeakcurrentsofSO2dependonconcentrationtimeat0.0V.System:0.1MNaOH.SO2concentration:0.1M.
[42]. An obvious oxidation peak (0.7V) could be observed at CeO2-NiAl-LDHs/NAC/WGE (c)compared tothat of WGE(a).In Fig. 6B, although the oxidation peak responses are obviously increasedatCNTs/WGE(b),CeO2-NiAl-LDHs/WGE(c)andCeO2- NiAl-LDHs/NAC/WGE(d)comparedtothatofWGE(a),itisnotable thattheoxidationpeakresponseatCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/NAC/WGE(d) isthelargestamongthefourelectrodes.ItillustratesthatCeO2- NiAl-LDHs/NAC/WGEshowsanexcellentelectrocatalysistowards the oxidation of aqueous sulfur dioxide. The reasons probably relatethecooperationofCeO2-NiAl-LDHsandCNTs,theformerisa goodcatalyst-sorbent,andthelatterimprovetheconductivitywith goodadsorption.Meanwhile,theoptimumoxidationconditionsof
aqueoussulfurdioxidesuchasconcentrationpotentialandcon- centrationtime wereinvestigatedatCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/NAC/WGE in0.1MNaOH.Thepeakcurrentis increaseddependingonthe potentialfrom−0.2Vto0.0VinFig.6C.Thepeakcurrentobviously increasesfrom2minto5min,andreachestoaplatformafter6min inFig.6D,suggestingasaturationadsorption.Thus,0.0Vand5min couldbeselectedasoptimumconcentrationconditions.Further, theexhaustibleelectrochemicaloxidationof5mL0.1Maqueous sulfurdioxidewasinvestigatedatCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/NAC/WGEby potentiostaticmethodat1.0Vwith3,9and12h.Beforetheelec- trochemicaloxidation,SO2 firstlyreactedwithNaOHwithform ofNaSO3.SO32-couldbedeterminedbythestandardiodometric
0.8 0.4 0.0 -0.4 0.0 0.7 1.4 2.1
0.90 0.45
0.00 -0.45
0.0 1.2 2.4 3.6
0.30 0.15 0.00 -0.15 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
8 6 4 1.0 2
1.2 1.4 1.6
i / mA
E / V vs. SCE
a
bc A
i / mA
E / V vs. SCE
a b c d B
i / mA
E / V vs. SCE C
i/ mA
t / min D
Fig.7. (A)CVsofH2SatWGE(a)andCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/NAC/WGE(c).Curveb:CVofCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/NAC/WGEin0.1MNaOH.(B)CVsofH2SatWGE(a),CNTs/WGE (b),CeO2-NiAl-LDHs/WGE(c)andCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/NAC/WGE(d).(C)OxidationpeakcurrentsofH2Sdependonconcentrationpotentialinconcentrationtime5min.(D) OxidationpeakcurrentsofH2Sdependonconcentrationtimeat0.0V.System:0.1MNaOH.H2Sconcentration:0.1M.
Table5
ComparisonsofSO2(H2S)atdifferentelectrodes.
R Material Desulfurizationefficiency(%)
[43] PbO2,ZnO/CFs 61.29%
[44] Pb/PbO2/CFs 55%
[45] -PbO2/AC 87.09%
[46] CeO2/AC 83.87%
Thiswork CeO2-NiAl-LDHs/NAC/WGE 92.7%(SO2),84.1%(H2S)
method[2].Inpresentexperiment,52.4%,71.6%and92.7%ofSO32−
wasoxidizedtoSO42−.TheprocesscanbeexpressedinEqs.(11) and(12).
SO2+H2OSO32−+2H+ (11)
SO32−+2OH−→SO42−+H2O+2e− (12) Theelectrochemicaloxidationof0.1Maqueoushydrogensul- fide was followed the same performs in 0.1M NaOH. Fig. 7A showstheCVsofaqueoushydrogensulfideatWGE(a)andCeO2- NiAl-LDHs/NAC/WGE(c).Anobviousoxidationpeak(0.4V)could beseenatCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/NAC/WGE (c)witha goodcatalysis.
Fig. 7B shows that the oxidation peak response at CeO2-NiAl- LDHs/NAC/WGE(d)isthelargestcomparedtothatof WGE(a), CNTs/WGE(b)andCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/WGE(c),suggestinganexcel- lentelectrocatalysisandinlinewithFig.6.Fig.7Cshowsthatthe peakcurrentisincreasedwiththeadsorptionpotentialfrom−0.2V to0.0V.Fig.7Dshowsthatthecurrentresponseisthelargestat 5min.Therefore,theoptimalconcentrationconditionsare0.1V and5min.Theexhaustibleelectrochemicaloxidationschemeof 5mL0.1Maqueoushydrogensulfide wasinvestigated atCeO2- NiAl-LDHs/NAC/WGEusingpotentiostaticmethodat1.0Vwith3, 9and12h.Beforetheelectrochemicaloxidation,H2Sfirstlyreacted withNaOHwithformofNa2S.S2− couldbedeterminedbythe standard iodometric method[2]. In present experiment, 43.8%, 71.9%and84.1%ofS2−wasoxidizedtoSO42−.Theprocesscanbe expressedinEqs.(13)and(14).
S2−+6OH−→SO32−+3H2O+6e− (13) SO32−+2OH−→SO42−+H2O+2e− (14) Moreover,theoxidationpeakcurrentsofaqueoussulfurdiox- ideandhydrogensulfidewereinvestigateddependingondifferent ratioCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/NAC/WGE.WhentheratiosofCeO2-NiAl- LDHsandCNTswere10:1,20:1and30:1,theresultsshowedthat thepeakcurrentsofaqueoussulfurdioxideandhydrogensulfide werelargerat20:1.Asacomparison,Table5summarizestheelec- trochemicaldesulfurization efficiencyusing differentelectrodes [43–46];wecanfindthatthedesulfurizationefficiencyatCeO2- NiAl-LDHs/ACiscomparablewiththeirwork.
4. Conclusions
CeO2-NiAl-layereddoublehydroxidewassuccessfullyprepared usingaureahydrolysismethodwhichwasuniformlydistributed onthesurfaceofACwithapetal-likestructure.CeO2-NiAl-LDHs/AC compositewassuccessfullyusedfortheremovalsofaqueoussulfur dioxideandhydrogensulfidewithgooduptake.Theiradsorption processes were spontaneousand endothermic, which couldbe describedbypseudosecond-orderkineticsequationandLangmuir equation.ThemixofCeO2-NiAl-LDHs/ACand CNTs(m:m,20:1) showsexcellentelectrocatalysistowardstheoxidationofaqueous sulfurdioxideandhydrogensulfidewiththeformationofsulfuric acid.Thisworkprovidesanenvironmentallyattractivemethodto removetheaqueoussulfurdioxideandhydrogensulfide.
Acknowledgments
ThisworkwassupportedbytheNationalNaturalScienceFoun- dationof China(NSFC,U140710231,21076054and 21174001);
NaturalScienceImportantFoundationofEducationalCommission ofAnhuiProvince(2010AJZR-85,2011AJZR-87).StudyFoundation ofNewProductandTechnologyofAnhuiEconomicandInforma- tionTechnology Commission(2012AHST0797).Hefei University of Technology:Graduate TeachingReform Research Fund(106- 033049),NationalCollegeStudentInnovationFund(2014CXCY321 and2014CXCY349).
References
[1]L.Zhao,X.Y.Li,Z.P.Qu,Q.D.Zhao,S.M.Liu,X.J.Hu,TheNiAlmixedoxides:
therelationbetweenbasicityandSO2removalcapacity,Sep.Purif.Technol.80 (2011)345–350.
[2]N.Diez,P.Alvarez,M.Granda,C.Blanco,G.Gryglewicz,I.Wróbel-Iwaniec,A.
´Sliwak,J.Machnikowski,R.Menendez,Tailoringmicro-mesoporosityinacti- vatedcarbonfiberstoenhanceSO2catalyticoxidation,J.ColloidInterfaceSci.
428(2014)36–40.
[3]W.P.Cheng,J.Z.Zhao,J.G.Yang,MgAlFeCumixedoxidesforSO2removal capacity:influenceofthecopperandaluminumincorporationmethod,Catal.
Commun.23(2012)1–4.
[4]Q.J.Chen,J.T.Wang,X.J.Liu,Z.S.Li,W.M.Qiao,D.H.Long,L.C.Ling,Structure- dependent catalytic oxidation of H2S over Na2CO3 impregnated carbon aerogels,Micropor.Mesopor.Mater.142(2011)641–648.
[5]D.G.Shchukin,E.A.Ustinovich,D.V.Sviridov,A.I.Kulak,Titaniumandiron oxide-basedmagneticphotocatalystsforoxidationoforganiccompoundsand sulfurdioxide,HighEnergyChem.38(2004)167–173.
[6]R.H.O.Montes,E.M.Richter,R.A.A.Munoz,Low-potentialreductionofsulfiteat aruthenium-oxidehexacyanoferratemodifiedelectrode,Electrochem.Com- mun.21(2012)26–29.
[7]E. Atanes, A. Nieto-Márquez, A. Cambra, M.C. Ruiz-Pérez, F. Fernández- Martínez, Adsorption of SO2 onto waste cork powder-derived activated carbons,Chem.Eng.J.211–212(2012)60–70.
[8]S.Ma,A.Noble,D.Butcher,R.E.Trouwborst,G.W.LutherIII,RemovalofH2S viaanironcatalyticcycleandironsulfideprecipitationinthewatercolumnof deadendtributaries,Estuar.Coast.ShelfSci.70(2006)461–472.
[9]S.W.Chun,J.Y.Jang,D.W.Park,H.C.Woo,J.S.Chung,SelectiveoxidationofH2S toelementalsulfuroverTiO2/SiO2catalysts,Appl.Catal.B:Environ.16(1998) 235–243.
[10]J.H.Uhm,M.Y.Shin,Z.D.Jiang,J.S.Chung,SelectiveoxidationofH2Stoelemen- talsulfuroverchromiumoxidecatalysts,Appl.Catal.B:Environ.22(1999) 293–303.
[11]K.T.Li,C.S.Yen,N.S.Shyu,Mixed-metaloxidecatalystscontainingironforselec- tiveoxidationofhydrogensulfidetosulfur,Appl.Catal.A:Gen.156(1997) 117–130.
[12]W.Jing,Q.Q.Guo,Y.Q.Hou,G.Q.Ma,X.J.Han,Z.G.Huang,Catalyticroleof vanadium(V)sulfateonactivatedcarbonforSO2oxidationandNH3-SCRofNO atlowtemperatures,Catal.Commun.56(2014)23–26.
[13]M.Y.Shin,C.M.Nam,D.W.Park,J.S.Chung,SelectiveoxidationofH2Stoele- mentalsulfuroverVOx/SiO2andV2O5catalysts,Appl.Catal.A:Gen.211(2001) 213–225.
[14]M.Y.Shin,D.W.Park,J.S.Chung,Developmentofvanadium-basedmixedoxide catalystsforselectiveoxidationofH2Stosulfur,Appl.Catal.B:Environ.30 (2001)409–419.
[15]D.Y.Choi,J.W.Lee,S.C.Jang,B.S.Ahn,D.K.Choi,Adsorptiondynamicsof hydrogensulfideinimpregnatedactivatedcarbonbed,Adsorption14(2008) 533–538.
[16]S.Bashkova,T.R.Armstrong,V.Schwartz,Selectivecatalyticoxidationofhydro- gensulfideonactivatedcarbonsimpregnatedwithsodiumhydroxide,Energy Fuels23(2009)1674–1682.
[17]Y.F.Qu,J.X.Guo,Y.H.Chu,M.C.Sun,H.Q.Yin,TheinfluenceofMnspecieson theSO2removalofMn-basedactivatedcarboncatalysts,Appl.Surf.Sci.282 (2013)425–431.
[18]X.Gao,S.Liu,Y.Zhang,Z.Luo,K.Cen,Physicochemicalpropertiesofmetal- doped activatedcarbons andrelationship with theirperformance inthe removalofSO2andNO,J.Hazard.Mater.188(2011)58–66.
[19]L.Zhao,X.Y.Li,C.Hao,C.L.Raston,SO2adsorptionandtransformationoncal- cinedNiAlhydrotalcite-likecompoundssurfaces:aninsituFTIRandDFTstudy, Appl.Catal.B:Environ.117–118(2012)339–345.
[20]C.M.S.Polato,C.A.Henriques,A.A.Neto,J.L.F.Monteiro,Synthesis,characteriza- tionandevaluationofCeO2/Mg,Al-mixedoxidesascatalystsforSOxremoval, J.Mol.Catal.A:Chem.241(2005)184–193.
[21]M.Cantú, E.López-Salinas, J.S.Valente,SOx removalby calcinedMgAlFe hydrotalcite-likematerials:Effectofthechemicalcompositionandthecerium incorporationmethod,Environ.Sci.Technol.39(2005)9715–9720.
[22]O.R.M.Neto,N.F.P.Ribeiro,C.A.C.Perez,M.Schmal,M.M.V.M.Souza,Incorpora- tionofceriumionsbysonicationinNi-Mg-Allayereddoublehydroxides,Appl.
ClaySci.48(2010)542–546.