BOUNDS OF π-ADIC WEIGHTED BILINEAR HARDY-CESΓRO OPERATORS 66ON PRODUCT OF LEBESGUE SPACES
Tran Van Anh, To Gia Can, Nguyen Thi Hong (*), Trinh Ngoc Mai Hanoi Metropolitan University
Abstract: In this paper we aim to investigate the boundedness of ππ,π βπ,2,π on the product of π-adic weighted Lebesgue spaces. We obtain the necessary and sufficient conditions on weight functions to ensure the boundedness of that operator on the product of π-adic weighted Lebesgue spaces. Moreover, we obtain the corresponding operator norms.
Keywords: Lebesgue spaces, conditions.
Received 27 November 2021
Revised and accepted for publication 26 January 2022 (*) Email: nthong@daihocthudo.edu.vn
1. INTRODUCTION
Theories of functions from βππ into β play an important role in the theory of the π-adic quantum mechanics, the theory of π-adic probability. As far as we know, the studies of the π-adic Hardy operators and π-adic Hausdorff operators are also useful for π-adic analysis [4,5,6,14,24,27,28].
The weighted Hardy averaging operators are defined for measurable functions on βπ by:
ππππ(π₯) = β« β
β€πβ
π(π‘π₯)π(π‘)ππ‘, π₯ β βππ, (1.1)
here β€πβ is the ring of π-adic non-zero integers, and ππ₯ is the Haar measure on βπ. Rim and Lee [24] considered the problem of characterizing function π on β€πβ, so that we have inequalities:
β₯β₯ππ
ππβ₯β₯π β€ πΆ β₯ π β₯π
where π is π-adic Lebesgue or BMO space. The corresponding best constants πΆ are also obtained by these authors.
Hung [14] considered a more general class of π-adic weighted Hardy averaging operators, which are called π-adic Hardy-Cesaro operators, defined as:
ππ,π π π(π₯) = β« β
β€πβ
π(π (π‘)π₯)π(π‘)ππ‘, (1.2) where π : β€πβ β βπ and π: β€πβ β [0; β) are measurable funtions.
The characterizations on funtion π(π‘), under certain conditions on π (π‘), so that:
β₯β₯ππ,π
π πβ₯β₯π β€ πΆ β₯ π β₯π
for all π β π, where π is π-adic Lebesgue space, are obtained. The best constants πΆ in the above inequalities are worked out too. It is interesting to notice that, by applying the boundedness of ππ,π on π-adic weighted Lebesgue spaces, Hung gives a relation between π β adic Hardy operators and discrete Hardy inequalities on the real field.
In [15], Hung and Ky gave the definition of the weighted multilinear Hardy-CesΓ ro operators ππ,π βπ,π to be:
Definition 1.1. Let π, π β β, π: [0,1]π β [0, β), π 1, β¦ , π π: [0,1]π β β be measurable funtions. The weighted multilinear Hardy-CesΓ ro operators ππ,π βπ,π is defined by:
ππ,π βπ,π(πβ)(π₯) = β« β
[0,1]π
(β β
π
π=1
βππ(π π(π‘)π₯)) π(π‘)ππ‘, (1.3) where πβ = (π1, β¦ , ππ), π β = (π 1, β¦ , π π).
The authors obtain the sharp bounds of ππ,π βπ,π on the product of Lebesgue spaces and central Morrey spaces. In our paper, we define the π-adic weighted bilinear Hardy-CesΓ ro operators ππ,π βπ,2,π as follow:
Definition 1.2. Let π be positive interger numbers and π: (β€πβ)π β [ 0; β), π β = (π 1, π 2): (β€πβ)π β βπ2 be measurable. The π-adic weighted bilinear Hardy-CesΓ ro operators ππ,π βπ,2,π, which define on πβ = (π1, π2) : βππ β β2 vector of measurable funtions, by
ππ,π βπ,2,π(π1, π2)(π₯) = β« β
(β€πβ)π
(β β
2
π=1
βππ(π π(π‘)π₯)) π(π‘)ππ‘,
Our paper is organized as follow. In Section 2 we give the content of this paper including the notation and definitions that we shall use in the sequel. We define the π-adic weighted Lebesgue spaces πΏππ(βππ). We also state the main results on the boundedness of ππ,π βπ,2,π on the π-adic weighted Lebesgue space and work out the norms of ππ,π βπ,2,π on such space. In Section 3 we give the conclusion of this paper.
2. CONTENT
2.1. Basic notions and lemmas
Let π be a prime number and let π β ββ. Write π = ππΎ π
π where π and π are integers not divisible by π. Define the π-adic absolute value | β |π on β by |π|π = πβπΎ and |0|π = 0. The absolute value | β |π gives a metric on β defined by ππ(π₯, π¦) = |π₯ β π¦|π. We denote by βπ the completion of β with respect to the metric π. βπ with natural operations and topology induced by the metric ππ is a locally compact, non-discrete, complete and totally disconnected field. A non-zero element π₯ of βπ, is uniquely represented as a canonical form π₯ = ππΎ(π₯0+ π₯1π + π₯2π2+ β― ) where π₯π β β€/πβ€ and π₯0 β 0. We then have |π₯|π = πβπΎ. Define β€π = {π₯ β βπ: |π₯|π β€ 1} and β€πβ = β€π β {0}.
βππ = βπΓ β― Γ βπ contains all π -tuples of βπ . The norm on βππ is |π₯|π = max1β€πβ€πβ|π₯π|π for π₯ = (π₯1, β¦ , π₯π) β βππ. The space βππ is complete metric locally compact and totally disconnected space. For each π β βπ and π₯ = (π₯1, β¦ , π₯π) β βππ, we denote ππ₯ = (ππ₯1, β¦ , ππ₯π). For πΎ β β€, we denote π΅πΎ as a πΎ-ball of βππ with center at 0 , containing all π₯ with |π₯|π β€ ππΎ, and ππΎ = π΅πΎβ π΅πΎβ1 its boundary. Also, for π β βππ, π΅πΎ(π) consists of all π₯ with π₯ β π β π΅πΎ, and ππΎ(π) consists of all π₯ with π₯ β π β ππΎ.
Since βππ is a locally-compact commutative group with respect to addition, there exists the Haar measure ππ₯ on the additive group of βππ normalized by β«π΅
0βππ₯ = 1. Then π(ππ₯) =
|π| ππππ₯ for all π β βπβ, |π΅πΎ(π₯)| = πππΎ and |ππΎ(π₯)| = πππΎ(1 β πβπ).
We shall consider the class of weights π²πΌ, which consists of all nonnegative locally integrable function π on βππ so that π(π‘π₯) = |π‘|ππΌπ(π₯) for all π₯ β βππ and π‘ β βπβ and 0 <
β«π
0βπ(π₯)ππ₯ < β. It is easy to see that π(π₯) = |π₯|ππΌ is in π²πΌ if and only if πΌ > βπ.
Definition 2.1. Let π be any weight function on βππ, that is a nonnegative, locally integrable function from βππ into β. Let 1 β€ π < β, the π-adic weighted Lebesgue spaces πΏππ(βππ) be the space of complexvalued functions π on βππ so that
β₯ π β₯πΏ
ππ(βππ)= (β« β
βππ
β|π(π₯)|ππ(π₯)ππ₯)
1/π
< β
For further readings on π-adic analysis, see [25,26]. Here, some often used computational principles are worth mentioning at the outset. First, if π β πΏ1π(βπ) we can write
β« β
βππ
π(π₯)π(π₯)ππ₯ = β β
πΎββ€
β« β
ππΎ
π(π¦)π(π¦)ππ¦.
Second, we also often use the fact that
β« β
βππ
π(ππ₯)ππ₯ = 1
|π|ππβ« β
βππ
π(π₯)ππ₯, if π β βππ β {0} and π β πΏ1(βππ).
In order to prove the main theorem, we need the following lemma.
Lemma 2.2. Let π β π²πΌ, πΌ > βπ and πΎ > 0. Then, the funtions ππ,πΎ(π₯) = {
0 if |π₯|π < 1
|π₯|πβ
π+πΌ π β1
πΎ2
if |π₯|π β₯ 1 belong to πΏππ(βππ) and β₯β₯ππ,πΎβ₯β₯πΏ
ππ(βππ)= ( π(π0)
1βπβπ/πΎ2)1/π > 0 Proof. From the formula for ππ,πΎ, we see that
β₯β₯ππ,πΎβ₯β₯πΏ
ππ(βππ)
π = β« β
βππ
β|ππ,πΎ|ππ(π₯)ππ₯ = β« β
|π₯|πβ₯1
β|π₯|πβ(π+πΌ+
π πΎ2)
π(π₯)ππ₯ = β β
β
π=0
ββ« β
ππ
βπβπ(π+πΌ+
π πΎ2)
π(π₯)ππ₯ = β β
β
π=0
ββ« β
π0
βπβπ(π+πΌ+
π πΎ2)
πππΌ+πππ(π¦)ππ¦ = β β
β
π=0
βπβ
ππ πΎ2π(π0)
= 1
1 β πβ
π πΎ2
π(π0) < β
Thus ππ,πΎ β πΏππ(βππ) for each πΎ and β₯β₯ππ,πΎβ₯β₯πΏ
ππ(βππ) = ( π(π0)
1βπβπ/πΎ2)1/π > 0.
2.2 . Bounds of πΌπ,ππ,π,πββ on the product of weighted Lebesgue spaces
Let π be πΏππ(βππ). Our aim is to characterize condition on functions π(π‘) and π 1(π‘), π 2(π‘) such that
β₯β₯ππ,π βπ,2,π(π1, π2)β₯β₯πΓπ β€ πΆβ₯β₯π1β₯β₯πβ β₯β₯π2β₯β₯π
holds for any π1, π2 and the best constant πΆ is obtained. The main result of this section is Theorem 3.2.
In this section, if not explicitly stated otherwise, π, πΌ, π1, π2, πΌ1, πΌ2 are real numbers, 1 β€ π < β, 1 β€ π1 < β, 1 β€ π2 < β, πΌ1 > βπ, πΌ2 > βπ so that
1 π= 1
π1+ 1 π2, and
πΌ =ππΌ1
π1 +ππΌ2 π2 . The weights π1 β π²πΌ1, π2 β π²πΌ2, set
π(π₯) = π1
π π1
(π₯) β π2
π π2
(π₯) It is obvious that π β π²πΌ
Definition 3.1. We say that (π1, π2) satisfies the π²πΌβββ condition if π(π0) β₯ π1(π0)
π
π1π2(π0)
π π2
For example, (π1, π2) where π1(π₯) = |π₯|ππΌ1, π2(π₯) = |π₯|ππΌ2 is satisfies the π²πΌβββ
condition.
Through out this paper, π 1, π 2 are measurable functions from (β€πβ)π into βπ and we denote by π β the vector (π 1, π 2).
Theorem 3.2. Assume that (π1, π2) satisfies π²πΌβββ condition and there exits constant π½ > 0 such that |π 1(π‘1, β¦ , π‘π)|π β₯ min{|π‘1|ππ½, β¦ , |π‘π|ππ½} and |π 2(π‘1, β¦ , π‘π)|π β₯ min{|π‘1|ππ½, β¦ , |π‘π|ππ½} and for almost everywhere (π‘1, β¦ , π‘π) β (β€πβ)π. Then there exists a constant πΆ such that the inequality
β₯β₯ππ,π βπ,2,π(π1, π2)β₯β₯πΏ
π
π(βππ) β€ πΆβ₯β₯π1β₯β₯πΏ
π1π1(βππ)β β₯β₯π2β₯β₯πΏ
π2π2(βππ)
holds for any measurable π1, π2 if and only if π: = β« β
(β€πβ)π
|π 1(π‘)|πβ
π+πΌ1 π1
β |π 2(π‘)|πβ
π+πΌ2 π2
π(π‘)ππ‘ < β
Moreover, if (3.7) holds then π is the norm of ππ£,π βπ,2,π from πΏππ11(βππ) Γ πΏππ22(βππ) to πΏππ(βππ).
Proof. As we note above, π β π²πΌβββ . Firstly, suppose that π is finite. Let π1 β πΏππ11(βππ), π2 β πΏππ22(βππ). Using Minkowski's inequality, HΓΆlder's inequality and π-adic change of variable (2.2), we have
β₯β₯ππ,π βπ,2,π(π1, π2)β₯β₯πΏ
π π(βππ)
β€ β¬ β
βππ
β(β« β
(β€πβ)π
β(|π1(π 1(π‘)π₯)π2(π 2(π‘)π₯)|)π(π‘)ππ‘)
π
π(π₯)ππ₯)
1 π
β€ β« β
(β€πβ)π
β(β« β
βππ
β|π1(π 1(π‘)π₯)π2(π 2(π‘)π₯)|ππ(π₯)ππ₯)
1 π
π(π‘)ππ‘
β€ β« β
(β€πβ)π
ββ β
2
π=1
β(β« β
βππβ|ππ(π π(π‘)π₯)|ππππ(π₯)ππ₯)
1 ππ
π(π‘)ππ‘
= π (β β
2
π=1
ββ₯β₯ππβ₯β₯πΏ
ππππ(βππ)) < β.
Thus, ππ,π βπ,2,π is bounded from πΏππ11(βππ) Γ πΏππ22(βππ) to πΏππ(βππ) and the best constant πΆ in (3.6) satisfies
πΆ β€ π.
For the converse, assuming that ππ,π βπ,2,π is defined as a bounded operator from πΏππ11(βππ) Γ πΏππ22(βππ) to πΏππ(βππ). Let πΎ be an arbitrary positive number and we set
πΎ1: = βπ1
π πΎ and πΎ2: = βπ2 π πΎ and
ππ1,πΎ1 = {
0 if |π₯|π β€ 1
|π₯|π
βπ+πΌ1 π1 β1
πΎ12
if |π₯|π β₯ 1.
ππ2,πΎ2 = {
0 if |π₯|π β€ 1
|π₯|π
βπ+πΌ1 π1 β1
πΎ22
if |π₯|π β₯ 1.
From Lemma 2.2, we get that ππ1,πΎ1 β πΏππ11(βππ), ππ2,πΎ2 β πΏππ22(βππ) and
β₯β₯ππ1,πΎ1β₯β₯πΏ
π1π1(βππ) = (π1(π0)
1βπ
βπ1 πΎ12)
1 π1
> 0, β₯β₯ππ2,πΎ2β₯β₯πΏ
π2π2(βππ)= (π2(π0)
1βπβ π2πΎ2
)
1 π2 > 0.
We fix π₯ β βππ which |π₯|π β₯ 1 and set
ππ₯ = {π‘ β (β€πβ)π: |π 1(π‘)π₯|π> 1} β© {π‘ β (β€πβ)π: |π 2(π‘)π₯|π > 1}.
From the assumption |π 1(π‘1, β¦ , π‘π)|πβ₯ min{|π‘1|ππ½, β¦ , |π‘π|ππ½}, |π 2(π‘1, β¦ , π‘π)|π β₯ min{|π‘1|ππ½, β¦ , |π‘π|ππ½} a.e π‘ = (π‘1, β¦ , π‘π) β (β€πβ)π, there exist a subset πΈ of (β€πβ)π has measure zero and ππ₯ is contained in
{π‘ β (β€πβ)π: |π‘|π β₯ |π₯|πβ1/π½} β πΈ.
Consequently, we have
β₯β₯ππ,π βΎ
π,2,π
(ππ1,πΎ1, ππ2,πΎ2)β₯β₯πΏ
π π(βππ) π
= β« β
(βππ)
β| β« (ππ1,πΎ1(π 1(π‘)π₯) β ππ2,πΎ2(π 2(π‘)π₯)) π(π‘)ππ‘
(β€πβ)π
β|
π
π(π₯)ππ₯
= β« β
|π₯|πβ₯1
β(|π₯|π
βπ+πΌ1 π1 β1
πΎ12
β |π₯|π
βπ+πΌ2 π2 β1
πΎ22
)
π
Γ
Γ |β« β
ππ₯
β| π 1(π‘)|
π
βπ+πΌ1 π1 β1
πΎ12
β |π 2(π‘)|π
βπ+πΌ2 π2 β1
πΎ22
π(π‘)ππ‘|
π
π(π₯)ππ₯
β₯ β« β
|π₯|πβ₯1
β|π₯|πβπβπΌβ
π πΎ2
(β« β
ππ₯
β|π 1(π‘)|π
βπ+πΌ1 π1 β1
πΎ12
β |π 2(π‘)|π
βπ+πΌ2 π2 β1
πΎ22
π(π‘)ππ‘)
π
π(π₯)ππ₯
β₯ β« β
|π₯|πβ₯ππΎ
β|π₯|πβπβπΌβ
π πΎ2
π(π₯)ππ₯ (β« β
ππ₯
β|π 1(π‘)|πβ
π+πΌ1 π1 β 1
πΎ12β |π 2(π‘)|π
βπ+πΌ2 π2 β1
πΎ22
π(π‘)ππ‘)
π
= πβ
π πΎβ₯β₯ππ,πΎβ₯β₯πΏ
π
π(βππ)(β« β
ππ₯
β|π 1(π‘)|π
βπ+πΌ1 π1 β1
πΎ12
β |π 2(π‘)|π
βπ+πΌ2 π2 β1
πΎ22
π(π‘)ππ‘)
π
Here we denote πΉ by the set {π‘ β (β€πβ)π: |π‘|π β₯ πβπΎ/π½}. Since |π 1(π‘1, β¦ , π‘π)|π β₯ min{|π‘1|ππ½, β¦ , |π‘π|ππ½}, |π 2(π‘1, β¦ , π‘π)|π β₯ min{|π‘1|ππ½, β¦ , |π‘π|ππ½} a.e π‘ = (π‘1, β¦ , π‘π) β (β€πβ)π , imply that ππ₯ β πΉ.
Thus we have the following inequality
β« β
πΉ
β|π 1(π‘)|π
βπ+πΌ1 π1 β1
πΎ12
β |π 2(π‘)|π
βπ+πΌ2 π2 β1
πΎ22
π(π‘)ππ‘ β€ π
1
πΎ β₯β₯ππ,π βπ,2,π(ππ1,πΎ1, ππ2,πΎ2)β₯β₯
β₯β₯ππ1,πΎ1β₯β₯πΏ
π1π1(βππ)β β₯β₯ππ2,πΎ2β₯β₯πΏ
π2π2(βππ)
β€ πΆπ
1 πΎ.
Here πΆ is the constant in (3.6). Letting πΎ to infinity, by Lebesgue's dominated convergence Theorem, we obtain
β«(β€ β
πβ)π |π 1(π‘)|πβ
π+πΌ1
π1 β |π 2(π‘)|πβ
π+πΌ2
π2 π(π‘)ππ‘ β€ πΆ.
From (3.7) and (3.9), we obtain β₯β₯ππ,π βπ,2,πβ₯β₯
πΏπ1π1(βππ)ΓπΏπ2π2(βππ)βπΏππ(βππ) = π.
3. CONCLUSION
In this paper, we find out the norm of π-adic weighted bilinear Hardy-CesΓ ro operator on product of π-adic weighted Lebesgue spaces as following:
β₯β₯ππ,π βπ,2,πβ₯β₯
πΏπ1π1(βππ)ΓπΏπ2π2(βππ)βπΏππ(βππ) = β« β
(β€πβ)π
|π 1(π‘)|πβ
π+πΌ1
π1 β |π 2(π‘)|πβ
π+πΌ2
π2 π(π‘)ππ‘ < β.
REFERENCES
1. J. Alvarez, J. Lakey and M. GuzmΓ‘n-Partida (2000), Space of bounded π-central mean oscillation, Morrey spaces, and π-central Carleson measures, Collect. Math Duke Math. J. 51, 1-47.
2. C. Carton-Lebrun and M. Fosset (1984), Moyennes et quotients de Taylor dans BMO, Bull. Soc.
Roy. Sci. LiΓ©ge. (2) 53, 85-87.
3. Y. Z. Chen and K. S. Lau (1989), Some new classes of Hardy spaces, J. Funct. Anal. 84, 255-278.
4. N.M. Chuong, Yu V. Egorov, A. Khrennikov, Y. Meyer, D. Mumford (2007), Harmonic, wavelet and π-adic analysis, World Scientific.
5. N. M. Chuong and H. D. Hung (2010), Maximal functions and weighted norm inequalities on Local Fields, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 29, 272-286.
6. N. M. Chuong and H. D. Hung (2010), A Muckenhoupt's weight problem and vector valued maximal inequalities over local fields, π β Adic Numbers Ultrametric Anal. Appl. 2, 305-321.
7. N. M. Chuong and H. D. Hung (2014), Bounds of weighted Hardy-CesΓ ro operators on weighted Lebesgue and BMO spaces, Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. (9) 25, 697-710.
8. N.M. Chuong, H. D. Hung and N. T. Hong, Bounds of π-adic HardyCesΓ ro operators and their commutators on π-adic weighted spaces of Morrey types, Submitted
9. R. R. Coifman, R. Rochberg and G. Weiss (1976), Factorization theorems for Hardy spaces in several variables, Annals of Math. (2) 103, 611-635.
10. Z. W. Fu, Z. G. Liu, and S. Z. Lu (2009), Commutators of weighted Hardy operators on βπ, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. (10) 137,3319-3328.
11. Z. W. Fu, S. L. Gong, S. Z. Lu and W. Yuan (2014), Weighted multilinear Hardy operators and commutators, Forum Math. 2014, DOI: 10.1515/forum 2013-0064.
12. J. GarcΓa-Cuerva (1989), Hardy spaces and Beurling algebras, J. London Math. Soc. 39(2), 499- 513.
13. G. H. Hardy, J. E. Littlewood, G. PΓ³lya (1952), Inequalities. 2d ed. Cambridge, at the University Press. MR0046395 (13,727e)
14. H. D. Hung (2014), P-adic weighted Hardy - Cesaro operator and an application to discrete Hardy Inequalities, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 409, 868-879.
15. H. D. Hung and L. D. Ky (2015), New weighted multilinear operators and commutators of Hardy- Cesaro type, Acta Math.Sci., Ser. B, Engl. Ed., 35N(6),1411-1425.
16. Y. C. Kim (2009), Carleson measures and the BMO space on the π β ππππ vector space, Math.
Nachr., 282, 1278-1304.
17. A. N. Kochubei (2001), Pseudodifferential equations and stochastics over nonArchimedean fields, Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York-Basel, MR 2003 b:35220.
18. Yasuo Komori and Satoru Shirai (2009), Weighted Morrey spaces and a singular integral operator, Math. Nachr. (2) 282. 219-231.
19. S.V. Kozyrev (2002), Wavelet analysis as a π-adic spectral analysis, Izvestia Akademii Nauk, Seria Math. (2) 66, 149-158.
20. S.V. Kozyrev, A.Yu. Khrennikov (2005), Pseudodifferential operators on ultrametric spaces and ultrametric wavelets, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat. (5) 69, 133-148.
21. J. Igusa (2000), Introduction to the theory of local zeta functions. Studies in Advanced Mathematics 14.
22. S.Z. Lu, D.C. Yang (1995), The central BMO spaces and Littlewood-Paley operators, Approx.
Theory Appl. 11, 72-94.
23. C. B. Morrey (1938), On the solutions of quasi-linear elliptic partial differential equations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 43, 126-166.
24. K.S. Rim and J. Lee (2006), Estimates of weighted Hardy-Littlewood averages on the π-adic vector space, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 324, 1470-1477.
25. Mitchell Taibleson (1975), Fourier analysis on local fields, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
26. V. S. Vladimirov, I. V. Volovich, and E. I. Zelenov (1994), π-adic analysis and mathematical physics, World Scientific.
27. S. S. Volosivets (2011), Hausdorff operator of special kind on p-adic field and BMO-type spaces, π-adic Numbers, Ultrametric Anal. Appl., 3, 149-156.
28. S. S. Volosivets (2012), Hausdorff operator of special kind in Morrey and Herz π-adic spaces, π-adic Numbers, Ultrametric Anal. Appl., 4, 222-230.
29. J. Xiao (2001), πΏπ and BMO bounds of weighted Hardy-Littlewood Averages, J. Math. Anal.
Appl. 262, 660-666.
30. A. Weil (1971), Basic number theory. Academic Press.
31. Q. Y. Wu and Z. W. Fu , Weighted π-adic Hardy operators and their commutators on π-adic central Morrey spaces, Submitted.
32. Q. Y. Wu, L. Mi and Z. W. Fu (2013), Boundedness of π-adic Hardy operattors and their commutators on π-adic central Morrey and BMO spaces, J. Funct. Spaces Appl., 2013, 10 pages.
33. Q. Y. Wu, L. Mi and Z. W. Fu (2012), Boundedness for commutators of fractional π-adic Hardy operators, J. Inequal. Appl. 2012:293.
CHUαΊ¨N CỦA TOΓN TỬ SONG TUYαΊΎN TΓNH π-ADIC HARDY- CESΓRO CΓ TRα»NG TRΓN TΓCH CΓC KHΓNG GIAN LEBESGUE
TΓ³m tαΊ―t: Trong bΓ i bΓ‘o nΓ y, mα»₯c ΔΓch của chΓΊng tΓ΄i lΓ nghiΓͺn cα»©u tΓnh bα» chαΊ·n của toΓ‘n tα» ππ,π βπ,2,π trΓͺn tΓch của cΓ‘c khΓ΄ng gian p-adic Lebesgue cΓ³ trα»ng. ChΓΊng tΓ΄i tΓ¬m ra Δược Δiα»u kiα»n cαΊ§n vΓ Δủ cho cΓ‘c hΓ m trα»ng Δα» toΓ‘n tα» nΓ y bα» chαΊ·n trΓͺn tΓch cΓ‘c khΓ΄ng gian π- adic Lebesgue cΓ³ trα»ng. HΖ‘n nα»―a, chΓΊng tΓ΄i cΕ©ng tΓ¬m ra chuαΊ©n của toΓ‘n tα» song tuyαΊΏn tΓnh p-adic Hardy-cesΓ ro tΖ°Ζ‘ng α»©ng.
Tα»« khoΓ‘: KhΓ΄ng gian Lebesgue, Δiα»u kiα»n.