• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Thư viện số Văn Lang: Reconsidering Constitutional Formation I National Sovereignty: A Comparative Analysis of the Juridification by Constitution

N/A
N/A
Nguyễn Gia Hào

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "Thư viện số Văn Lang: Reconsidering Constitutional Formation I National Sovereignty: A Comparative Analysis of the Juridification by Constitution"

Copied!
7
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

vii

Contents

Juridification by Constitution. National Sovereignty in Eighteenth

and Nineteenth Century Europe ... 1 Ulrike Müßig

1 On ReConFort’s Research Programme in General ... 3 2 Method of Comparative Constitutional History ... 5 2.1 Targeted Sources of ReConFort ... 5 2.2 Methodological Challenges: Finding the Tertia Comparationis ... 6 2.3 Constitutionalisation by Public Sphere ... 7 2.3.1 Press Media as Roadster of Politicisation ... 7 2.3.2 Importance of Cross-Border News: The American

Revolution in the Polish Public Discourse ... 9 3 References to the National Sovereignty in the Historic Discourses

of the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Europe ... 13 3.1 In General: The Nation’s Start as Singular State

Organisational Legal Point of Reference ... 13 3.2 The Various Interpretations of National Sovereignty

in the Works of Sieyès ... 18 3.2.1 Anti-estate Societal Meaning of National Sovereignty ... 19 3.2.2 Anti-monarchical Meaning of National Sovereignty ... 20 3.2.3 The National Sovereignty as Idea or Principle

of an “ordre nouveau” ... 21 3.3 Openness of the Political Vocabulary of 1789 for

the Rankly Oriented Use of Nation by the French parlements ... 27 3.4 The Nation in the Polish May-Constitution 1788 ... 29 3.4.1 Old Republicanism as an Integral Part of the

Juridification by Constitution... 29 3.4.2 The Procedural Openness of May

Constitution as Reflex onto the Juridification

of National Sovereignty ... 33

(2)

3.5 National Sovereignty in the Cádiz Constitution 1812 ... 35

3.5.1 Sovereignty of the Spanish Nation ( nación española ) ... 35

3.5.2 Late Scholastic Concepts of the Transfer of Sovereignty ( translatio imperii ) or the Nation as Moral Entity ( cuerpo moral ) in the Cádiz Debates ... 41

3.5.3 The Natural Origin of National Sovereignty as a Limitation for the Monarchical Sovereignty ... 44

3.5.4 Primacy of the Cortes in the Constitution of Cádiz ... 46

3.5.5 The Legitimisation of the Cádiz Constitution by the Old Fundamental Laws of the Kingdom ( las antiguas leyes fundamentales de la Monarquía ) ... 47

3.5.6 Struggle of the realistas for the Monarchical Principle .... 51

3.5.7 Contemporary Ambiguos Evaluation of the Cádiz Constitution ... 52

3.6 The Constituent Sovereignty in the Norwegian Grunnloven ... 54

3.6.1 Eidsvoll Debates and the Norwegian Grunnloven of May 17, 1814 ... 55

3.6.2 Moss Process into the Swedish Union: The Extraordinary Storting as Constituent Assembly and the Fundamental Law of the Norwegian Empire of November 4, 1814 ... 57

3.6.3 Relationship Between Monarch and Parliament in the Norwegian Grunnloven ... 58

3.6.4 Monarchical Right to Veto on Constitutional Amendments and the Smooth Transition to the Parliamentary System ... 61

3.7 The Lack of the Notion Sovereignty in the French Charte Constitutionnelle 1814 ... 66

4 The Undecisiveness Between Popular and Monarchical Sovereignty in the Constitutional Movement After the French July Revolution 1830 ... 67

4.1 The Constitutional Movement After the French July Revolution 1830 ... 67

4.2 Belgian Constitution of 1831 ... 70

4.3 Parliamentarism in England ... 72

5 Octroi of the Statuto Albertino 1848 ... 74

5.1 The Octroi of the Piedmontese Statuto Albertino and the Lack of an Italian Parliamentary Assembly ... 74

5.2 Italian costituzione flessibile Under the Statuto Albertino ... 76

5.3 On the Extension of the Statuto Albertino 1848 to Italy 1860: From the Octroi to the Referenda ... 77

6 Improvised Parliamentarism in the Frankfurt National Assembly ... 79

7 Summary and Outlook ... 81

References ... 83

(3)

ix

National Sovereignty in the Belgian Constitution of 1831.

On the Meaning(s) of Article 25 ... 93

Brecht Deseure 1 Introduction ... 94

2 Parliament Versus King ... 96

2.1 Parliament as the Sole Representative of the Nation ... 96

2.2 Congress as the Sole Constituting Power ... 100

2.3 The Legitimacy of the Senate ... 106

2.4 Nation Versus King ... 107

2.5 The Royal Veto and the National Will ... 110

2.6 Republican Monarchism ... 113

2.7 The King-Magistrate ... 118

2.8 The Constitutional Powers of the King ... 121

3 National or Popular Sovereignty? ... 126

3.1 A False Opposition ... 126

3.2 The Limitation of Political Participation ... 131

4 Reception ... 134

4.1 The Contested Nature of Popular Sovereignty ... 134

4.2 Legal Order, Legitimate Representation and Political Participation ... 139

5 Conclusions ... 146

6 Summaries (French & Dutch) ... 148

6.1 La souveraineté de la Nation dans la Constitution belge de 1831. Sur les significations de l’article 25 ... 148

6.2 Nationale soevereiniteit in de Belgische Grondwet van 1831. Over de betekenis(sen) van artikel 25 ... 150

References ... 152

The Omnipotence of Parliament in the Legitimisation Process of ‘Representative Government’ under the Albertine Statute (1848–1861) ... 159

Giuseppe Mecca 1 Parliament, Consensus and Public Opinion ... 160

2 Between Lemmas and Culture ... 163

2.1 Constitution and Sovereignty Within the ‘ Consiglio di Conferenza ’. Some Choices Between Political Opportunity and Juridical Reasoning ... 165

2.2 Culture, Foreign Models and Coeval Experiences ... 169

2.3 The Sovereign Power between Dictionaries, Political Catechisms and Newspapers... 176

2.3.1 Dictionaries ... 177

2.3.2 Political Catechisms ... 178

2.3.3 Newspapers ... 180

Contents

(4)

3 The Represented “Nation”: A Pact Between Sovereign and People,

the Force of the Constitution and Political Representation ... 183

4 From Words to Practice. Initial Steps of the ‘Representative Government’ ... 188

4.1 Massimo D’Azeglio and the Defence of the Representative Government ... 196

5 Towards National Unification ... 199

6 Conclusion ... 203

7 Summary (Italian) ... 206

References ... 208

The Sovereignty Issue in the Public Discussion in the Era of the Polish 3rd May Constitution (1788–1792) ... 215

Anna Tarnowska 1 Introductory Remarks ... 216

2 Planes of Discussion ... 218

3 Characteristics of Sources ... 220

4 Some Aspects of the Discourse on Sovereignty in the Poland of Enlightenment ... 224

4.1 Sovereignty as a Theoretical Problem... 224

4.1.1 Introduction ... 224

4.1.2 ‘Sovereignty’ in Media and Free Prints Debate ... 229

4.1.3 ‘Sovereignty’ in Parliamentary Debate ... 229

4.1.4 ‘Sovereignty’ in Legal Acts ... 231

4.2 The Nation ... 233

4.2.1 Introduction ... 233

4.2.2 ‘The Nation’ in the Media and Printed Materials ... 235

4.2.3 ‘The Nation’ in the Parliamentary Debate ... 241

4.2.4 ‘The Nation’ in Constitutional Acts ... 247

4.3 The Monarch as a Sovereign ... 249

4.3.1 Introduction ... 249

4.3.2 The Monarch in the Debate of Public Media ... 250

4.3.3 The Monarch in the Parliamentary Debate ... 252

4.3.4 The Monarch in the Constitutional Acts ... 256

5 Summary ... 257

6 Summary (Polish) ... 259

References ... 261

Appendix ... 265

Our Free Royal Cities in the States of the Rzeczpospolita of April 18, 1791 ... 265

Article I ... 265

On the Cities ... 265

(5)

xi

Article II ... 267

On the Rights of the Town Citizens ... 267

Article III ... 270

On the Justice for the Citizens ... 270

About the Authors ... 275

Index ... 277

Contents

(6)
(7)

xiii

Contributors

Brecht Deseure University of Passau and Vrije Universiteit Brussel , Passau , Germany

Giuseppe Mecca Faculty of Law , University of Passau , Passau , Germany

Ulrike Müßig Advanced Grantee of the ERC, Chair of Civil Law, German and European Legal History , University of Passau , Passau , Germany

Anna Tarnowska Faculty of Law and Administration , Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Currently, local communities in Soppeng District are building small-scale adaptation strategies based on learned experiences and previous flood events.. Therefore,