getdoc3a11. 188KB Jun 04 2011 12:04:16 AM
Teks penuh
Garis besar
Dokumen terkait
This new proof, however, is elementary in that it does not use the Kummer- Dedekind, nor the Kronecker Density Theorems; the proof actually shows that our sets of primes have a
(f) A possible reason why sub-fractional Brownian motion is the limit in the non-branching model with deterministic θ (Remark 2.3(a)) and in the branching model (Theorem 2.4(a)) is
We prove an almost sure limit theorem on the exact convergence rate of the maximum of standardized gaussian random walk increments.. On a conjecture of R´
Proof : The only problem is to prove formula (4), that is to prove that u is the sum of its Taylor expansion with respect to λ. In the case where A is a complex Banach algebra,
tion probability p is almost Fellerian and satisfies the criterion of exponential stabilization associated with (U, V ).. case, to obtain exponential speed to the law of large
The proof of this lemma would follow by the same arguments as the proof of Lemma 3.1 of [5], applying the criterion for absolute continuity of the supremum of a Gaussian
(2) Branching Mechanism Reconstruction: By reconstruction of the branching mech- anism, the variable coefficient σ ( x ) of the branching generator is transformed as a
It is not surprising, because the equation can be integrated by the inverse scattering method or, in other words, it is S-integrable, it is well known in the case of
