• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Budget Hearing Presentation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2025

Membagikan "Budget Hearing Presentation"

Copied!
22
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Cape Town BEPP – Addressing the backlogs and future demands for Social Amenities

Community Services

(2)

Go to Insert > Header & Footer > Enter presentation name into footer field 2

Current Situation

City plans and options

Facility backlogs and growing demand

Financial realities

City Vision for Social Amenities

Presentation Overview

Workshops /discussions

Questions

(3)

3

Community Services (Sport Fields/Complexes, Recreation Centres, Multipurpose Centres, Halls, Parks, Libraries)

Our vision:

To provide social amenities on an equitable and sustainable basis across Cape Town to promote

healthy lifestyles.

To optimise and rationalise social amenities on a continuous basis to ensure sustainability and alignment to current and future community needs.

Addressing the backlogs and future

demands for Social Amenities

(4)

Go to Insert > Header & Footer > Enter presentation name into footer field 4

Current Situation

• According to the South

African National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

(SANHANES) released on 6 August 2013, : "The Mother City knocked the socks off its rivals,

offering its residents the greatest number of facilities (sports clubs, gyms, fitness amenities and recreational parks) per 100 000 people

• Numerous facility provision awards

(5)

5

(6)

Forward Planning 2032: Social Facilities in Cape Town

Integrated Social Facility Investment Priority Guide

(Product 5) October 2014

CSIR/BE/SPS/ER/2014/0060/B.2

(7)

Context

Scientific-based accessibility analysis exercise that assesses whether people have access to facilities, whether these facilities are within reasonable reach, and whether they’re able to accommodate future population growth

This project product generally highlights the social/ community facility demand pictures for 2032 from a City of Cape Town perspective.

Demand  2007 projected population figures

 2016 projected population figures

 2032 projected population figures Supply

For every 0.2 Ha of district park, 1 000 people are served Travel mode and

access time

Transport via existing road network:

 District parks must be accessed within 20 minute travel time by vehicle in off peak conditions

(8)

Thank you

Population Demand

3 664 445

People 4 466 969

People (Projected)

High growth areas

(9)

Municipal multicode sports grounds- Served and Unserved 2032

(Constrained by distance (10km) & capacity)

79% Served

Municipal Multi - Code Sport Facilities

(10)

Municipal Multicode Sports Grounds:

Potential New Locations for 2032

(11)

Overall Social Facility Investment Guide 2032

(12)

City Manager

1% Community Services 8%

Transport for Cape Town

17%

Compliance & Auxil- iary Services

0%

Finance 6%

Social Dev & Early Childhood Devel-

opment 2%

Corporate Services 41%

City Health 1%

Safety & Security 9%

Human Settlements 3%

Economic, Envi- ronment & Spatial

Planning 6%

Tourism, Events & Marketing 5%

2014/15 EFF Capital Budget (excl. R1.7Bn EFF Utility Services)

CAPITAL BUDGET - EFF BASE ( COMMUNITY SERVICES)

EFF Base allocation limits access to USDG funding due to counter- funding requirements

City Parks 9,752,752

16%

Library and In- formation

Services 18,963,252

31%

Sport, Recreation and Ameni-

ties 31,902,029

53%

Community Services 2014/15 EFF Capital Budget

(13)

13

Community Services Capital Budget per Major Fund Source

Budget

2011/12 Budget

2012/13 Budget

2013/14 Current

2014/15 Proposed Pro-

vision 2015/16 Proposed Pro-

vision 2016/17 Proposed Pro-

vision 2017/18 Proposed Pro-

vision 2018/19 Proposed Pro- vision 2019/20 CGD 95,917,949 120,917,258 124,955,957 132,703,834 73,617,054 76,471,628 53,640,000 71,000,000 60,500,000

CRR 14,552,161 13,810,896 26,564,147 44,040,336 28,042,274 0 0 0 0

EFF 48,501,636 37,992,449 49,905,600 65,618,033 41,573,576 42,573,576 42,573,576 42,573,576 36,332,241 REV-ENUE 9,921,020 19,419,208 7,700,491 7,175,001 7,096,500 7,463,510 7,850,340 8,258,060 300,000 GRAND TO-

TAL

168,892,766 192,139,811 209,126,195 249,537,204 150,329,404 126,508,714 104,063,916 121,831,636 97,132,241 25,000,000

75,000,000 125,000,000 175,000,000 225,000,000 275,000,000

(14)

2014/15 CAPITAL BUDGET per MAJOR FUND SOURCE

Department CGD CRR EFF REVENUE Grand Total

Projects, Strategy &

Support

266 990

266 990

City Parks 43 799

028 19 755

601 9 752

752 268

921 73 576 302 Sport, Recreation &

Amenities 52 865

427 7 380

648 31 902

029 25

506 92 173 610 Library &

Information Services 47 901

152 15 146

010 18 963

252 6 443

584 88 453 998 144 565

607 42 282

259 60 618

033 7 005

001 254 470 900

57% 16% 24% 3% 100%

2015/16 150 329 404 2016/17 126 508 714

CGD57%

CRR17%

24%EFF

REVENUE 3%

Cemetery Development 2015/16 20 824 392 2016/17 19 304 213

(15)

15

STAFF ATTRITION COMMUNITY SERVICES

Yr 2003

Yr 2004

Yr 2005

Yr 2006

Yr 2007

Yr 2008

Yr 2009

Yr 2010

Yr 2011

Yr 2012

Yr 2013

Yr 2014 C

o m m u n i t y S e r v i c e s

4,694 4,447 4,241 4,064 3,921 3,816 3,708 3,669 3,716 3,729 3,668 3,634

C i t y o f C a p e T o w n

18,57 3

18,35 3

19,75 3

21,58 8

21,72 1

22,48 1

23,47 0

25,32 0

25,49 4

26,76 8

27,64 2

27,68 1 2,500

7,500 12,500 17,500 22,500

27,500 No of Staff per Org Unit

Community Services vs City of Cape Town 2003 -2014

N o . o f S ta ff

ComServ

-23%

CoCT

+49%

(16)

CAPITAL BUDGET: COMMUNITY FACILITIES

Principles endorsed by Portfolio Committee :

Only capital projects with no future operating budget requirements.

Only upgrades and extensions to existing facilities where current operating budgets are available.

Business improvements projects, such as synthetic pitches to replace traditional turf to reduce future operating costs and allowing better future utilisation.

Capital safety measures at facilities to reduce security charges.

More cost effective service delivery options such as the proposed

integrated approach to facility provision.

(17)

CURRENT CITY APPROACH

Pro-active integrated planning, budgeting, implementation and management (optimisation)

Metropolitan, District, Integrated Zone and Local Area Planning – Khayelitsha, Mfuleni Urban Node.

Facility Level (City Directorates, External Funders, PAWC,) –Kuyasa Library, Du Doon North Integrated Facility.

Facility Level (Community Services Departments) Blue Ridge, Valhalla Park

Rationalisation project

Broad based action and mainstreaming –

Quick wins

Improve “return on investment” / expanding of current revenue sources

Commercial opportunities –

Leases/management agreements

Business improvements with the intent to save on operating budget

Partnerships/ volunteers / friends groups –

Outsourcing –

External funding (e.g. lotto) –

Hardening of facilities / artificial pitches / automatic irrigation ext.

Go to Insert > Header & Footer > Enter presentation name into footer field 17

(18)

Integrated planning examples

(19)

19

Khayelitsha

(20)

Valhalla Park: Integrated Facilities Planning

Precinct 3

Valhalla Park Community Recreation Park Lavistown Local Area Plan – Angela Street Precinct

1 2

3 4

5 6

7

(21)

Go to Insert > Header & Footer > Enter presentation name into footer field 21

SUMMARY

Amenity demand / backlogs and

growth

Funding capex

& opex

Current City

plan and

options ?

(22)

Go to Insert > Header & Footer > Enter presentation name into footer field 22

Questions that need to be answered / Discussion points

What could be changed or added to the current City’s approach?

What institutional arrangements /capacity should be put in place / be created to manage multi functional integrated facilities?

Does the Integrated Human Settlement planning and funding model result in “Integrated Human Settlements”?

Are the current Social Amenities facility provision standards as currently set affordable and sustainable in the South African context? How should these standards be determined?

Could additional funding be made available for the provision and management of Library Information Services (underfunded by R500 million)?

Referensi

Dokumen terkait