• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Charge distribution in neutron stars.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "Charge distribution in neutron stars."

Copied!
62
0
0

Teks penuh

Compact stars such as neutron stars and quark stars are the stars that are in the final stage of stellar evolution. The thermal energy is what prevents the collapse of the star due to its own gravity. With the discovery of the radio pulsars, the existence of neutron stars was thus put on firm ground.

In the second chapter of this thesis, we have shown the theoretical formulation of the relevant equations. The generalization of the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkof(TOV) equation for a charged star was proposed by Bekenstein[2], who also pointed out many arguments against the stability of the star. This mass M(r), is the total mass measured from the reference frame of the star itself.

The distant observer will see a contribution from the gravitational potential of the total mass of the charged star, as well as its Coulomb contribution. This means that the effective pressure is softened by the presence of the electric charge. Regardless of the nature of the charged particle (the charge is shown squared), the presence of this additional Coulomb term further reduces the pressure.

The net result is that the effective equation of state inside the star is softened due to the presence of the charge.

The numerical integration procedure

The 4-point Runge Kutta method

Hereyn+1 is the RK4 approximation of y(tn+1), and the next value(yn+1) is determined by the current value(yn) plus the weighted average of four increments, where each increment is the product of the size of the interval,h, and an estimated slope specified by functionf on the right-hand side of the differential equation.

The Interpolation

Modification to the equations

The inputs to the equations are the pressure P, the energy density and the charge density ρch. We also note that since the electric field appears in the mass term (3.4) and the pressure gradient term (2.26) in quadratures, and also in the Coulomb part, the productρchE is invariant, so the form of these equations is not affected by the sign of the charge—i.e.

The Input parameters

The polytropic equation of state

The benefit of using such a form of EoS is that, by varying the polytropic index, the equation of state of matter can be obtained in both the relativistic and non-relativistic regimes. The other benefit is that we have a simpler form for the relationship between pressure and density, which is otherwise very complicated for a system like a neutron star, with many nuclear processes and interactions occurring between particles within the matter. In our numerical code we have mainly used units and dimensions for pressure and density in units of (MeV/fm3).

The charge distribution

In table (3.1), we have shown the different parameter values ​​that we have chosen for the different load distributions. Since the central density is maximum, and the surface density is zero, for a polytropic neutron star, so the nature of the charge density also follows accordingly. In the figures we show the mass-radius relation for all five charge distributions for different values ​​of the charge fraction α.

The nature of the curves clearly indicates the nature of the charge distribution we have assumed, with a slight variation due to the gravitational effects. In figure (4.11), we plotted the metric coefficient eλ as a function of the radius of the maximum mass star for each of the charge fractions for all five different distributions. We found that there is a small change for higher charge fractions, showing the enhancement in the compactness (MR) of the star with charge.

In figure (4.12) we have shown the variation of the charge with the radius of the maximum mass star (and the maximum charge they can hold) for each of the 5 charge distributions. The next analysis was performed to check the nature of the pressure gradients dpdr for all the five charge distributions. For figure (4.18), the height of the peaks is different from the rest of the four types of distributions, which may be due to the presence of higher charges near the center of the star.

Ray et al.[5] showed that the charge can be as high as 1020 Coulombs to cause any change in the stellar mass-radius ratio, yet remain stable as long as one considers only the hydrostatic equilibrium and the global cancer balance. The primary concern for such a highly charged star was the confinement of the charged particles with the neutral particles. For this project, what we considered was to take, for example, 5 cases of the charge leakage process and work out the detailed morphologies of the charged stars in these cases.

To add to the cause, the modified TOV equation (vide equation (2.26)) is also softened due to the presence of the charge terms - meaning that the integration process continues further for larger values ​​of the radius, and thus a larger mass and charge of the charged star. Returning to our situation, we note that we are unable to obtain larger values ​​for the mass and radius of the charged system when the central value of the charge density is significantly lower than the mass density. The similarity in nature of the maximum mass metric function of the five distributions, as shown in Figure (4.11), also confirms our conclusion.

One could argue that the pressure gradient (dp/dr of the TOV equation) is softened by the presence of the charge density, and should allow for a star with a larger maximum mass. Our conclusion here is that it does indeed change the value for the maximum mass, but not substantially, because the central density (and thus the central pressure) of the star receives an almost negligible contribution from the electrostatic energy due to the presence of the star . charged particles. So we can conclude that the charge density in the core of the charged is polytropic.

We also conclude that the higher mass-radius configuration obtained for a charged polytropic neutron star is due to the choice of the charge density, where it varied linearly with the mass density.

Table 3.1: Variation of parameters for charge distribution.
Table 3.1: Variation of parameters for charge distribution.

Gambar

Table 3.1: Variation of parameters for charge distribution.
Figure 3.1: Variation of the charge density (ρ ch ) (y-axis) vs the matter density (ρ) (x-axis)
Table 4.1: The maximum allowed Mass-Radius for different distributions with corresponding maximum values of charge fraction α it could reach.
Figure 4.1: Mass-Radius relation for different values of α, for charge distribution 1.
+7

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

The relation between the mastery of vocabulary and the other aspects such as reading, listening, and writing is very important to the students especially in teaching learning process..

Destoner Nut Silo Nut Crackers Winnowing Columns Clay Bath Wet Shell Bunker Boiler Depericarper Fibre Cyclone Nut Polishing Drum Clarifier Sludge Tank 1 Desander