• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

LUFUNO MPHAPHULI & ASSOCIATES (PTY) L

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2025

Membagikan "LUFUNO MPHAPHULI & ASSOCIATES (PTY) L"

Copied!
5
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No.:

In the matter between:

LUFUNO MPHAPHULI & ASSOCIATES (PTY) LTD Applicant and

NIGEL A ANDREWS First Respondent

BOPANANG CONSTRUCTION CC Second Respondent

NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

1. BE PLEASED TO TAKE NOTICE THAT the applicant makes application for leave to appeal to the Constitutional Court of South Africa against the whole judgment granted by the Supreme Court of Appeal on 22 November 2007 (per Ponnan JA writing on behalf of unanimous court) in which the applicant’s case was dismissed with costs.

2. BE PLEASED TO TAKE NOTICE FURTHER THAT the appeal is

(2)

based on the following constitutional issue:

2.1. The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the only grounds for setting aside an arbitrator’s award are those contained in the Arbitration Act.

2.2. The non-observance of the principles of natural justice generally and the audi alteram partem rule in particular do not constitute a basis on which an arbitrator’s award can be set aside.

2.3. Section 34 of the Constitution guarantees all litigants, including those in an arbitration, the right to a fair hearing in an impartial tribunal and this, implicitly, would include their right to receive natural justice more generally and audi in particular.

2.4. The Supreme Court of Appeal has interpreted the law in a manner that is inconsistent with the guarantee afforded to litigants in the Bill of Rights.

2.5. The Common Law should be developed in order to cure this inconsistency.

3. KINDLY TAKE NOTICE FURTHER THAT the applicant seeks an order in the following terms:

(3)

3.1. That the decision of the Supreme Court of Appeal be reversed/overturned;

3.2. That the costs of this application be costs in the appeal;

3.3. The granting of further and/or alternative relief.

4. KINDLY TAKE NOTICE THAT the accompanying affidavit of Lufuno Herman Mphaphuli will be used in support of this application.

5. KINDLY TAKE NOTICE FURTHER THAT a copy of the Supreme Court of Appeal’s judgment is also attached to the application.

6. KINDLY TAKE NOTICE FURTHER THAT the applicant/appellant has appointed Knowles Husain Lindsay Inc (No 2 Maude Street, The Forum, Fourth Floor, Sandown, Sandton; Ref: Mr Alex Eliott) as the address at which it will accept notice and service of all process in these proceedings.

7. KINDLY TAKE NOTICE FURTHER THAT within 10 (ten) days of the lodging of this application, the respondents may respond hereto in writing and in which they:

(4)

7.1. Indicate whether or not they consent to the granting of leave to appeal, and if not, the grounds upon which they oppose the application; and

7.2. Appoint an address at which they will accept notice and service of all documents in these proceedings.

DATED AT SANDTON ON THIS THE 13TH DECEMBER 2007.

KNOWLES HUSAIN LINDSAY INC Applicant’s attorneys

Docex 42, Sandton Square Tel: (110 669-6000 Fax: (011) 669-6299

C/O FRIEDLAND HART INCORPORATED 201 Van Der Stel Building

179 Pretorius Street

Pretoria Ref: Mr A Eliott

To:

THE REGISTRAR OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

(5)

And To:

BARNARD INC

First Respondent’s Attorney

Shop 2 Saambou Building Received copy hereof this Lower Ground Level ___ day of December 2007 227 Andries Street

Pretoria ___________________________

Tel: (012) 664 0704 for: First Respondent’s Attorney Ref: WB/cl/QB0025

And To:

SHULZ LEWIS INCORPORATED Second Respondent’s Attorney C/O NEUHOFF ATTORNEYS

62 Bronkhorst Street Received copy hereof this

Groenkloof ___ day of December 2007

Pretoria

Tel: (012) 460 9360 ____________________________

Ref: Mr Schulz for: Second Respondent’s Attorney

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Granting leave to the Applicant to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal, alternatively to the Full Court of the Witwatersrand Local Division of the High Court of South Africa against

This is an application for leave to appeal against the judgment and order of the Supreme Court of Appeal setting aside the decision of the High Court which found that the First and

NOTION OF MOTION KINDLY TAKE NOTICE that, in terms of Rule 19 of the Constitutional Court Rules, the aforementioned Applicant hereby notes an application for Leave to Appeal to this

Applicant approaches this Honourable Court for the following orders in the following terms: 1 Applicant’s application for leave to appeal to this Honourable Court, against the judgment

Page 4 CAN THE APPLICANT APPLY TO THE HIGH COURT TO LEAD FURTHER EVIDENCE ON HIS AGE GIVEN THAT HE HAS BEEN REFUSED LEAVE TO APPEAL BY THE HIGH COURT AND THE SUPREME COURT OF

The applicant, F&J Electrical CC F&J, sought leave to appeal against a judgment of the Labour Court which dismissed its application for rescission of an order granted by that Court

ISSUES TO BE ARGUED: i Does the Court have jurisdiction to hear the application for leave to appeal and the appeal; ii Should leave to appeal be granted to the Applicant; iii Did

That the Applicant be granted leave to appeal to this Court the entire judgment made by JUSTICE LEGODI on the 17TH FEBRUARY 2015 sitting in the HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, GAUTENG