• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA 1997 -II

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA 1997 -II"

Copied!
2
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

CASE NO: CCT 33/97 In the matter between

MEMBER OF THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL FOR

DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF GAUTENG and

THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IVOR BLUMENTHAL

ELIZABETH CLOGG

Applicant

First Respondent Second Respondent Third Respondent

D I R E C T I O N S

The following directions have been given by the President in terms of Rules 18 and 19:

1. The application for leave to appeal to the Constitutional Court granted.

2. The appeal is set down for hearing at 10.00 a.m. on Tuesday 3 March 1998.

3. The appeal record is to be compiled in terms of rule 17 of the rules of the Constitutional Court, save that the record shall be lodged with the Registrar by not later than 31st

December 1997. Clear photocopies may be used in preparing the record.

4. The appellants' argument is to be lodged with the Registrar by not later than 9 January 1998.

The Respondent's argument is to be lodged with the Registrar by not later than 30 January 1998.

1ADELA

REGISTRAR: CONSTITUTIONAL COURT 13 November 1997

GRIFFIER VAN DIE KONSTITUSIONELE HOF

PRIVAATSAK/PRIVATE BAG X32

1997 - I I - 13

BRAAMFONTEIN 2017

REGSTRM OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT

(2)

i, \

To: Moodie & Robertson 9th Floor, Total House 209 Smit Street

BRAAMFONTEIN. 2017 Tel: (011)403-5171 Fax: (011)403-1946 Ref: Mr H F Beckenstrater and to Strauss Scher

The First, Second and Third Respondents Attorneys 2nd Floor, East Lobby

90 Rivonia Road Sandton

2196

Ref: Mr Strauss/NH and to The Registrar

Witwatersrand Local Division High Court of SA

Pritchard Street JOHANNESBURG

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 80/08 In the matter between THE TRUSTEES FOR THE TIME BEING OF THE BIOWATCH TRUST Applicant versus THE REGISTRAR, GENETIC

Leave to appeal be granted directly to the Constitutional Court against the judgment and Order of the Full Bench of the High Court, Gauteng Provincial Division Pretoria, under case

The respondents will argue that i leave to appeal should be refused in the interests of justice inter alia on the basis that the case a presents no constitutional issue of substance

Today the Constitutional Court delivered judgment in respect of two applications for leave to appeal that relate to the same issue, namely the constitutionality of the Contingency Fees

2 THE NATURE OF THE PROCEEDINGS This is an application for leave to appeal against the judgment of the Labour Appeal Court per Waglay DJP dated 3 September 2010 “the LAC Judgment’ 3

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Constitutional Court Case No: Supreme Court of Appeal Case No: 537/10 Western Cape High Court Case No: In the matter between: JUDGE

CONFIDENTIALITY IN THE HIGH COURT 4 On 29 September 2011, the second respondent to this application lodged an interlocutory application in the North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria "the

2 The issues that will be argued, clearly and succinctly stated 2.1 The issues that will be argued are: 2.1.1 whether leave to appeal should be granted; 2.1.2 whether the Labour