Annual Evaluation of BEPPs 2016/17 MTREF
Project Pipelines –
Intergovernmental Projects &
Catalytic Urban Development Projects
20- 21June 2016
Why the focus on projects?
• Projects are the tangible result of planning and funding – it is what people feel and experience
• Funding is a limited resource
• Project delivery should be evaluated and measured against output, outcome and impact indicators
Range of projects in metros
• Capital and Operating Budgets (mix of wish list or “fall out of the sky”
projects with needs-based projects in no priority and usually lacking a spatial perspective).
• Infrastructure projects – Consolidated Asset Management Plans (Engineering)
• Public Transport Projects (connecting spaces in Integration Zones with Economic nodes and Marginalised Areas including Informal Settlements)
• Human Settlements Projects
• Mayoral/MEC Projects/Ministerial projects
• Catalytic Projects – projects that will directly contribute to spatial
restructuring and transformation. Projects that directly arise from UNS (IZ identification and prioritisation, and precinct planning)
Integration Zones Matrix
2020/25 2025/30
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Built Environment Results &
Indicators Spatial Planning
IZ Priority
IZ 1 1
IZ Strategy Institutional Arrangements
& Operating Budgets Intergovermental Project
pipleine Institutional Arrangements
& Operating Budgets Capital funding Institutional Arrangements
& Operating Budgets Implementation Institutional Arrangements
& Operating Budgets Urban Management Institutional Arrangements
& Operating Budgets
IZ 4 2
IZ 2 3
INTEGRATION ZONES - Priorituzation, Planning, Funding, Implementation, and Management
2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/2019
Objective:
Prioritization of Integration Zones and Planning of Izs (
Strategy,Projects, Funding, Urban
Management)
Intergovernmental Project Pipeline
Intergovernmental Project Pipeline in Integration Zones
Priority Project
Description
Municipal Provincial National PRASA Eskom SANRAL Households Private Sector
Integration Zone name
1 Station
Upgrade X
2 BRT X
3 Bulk water
works X
4 Hospital redevelopment X
5 Substation
upgrade X
City-wide projects
6 Social Housing X
7 Police Station X
8 Rail Extension X
9 School X
10 Land
Development X
Value (Rand)
Objective:
Catalytic Urban Development Project Pipeline
Catalytic Urban Development Project Pipeline Template
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Name of Integration Zone Network Element Name of Precinct Name of Project Description of
project Location Type (e.g.
Residential) Yield (Quantity)
As Per Guideline As per Guideline
[Insert name of Integration Zone]
Hub
[Insert name of Hub]
[Insert name of Precinct]
[Insert name of Project]
Corridor
[Insert name of Corridor]
[Insert name of Precinct]
Catalytic Urban Development Project Pipeline
• Projects are the result of spatial planning process, and should be able to be justified in terms of the Intervention Logic (UNS and BEVC) with a direct link to the Budget process, anchoring other projects (metro and provincial, SOC, etc.).
• Should have had rigorous project preparation – concept feasibility, project viability, funding mix, sequencing, etc.
• The delivery of the project should contribute to intermediate outcomes, and ultimately outcomes and impact.
Lists of Catalytic Projects – Way forward
1. Apply rigour of Intervention Logic to get to truly catalytic projects that will directly contribute to spatial transformation (transversal, sector blind, spatial
2. Work with CSP and NDP from NT to do the above 3. Refine the Catalytic Project list per metro
4. Sign-off from Municipal Manager
5. CSP Support for catalytic projects: WB- ULI Panel; Land Transaction, CPPF (DBSA), demand-led Technical Advise; GTAC
