QUANTR!HUAN LY
SlT LIEN KET
TRl/CfNG DAI HOC - DOANH NGHIEP:
MQT TIEP CAN CUA NGANH HE THONG THONG TIN QUAN LY
• N G U Y I N DUY THANH
T 6 M T A T :
Trong bo'i c^nh h^i nhap toan cau cua cugc each mang cong nghiep 4.0, nghien cd'u sif lien ket giffa trifflng dai hpc va doanh nghiep giiip cac tnrdng dai hoc nang cao cha't liTdng day v^
hpc, dong thdi cung cap cdc ky nang va kien thffc can thi^t cho ngffdi hpc theo cdc yeu cdu cua doanh nghidp. Nghien cff^ n&y de xua't mo hinh khdi niem cho sff lien ke't trffdng dai hgc - doanh nghigp vdi mOt tie'p c3n cua ngSnh He tho'ng thong tin quan ly. Ke't qua nghien cffu chl ra cdc thanh phin tien to' cua sff lien ke't va sff lien ket trffdng dai hpc - doanh nghidp c6 quan h^ ca'u tnic vdi th^nh qua doanh nghiep.
Tiir khoa: Doanh nghi6p. sff lien ke't, thanh qua doanh nghiep, tnfdng dai hgc, ng^nh he thong thong tin quan ly.
1. Gidi thi^u
Trong boi canh hgi nhap toan cau, nghien cffu moi quan he giffa trffdng dai hgc va doanh nghiep gilip cdc trffdng dai hoc nang cao cha't Iffdng day va hoc. cung cap cac ky nang va kie'n thffc can thiet cho ngffdi hpc theo cac yeu cau cua doanh nghiep.
Theo Pham Quang Trung (2017). cdn khoang each rat Idn giffa cac chffdng trinh dao tao d cac trffdng dai hpc \a thffc ti^n cac doanh nghiep tai Viet Nam. Thffc le co den 949c sinh vien ra trffdng d cdc Irffdng dai hpc. d^cbietla sinh vien cac nganh Ky thuat. can phai dao tao lai nidi co the dap ffng dffdc nhu cau cua cac doanh nghiep [21]. va chi co l%sinh vien td't nghiep tff tao dffpc viec lam [22].
Nt:anh He thong thong tin qudn K dang la mgl
trong nhffng nganh mdi nhat tren the gidi. Tuy nhien. d Viet Nam, nganh He thong ihdng tin quan ly chffa dffdc quan tam nhieu ca ve nghien cffu. dao tao \a thffc tien. Mac dii, cd nhieu trffdng dai hpc tren ca nffdc dao tao nganh He thong thdng tin quan ly. Tuy nhien. nganh He thong thdng lin quan ly chffa phai la nganh chu Iffc cua cac trffdng dai hpc d Viet Nam. Ngoai ra. hau hel sinh vien nganh He tho'ng thdng tin quan ly sau khi ra trffdng van chffa dffdc lam cac cdng viec phii hdp vdi chuyen mdn he thd'ng thdng tin quan ly, da so' hp lam cac cong \ iec ve CNTT hoac cdc cong viec lien quan khdc. Mai khac, viec nghien cffu ve he ihd'ng thdng tin quan 1\ d cdc trffdng dai hpc va cdc hpc vien gan nhff chffa ch! ra dffpc md'i quan he vdi viec dao
So 11 -Thang 5/2020 185
TAPCiCiKTinNC
tao ngiknb H^ thong thong tin qudn ly. Ben canh d6, cdc doanh nghiep cung chtta thifc sff nhSn thffc rd vai trd ciia nginh He ihd'ng thdng tin quin ly.
th^m chl c6 nhieu id chffc cdn hi^u nginh H^
thong thdng tin qudn 1;^ nhff la nginh CNTT.
Cic nghi€n clhi chi ra Tn6i Hfin k^t chat che giffa nghidn cffu, d i e tao (tnfdng dai hpc). vi thtfc tiSn (doanh nghidp) [1, 27. 34]. DSy li quan hd dang dffdc cdc nhi nghidn cVhj vi giio due hidn dai vi cdc nha quan IJ d cic ti chffc rS't quan tSm. Do dd, nghidn ctfu md'i quan he giiJa nghidn cff'u, dio tao (cic tnfdng dai hpc va cac hpc vidn), vi thifc ti^n nhu clu cua cic doanh nghiep d6i vdi nginh H^ thtfng thdng tin qudn Iy li cdng vide h€'t stfc cin thi^t vi cd y nghia c i v l hoc thu§t dd'i vdi cic trffdng dai hpc vi cdc vidn nghidn cffu, cung nhff v l thffc tiln dd'i vdi cdc td chffc vi doanb nghi$p.
2.Cdsdl^thuy(ri
2.1. Stf liin ki't giOa cdc td chdc
Lidn kd't giffa cdc td chtfc Ii mdt trong nhffng hlnh thffc quan trpng trong qud trtnh phit tridn cua xa hOi hi^n dgi. Theo Saffu & Mamman (2000) thi si^ Iidn kd't giffa doanh nghidp vi td chtfc dio tao nhJSm dat dffpc dpng Iffc phit tridn lau dii.
Dismukes & Petkovic (1997) khIng dinh rang, cac doanh nghidp phii dd'i mit vdi nhffng thdch thtfc trong canh tranh loan clu vi nhan manh tam quan trpng cia cdc boat dpng thinh l§p cdc td chtfc dio tao li cin thid't, nhim giup doanh nghidp giai quyd't cdc vS'n de phtfc tap. Heide & Stump (1995) chl ra cdc lpi Ich vi ddng Iffc khi b^t diu thtfc hien lidn ket dffa trdn gid thuye't Ii cdc mdi quan he dffpc hinh thinh, nhlim ning cao kha nang giii quyd't cdc vS^n d l cho doanh nghidp.
2.2. S^ Uin ket giffa trffdng dqi hgc vd doanh nghidp
Md'i quan hg giffa tnfdng dai hpc vi doanh nghiip cd lidn quan tdi hai nhdm yd'u to' chinh. Cu thd, nhdm (1) - yd'u td' bd'i cinh va to chtfc, vi du, y^u td' bd'i cinh, yeu td td chffc... [2. ! 1, 19]; vi nhdm (2) - ylu to'doanh nghidp, vi du, die diem hoal dpng, nhin thtfc doanh nghiep [24. 35]. Ben c^nh dd. cic hlnh thtfc lien ket chinh giffa tnfdng dai hpc va td chffc vi doanh nghidp cd the xdc dinh tifdng tfng trong 3 nhi|m vu, bao gdm hoat dpng lien kei cd Iidn quan ddn dio tao, hen kit cd lien quan dd'n hoat ddnj: nghien ctfu. vi lien ket cd Iidn quan dd'n boat ddng cung cap dich vu vi tff vlTn [13.16].
2.3. Thanh qud tff s^ tiin kfttru-ed^' hgc - doanh nghi$p
Dd'i vdi trffdng dai hpc; ting ^ li^'iij: cac ho^t ddng nghidn ctfu v i gidng dgy nhjm dap tfng tdt nhS't nhu clu ciSa cic td chtfc va doanh nghidp, tid'p c§n vdi cdc kitfn thtfc thffc tien. tich h(?p HTTT vio he thtfng d i e tao. t^o ra thu nhip ting thdm nhd chuydn giao cdng n g h | lU- Ngoii ra, dffa v i o chitfn Iffpc phdt tridn ciSa doanh nghidp, tnfdng dai hpc se dff b i o dffdc nhu cau, loai Iao ddng cin thitft. dd cd chffdng trinh d i o tao phil hdp vdi thffc tiln [25].
Dtfi vdi doanh nghidp: cd ngudn nhan Iffc dffpc d i o tao td't, titft kidm dtfdc thdi gian v i chi phi d i o tao lai, dd cd dffdc nhSn stf phd hdp vdi chuydn mdn vi nhu clu ciSa doanh nghidp, tao ra sdn phim vi dich vu mdi, cdi thi0n hi$u qud kinh doanh, ting thu nhip cho nhin vidn, ning cao ldi nhuSn doanh nghidp,... [23]. Bdn canh dd, vi|c chuydn giao cdng ngh$ gifla trtfdng dai hpc vi doanh nghidp gdp phin ting khd ning khdm phi cic nguydn vit lidu mdi, tfng dung phdt minh sing che vi ddi mdi sdng tao v i o vi^c phit tridn sdn phim vi dich vy [4].
3. Md hinh nghidn ci3\i
Ttf cdc van de chtfdng trtnh dio tao d cic trffdng dai hpc vi thtfc tien cic doanh nghidp lai Vi|t Nam; cd sd ly thuyd't v l mtfi quan he gifla trtfdng dai hpc vi doanh nghidp, thinh qud dat dffdc tfl quan hd giffa trffdng dai hpc v i doanh nghidp, vi cic nghidn ctfu lidn quan, mdt md hinh Iy thuytft d l xem xdt md'i quan h? gitfa trtfdng dai hpc vi doanh nghiep, vdi btfi cdnh cua nginh he thd'ng thdng tin qudn ]•$ dffpc d l xuat nhff d Hlnh 1.
3.1. Cdc tien tSlUn k^t 3.1.1. Cdc yeu id thuc ddy
Yd'u to btfi canh (Contextual factor) thd hidn mtfi quan hd than thiet s^n cd gitfa hai bdn - kinh nghiem trong qud trinh hpp tic, danh tieng c6a dtfi tic, xdc dinh muc tieu nghien ctfu vi khd ning nghidn cffu cua dtfi tdc. Trong dd, mtfi quan h§
than thitft san cd giffa hai bdn dai ducJc ttf trong qui khtf do cic thda ihu^n trffdc day trong cic dff dn, cic boat ddng cua doanh nghiep vdi c i c ddn vi khdc [36]. Myc tidu phdi dtfdc dinh nghTa rd ring vi chinh xic gifla cic bdn, thone qua dd dtft ra dtfpc cdc ydu cau, tidu chuIn Cl' '',L i3] ] Ngne Iffc ttfng bdn khi tham gia v i o hd- i^^.j, ^^^^^
dtfn mtfc dd hpp tic cua cic dtfi tdi • idoan
186 S d l l -Thang5/2020
QUANTRI-QUANLY
cua dff dn. kha nang giai quye't cac \an de lien quan den k\ thuat cua dff an [33].
Yd'u itf td chffc (Organizational factor) the hidn cac cam ke'l. thda thuan giffa hai ben va kha nang dim phan. giao tie'p, truyen dat ihdng tin giffa cac ddi ldc khi thffc hidn lien ke't. Trong dd. Cam ket giffa hai ben, lien quan de'n cac cap dieu hanh nhff cam kei tai mtfc dieu hanh cap cao khi cac nha dieu hinh ca'p cao tham gia ho trd cho dff an (I2|.
lien quan de'n trien vong hdp tdc trong tffdng lai qua viec hy vpng hpp tdc lau dai vdi dd'i tdc va mong mud'n dau tff lau dai, duy iri md'i lien ke't vdi Joi tic [37] .\>i\ dtfng dffdc mdt he tho'ng thdng tin thich hdp va truyen dat thanh cdng giffa cac doi tdc chinh li nen tdng tao nen sff thinh cdng khi hdp lac giffa cdc ben [33].
3.i.2. Cdc xeu id'cdn Ird
Ddc diem hoal ddng (Operating characteristics) khdc nhau giffa cac irffdng dai hgc va cdc doanh nghidp la sff cdn trd va gay khd khan cho viec hpp tdcgiffahaidoi tdc nay. The hien qua sff khac biel giffa mdi irffdng lam viec gidng day va nghien cffu khoa hgc cua trffdng dai hpc vdi mdi trffdng kinh doanh ciia doanh nghiep [32]. Cac irffdng dai hgc iao va iruyen ba iri thffc nen lang, trong khi doanh nghiep tao ra sdn pham va dich vu trong mdi Irffdng canh tranh [38]. Cac doanh nghiep thffc hien nhffng muc tieu ngan han, trong khi cdc td chffc nghien cffu va dao tao lai theo cac muc tieu dai han [7]. Trffdng dai hoc va doanh nghiep cung cosff khdc biet dang ke ve vin hda va gia tri, nen CO the tao ra nhtfng can trd trong khi giao tiep [20].
(Hinh 1)
Hint! 1: Si/ llSn ket tn/dng dgi hoc - doanh nghiep
Nhan ihtfc doanh nghiep (Perceived enterprise) ve trffdng dai hpc lam giam sff lien ke't giffa doanh nghiep va irffdng dai hgc. The hien qua \icc cac trtfdng dai hgc quan tam den nghien ctfu cd ban theo khdi niem. md hinh mdi, kv thual do Iffdng, vi thie't hi nghien ctfu cdn lac hau. khdng phu hdp nhu cau doi mdi cua doanh nghiep [32|. lam cho doanh nghiep khdng cam nhan dffdc ldi ich dat dffdc khi hen ket vdi tnfdng dai hpc |38I. Cac nha nghien cffu cdn thieu ddng cd va ky nang khi nghien ctfu phat trien san pham va dich vu theo nhu cau ciia doanh nghiep, nen cdc doanh nghiep cho ring nhffng nghien ctfu d cac trtfdng dai hoc la qua thien ve ly thuyet, khdng phCi hdp vdi nhu cau cua ho [7], va kien thtfc cua sinh vien hay chffdng trinh dao tao ciia cac trffdng dai hpc khdng phii hdp vdi nhu cau mdi doanh nghiep [32],
3.2. S^ lien ke't tridfng dqi hgc - doanh nghifp Sff lien kei giffa trffdng dai hpc va doanh nghiep bao gom hai ye'u to la lien ktft dao tao (Training linkage) va lien kci nghien cffu (Research linkage! Cac hinh thffc lien ktfl gitfa doanh nghiep vdi trffdng dai hgc thffdng theo cdc dang nhff lien ktft dao tao va cung ca'p dich vu \ a trong cdc hoai ddng nghien cffu [14]. Theodd. lien ke't dao tao gitip cho doanh nghiep nang cao trinh dd nguon nhan Iffc qua cac khda dao tao do trffdng thffc hien va doanh nghiep co the md rdng thffdng hieu ra cdng dong qua cdc hoat ddng hpp tac vdi nha trffdng. de thu hut sinh vien gidi vao doanh nghiep [10]. Lien ket quan trong giffa doanh nghiep va trffdng dai hpc chinh la hdp tac nghien ctfu va quan lam nhieu hdn dtfn ldi ich chung cua hai ben [ 18], khi nay ke't qua nghien ctfu cua irffdng dai hpc dff(fc chuyen giao va ddp tfng dffdc cdc yeu cau ciia doanh nghiep [6].
3.3. Ket qud cda sff lien ket
Ke't qua cua sff lien ke't gifla trffdng dai hgc va doanh nghiep la thanh phan ddu ra ciia mo hinh vdi ytfu to thanh qua doanh nghiep (Enterprise performance).
Sff lien ktft giffa doanh nghiep va trffdng dai hoc
So 11 -Thang 5/2020 187
UPCiClKTMlK
giffp cic doanh nghiep gidm dffdc c i c chi phf nghidn ctfu vi phit trien. vi cd nhieu cd hdi hdn dd phit tridn mtfi lien ktft vdi trffdng dai hpc va bd sung them dffdc ngudn Itfc cho minh [15], md r$ng hinh anh vi thffdng hidu cua doanh nghidp [5]. Chuyen giao cdng nghd gitfa trffdng dai hpc vi cic doanh nghidp g'up cung ci'p cic chuydn gia ky thuat tdi doanh nghidp de phit trien cdng nghd, san ph^m vi djch vu mdi, cung ci'p bdn quyln cua cdng nghd [31], t?o nhieu diiu kidn cho doanh nghidp trong vide phit tridn vi thtfdng mai hda c i c cdng n g h | mdi [26].
3.4. Mdi quan h$ giffa cdc khdi ni^m Sff tic ddng tich ctfc cua cic ytfu ttf thuc day cOa cic tiln ttf tdi thanh phin Hdn ktft dffdc thtf hidn qua mtfi quan he ddng bitfn gifla ytfu td' btfi cinh vdi cic ytfu ttf Iidn ktft d i o tao va Hen ktft nghidn ctfu. Cdc md'i quan hd niy dtfdc thd hien trong cdc nghidn ctfu nln tang v l mtfi quan hd gifla trtfdng dai hoc va doanh nghidp nhtf ciia Bloedon & Stokes (1994); Cyen & Goodman (1997), vi dffdc khdng dinh lai trong cac nghien cffu ciia Valentin & cdng sff (2004); Easton (2011); Chau & cdng sff (2018). Do dd, dtfi vdi yd'uttf bd'i cdnh, cic gia thuytft sau dffdc de xutft:
Pig: Yeu tdb^i cdnh cd tdc ddng tich cue den lien kit ddo tgo.
Plf,: Yeu tdbd'i cdnh cd tdc dgng tich cifc den liSn kei nghien cffu.
Bdn canh dd, md'i quan hd ddng bitfn gifla yeu ttf td chffc (ORF) vdi cdc ytfu ttf thinh phan lien ktft (lien ktft dio tao va lidn kd't nghidn cffu) dffdc thd hi|n trong cic nghien ctfu nln tdng ve mtfi quan h$ giffa trffdng d^i hpc va doanh nghidp nhff cOa Cyert & Goodman (1997); Davenport & cdng sff (1999). vi dffdc kbing dinh lai trong cic nghidn ctfu lien quan nhtf ciia Valentin & cpng sff (2004); Easton (2011); Ye & Shen (2015). Dodd, dtfi vdi yeu ttf td chffc. cac md'i quan hd sau dffdc d l xutft:
P2u.- Yiu id id chffc cd tdc dgng lich ciic den lien ket ddo tgo.
P2f,: Yeu td id' chffc cd tdc dgng tich cUc den lien ke't nghien cffu.
Ngoii nhtfng tic ddng tich ctfc ciia cic yeu td' thuc day tdi cac ytfu to cua sff iidn ktfl, trong md
hlnh nghidn ctfu cdn sff tic d0ng tidu cu' - '"* '^^'^
yeu ttf cdn trd ciSa cic tiln ttf tdi thai'! nan hdn ktft dffdc thd hi^n qua mtfi quan he ntinch bidn gifla ytfu ttf d i e didm boat ddng ^OPC) vdi cic ytfu ttf Iidn ktft d i o t^o (TRL) va lien ket nghidn cffu (REL). Cic mtfi quan h§ na\ dffdc thd hi^n trong cic nghien ctfu n l n tdng vc md'i quan h^
gitfa trffdng dai hgc va doanh nghiep nhtf ciSa Shenhar (1993); Hellepputl & cdng sff (1993), vi dffdc khlng dinh l^i trong c i c nghien ctfu Hdn quan nhff cua Ervin & cdng sff (2002); Mason &
Leek (2013). Do dd, dtfi vdi die didm hoat ddng, cic mtfi quan h | sau dffdc d l xutft:
P3g: Ddc diim hogt ddng cd tdc ddng tiiu ci/tc din liin kit ddo tgo.
P3^: Bdc diim hogt ddng cd tdc ddng tiiu cifc den lien kit nghien cffu.
Ngoii ra, mtfi quan h^ nghich bitfn gitfa ytfu ttf nh^n thtfc doanh nghipp (PEE) vdi cdc ytfu ttf thanh phan Hen ktft (lien ktft d i o tgo vi lien ktft nghidn ctfu) dtfdc the hidn trong cic nghien ctfu nln ting v l mtfi quan he gifla trtfdng dgi hpc vi doanh nghidp nhff c^a Shenhar (1993); Hellepputl
& cpng si^ (1993), vi dtfdc khlng dinh Igi trong cic nghidn ctfu cua Ervin & cdng stf (2002):
Mason & Leek (2013), Do dd, dtfi vdi nh$n thtfc doanh nghidp, cdc mtfi quan hd sau dtf^c de xuat:
P4a: Nhdn thffc doanh nghi$p cd tdc ddng liiu cue din lien kit dao tgo.
P4f,: Nhdn thffc doanh nghidp cd tdc ddng tiiu cue din liin kit nghiin cffu.
Mat khdc, sff tic ddng tich ctfc cua cic ytfu ttf ciia thinh phan lidn ktft tdi thinh phin ktft qud dtfdc thd hidn qua mtfi quan hp ddng bitfn giffa cdc ytfu ttf lidn ktft d i o tao (TRL) va lien ktft nghien ctfu (REL) vdi ytfu ttf thinh qud doanh nghidp (ENP). Cdc mtfi quan he n i y dffdc thd hidn trong c i c nghidn ctfu nen tdng v l mtfi quan hd gifla trtfdng dai hgc v i doanh nghidp nhtf ci3a Brown (1991); Roessner (1991); Shenhar (1993), vi dtfdc khlng dinh lai trong c i c nghidn cffu Hen quan nhtf cua Dooley (2007); Mahk & cdng stf (2012). Do dd, dtfi vdi thinh qua -tiMith nghiep cic mtfi quan hd sau dtfdc d l xud
P5: Liin kit ddo tgo cd tdc dgng n^h ct^^ ^g^
thanh qud doanh nghiip.
188 S ^ n -Thang5/2020
liAmii-iiAiiiy
P6: Uin kit nghiin cffu cd tdc ddng tich cffc din thdnh qud doanh nghi$p.
3.5. Y nghia cda md hinh nghiin cffu Md hlnh nghidn ctfu de xutft dtfa tren cd sd If thuyd't v l cic mtfi quan he gifla trtfdng dai hoc va doanh nghidp, thinh qui dat dtfdc tfl quan hd gitfa trtfdng dai hpc v i doanh nghidp, va cdc nghien ctfu Hdn quan. Tfl dd, x i y dtfng mdt md hinh ciia stf lidn ktft v l dio tgo v i nghidn ctfu, md hinh dffa trdn cd sd cda c i c IJ thuytft Hdn quan. Theo dd, nid hlnh If thuytft xem xdt mtfi quan hd gifla trffdng dai hpc v i doanh nghiep vdi btfi canh nghidn ctfu ciia nginh Hd thtfng thdng tin qudn If. Ktft qud nghidn ctfu gdp phin bd sung cd sd If thuytft cho If thuytft v l mtfi quan hd gifla trtfdng dai hpc vi doanh nghiep hay td chffc.
Die bi^t, vdi btfi cinh nghidn cdu cOa nginh Hd thtfng thdng tin quan ly, ktft qud kidm djnh md hlnh khii nidm se gdp phan khlng dinh sff lien kd't chit chd gifla qui trinh nghidn ctfu v i dio tao d cic trtfdng dai hgc cd nginh Hd thd'ng thdng tin qudn \f vdi thtfc tidn cdng vide d cdc doanh nghidp hay td chtfc trong thdi dgi cdng nghidp 4.0 hidn nay.
4. Ktft Iu$n
Nghidn ctfU nay xem xet stf lidn kd't trffdng dai hpc-doanh nghidp. Diy l i mOt trong nhiftig nghidn ctfu diu tien xem xet va ddnh gid stf Hdn kd't gifla trtfdng dai hpc va doanh nghidp, d cic khia canh khic nhau, vdi btfi cdnh ciia nginh Hd thtfng thdng tin quan iJ. Nghien ctfu da dtfa trdn cd sd IJ thuytft v l moi quan he gifla cic td chtfc, stf lien ktft gifla trtfdng dgi hpc v i doanb nghiep v i cdc nghidn ctfu lidn quan, d l xui't mdt md hlnh khdi nidm v l cic mtfi quan he gifla trtfdng dai hgc vi doanh nghidp.
Cac thinh phin chlnh cua md hlnh nghidn citu bao gdm cic tiln ttf Iidn ktft cd hai nhdm ytfu to li cic ytfu to thuc day vdi hai ytfu ttf li ytfu ttf btfi cdnh vi ytfu ttf td chtfc, va cdc yeu ttf cdn trd vdi hai ytfu ttf i i die tinh hoat ddng v i nhin thtfc doanh nghidp; thinh phin Udn ktft vdi hai ytfu to li lidn ktft dio tao v i Hdn ktft nghidn ctfti; vi thinh phin kd't qud vdi ytfu ttf thinh qud doanh nghidp. Md hinh khdi nidm van chffa xem xet dly du cic thinh phin ciia stf Hdn kd't gifla trtfdng dgi hgc vi doanh nghidp nhtf vien nghien ctfu, nginh cdng nghiep, vi cdc ytfu ttf vTmd. Han chtf niy mdra cic hffdng nghien ctf^ titfp theo trong tffdng lai •
TAI L i t U THAM KHAO:
1. Chau, v.. Oilman, M., & Serbanica, C. (2018). Ahgning university-uidustry interactions: The role of boundary spanning in intellectual capital transfer. Technological Forecasting arui Social Change, 123,199-209.
2. Barnes, T., Pashby, 1., & Gibbons, A. (2002). Effective university-industry interaction: A multi-case evaluation of collaborative r&d projects. European ManagementJoumal, 20(3), 272-285.
3. Bloedon, R., & Stokes, D. (1994). Making univereity/industry collaboradve research succeed. Research Technology Management, 57(2), 44-48.
4. Bishop, K., Este, P., & Neely, A. (2011). Gaining from interactions widi universities: Multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity. Research Policy. 40( 1), 30-40.
5. Brennan, L. (2003). The view from the ivory tower: What do university alliances offer technology firms?.
Academy Management Perspectives, 17(1), 125-126.
6. Brown, M.. Beny, L., & Goel, R. (1991). Guidelines for successfiilly transferring government-sponsored innovations. Research Policy, 20(2), 121-143.
7. Cyert, R., & Goodman, P. (1997). Creating effective universily-induslry alliances: An organizational learning perspective. Organizational Dynamics, 25(4), 45-58.
8. Davenport, S., Davies, J., & Grimes, C. (1998). Collaborative research programmes: Building tmst from difference. Technovation, 79(1), 31-40.
9. Dismukes, J., & Petkovic, R. (1997). One point of view: University-based vimial alliances could Spur technological innovation. Research Technology Management, 40,10-11.
So 11 - Thang 5/2020 189
TAPnfCllKTMiM
10. I>>»ley. L. (2007). Univeraiy-indusny coUaborauon: Grafting the entrepreneurial paradigm ' ' ""*•
stmciures. European Journal Innovadon .Management. 10,316-332.
11. Easion. P. (2011). Hawks and baby chickens; Cultivating the sources of indigenous science eduv .<' ^ ultural Studies Science Education. 6(3). 705.
12. Elmuti, D., & Kathawala. Y. (2001). An overview of strategic alliances. Management Decision, 39(3), 205-218.
13. Este. P., & Patel. P. (2007). University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions wilh industrj'?.^«earcAPo/icy. 36,1295-1313.
14. Fonlana, R., Geuna, A., & Matt, M. (2006). Factors affecting university-uidustry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling. Research Policy, 35(2), 309-323.
15. George, G., Zahra, S., & Wood, D. (2002). The effects of business-university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: A smdy of publicly traded biotechnology companies. Journal business Venturing, /7(6), 577-609.
16. Grimpe, C . & Fier, H. (2010). Informal university technology transfer A comparison between the United States and Germany. Journal Technology Transfer, 35,637-650.
17. Heide, J.. & Smmp, R. (1995). Performance implications of buyer-supplier relationships in industrial markets:
A b^nsaction cost explanation. Journal Business Research, 32( 1), 57-66.
18. Jacob, M. (2000). From sponsorship to partoerahip in academy-industry relations. R&D Management, 30(3), 255-262.
19. Kim, T. (2009). Transnational academic mobility, internationalization and intercultiiraUty in higher education.
Inlercultural Education. 20(5), 395-405.
20. Kock, N., Auspitz. C , & King, B. (2000). Using the web to enable industry-university collaboration: An action research study of a course parmership. Informing Science, 3(3), 157-165.
21. Ld Hoa (2018). Sinh vidn sau khi ttft nghidp vin phii d i o tao them, truy cgp 27/01/2018 tff http://giaoduc.net 22. Ld v a n (2017). Chi cd 1% sinh vidn ttft nghidp nf tao dffdc vide lim, tiny c i p 23/2/20\7 tii hltp://vietnamnet.vn.
23. Malik, M., Danish, R., & Munir, Y. (2012). The impact of pay and promotion on job satisfaction: Evidence from higher education instimies of Pakistan. American Jourruil of Economics, 10(5), 6-9.
24. Mohnen, P., & Hoareau, C. (2003). What type of enterprise forges close luiks witii universities and government labs? Evidence frt)m CIS 2. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24(2-3), 133-145.
25. Nguyin Thi Thu Hing (2015). Mtfi lien ket gifla doanh nghidp v i irffdng dai hoc: So sdnh nghidn cffu tgi thinh phd H 6 Cht Minh vi tinh Lim Dong. Tgp chi Phdl triin Khoa hgc vd Cdng nghi, 16(3(3), 33-44.
26 Paikhe. A. (1993). Strategic alliance strucmring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy Management Jourruil. 36,794-829.
27. Perkmann. M.. & Walsh, K. (2007). Universit)'-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal Managemeni Reviews. 9,259-280.
28. Pham Quang Tmng (2017). Khoing each giffa d i o tao v i tiiiTc te, tray cap 01/2/2017 tiy hup.//daidoanket.vn 29. Roessner. J.. & Bean. A. (1991). How industry interacts witii federal laboratories. Reseanh Technoloev Managemeni. .?-/(4). 22-25.
30. Saffu. K.. & Mamman. A. (2000). Mechanics, problems and contributions of tertiaiy strategic alliances- The case of 22 Ausnralian universities. Intemaiional Journal Educational Management. 13(6), 281-286.
31.Santoro.M.(20001. Successbreedssuccess:ThelinkagebetweenrelationshipintensityandUin_ •, ,„ ,,on\es in industry-univei^ity collaborative veniuve^. Journal High Technology Management Research. /y(21, : ^ - 32 Shenhar. A. (1993). The promis Projea: industr.' and university learning together. Intern, , / - ^^^ . Technology Managemeni. til(>-%).fi]]-62]. " "
190 S ^ l l -Thdng 5/2020
MANTII-HARU
33. Valentin. E. (2000). University-industi? cooperation: A framework of benefits and obstacles. Industry and Higher Education, 14(3). 165-172.
34. Ye. X., & Shen, Y. (2015). Analysis of industry-university-research co(^ration organization. lEEM 2016 Proceedings.
35. Mason, K., & Leek, S. (2012). Communication practices in a business relationship: Creating, relating and adaptingcommunication artifacts tiirough time./ndusfrifl/Monte/ingWanogemtfn/, 41(2), 319-332.
36. Menguzzalo, M. (1992). La cooperacidn: Una altemativa para la empresa de los 90. Direccidn y organizacidn:
Revista de direccidn, organizacidn y administracidn de empresas. 4,54-62.
37. Montoro, M.A. (1999). Factores Organizaiivos Delerminantes del txito de la Cooperacidn entre Empresas.
RiD. Dissertation, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
38. Ervin, D.E., Lomax, T., Buccola. S. T., Kim. K.. Minor. E., Yang, H., & Oancy. K. (2002). Universily-induslry relationships: Framing the issues for academic research in agricultural biotechnologym, truy c§p 15/04/2002 tff htt^;//www.pewagbiotech.org/research
Ngiy nh^n bii: 18/4/2020
Ng&y phSn bi$n dinh gi^ v^ s&a chaa: 28/4/2020 Ngdy chtfp nh^n ding bdi: 8/5/2020
Thdng tin tdc gid:
NGUYEN DUY THANH
Trffirng Dgi hpc Ngfin hing Thdnh pbtf H 6 Cbi Minh
UNIVERSITY - ENTERPRISE LINKAGES:
INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT-DRIVEN APPROACH
• NGUYEN DUY THANH Banking University of Ho Chi Minh City
ABSTRACT:
In the context of Vietnam's global integration process and Industry 4,0, this research on linkages between imiversities and enterprise is expected to help universities improve their teaching and learning quahty and provide their students with knowledge that allow them to woik at enterprise. This study proposes a concepmal model for university - enterprise linkages with the information systems management-driven approach. This research fmds out that antecedents of linkages and unlversi^ - enterprise linkages are structurally related to the perfromance of enleiprises.
Keywords: Enterprise, linkage, firm performance, university, information system management sector.
So 11-Thang 5/2020 191
