Growth in outstanding borrowing (long-term liabilities) 68. We are tabling the IDP and Budget at a crucial time in our country’s history, while we are still battling with considerable service delivery and economic challenges. Against this backdrop, the Municipality has its own challenges, as is reflected in the feedback received from our communities through public participation processes and in recent service delivery protests. The duty of Government collectively across the different spheres is to respond to these challenges and to ensure that there is effective and efficient service delivery. As the sphere of government closest to the people, our communities look towards the Municipality to provide them with services, improve their quality of life and restore their dignity. Our challenges are further compounded by the fact that the Eastern Cape is one of the poorest of South Africa’s nine provinces. As the economic hub of the Eastern Cape, there is a heavy load on the Metro, and all these factors combine to create an extremely challenging environment for this Municipality. The 2012/13 IDP Review and MTREF Budget in tandem address some of these challenges, in response to the needs highlighted by our communities. Efficiency and financial discipline will be vital in ensuring the long-term financial sustainability of the institution and that the scarce resources available are channeled to areas of greatest need. We have identified poor and under-developed wards for special attention in service delivery and budget allocation. Furthermore, the institution is in the process of establishing a multi-disciplinary Rapid Response Task Team to proactively address service delivery issues. In order to address the above, this Budget aims to, amongst others, improve operational efficiencies. In this regard, the following areas will be prioritised internally:. a) Reduction in overtime, telephone and cellphone usage, travelling and the use of out of town venues. b) Streamlining the use of contracted security services. Fiscal issues that will be prioritised and will increase budget availability include the following:. b) Increasing the revenue base and attracting investments (in this regard, a Team was recently established under the Executive Mayor to consider how the institution will vigorously pursue additional sources of funding). c) Focusing on repairs and maintenance to reduce water and electricity losses. d) Streamlining trading services to ensure long-term sustainability. External areas contributing towards the longer term financial sustainability of the Metro, service delivery and job creation that will be prioritised, include the following:. a) The Presidential Infrastructure Co-ordinating Commission Projects (PICC). The key service delivery priorities, as reflected in the IDP, and the need to maintain the Municipality’s financial sustainability, informed the development of the Budget.
Property Rates
Total Operating Transfers and Grants. The Municipality is faced with the challenge of providing services with its limited financial resources. Against the aforementioned background, the Municipality has undertaken the tariff determination process relating to property rates and service charges as follows. to allow for a property owned by a trust where the total number of beneficiaries meets all of the other requirements of this policy; and provided further that the gross monthly income of all persons residing on that property be added to the gross monthly income of the beneficiaries staying on that property;. m) owners qualify for only one rebate per year, if financial circumstances change they can only apply for future years;. Sporting organisations, the sole purpose of which is to use the property owned/leased by them for sporting purposes, whether for gain or not, may qualify for a rebate, with amateur bodies being granted 100% and professional bodies 40%. Any profits earned must be invested in the betterment of the organisation and not be for private gain. Audited financial statement must be provided, if however the sporting body does not have audited financial statement reasons therefore must be provided on the clubs official letterhead. 75% rebate may be granted to the owners of Game Parks. In this regard the following stipulations are relevant:. a) the property must be used predominantly as a game park with the sole purpose of viewing of animals by the general public at an affordable price and for encouraging tourists to the area;. b) the usage of the property must be in accordance with the zoning scheme of the area;. c) the owner must be registered with the South African Revenue Service and provide proof thereof with the application. If proof of registration with SARS cannot be produced due to recent ownership change, upon application, a municipal official, authorised by the Municipal Manager shall issue a certificate of compliance to the owner, after an inspection of the property has been conducted and the municipal official is satisfied that such land is used predominately as a game park;. d) the owner must run educational programs for schools and not for gain institutions at a nominal fee. Proof of such activities must be submitted with the application;. e) the land owner must prove that he/she has complied with the National Veld and Forest Fire Act (Act 101 of 1998) and legislation governing the control of alien invasive species;. f) property used for hunting of game shall not qualify for the rebate. All accounts of the applicant must be up to date or arrangements must be made to pay any outstanding balances before any rebate will be granted.
Sale of Water and Impact of Tariff Increases
If the usage of a property changes during a financial year, the rebate applicable will be reduced pro rata for the balance of the financial year. The applicant must continue to pay the rates account in full until the rebate is granted as no interest will be reversed.
Sale of Electricity and Impact of Tariff Increases
Sanitation and Impact of Tariff Increases
National Treasury has also urged municipalities to ensure that sanitation tariffs are fully cost reflective by 2014. Sanitation charges are determined based on the volume of water consumed, which is appropriately reduced by the percentage of water discharged into the sewer system.
Refuse Collection and Disposal and Impact of Tariff Increases
In this regard a phased-in approach has been proposed to ensure that tariffs are fully cost reflective by 2014.
Overall impact of tariff increases on households
OPERATING EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK
Employee related costs
Council’s target for 2012/13 is to restrict personnel costs to 34% of total expenditure
Personnel costs in the 2012/13 Budget represent 24.3% of total expenditure
Remuneration of Councillors
Debt Impairment
Depreciation and Asset Impairment
Finance Charges
Bulk Electricity Purchases
Bulk Water Purchases
Other Materials
Contracted Services
Other Expenditure
2012/13 Operating Budget as per Expenditure Category
24.3% Remuneration of councillors
Debt impairment 3.4%
Depreciation asset impairment
Finance charges Bulk purchases 2.8%
Other materials 6.8%
Contracted services
Transfers and grants
Other expenditure 10.9%
Free Basic Services: Basic Social Services Package
In order to qualify for free services the households are required to register in terms of the Municipality’s Assistance to the Poor Policy. The cost of the social package of the registered indigent households is largely financed by national government through the local government equitable share allocation, received in terms of the annual Division of Revenue Act.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
National Treasury has suggested that 40% of the capital budget should be allocated for asset renewal/rehabilitation. The following graph provides a breakdown of the capital budget to be spent on infrastructure related projects over the MTREF.
ANNUAL BUDGET TABLES - PARENT MUNICIPALITY
Explanatory notes to Table A1 - Budget Summary
Explanatory notes to Table A2 - Budgeted Financial Performance (revenue and expenditure by standard classification)
Explanatory notes to Table A3 - Budgeted Financial Performance (revenue and expenditure by municipal vote)
The purpose of the format in which the budget is presented, is to enable the Council to enforce a vote in accordance with the municipality’s organisational structure, so as to assign
Explanatory notes to Table A4 - Budgeted Financial Performance (revenue and expenditure) Revenue
The Financial Performance Budget is required to be approved concurrently by revenue source and expenditure type, so as to ensure consistency with annual reporting format requirements
Total revenue amounts to R7,2 billion in 2012/13 and increases to R8,5 billion in 2014/15
Services charges relating to electricity, water, sanitation and refuse collection and removal constitute the biggest component of the total revenue base, amounting to R3,95 billion for the
Expenditure
Explanatory notes to Table A5 - Budgeted Capital Expenditure by vote, standard classification and funding source
Table A5 is a breakdown of the capital programme in relation to capital expenditure by municipal vote; capital expenditure by standard classification; and the funding sources
Explanatory notes to Table A6 - Budgeted Financial Position
Any movement on the Budgeted Financial Performance or the Capital Budget will invariably impact on the Budgeted Financial Position. For example, the collection rate assumption will
Explanatory notes to Table A7 - Budgeted Cash Flow Statement
- The budgeted cash flow statement represents the first measurement in determining whether the budget is funded
- It reflects the expected cash in-flows versus cash out-flows that is likely to result from the implementation of the budget
- The cash position of the Municipality declined significantly over the 2007/08 to 2011/12 period, from R1.9 billion to R769 million
- The 2012/13 MTREF has been informed by the planning principle of striving to ensure adequate cash reserves over the medium-term
- Cash and cash equivalents amounts to R979,2 million as at the end of the 2012/13 financial year and increases to R1.6 billion in 2014/1 The 2012/13 cash balance is significantly
- The table assesses the funding levels of the budget by firstly forecasting the cash and investments at year end and secondly reconciling the available funding to the
- As part of the budgeting and planning guidelines that informed the compilation of the 2012/13 MTREF, the end objective of the medium-term framework was to ensure the budget is funded
- It is to be noted that the budget progressively moves from a funding surplus of R111.6 million in 2012/13 to a surplus of R553.3 million in 2014/15
It reflects the expected cash in-flows versus cash out-flows that is likely to result from the implementation of the budget. The table assesses the funding levels of the budget by firstly forecasting the cash and investments at year end and secondly reconciling the available funding to the investments at year end and secondly reconciling the available funding to the liabilities/commitments that exist.
Explanatory notes to Table A9 - Asset Management
The table provides a summarised version of the capital programme divided into new assets and renewal of existing assets; and also reflects the relevant asset categories. The associated
National Treasury has suggested that municipalities should allocate at least 40% of their capital budget to the renewal/rehabilitation of existing assets, and allocations to repairs and
Explanatory notes to Table A10 - Basic Service Delivery Measurement
Table A10 provides an overview of service delivery levels, including backlogs (below minimum service level), for each of the main services
- Consolidated Budget Tables
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
- OVERVIEW OF ANNUAL BUDGET PROCESS
- IDP & Budget Timetable 2012/13 to 2014/15
- ALIGNMENT OF ANNUAL BUDGET WITH INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
These targets informed the preparation of the multi-year budget, as well as the Service Delivery and Budget Implementation Plan (SDBIP). After the tabling of the budget, a series of meetings was held throughout the municipal area to consult with the elected public representatives, employees of the Municipality, Civil Society, business, labour, National and Provincial Governments on how the budget addresses the IDP priorities and objectives.
BUDGET ALLOCATION ACCORDING TO IDP PRIORITIES
2012/13 Expenditure by IDP Priorities
Alignment with National and Provincial Priorities
The above is an indication of NMBM’s alignment to the National and Provincial Key Performance Areas and how Directorates are aligned thereto. It should, however, be noted that in terms of implementation all Directorates are focusing on the five areas.
MEASURABLE PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES AND INDICATORS
- Performance indicators and benchmarks
- Borrowing Management
- Safety of Capital
- Liquidity
- Revenue Management
- Drinking Water Quality and Waste Water Management
- Basic social services package for indigent households
The gearing ratio is a measure of the total long term borrowings over funds and reserves. The liquidity ratio is a measure of the municipality’s ability to utilise cash and cash equivalents to meets its current liabilities.
Service Social Package Approximate Cost R‘000
57 852 Water The first 8kl of water per month provided free to
15 392 Water
20 049 Sewerage
6 000 Refuse co-ops Co-ops to clean indigent and informal residential
14 073 Total Operating
Costs
OVERVIEW OF BUDGET RELATED POLICIES
- Financial Management Policies
- Review of credit control and debt collection policies
- Budget Adjustment Policy (part of Financial Management Policies)
- Supply Chain Management Policy
- Cash Management and Investments Policy
- Tariff Policies
90 days has been prioritised as a specific strategy, in order to improve the Municipality’s cash position. The adjustments budget process is regulated by the MFMA and is aimed at entrenching increased levels of discipline, responsibility and accountability in the financial management practices of the Municipality.
OVERVIEW OF BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS
In order to ensure that the Municipality continues to deliver on its core service delivery mandate, the mid-year review and adjustments budget processes are utilised to ensure that underperforming functional areas are identified and funds redirected to performing functional areas. No growth in property rates income has been provided for, in view of the depressed property market.
2012/13 Budget
No loan funding is available to support the Capital Budget, in view of financial affordability considerations. No growth in revenue sources has been provided for in view of current consumption trends in municipal services.
2013/14 Budget
The level of property rates and tariff increases to ensure the delivery of municipal services on a financially sustainable basis. No budget allocation has been made to programmes and projects, unless the respective programme and project plans have been submitted by the relevant Executive Directors.
2014/15 Budget
OVERVIEW OF BUDGET FUNDING
- Medium-term outlook: operating revenue
The following graph is a breakdown of the operational revenue per main category for the 2012/13 financial year.
2012/13 Operating Revenue
Medium-term outlook: capital revenue
2012/13 Draft Capital Budget by Source of Funding
National Government
Other transfers and grants
Public & contributions
Internally generated funds
Cash Flow Management
The main purpose of the other working capital requirements is to ensure that sufficient funds are available to meet commitments as and when they fall due. The desired cash levels are, however, two months’ operational expenditure in order to ensure the continued liquidity of the Municipality.
Funding Compliance Measurement
- Cash/cash equivalent position
- Cash plus investments less application of funds
- Monthly average payments covered by cash or cash equivalents
- Surplus/deficit excluding depreciation offsets
It is concluded that the Municipality’s cash backed and accumulated surpluses reconciliation reflects surpluses of R111.6 million, R248.9 million and R553.3 million for the and 2014/15 financial years respectively. It is to be noted that for all practical purposes that the 2010/11 and 2011/12 MTREF was unfunded, when considering the funding requirements of section 18 and 19 of the MFMA.
Property Rates/service charge revenue as a percentage increase less macro inflation target
Cash receipts as a percentage of ratepayer and other revenue
Debt impairment expense as a percentage of billable revenue
Capital payments percentage of capital expenditure
Borrowing as a percentage of capital expenditure (excluding transfers, grants and contributions)
Transfers/grants revenue as a percentage of Government transfers/grants available The purpose of this measurement is mainly to ensure that all available transfers from national and
Repairs and maintenance expenditure level
Asset renewal/rehabilitation expenditure level
EXPENDITURE ON ALLOCATIONS AND GRANT PROGRAMMES
GRANTS RECEIVED
GRANTS EXPENDITURE
GRANTS RECONCILIATION
ALLOCATIONS AND GRANTS MADE BY THE MUNICIPALITY
It includes grants-in-aid made in accordance with the Municipality’s grants-in-aid policy and transfers to entities and other organisations to primarily support their operational expenditure.
ALLOCATIONS AND GRANTS MADE BY THE MUNICIPALITY
COUNCILLORS AND BOARD MEMBERS ALLOWANCES AND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COUNCILLORS & BOARD MEMBER ALLOWANCES AND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
DISCLOSURE OF SALARIES, ALLOWANCES & BENEFITS
ANNUAL BUDGETS AND SERVICE DELIVERY AND BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION PLANS –DIRECTORATES
It includes the service delivery targets and performance indicators for each quarter, which forms the basis for the performance agreements of the Executive Directors. The SDBIP relating to the 2012/13 financial year will be approved by the Executive Mayor during July 2012, following the approval of the Budget.
CONTRACTS HAVING FUTURE BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS
In accordance with Section 53 of the MFMA, the Executive Mayor is required to approve the SDBIP within 28 days after the approval of the budget. Furthermore, the Executive Mayor must ensure that the revenue and expenditure projections for each month and the service delivery targets and performance indicators, as set out in the SDBIP, are made public within 14 days after the approval of the SDBIP.
Contracts impacting on the Municipality’s revenue
In terms of section 53 (1)(c)(ii) of the MFMA, the Service Delivery and Budget Implementation Plan (SDBIP) constitutes a detailed plan for implementing the Municipality’s delivery of services and its annual budget, which must include the following:. Revenue to be collected, by source; and. Operational and capital expenditure, by vote. b) Service delivery targets and performance indicators for each quarter. It therefore facilitates oversight over the financial and non- financial performance of the Municipality and allows the Municipal Manager to monitor the performance of the Executive Directors, the Executive Mayor/Council to monitor the performance of the Municipal Manager, and the Community to monitor the performance of the Municipality.
Contracts Impacting on the Municipality’s Expenditure
LEGISLATION COMPLIANCE STATUS
The municipality has been implementing the provisions of the MFMA in accordance with a documented Implementation Plan. The municipality submits the various reports required to the Executive Mayor, Council, and NT on an ongoing basis, in accordance with the MFMA.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE DETAILS
The Municipality currently has two Interns on the Municipal Financial Management Internship programme, as approved by National Treasury. All but one of the Municipality's previous Interns, have been appointed in permanent positions within the Municipality.
ACTING MUNICIPAL MANAGER’S QUALITY CERTIFICATION
The Interns undergo training in various sections of the Budget and Treasury Directorate and monthly meetings are held to assess their progress and to discuss their future assignments.
Quality Certificate
THEMBA HAN Acting Municipal Manager of Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality, hereby certify that the annual budget and supporting documentation have been
Acting Municipal Manager of Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality (EC000) Signature _____________________________
Date _____________________________
