• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Thư viện số Văn Lang: Safer Healthcare: Strategies for the Real World

N/A
N/A
Nguyễn Gia Hào

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "Thư viện số Văn Lang: Safer Healthcare: Strategies for the Real World"

Copied!
5
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

xiii

1 Progress and Challenges for Patient Safety. . . 1

Progress on Patient Safety . . . 1

Harm Has Been Defi ned Too Narrowly . . . 3

Safety Is a Moving Target . . . 5

Only Part of the Healthcare System Has Been Addressed. . . 6

We Are Approaching Safety in the Same Way in All Settings . . . 6

Our Model of Intervention Is Limited . . . 7

Healthcare Is Changing . . . 8

References . . . 10

2 The Ideal and the Real. . . 13

The Day-to-Day Realities of Healthcare . . . 14

Comparing Actual Care with the Care Intended by Guidelines . . . 14

Reliability of Clinical Systems in the British NHS. . . 15

Following the Rules: Reliability of Human Behaviour. . . 15

The Ideal and the Real: Five Levels of Care . . . 17

The Cumulative Impact of Poor Quality Care . . . 18

Explicit Discussion of the Real Standard of Care Is Critical. . . 21

What Is the Impact of Improving Quality Standards? . . . 22

Levels of Care and Strategies for Safety Improvement . . . 23

References . . . 25

3 Approaches to Safety: One Size Does Not Fit All . . . 27

Approaches to Risk and Hazard: Embrace, Manage or Avoid . . . 27

Three Approaches to the Management of Risk . . . 29

Embracing Risk: The Ultra-adaptive Model . . . 30

Managing Risk: The High Reliability Approach . . . 30

Avoiding Risk: The Ultra-safe Approach . . . 31

Rules and Adaptation. . . 32

How Many Models for Healthcare?. . . 33

Moving Between Models . . . 34

Refl ections on the Safety Ideal . . . 35

References . . . 36

(2)

xiv

4 Seeing Safety Through the Patient’s Eyes . . . 39

What Do We Mean by Harm? . . . 40

Safety and Quality of Care from the Patient’s Perspective . . . 41

Safety Through the Patient’s Eyes . . . 44

The Patient Potentially Has the Most Complete Picture . . . 44

The Healthcare professional’s View is Necessarily Incomplete. . . 44

The Resources of the Patient and Family Are Critical to Safe Care . . . 44

Coordination of Care Is a Major Safety Issue. . . 45

Rethinking Patient Safety . . . 45

References . . . 46

5 The Consequences for Incident Analysis. . . 47

What Are We Trying to Learn When We Analyse Incidents? . . . 47

Essential Concepts of ALARME . . . 50

Select Problems for Analysis Which Are Important to Patients . . . 50

Widen the Time Frame of Analysis: Review the Patient Journey . . . 52

Success and Failure in Detection and Recovery . . . 55

Adapting the Analysis to Context . . . 56

References . . . 58

6 Strategies for Safety. . . 59

What Options Do We Have for Improving Safety? . . . 59

Five Safety Strategies. . . 60

Strategy I: Safety as Best Practice . . . 61

Strategy II: Improvement of Work Processes and Systems . . . 62

Strategy III: Risk Control. . . 64

Strategy IV: Monitoring, Adaptation and Response . . . 65

Strategy V: Mitigation . . . 67

Innovation . . . 68

Selection and Customisation of Strategies to Clinical Context . . . 69

References . . . 71

7 Safety Strategies in Hospitals . . . 73

A Little History . . . 73

The Enthusiasm of the Early Years, 1995–2002 . . . 74

The Advent of Professionalism 2002–2005 . . . 74

Safety Culture, Multifaceted Interventions, and Teamwork 2005–2011 . . . 74

Refl ections on Safety in Hospitals . . . 75

Safety in Hospital: Distinguishing Current and Future Strategies . . . 75

Safety as Best Practice . . . 77

Improving the System . . . 77

Reducing the Burden on Staff: Simplifi cation and Decluttering . . . 78

Contents

(3)

Risk Control . . . 80

Control of Medication . . . 80

Potential for ‘Go and No-Go’ Controls in Surgery . . . 80

Placing Limits on Care . . . 81

Monitoring, Adaptation and Response . . . 82

Patients and Families as Problem Detectors . . . 82

Team Training in Monitoring, Adapting and Response . . . 83

Briefi ngs and Debriefi ngs, Handovers and Ward Rounds. . . 83

Mitigation. . . 84

Support Systems for Staff and Patients . . . 84

Regulatory and Political Determinants of Approaches to Safety . . . 85

Safety in Context: The Many Hospital Environments . . . 87

References . . . 90

8 Safety Strategies for Care in the Home . . . 93

An Ageing Population and the Expansion of Home Care . . . 93

The Challenges of Delivering Healthcare in the Home . . . 94

The Hazards of Home Care: New Risks, New Challenges . . . 95

Accidental Injury in the Home . . . 95

Adverse Events in Home Care . . . 96

Adverse Drug Events . . . 96

Risk to Family and Other Care Givers . . . 96

Problems of Transition and Coordination . . . 97

Infl uences on Safety of Healthcare Delivered in the Home. . . 97

Socio-economic Conditions Take on a Much Greater Importance. . . 97

The Home Environment as Risk Factor . . . 98

Increasing Responsibilities of Carers . . . 98

The Training and Experience of Home Care Aides . . . 100

Fragmented Approach of Healthcare Professionals . . . 100

Safety Strategies and Interventions in the Home . . . 100

Optimization Strategies in Home Care: Best Practice and System Improvement . . . 101

Discharge Planning and the Journey from Hospital to Home. . . 102

Training of Patients and Carers . . . 102

Risk Control Strategies in Home Care. . . 103

Monitoring, Adaptation and Response Strategies in Home Care . . . 104

Detecting Deterioration. . . 105

Mitigation. . . 106

The Responsibilities of Carers . . . 106

Mitigation Strategies in Home Haemodialysis . . . 107

Refl ections on Home Care Safety . . . 107

References . . . 109

(4)

xvi

9 Safety Strategies in Primary Care . . . 113

Challenges for Primary Care . . . 113

The Nature of Risk in Primary Care . . . 114

Error and Harm in Primary Care. . . 115

Diagnostic Errors . . . 115

Safety as Best Practice . . . 116

Improving the System . . . 118

Risk Control Strategies . . . 119

Control by Assessment of Competency . . . 119

Control of Hazards . . . 120

Monitoring, Adaptation and Response . . . 120

Developing a More Systematic Approach to Watching and Waiting . . . 121

Improving Transitions Between Hospital and Primary Care . . . 121

Mitigation. . . 123

Refl ections on Safety in Primary Care. . . 123

References . . . 125

10 New Challenges for Patient Safety. . . 129

The Changing Nature of Healthcare . . . 129

Improved Safety in Some Contexts . . . 131

New Challenges for Patient Safety . . . 131

Increasing Complexity . . . 132

The Challenges and Risks of Care Coordination . . . 132

The Benefi ts and Risks of Screening . . . 133

The Benefi ts and Risks of Information Technology . . . 133

The Burden of Healthcare: Impact on Patients and Carers . . . 134

A Global Revolution Rather Than a Local Evolution . . . 135

References . . . 137

11 A Compendium of Safety Strategies and Interventions. . . 139

Seeing Safety Through the Patient’s Eyes . . . 139

Considering Benefi t and Harm Along the Patient Journey . . . 140

Patient Safety as the Management of Risk Over Time . . . 141

Adopting a Range of Safety Models . . . 142

Developing a Wider Range of Safety Strategies . . . 144

A Compendium of Safety Strategies . . . 145

References . . . 150

12 Managing Risk in the Real World . . . 151

Implications for Patients, Carers and Families . . . 151

Implications for Frontline Clinicians and Managers . . . 152

Implications for Executives and Boards . . . 154

Implications for Regulatory Agencies and Government . . . 155

Future Directions for Research and Practice . . . 157

Contents

(5)

xvii

Fig. 2.1. Five levels of care

Fig. 2.2. Optimisation and risk management Fig. 3.1. Three contrasting approaches to safety Fig. 4.1. Four patient journeys

Fig. 4.2. Varying standards of care over time Fig. 5.1. Analysis of safety along the patient journey Fig. 5.2. A case analysed with ALARME

Fig. 6.1. Analysis, context and strategies

Fig. 7.1. Improving systems reduces the need for adaptation Fig. 7.2. Guidelines for fractured neck of femur in the fi rst 24 h

Fig. 7.3. Safety strategies in peri-operative care in Europe and the United States

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Humanist scholars are encouraged to respond positively, both to challenges common to humankind in general, such as clean air and water, food, health, energy, universal education, human

2012 Survey, changes in parents involvement in activities at home and at school from pre-K, kindergarten and grade 1 USA Achievement in language, reading literacy and math The

We are indebted to several other individuals and organisations for their input and support: Alexander Etkind and the Department of Slavonic Studies, University of Cambridge; Jonathan

We identified two major financial models for the humanities: a North American model, which has a focus on individual research supported by major endowments and tuition fees and is often

Not only is the level of public funding promised much higher than in the US; the EU Commission appears to be seriously interested in tapping into humani- ties research in order to

assessment systems What effects do ranking systems have on research, on the behaviour of researchers and on the management of research in your area?. Give examples to illustrate your

Starting with the Four Frees and One Care policy implemented in 2003, China’s health-care policies have continued to commit to providing universal access to HIV medication.1 Since 2014,

Spain shows that a humane response to migrant health is possible in Europe For many years, people advocating for the right to health care of undocumented migrants looked to Spain as