Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Science and Animal Industry, Fol1tme 5, Nu·mber 1, htly, 193f';.
The Enzymic Activity of Egg-White.
Its Bearing on the Problem of W atery-Whites
By
'E. VAN MANEK, B.Sc. Agric. (S.A.),
~I.Sc.Agric. (Comell), Poultry Uesearch Officer, Onderstepoort, and
CLAUDE HIMIKGTON, :M.A., Ph.D., B.Sc., A.I.C., Resea rch Fellow under the Empire Marketing Board.
ONE o£ the hypotheses advanced as an
explanation of ",,·atery- w·hiteness " in eggs is that there is present in the allnunen of
sucheggs enzymes of proteolytic nature, by the action of which the protein 1-ecome,; disintegrated, thereby decreasing in viscosity.
]~xperiments
designed to test this hypothesis were commenced as far back as the spring of 193:3, but the results then obtained were considered insuffi(·ient to suhshmtiate the view
,and the
experiments were discontinued.
A puhlication appeared recently howeYer by A. K. Halls and T. J,. S"·enoon of the Bureau of Chemistry and Soils, \V.ashington D.C. (19:34), in which the claim was made that a proteolytic enzy me is present in egg-white, parlicularly in thick albumen, and that
" the disappearance of thick wbite from eggs in
storage is due toa slow proteolysis catalysed by t ry pi.ic proteinase " .
In v
iew of the fact that, themethods employ ed by these a uthors appeared in our opinion to be open to crit
icism
,it ,yas d
ec-ided toinvestigate the problem using a suitable technique.
In the first place, a repetition of the
\Villstiitter titration m
ethodemployed by Balls and Swenson convinced u
sthat the aeeuracy is insufficient for the detection of such small
changes as were
toh
eexpected. In no instan
ce could increases0£ the order ohi;;cr
vedby the American workers he recordecl; the end-points were neyer particularly sharp in such large Yolumes
.Attempts were made to increase the accuraey by titrating to a definite pH st anda rd in a comparator instead of " to a faint but true blue which required a little practice to recognise " but without much suceess.
The choice of the above method for the purpose of the investig
a- tion would
seemmoreover to have been singularly unfortunate.
Recognising, as it does, any increase i
ncarboxyl groups, it would fail
to distinguish between lipolytic and proteolytic activity . The presence of an
active lipase in both egg
yolk and egg white has been demonstrated by Koga (1923) anwng others.
329
ENZYMIC ACTIVITY Ol' EGG-Wlll'IE.
Any attempt to
detect thepresence of small Cjluniities of
proteo-lytic enzymes (proteases, ereptases, etc.)
,in egg albumen demands the employment of a sensitive micro-method
wh~rhis specific foi· the determination of p eptide cleavag·e. Of
thevarious methods available, the
well-lmowuformol t.itration technique appeareu to us to he the most. suitable. Using
decinormal carbonate-free sodium
hydroxi de, contained in au automatic micro-1mrette graduate(l in twentieth s of a cubic centimeter, and titrating
toa standard
pH value(pH
8 ·4)with the
helpof a Cole-Onslow
comparator,no difficulty was experienced in attaining an accuracy of ±
0 · 02 c.c.This is c:leady
eYident from the
protoeo1s re('orded.
·ExrEH.IMEXTAL.
Having
in our
previous experiments (not recorded) employed only the one substrate geln.t.in, -which is hequenily used
inthe
determinationof tryptic activity, and obtained negative results, it was decided to exte
nd the scopeof the investigation by including sueh substrates as easein and peptone and by working over a wide pH range, any erepsin-like fermen
t.would l1e expeded to attack casein and peptone but not gelatin.
K osearch
wasmade for lipolytic
Ol'other types of en;r,yme.
:1lbumen solntions.
Various
numbersof eggs
wereused as recorded, either new lai<l (1 hour old), fresh or old
fromwhite Leg·horn pullets, intensively housed and all
fedon a graiu and mash ration. 'l'he albumen "
·asseparated into the two portions, thick and thin by the sieve methofi of Holst and Almquist (1931). 3 c.e. portions of eith er fmdion were diluted to
1() C.e.With Water ann aJJmYed i.O Si.and for
:3()minuteS
:d35°.
In the majority of these experiments, the precipitated mucin "
·ascentrifuged oft
aftershaking
thediluted solution with glass heads, thereby aYoicling the difficulty of removing a repreile11tative samplt>
of the digestion mixture by the pipette, and exeluding the possibility of precipitated particles adsorbing the indicator.
It is noteworthy that the proportion of thick to
thiu albumen did not appear to he
markedlycliffe1en( iu normal ancl so-called water, Y
-white eggs, except those which were very stale,
leadingus to su spect that
physicalvariations in organisation of the
profeinphase may he intimatel.v bound
upwith the phenomenon of
\Yatery-"-hitenPSI'.
Su hstrate.~.
Two and 5 per c-ent. casein solutions were prepm·ed in
the u
sualway b,Y grimling the protein with the requisite amount of alk ali , ancl
diluting to volume. The pHwas adjusted
if necessa.r,v to 8·4.
Two pPr cent. gelatin
wac; preparedl1y dissoh-ing
comn1 "l'cialgelat.in in
warmwater
(U0°) andadjuRtinf;
thepH.
2
}Jer cent ..
pepi.oue ·was similarly prepare(lhom Parke, DaYi;;
& Co., " Tin.rterologie
PerJtone ".
A :few flrops of toluol were added and
P~1chstoppered solution
kept in the
icebox when not. in
useHuffers.
A rang-e. of pho~pbatp :llld
ur
horatp buffer~ 1\"Pl'P prepan·d h OJll('lark and L11b::; tables; ihe ::;olutions ,,·ere not. ho11·en•r, diluted a,; a high buftPrtttg JIOII·er "'<lc' olhin"d. J11 the <·mnp;tr:l!or n honile hui-fpr of ]dl N·4 was Plltploy .. <l.
l'i·.IJJisin .-.\11 :l<"ti n• il·_q1:.;i 11 -;ulntion "·;IS pr<>p:irHl hotn ptp;,;
ji<IIHTP;i,; <I("<"<JJ"<fing to ('o]t• (l!l:_!(j). Jj~ <l<"tiYif.\· \\·a,; i<•-;tt•d ll]IOII t'<l't'ill ht>t' <-out rol t'"\jiPritllt'IIJ :'\o. --1) .
. .\ gly<'<'l•d t'"\lr;~<·t ol p:i!'<TP:~:; \\.,., ,tJ,o prt"']l<•red :111d 1 Jti, n_qbinogt•n 11tili'<'<l io dtPck i lw ::<"iiYii~ of tlte eni<•J·okina:.;e prep:lr[l- tiott ical<-ifit-d 1nilk nwthodl.
l·:ll!emkitJa:.;p 11·a.-; pn•pan·d t'oli<JIIing JLtll::; <llt<l SIH'll,-;un (I!J:;-±,1 .
• \n Erep,;in ~olutiou 11·a,; lll'Ppan•d h.1· griuding pig',; inte,;ti11al llliH:o,;:t "·itb li<llld and 11<1ieJ, ,;(r;~iuing and filtPring·. It,; :1di1·it.1 i-; dt>nwn.-;tr.ttt'd in <·mlirol ""]ll'rim<·nt' ~o'. (i <ond 7.
Formol ,')olulion.---TlJi,; 11'<1" marl<' up a<·<·oHlitlg to(',,],. (lL!:!G). Une thop of .1 JHH <·ent. alcoh"li<" jlhPnolphtltalein ,;oluhon !wing nd<led JlPl' ,._,._ anrl :;Jlffi<·iPnt ,;odi1llll h~·droxi<h· ~ohHinn io ln·iug· tu p}l ·'-'·-!. ThP r<'<~dioJt II :to" e:~n•lnll·: ad.iu-i<·d t'<t< h .!a,\·.
l'tlnrliun l'l'l'hllliJIII'.- 'l'l:e di:..:·e-tion lllixtl'n•.-; \\·pre lllY<~ri:ilJl.\·
lll:HlP up Ly 111i:,ing-, in ,lll;d] ,;iop]H'n·cl fb,b, 10 1'.<·. of ilw dilnte<l
<'gg· ;dlnlllll'll, 10 <'.l'. of ,;uL,;ir;JI<' .-;o]utioll :111<1 ]:-, r·.<·. of lll!llPl' :111d
;,dding 4 drop,; of ioluoi. :111 :<ll((:l!llt ]ll'l'l·iou,:l\· d<•tPrlltillPd "'' ,.;ulli<·iptl( to it1l>ihit iJ:Il'IPri:~l :l<"ti,·ity.
In
l':l:ie,; ll'ill•rt• kina,.;t· 11·:1,; 11"1'<1. <·.l'. of tlti,; ,;olution rt'pb <·e<l<·.r·. of hul'i'PJ'. Till' hnfr<·ritq.!· pol'<'r ,,.,1, "tllit'it'tlil\· ."tl'llllg· to i'll<lhlt•
ilii,: to ht• .lont• 11·ithout :ll'i'Pl'ling· the fit::tl pll ol tlH· !llixtPn'.'· 'l'he ,:oint ioJL-; 1\'l'l'P lpf( in a l'Oll:;iall( tPllljlPI'<Itlii'P \Yilt<'l' hath :1( ±:J'i0
An aliqnol of 10 t'.l'. \1':1,: 11·ith<lra\\n for iitr:tlioll ai ZPI'Il time. Tn ihj,: 11·:1~ ~1dd<•d ]() dmp,; of l JHT t'l'llt. nL·ohnlir- plieJJolphtlwlein
~olntion and det•inonnal sn<liutl! ]Jn]nJ.\i<lt• run i11 until the .. olonr a~ ~t'<'ll .in tltH t·onlp:~rator ll!:tt<·l!t·tl t'ht• .sta11tlnnl of
pH
i'\·-J.. l·'i,·e <'.<·.of forJilOl soh1t ion 11·a.-; Jl<m· :l<td•·d «llll 1 ht- :11 ixl ure :1g:1in tit r·:ded to pi[ 1'\·4, (i]p <(ll:lll(it.\· rPqniretJ llPill!.l' :1 :lin•!'1 11'<'"'~\ll'P of ill<' :IIIH>I!JJI of <lllli!lo nitrog"t'll jll'l''PIIt. 'l'}lt' t!P}if':t<'_Y of tliP titration 1\'H:i ,.;ur-h thai a diffPrf'liC'P of Oil<' dmp, eqn:tl 1o 0·!12 <·.<·., <"onld he POI,;il_,.
di:;tittgniod!Fd.
_\ftpr :1 iiliH' itdt·n·al \\hi .. h ,·ari<'d in <iillt·t·<·nt <'"\]!Pritn<'llb fro111 I to :.!4 hour~. a ~<'<'OJl<i ,;alltpk 11·;!,.; n•lli<>l"t•d :111d ~intil:trlv iitr.:li<'<l. :1 fitt:ll :i:lllljllt' la•ing i:~h·11 a1 th .. t'ltht' ol tltt• <'.\jiPI'iiiH'Iil. TIH· titr:dion dillt'l'<'lwf',: l:Ptll-<'<'11 ill<' "Pro ;tw! hr~l :<nd c;<·•·ottd tinw i11it·n·;!l,; ;lJ·p
!'Pt·nr<lP<l in th<' pmiot·o],;.
('nul ro/ H.tp1'1·illlt"Jil-<.
Tit<' <'(J!trro] e:qwri1nenb ol TaLIP
T
,:pn-ed to dPtnon,:tt·ate thf' Idi;!lrilit:v of tltl' nwillocl a,.; f:tr a:; l'f'lH'Odndi' it_.,- of re~nlt;; was t·ont·erned and thP 8hSPJlf'P of ktdel·inl inh•rfPren<·e. En~n ill theEN?.YMIC .-I.CTIVITY Of' EGG-WHITB.
presenee of ente1·okina:;e no proteolysis ocemTed in the various substrates after 24 to 46 hours, which ju:;tified the eonc.lusion that the increases in amino nitrogen observed when egg albumen m· enzyme
soluhous"·e1·e present could be attributed to the action of the latteT.
En~psin
was acti'e upon casein and upon peptoue buL had no eftect upon gelatin.
The use of casein as a substrate by Balls and
~"·eusoncau be crticised on the grounds
that itfails to di
stinguishbetween erepsin- like. enzymes and true protea.ses (e
.g. trypsin). The eondusion arrived at by these authors that a " tryptic protei nase '' i
spresen
tin eggs is not justified by their data, if one discounts the reported auxiliary effeet of entero-kinase. In some
caser;no increase occuned on the addition of kinaRe, in others,
slightly highertitration figures -were reeorcled, but considering the limitations of the met hod these
figure~>do not, to our mind, carry much eouviet.ion.
Autol.11sis l!J,l,perimcnts.
Were a protease responsible for the break doml. of egg
albumen, leading to the eondition of watery-white, it would he expeded that measurements of amino nitrogen in su<h albumen
solutions, suitablybufferecl, would reveal the presenee of sm·h
<Illenzyme es pecially wheu incubated at a temperature of 37° for periods rang
·iug from Gt.o 24 hours.
lt ;;ee me'l natund to look
, inthe fir,;t. place, for
snch aut.otlig·es- tiou of egg album en alone. Au to lytic aeti vi ty of tissues u
suallyproceeds most rapidly in a slightly aeiclmedinm. Test,; were however perfmmed with thick albumen solution
sbuffered at
reac.tionsranging from pH 5·5-6·0; 7·5-8·0.
No action wasobsened at any pH although these eggs were Rhown
tocontain an active erepsin as
sub-t>equently reported (see Table II, trial 12).
Autolyti
cproteinases seem,
th
e1·efore, tob
ed
ennitel)·ahRent from the eggs under consirlernti0n in om·
experiuteutr;.In onler to meet the possibility that. a proteina
se'"at> present hut that egg albumen "
·as not asuitable substrate to
reve~dits activity, experiments were earried out in which egg albumen was added to gelatin
solutions buffered at pH7 · S
01'S · 4 and with, or without, the ad<lition of kinase. K o increase of amino nitrogen could he demonstrated (see trials 1, 9 and 13 ). The egg coneerned iu trial
1was a " watery-write
"a<' understoocl
h~rthe tra(le
.'l'hat
the majority of eggs do
containan
erepsin-lib'enz_yme.
part.ieularly associated with the thick .a lbumen was clearly proved by the u
seof easein
·or peptnur Rolntion;; a,;
su!Jstrate~.The activity is not great and requi ref:' a micro-method for its flemonf'tra tion. 'l'he enr.yme wouhl appear to he associated in normal
eg·g-swith
thethick albumen frac-tion; e\'en in a five-mouths-
oldegg· a feeble ae.tion \\'as found in the thick white hut none in
the thin. In
egg-,;having·
Hoa.ting air
cells,this enzyme waR J
emonstra.blein bot·h
fradions(see trials
6and
8).In the ease nf trial G, t
-he allnm1enRfrom two
eggs were HliXefl aiHl a
greate r
activit.~'fouml in the
thin
white than
tlu· tl1 ic-k It lllll~t lw 11:'11\Ul'i'ed. ;l<J\\'1:'\'t'l, that i,, '-'"l' :d ; l1e'(' ··~!.!-"
u11l\ ;; oltlall 11\!<\Utih· of thi1·k ,,·hit1.• L~ih·d T11 pn~s lht> ~j,.,.,_ ll 1' l'U~.-iltl,. lhnt. ,; rli.fru~ioH nt 11w .nzyJnt· bnd rll';'llrn·d l'nHtl tl11,.], tD dt! II.
lt l~ ,.:]~'lll.fi('<lJll t\l;t\ jJl'Oit•())_\''il' \\'it' oiJC.pl'\'l:'t\ lljHII\ [tt'jl[illlt' :11111 , " ", • 1 " " , ~ 1 ;·I 1 ~ 1 r·, 1 1 ., , ~~-il h , 11 1 1 1. ,. ad .1 i t i " 1 1 "
r
1. , 11 , . 10 \, i 11" "-• .. \~ l't•g'<trd~ tilt' pJI "l'lillllllll, lhP pn·illllilt:IJ\. trial>.\~,,,_ '.!-l.l :lj>jll':lr·••d \1) illtlh·illt• :1 Vl'<'<lit'l :1di1·1t,\ .:ll pll 7
S
t\Wll <tl· ,..;·-L It11'<1.' dt·•idt·d. tlt<ll'f,,ll', \(' ttl.-'1'1'\(' til•' :t•liYit\· ol i~tdilid11:1l
;tl\:tilll('lt .;,dnlillll'i. poolt•d l'rl>lll 1 '''' ··.~·g·,, (>li-'1
",,,t[[,,.:,. :
1!_,. 11id;• p!lr~l il g·l~.
Tit,.,,. l'f''itdh an• t·••<·nnll'rl i11 tri:~l..c l-t-11; iilld Fig·'·!. :2,:11111:\: l-':g-. -J. ,-.,prc>~('Lri.iu;.: a ··oJII[lO'iill:' 11f I lit-> ~n<>l ;-l,:>llg·p.; oi ,,-n,·d .11 :h,·
1 :. d i 1· i d '-L' I '·' 1 11 • r i n 11 • 1, I "_
]j :'Pt'l\l:' I \<'Iii' 1\L:ll t\\IJ rq_::ii!l" 11J lil;t:O.:illilll\J ;:i'lll·it\· ,.,j,j; 1irP
••llt i':i1rl.1 ,.:l!,t·tds· ltH•:ilisPd ;;I 1dJ _-,.,-1. tlu· ntl:t>r 'l"''':tditlg r>~t-r 1h1·
i:ll:p·p pfl 'j'·()_,'-; (), ,\(' liJtt>J'lll<"di:t(l l't'lltii>.J'I' ll t·t->rtHill llllttl\IH1 l)f ill'll\'il,l l'lolll:l 'til[[,,_. d!•lo·!'lo'ti.
)1 :--t'•.•JJJ~ to 11:--; llHIJ'v iii"·l"\. 11Jd1 t\.\"11 ~~·Jt~ll'~de· t~::;.-:_\.ll'lt'."' ila\-lli}.!'
di!lt'l'elll' optitll<l :~n· l'llli•·<'l'I!P<\. ;,11d I
It>
'11.'2'!2>'~1 in11 i-; Lnnlf' o11! !1_\ I h(•'2'1'1';ti_;']' )'(•\;Ill\'<' l!l'ill'll\ it• \)It' 'o]f ~ (}_,"1·(1 li'!'.i1111 i11 !Itt• l'<tc'l' II')'I'J'-
~I'lllt'd h_1 [<'ig-. I, 1111 ~\;t·h ,Jj]lt•l't:lll t' 1 l'l'\1"1';11).2'.i!l I lit• 111\,t•)' \\\'(1 ('11~1':'.
]( i, \\l'll k1111\\'1J tlt:d :1 nli>.:(Pn• ,,j· l11n •'liZI'llll'' l!:l\'ill('.' dii'fl'l'<'i\1
"[>1111111 ,,·ill :dl'11n\ :\11 <·>.:lt'iid,-d Jlli-;H·Iilil,\ ·,·111'\t' ,.,jl;l1iting 111·"
hiilllJ"- _\-;;til 1'>.::\111!'1''· IIi<• pll-•ll·lilil,l ,_.111'1.1' ut )''-'P~ill ;wiing· llJI""
<'~!..! :Jihutll<'ll (.\ol·lltrop l~Jl!l1 l1<1:' lwt•Jl -;t·h·t·l>.·d <111d lt'}l'"dnt·<•d lll'i1·•·
:tpttH tllP ~~ll111' gT<tph PCIJ"t'l' -""'~~ I]J;~t ~1H' ( \\"11 1''11'\"[\> lit• _..,_, illllH·li
;,-;,1]_,
;tl•lllll iht• po:ld ,,j· thc>ir iiiiPI''"'''io;t_ TJ,j, gi'"'' 11 11,\jllditt·lil·;l\ ' ' ' ' "
i·t•!l!]':llltiiiP 1•-ii\1 lilf' t·•IIH]ilioll> oloL1i11itl~ in
•.·g·:.::
11l1il1'. It i~ '''I'llrr""'
Fig . . , il~<tt t!J,. '"·,·rhJ>Jiil!g· i'''ldl-; n " totnpn.;it~ ,.,,~.,-,_._f"Xl1ihi1i11!..! tin• ntaxilll'> a11cl <tiL l",it'lldt•d inlf'l'li'l'ill!.<' t:iJIQ'<' nf lt·-~Pl' llt (:\it 1· .. \\';• t·tllt~irl<·r. lilt'lt'Tnlt', 111:~1 il1•' •·ut H''. ot t>i!..!·. -+ ltl~\.1
P8t.·li 't;.- l'i>:'<dl-1'11 into (1\'1\ ji<LJI iall,l il\i'IJ[\jiJ':II}.t l'Oit'llJOIIc'llh,
n'jli'<'C't'Jdirl!!' IIYO <'llZ_I'lHC~ ll'hn~c nplllilil [i,. <II <t]tJtl'fiXlllt:liPLy pff .-,.;, and 7·()-N tl.
j) I< 1'1. ,_; --.1 l I \ .
:-->1'.\'t•l':d l'l'l'IIT'd~ :ll't' 1"
IJ,.
ftll\1111 i11 lltt· litc·r;l\111\' ol itil.l',(l_~·;J11111\.Il)1<>1: 1111' (-'\IZ_\'lllil' ill'til·it\' II) t')-2!.:''· )Jill ilt 1\lilll\' • ' i l ' ' ' ' 1\11' !'l''i!\t~
\\.t•!'l' ~H11 n~J;tlnh1p·u~1l!~.
\\'•dli!2t'lltll1h rl 1tt1."1) J'<']l•JI·I••,J ti;,. [lit''•'ll<·•· or " pr"J,.,,J_,·t;,- l'liZYHl(~ Jn egg-·-\·nJk, hut \\".;J;-.; llll:.::hl'.\ tO (lP1110I!-.:lJUj<1 ill!\' ~ll('fl Cll·jjyj1\·
;n ;,~f!- alLmiiPl.L T\iJg':l I ]!J:!:i) dt•n:,,, 1 i1P pn·.;ew P 11t'. <i tryp.;in-1 ik~
i'llZ_\'IIIt' i11 yoJk. <lt•IP:·Iill~-. (Ill tJw nllh'l' li:IJJd. !I !l<oi-illl'lll!,i,lpr:.Jl]p l')'f'l'ti(' ilt'ti.\·jj~·- J•:g·~· \\•hit~•. \!(• i'lllhitl(•b, ('II]Ji<\iJt~ <I Tilll'il\l)hf.il' PliZ\'llte iu 'lllall amm1111 . . \tltli1imt<d n•ff'l'f;ll,.,., arl' qnolc·<ll)) B:ilb
:11111 "''""' 11:'011.
HNZYMIC ACTIVITY O:F EGG-WHITE.
It is evident from the present work that at least two peptide- splitting enzymes were prese
nt in the albumens of the eggs studied,
whether norma
lor " watery-white ". The em;yme with a pH ()ptimum about 7 · 6-8 · 2 is probably similar to tissue erepsin.
Alth ou gh our data do not pretend to ofter any explanation
ofthe cause of " watery-white " it is of interest. to discuss our findings in the light of some of the
hypotheses which have been put fonYard to explain this condition.
In the first place the conclusions of Balls anrl Swensou a1·e clearly untenable. It is difficult to understand, however, how an ereptic enzyme could in any way modify the c-ondition of tlw native protein. Our a
utolysistrials indicate that no breakdown occurs under these cond itions at pH valu es ranging from 5 to 8.
It is a
lsosignific-ant that
anumber of eggs examined within 12 hours of
laying have been found hy us toexhibit the condition known commercially as " watery-whiteness ·'. Storage is not essential to the development of t.hi::; condition and iu our opinion the ooudition induced by shaking, as reported hy
variout~ authors (e.g.
Canham 19M, Ha
lnan19:33, Dryden
1934),is not identical with that which appears in certain eggf'. a few hours after having been laid.
Our observations suggested some association between a tendency towards natural watery-whiteness and imperfect shell formation. In support of this, it may be recorded that imperfectly shelled eggs picked at random from a day's collection pr.oved subsequently, although not in every case, to develop watery-whitenef'.s within a short time after being laid (12 hours)
,and our experience would iiJ.dicate t
hat experimentstaking cogi,i&auce of this fnet, might help to throw ligh t upon the problem.
Few, if any, eggs with perfectly
developed shells of fine texture
andgood ealcifica tion, result ultimately in watery-whites.
The
·white of
anegg is an elaborately orgaui,;ed struc ture as may be verified by observing its behaviour when poured upon a sieve.
The thick albumen formil a kind of p.ouch supported no d.ouht by interl acing fibrill:oe of mucin. Within this pouch the bulk of the thin white is contained and is liberated when the structure gives way upon the sieve surface. Eveu so, both thick
audthin fractions contain mucin which becomes visih
leupon diluting the materials with water.
As stated
previou sly, a low proportion of thick to thin albumen is by
no means an invariable accompaniment to the \Ya.tery-white condition,
in fact our experimentshave sho,vn that this is rarely the case. The
loweredvisco ity of the white seems to be due laTgely to a loss of structural organization. It would be of interest to determine wh etLer the total amount of mucin in watery-white eggs is less than in normal eggs and also what dterations, if any, t.hi,;
protein has u
ndergone.Artificial disintegration of the albumen, as for exampl e by the injection of t
rypsinor erepsin into normal eggs, may be expec-ted to result in a
lowered viscosity ofthe white, but this in no 'vay proves that the naturally oecurring watery white is produced in the same way.
334
]<~. VAN ::\IANEN AND CLA UDN ltUlll\GTON.
A hypothesis
whi<·h makes,;ome appeal to u:;
i::~that the cause may
be sought.in
nnuvset of the L0und- to the free-water ratio.
Proteins are
known
to<:ombine with a certain proportion of the water in whieh they are
<lis::~olvedin su<:h a manner that this quantity of the sohent is bound or eliminated in suGh a "·ay that it uu longer participates in osmoti<· phenomena.
A.nyrelease of thi.H bound water cau:ses a diminution in the Yi,;co:sity of the system. The point
i~H
usceptibleof experime11tal irlYestigation mul ,.:houl<l lw considered in any attempt to explain the oceurrence -of " watery-whites ". St.
John (1981)
hasfound
thf'hound water in thick Pgg white to be
llO le~R than
2(5 per cent.
Heg·anlrng the whole problem from a <letadred
~tandpoiut,it
;q>pears to
UHthat ·nany ta(·it a:-;sumptions ha,·e heen made whieh rf'lluire
experiment~tlproof or <lisproof. Spe<·ulatiou base<l on false premi:;e,; is obviously useless.
l'hysico-ehemical pos,;ibilitie~have not received the attention ·
they wouldappear to merit. in s1H'h
aproblem.
lt seems to
usthat
the fin;tpoint to bf' eluei<late<l i
nan approaeh to the
problemit> the actual nature of the differem:e between the
<'olloi<laJ
~y,;temsof protein in '\Yater comprising the total white ill normal and \vutery-white
eg~J:~-Thf' function of the muc·in apl•t'Hl'H to be to preselTf' a structural m·g-anizution in the whitf'
ibhehYeen ihe allmmen aml the otber memhets of the colloidal complex, hut how this
functionis di;;eharged is obsr:ure. Somf'
disorganization,;eem,; to take plaee in
'' watery-wl1iteness ".One cannot help recalling· the somewhat similar
problemof gluten
dispersionsin water. The protein from a
"shong " flour forms a highly viscous colloidal solution. that from a " weak " flour a less viscous one.
Thereason for this behaYiour is not known. Even a highly vi::;euus solution undergoes a more or less rapi
rlspo11 ta neou,;
rleerease in Yiscosity \Vithout, as far as can he ascertained,
an,vmarkerl or obvious change in the protei
It;the action of enli,Vlllf'S has been definitely exclurl ed. *
Ourknowledge of protein systems with their possibilities of
hydration,dissociation and polymerisation is still "o meag-re that.
much workwill have to he done before such pe<"uliar changes as that above mentioned can he understood. It is along-
these lineH, howe\'er, that we feel the solution of the
"·ater~·-wl1iteproblem will
ultimatel~·be
,,ttained.SrM~fAHY.
1. The
enllymic acl.ivit.y of solutions of thick awl thin alhumen
from norn1al and. \Vatery-white eggs has been studie<l, using a Jnjcro-titration method
determining peptide cleavage in tf'rms of tlw increase in amino nitrogen.
2. Thi<·k
0rthin albumen
~·loneat pH value" ranging from
5 · 5to 8 · 5 s11ffer
no autolysisat 37°,
neithercan any protein-splitting enzyme
be detectedat. any pH by the addition of g-elatin as substrate.
* Since thi~ was written, an article has appeared h~r Blagovf>schemki and Yurgenson (] 935) in which it i~ claimed that there is present in wheat flour an enzyme which exercises n definite solvent action on these protPins by virtue of n disaggregation rather than an hydrol~'si~. It is claimed that there is no increase in amino-nitrogen during the process. It would sPem highly desirable that egg white be studied in a similar manner.
335
EN~YMIC ACTIVITY OF EGG-"WHITE.
3. The
v•orkof
Hall;;and
Swenson iscriticised
011ac·eount of
insufficient sensitivityof the
methodemployed
and the fad thatit
issuch
as •vouldfail to
tli~:~tinguishbetwPen
an inl'reasein acid groups
dne to lipolytic.and due to proteolytic actiYity. .Moreover,
the use of casein as asubstrate is ineapable of
differentiating proteasefrom erPptase activity.
4. The presenee
in egg white of at least hvo erepsin-like enzymes
havingtlifferent pH optima (approximately 5·5
and7·0-8·0) has
been
de1rwnstrated.
'VJH>ther
or
not these euz;nnp,; play ~wypart in
thetlevelopmeut
of '' "·atery-white"i;; nneeJtain hut
for rPason~ <li:_;r·nsse<lit woulrl
seem 1m I i kely8omP
ohRernttion:=:; upon
""·ater.\ -wh
ite " i 11eggs
arPrecorderl nnd
th:.~problem subjected to a ,;l,ort di,;cu:-;,;ion.
BALLS, .-\. K., AXD :-iWE".'\SOX T. L. (193+). Proil>olysis in Rtored Egg,, Ind. En.o. Ohem., Vol. ~W. pp. i5i'0-2.
BLAGOYJ•:SCHEXSKI . .-\. V., AXD YrRGEKSOK, :\L P. (19:30). On tlw ehanges of wlwat proteins under the action of flour and yeast enzymes.
J/iod1r'111 . . J., VoL 29, pp. RO,)-RlO.
CAXHAM, A. S. (HJ::l:3). \YatPry \Yhites of Eggs. Heported. Preliminary Jnyestigations. Ondr•rsteponrt .J. Fet. Sci. nnd A:nimn.l Ind .. VoL 1.
X o. 2, pp. 02!1-;366.
COJ,E, S. \V. (1920). l'ractieal Ph.\·siologir·al ('ltemistr~-. HeffPr &. Sons, Cambridge.
DRYDE:\, \V. H. (UJ8-!). The Effec·t of Hiffennt :\f.,thods of Packing on Quality of Eggs. Hm·per .-1 dn ms Utillt?l Po11ltry .] ournu/, Vol. 19, No. 5.
HALKAX, E. T. (19:3;3). The Cause of " \Yater~· \Vhitt>s" and Otht>r Defef'ts in J•:gg'. Poultry Ilnndb., 192::3, p. B.
HOLST, W. F., AND AL:\1Ql:IST, H. ,J. (J 9:ll ). ?lleasnremeut of Dt>terioration in tlH; Rtored Hen'R l~gg. Tli/.oordia, Vol. (i, Xo. :J, Augnst, 1!131.
KOUA. T. (192:l). t'ber diP Fermente im Hiihnerei. nior'lielll. Zeit., Vol. 141, pp. 430-4<1-(i.
XOHTHJtOP, .J. H. (1919). The Effec·t
or
\'arions Acids on the Digestion of Pmtein by Pepsin . .J. G!'il, Physiol .. Vol. l, pp. 607-M2.ST . .JOHK, .J. L. nn:n). T<>mperatUl'P at 1\'hic·h unbound water is completely frozen in a biocolloid. J. A.mcr. Ohnn. Soc., Vol. .53, pp. 4014-9.
WOHLGEMUTH, J. ll90i)\. 7-r•it. J. l'hysiol. Chnn., Vol. 44, p. 040.
336
TABLE
I.
Corres-lnere~st' 8ubHtratP. Enzyme. ponding pH. Kin~se. Timl'. c.c. N/10 RemarkH. Trial No. ~aOH. Hour.-.:.. Gelatin 2% .... -1 I 7·H 18 NilI
::-fo action. 42 Nil Casien iio/o ... J i i H 2 ·;) :\'ilI
Xo action. -I 24 Nil T'eptom• 2% ..· 1
-:l I i·HI
I
1 Nil I ~ (I
46 ::-fil Xo action indut·cu by added kinase. ~ I 1 Nil~ _,
r 411 +0·02 ~ Casein 5o/o ... Trypsin 8·4 r 1 11-Ui 0 · 2 c.c. extract of fresh pancreas. !..-'.
I .... 46 I 0·72 :.- '7. Ert'psin I 8·4 () r; I Nil ~ ~o dotting of calcified mill; in 18 hourR.z
18 I NilI
1 c.c. extract in intest. mucosa.~
I ... CasE'in 2% ... I l•~repHinI
7·HI
u ;j +O·JJ Definite action on casein at 7 · S.~ 18 0·90 (") -< ;... P<'plonc 2o/o .... Erepsin I R·4 I I 0 li 0·20 DefinitP aetion on peptone at pH H · 4. d !:;) IH l ·O;i ~ G<'latin 2o/o .... Erepsin I S·.J I O·il I Nil Xo action. ,...
""'
18 +0·05""'
,...z
0 ....;z
t"<j 'l'AHLE 11. '7. ;:-.:! >< ~ H
I
Number 0' Increase 0 Triall
Kind./0 :.-No. Substrate. of Age. thick pH. Kinase. Time. r.r. N/10 Remarks. () f'ggs. white.
I
NaOH. ..., H< -
I dum.,.,. ---HI
I
I
..., 1 -0 35 This egg had a floating air-cf'll ~ 5I
-0·35 0 I ":1 . 1 . Gelatin 2% I 2 days Thi~k .J'/·7 8·4 1 -0·02 Albumen not centrifuged. t"<j 5 -0·03 Negative results, probably due to bad samp--;;) 1 ;-.;il ling. 1 c.c. kinaee used. :! ' 5 Nil
I
:::: Thin I J +O 03I
~o action. :.; 5 t-0·02 H ...., t<: -0·03 Thi<"k I ;) NilI
1\>Iembranf's centrifuged out. 1 c.c. kinase I l II
-0·02used. ;) -0·02 D:> 2 Casein :l
I
I hour 44·() H·.J. 1 -0·02 No action. D:> I 00 :) -0·02 Thin I l +0·02 [)I
+0·02
I
- I
--~----
Same 2 +O ·10 Pf>rformed day following Experiment No. 2.I
threeI
ThickI
:H·5 +0·30 Albumen solution kept in refrigemtor. eggs 2 +0·30I
2 c.c. kinase used. An f'reptase probably
a
I Peptone 2% as in II
21·5 j-0·43 present; action increaser! by kinase. ex peri-2 +0·02 Greater action with thick white. mcnt 21·5 +0·17 :\o. 2 Thin 2 +0·05 21 ·ii +0·19-
--- I I +0·13I
An ereptase probably present. 1 c.c. kinase Thick I 21 +0·25 had no auxiliary effect .. I 1 +0·12 4 I Peptone 2% :~ I l day .J.il·O 7 8 :H +0·22 l Nil No action with thin white. 21 -0·02I
Thin1 l\ il 21 ~o
o-t
~---c.: ~ cc
- Trial Substrate. No. ,'j Casein 5%
--
~---- 6 Casein 5% ---- Casein 5% 7 Peptone 2% ------- ---
Casein 5%s
Peptone 2% ~--- Uelatin 2% () Cas~in 2~·0 Peptone 2% ------
Number of eggs.
I
3 --- 2---
I ---- l ---- :lI I
'_I1Alll.E
I!.
(continued). I II I
Kind. %I
Age. thick pH. KinasP. Time.I I
white.I I I
hours. 1·5
I
Thick ! 18 1·5 5 months 41 !J 8·4 18 1·5 18 Thin 1·5 18 ----------~----------- 18 Thick 66 -j 18 4 dayR 41·!l 7 8 66 18 66 Thin+
18 66 ----------· --- 7·8 2 !) 1 hour Thil'k 43·4I
24 8·4I
2·5 24 ---
----
---- 7·8+
2·!3 1 day Thick 4;) ·2 24 8 ·4 2-5 ____ I __I
24 ----- 7-8I
2 22 8·4 :l
I
j2 1 hour Thick 53·S 7·8I
2 22 8·4
I I
2 22 7·8 2 I 22 I --
.
-
-- Increase I c.c. N/10 I Remarks. NaOH.I
Feeble action with tkick white only. -f-0·10 u ·15 +0·05 Nil -1 c.c. of kinase used which had no auxiliar y -0·15 effect - -0·25 --- 1 0-10 1 These eggs had floating air-cells. 1n ow -f-0·25 pnctically no thick white left. 1 c.• -f-0 -10I
kinase used. Action greater in the thi +0-15 white than in the thick. n +O 30 +0·40 +0·18 I Kinase had no auxiliary effect. -f-0 36 +0-25 No action on plptone at pH 8·4. l~efini1 +0·20 action on casein at pH 7 ·8. 2 c.c. kinaf .e -f-0·07 used. -0·10 --- +O 30 This egg had a floating air-cell. Condu~ior +0 25 of former trial confirmed. -fO ·05 0·10 2 c.c. kinase used. - +O 02 1No action on gelatin or· c·asein at either pfc -0·04 -0 ()!) Definite action on peptone at pH 7 ·8. I Nil -0·15 2 c.e. of kinase used. I Nill -0·07 0-05 0 03 11·2.~ ---
---
t:j
< ""
7, ~ >z
t:jz ~
tJ (') ::-< ;.. d~
::::: ~ 1-<z
Q H c !7,I I I - ':;umber Trial
I
!\o. Su bstrato. !I of egf!~.· - · - --- , -
C·tsein 2% I 10 2 PPjJione2 '!{ , I ·-· --- 1 ~ - -- - - _! __ _ _
III
CaHBin 1'-;;) PoptnrH' 2%
·-- - j--·
I I 12 1I
Nil
I I I
~
1 - --
1 j Same eg?;s n~ 1u experi- ment ~(l. 11T.un.h IT. (l'ontllllll:'r1). ·-- 11
%
A)(l'. Kind. thiC'k I pH., - I
ll day ...I 1-- - - 1 l hour I I
Thick
'ddt<>.
!
7 ·8 ,ti)·O H~ I
7·:-lI I I
K •I' . . - -- - 1 ~ - --· -1 I , s
'.L'hi<·k 1 ;;z. 7 I u ·ii I I ' I- -[- - 1 I
'l'hi<k I;) ·0 ,) ·;) H·U t) .;") 7·0 ~ -i ;l
J.~! nr:..o.;c. J~im.C'. i -I _I_ I
I I
Hours. 2 22 2 22 2 22 :! 22 1 ·,) ;W I :; 20 1 . ii :.'0 (j :!~ (j 2-t. (i 2~ ti :!4- (j 2-l
__ _ _ !_ ~ - · - -~ - ~,--1- -- - ·- ·
Uelatltl 2 /o 1 : I --, --I I'--·-~-0 -·----1' .. 7·S
(j ~~ 24 13 Peptorw 2% :! 1 "'""' 'J'hi<·k .)() 0 G·O !J8 20 4+
bwr·ea~e ('.C. X/10
.\', , oH.
1\il- : o ·
:n Nil i-0 (l;j f 0·15 1-0 :~3 I ~ 0 · 11Remarks. Definite action on both fubstratcs but mar(' marked at the lower pH. Similar J-esuits on pepton<' ut f.> II 7 · 8 when mucin nof, reJnnvf>d. :! t·.f·. h::ina . ..,~ UI"Pd.
-~ o ::_[ I
0 li'i l:efinite ;u;tion on both substrak>' in cac:h -0 4o.· I l'asc: aet.i vity appears to be. l<>s" at the +0 ·]:) loWPI' pH vahlPH. 2 C.C. kitHLHC URCCl. -f 0·3!) Nil ·I 0 03 --0 OJ -0·02 () l)J () (I] +O 02 ~ 0 02 ,-O·o:l .I O·O:l I ,-0 ·03 !\ il .,-0·04 )iii ;.;'il \' j) ,-0 ·OS ·• o ·II\'o action at any pH although th<>se <'gg,; kz1own to <·(nlt.uin a.n active enzvnll': 1-lf'e previou~ (''>/'<'rintent. " 'fh<·n· is no (•videnee of an <tutolytic proteas<' tH:ting on the nlbutncn as suL~tr.:1tf>. l\'o actio11 on gt'latiJ'. J)pfinitc 'ldion nn peptone. \ ... u kina:--;~ ll~f'd.
t'l
z
N ~~
0 :... n ~ ....< .... '"
><I 0 r.j -~ ~- ~
~ ~~
,...
1-'Trial No. 14
-- I
!!
ISubstrate. Peptone 2% If\
!
Peptone 2% I '- ---- 1 ---
1- 16 I Peptone
2% ! i i
Number of egt-.rs. 2 2
A.ge. I hour J hour -·--·-·· -··· 2 1 hour
Kinrl. Thick Tl:id< 'fhiek
i I I I
I
'LIHI.E II. (umtinuerl).
(xl
thick white. ·+;; ·H ,;;l k 60·0pf-1. lGtu1sP. ;) () ;}-;) (i·O (i·;) 7 0 7-[) ~-0 R·f) ( Bor"'t0) -···-·· ;) ·0 ;) ·fi fi 0 (i .;, II 7 ,) H·O
Tiln<·. Houn;.
[rH:rca'L' i C,(•.:N/LO :\aOH. 20 Sil 4H "lil 20 -i 0·17 4S +O 2!1 20 -1 0 07 4H +0 2:~ :!0 ·1 0 .II 4S j 0 4:!
i
:20 + () 07 I 48 Io
47 20 tO l:l I 48 : 0 ·67 ' 20 -l-0 ·ll I 48 : 0-58 I:w
-~o 1 :r>l{enla..r.kf-'. Definite action on peptone ; apparently two optimfL at pH 5 ·5 anrl within the range pH 7 0-8 ·0. (See Fig. J ). *For pH H ·;) l>orate bnffer u:;erl anr.l the figures <:orrecLerl to tlw Hamf' ha.RiR >cR phospha-t.<' bnffE'r. No kina:-;e usPd. I 4s -! o 2:~ 1
___ , ____ ---·----~----·--·--·--·---···----- __ ·)4 : I 0 · OU 1
lkfinite aetion for first 24 homs, I ittlc pro-. I 48 I tO ·ll grcss r.ft.cr· this time. 'l'wo optima. at , 24 1 ! 0 17 1 pH ii -.~ tcnrl range pH 7 ·O-S ·0. (Sec ' 48 +0. 17 I Fig·. 2.)
i
I24 ! () ]() 48 1 0 ·10 24 I 0 J I 4il tO II 24 0 ]() 48 -,--0 2:l 24 0. ];) 48 --0·10 24 41:\ . 0·21) .C.(). :22
A11 ren.gentK ~terilizcrl by auto('b.ving nnd thl' r.mount of toluol pr·c'seni increRsecl. .\'o kin~s<· '"ed. I --w ·-··· ---! 24 ;j ·0 4S -4 ()-()2-h-iefinite fwtion on peptone. Two optima ;).;") 24 48 ti·O 24 48 {j. ;) 24 48 7 0 24 48 7 .) :/4. !S S II 24 4S
f-0·0:\ I 11,(: pH ;'\ .. ti ancl mnge pH 7·0-8·0. -1 0 2:l -t-0·31 (:-it'(' Fig. :L) -! 0 JH I 0·27 -'--0 ·13 -;-0. 26 -1 0 28 I 0 23 f-0 10 +0·20 . 0 12 i 0 2H
Ko kim1se used.
~ <j
.... z "" "" ....
~ t,;z ,,. z
t:l (') ::-< .,... d t:l t:j P:l H ;,:: Hz
C':l ...; 0 7:E!'ZYliiiC ACTIVITY OF EGG··WHITE.
· ••
. ..
. ..
, .
'"
"'
..
rll.
E. VAN MANEN AND CT.AUDE ltlliUNGTON.
70
·60
Fig. :!.
70
c.o ... poel!t..rflt._l,2:&ndl
..
pH. 7 0
• . .
Fig. 4.
34~J
ENZYMIC ACTIVITY OF EG(; \1"1-JJTE.
ll)"'-'l~~u,.,tcun•· oll~•tr~oln~ '"~ ('.ornl>lnf'd .\cU<W yf '""
Jlfl~"'t"' •·n,1rnc• u>•r .,. Hltnhd r~nu of ptl
Frg . . ).
;)4-1