Development of the HARM model for aviation dosimetry
M.G. Mosotho1, R.D. Strauss1 & R. R. Nndanganeni2
1Center for Space Research, North-West University, 11 Hoffman Street, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
2Space Science Division, South African National Space Agency, Hospital Street, Hermanus, South Africa.
65thSAIP Conference|Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha
1st - 8th July 2022
1 / 12
Overview
Introduction & Model Description Applications
Status & Conclusion
Introduction
“Snapshort”: High Altitude Radiation
Credit image: M¨oller [2013], PhD Thesis 3 / 12
Dose approximation model:
Dr(Pc, t, h) =− Z h
h0
Z ∞ Pc
dDf
dP dPdh= Z h
h0
Z ∞ Pc
J (P, t)F(P, h)dPdh
Dorman Function :Df(Pc, h) =D0(Pc, h)1−exp(−α(Pc/P0)−κ)
CDA solution :J (P, t) =J0(P)exp
− ψ βηPγ
Yield function :F(P, h) = F0(Ra00+ Pa0)
γ1−γ2 a0 Pγ2
Application:
CDA : GCRs Primary particles...
100 101
100 101 102
J(P,t) GV.m2.s.sr−1
Rigidity range of interest : 1.08-39.5 GV Trimmed dataset
LIS
PAMELA : [Interpolated]
AMS-02 : [Interpolated]
CDA
Rigidity, P [GV]
Credit data [Spectra]: https://tools.ssdc.asi.it/CosmicRays/ 5 / 12
Application: Extrapolation - Polar NM...
−2.0
−1.5
−1.0
−0.5
η(P,t)
χ2r=0.9589 Rd=0.7438%
1.25 1.50 1.75
γ(P,t)
χ2r=0.9456 Rd=0.2887%
2 4
ψ(P,t)
χ2r=0.2345 Rd=0.4549%
2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Time [years]
50 100 JT(P,t)
χ2r=0.1217 Rd=0.0048%
Credit data [All NMs]: https://www.nmdb.eu/
Status:
• Validated model with TEPC data
• We have to:
• Incorporate SEP spectral observations.
• Simulate the impact of the 1000 hours annual flight time limit on dose accumulation on various flight routes.
• Improve the model flexibility and weaknesses.
7 / 12
Application:
Model GUI...
Application:
Local Flight...
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Elapsed time [minutes]
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
DoseRate,µSv/hr
A B
HARM MAIRE CARI7
9 / 12
Application:
International Flight: Equator crossing...
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Elapsed time [minutes]
0 1 2 3 4
DoseRate,uSv/hr
A B
HARMMAIRE CARI7
HARM - CARI differences...
• The Dose Rates calculated by the HARM are systematically lower (approx. 15%) than those calculated by CARI-7.
Possible reasons include:
• CARI-7 doses are takes into account the an aircraft shielding, whereas HARM assumes values in atmosphere.
• CARI-7 uses dose conversion coefficients from ICRP Report 106 whereas HARM doses mimics the TEPC data observation.
• The origin of these difference is under investigation and this analysis will be updated as soon as possible.
11 / 12