Holistic eHealth Value Framework
9.5 Concluding Remarks
Chapter > METHODS FOR LITERATURE REVIEWS <>>
HANDBOOK OF EHEALTH EVALUATION
<>>
References
Ammenwerth, E., & de Keizer, N. (2004). An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care. Trends in evaluation research, 1982-2002. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 44(1), 44–56.
Anderson, S., Allen, P., Peckham, S., & Goodwin, N. (2008). Asking the right questions: scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services. Health Research Policy and Systems, 6(7), 1–12. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-6-7
Archer, N., Fevrier-omas, U., Lokker, C., McKibbon, K. A., & Straus, S. E.
(2011). Personal health records: a scoping review. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association, 18(4), 515–522.
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.
Bandara, W., Miskon, S., & Fielt, E. (2011). A systematic, tool-supported method for conducting literature reviews in information systems. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2011), June 9 to 11, Helsinki, Finland.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews.
Review of General Psychology, 1(3), 311–320.
Becker, L. A., & Oxman, A. D. (2008). Overviews of reviews. In J. P. T.
Higgins & S. Green (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (pp. 607–631). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Cook, D. J., Mulrow, C. D., & Haynes, B. (1997). Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Annals of Internal Medicine, 126(5), 376–380.
Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (2009). Research synthesis as a scientific process.
In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), e handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 3–17). New York:
Russell Sage Foundation.
Handbook of eHealth Evaluation - Chapter 9.qxp_Chapter 9 2017-02-21 3:16 PM Page 174
Chapter > METHODS FOR LITERATURE REVIEWS <>#
Cooper, H. M. (1988). Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowledge in Society, 1(1), 104–126.
Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1), 38–43.
Darlow, S., & Wen, K. Y. (2015). Development testing of mobile health interventions for cancer patient self-management: A review. Health Informatics Journal (online before print). doi: 10.1177/1460458215577994 Daudt, H. M., van Mossel, C., & Scott, S. J. (2013). Enhancing the scoping
study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, 48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-48
Davies, P. (2000). e relevance of systematic reviews to educational policy and practice. Oxford Review of Education, 26(3-4), 365–378.
Deeks, J. J., Higgins, J. P. T., & Altman, D. G. (2008). Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In J. P. T. Higgins & S. Green (Eds.),
Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (pp. 243–296).
Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Deshazo, J. P., Lavallie, D. L., & Wolf, F. M. (2009). Publication trends in the medical informatics literature: 20 years of “Medical Informatics” in MESH. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 9, 7.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-7
Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2005).
Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 10(1), 45–53.
Finfgeld-Connett, D., & Johnson, E. D. (2013). Literature search strategies for conducting knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(1), 194–204.
Grady, B., Myers, K. M., Nelson, E. L., Belz, N., Bennett, L., Carnahan, L., . . . Guidelines Working Group. (2011). Evidence-based practice for
telemental health. Telemedicine Journal and E Health, 17(2), 131–148.
Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117.
HANDBOOK OF EHEALTH EVALUATION
<>#
Greenhalgh, T., Wong, G., Westhorp, G., & Pawson, R. (2011). Protocol–
realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: evolving standards (RAMESES). BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 115.
Gurol-Urganci, I., de Jongh, T., Vodopivec-Jamsek, V., Atun, R., & Car, J.
(2013). Mobile phone messaging reminders for attendance at healthcare appointments. Cochrane Database System Review, 12, CD007458.
doi: 10.1002/14651858
Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. London: SAGE Publications.
Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2008). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Cochrane book series. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Jesson, J., Matheson, L., & Lacey, F. M. (2011). Doing your literature review:
traditional and systematic techniques. Los Angeles & London: SAGE Publications.
King, W. R., & He, J. (2005). Understanding the role and methods of meta-analysis in IS research. Communications of the Association for
Information Systems, 16, 1.
Kirkevold, M. (1997). Integrative nursing research — an important strategy to further the development of nursing science and nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(5), 977–984.
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. EBSE Technical Report Version 2.3. Keele & Durham, UK: Keele University & University of Durham.
Kitsiou, S., Paré, G., & Jaana, M. (2013). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of home telemonitoring interventions for patients with chronic diseases:
a critical assessment of their methodological quality. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(7), e150.
Kitsiou, S., Paré, G., & Jaana, M. (2015). Effects of home telemonitoring interventions on patients with chronic heart failure: an overview of systematic reviews. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(3), e63.
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 69.
Handbook of eHealth Evaluation - Chapter 9.qxp_Chapter 9 2017-02-21 3:16 PM Page 176
Chapter > METHODS FOR LITERATURE REVIEWS <>>
Levy, Y., & Ellis, T. J. (2006). A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research. Informing Science, 9, 181–211.
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., … Moher, D. (2009). e PRISMA statement for reporting
systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), W-65.
Lyden, J. R., Zickmund, S. L., Bhargava, T. D., Bryce, C. L., Conroy, M. B., Fischer, G. S., . . . McTigue, K. M. (2013). Implementing health information technology in a patient-centered manner: Patient
experiences with an online evidence-based lifestyle intervention. Journal for Healthcare Quality, 35(5), 47–57.
Mickan, S., Atherton, H., Roberts, N. W., Heneghan, C., & Tilson, J. K. (2014).
Use of handheld computers in clinical practice: a systematic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 14, 56.
Moher, D. (2013). e problem of duplicate systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 347(5040). doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5040
Montori, V. M., Wilczynski, N. L., Morgan, D., Haynes, R. B., & Hedges, T.
(2003). Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts. BMC Medicine, 1, 2.
Mulrow, C. D. (1987). e medical review article: state of the science. Annals of Internal Medicine, 106(3), 485–488. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-106-3-485 Oates, B. J. (2011). Evidence-based information systems: A decade later.
Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems.
Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/
viewcontent.cgi?article=1221&context=ecis2011
Okoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2010). A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Otte-Trojel, T., de Bont, A., Rundall, T. G., & van de Klundert, J. (2014). How outcomes are achieved through patient portals: a realist review. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association, 21(4), 751–757.
HANDBOOK OF EHEALTH EVALUATION
<>>
Paré, G., Trudel, M.-C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews.
Information & Management, 52(2), 183–199.
Patsopoulos, N. A., Analatos, A. A., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences. Journal of the American Medical Association, 293(19), 2362–2366.
Paul, M. M., Greene, C. M., Newton-Dame, R., orpe, L. E., Perlman, S. E., McVeigh, K. H., & Gourevitch, M. N. (2015). e state of population health surveillance using electronic health records: A narrative review.
Population Health Management, 18(3), 209–216.
Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-based policy: a realist perspective. London:
SAGE Publications.
Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2005). Realist review—
a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(Suppl 1), 21–34.
Petersen, K., Vakkalanka, S., & Kuzniarz, L. (2015). Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update.
Information and Software Technology, 64, 1–18.
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences:
A practical guide: Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Co.
Rousseau, D. M., Manning, J., & Denyer, D. (2008). Evidence in management and organizational science: Assembling the field’s full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. e Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 475–515.
Rowe, F. (2014). What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(3), 241– 255.
Shea, B. J., Hamel, C., Wells, G. A., Bouter, L. M., Kristjansson, E., Grimshaw, J., … Boers, M. (2009). AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), 1013–1020.
Handbook of eHealth Evaluation - Chapter 9.qxp_Chapter 9 2017-02-22 9:43 AM Page 178
Chapter > METHODS FOR LITERATURE REVIEWS <>>
Shepperd, S., Lewin, S., Straus, S., Clarke, M., Eccles, M. P., Fitzpatrick, R., . . . Sheikh, A. (2009). Can we systematically review studies that evaluate complex interventions? PLoS Medicine, 6(8), e1000086.
Silva, B. M., Rodrigues, J. J., de la Torre Díez, I., López-Coronado, M., &
Saleem, K. (2015). Mobile-health: A review of current state in 2015.
Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 56, 265–272.
Smith, V., Devane, D., Begley, C., & Clarke, M. (2011). Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), 15.
Sylvester, A., Tate, M., & Johnstone, D. (2013). Beyond synthesis:
re- presenting heterogeneous research literature. Behaviour &
Information Technology, 32(12), 1199–1215.
Templier, M., & Paré, G. (2015). A framework for guiding and evaluating literature reviews. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(6), 112–137.
omas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45.
vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Riemer, K., Plattfaut, R., & Cleven, A. (2009). Reconstructing the giant: on the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2009), Verona, Italy.
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 26(2), 11.
Whitlock, E. P., Lin, J. S., Chou, R., Shekelle, P., & Robinson, K. A. (2008).
Using existing systematic reviews in complex systematic reviews. Annals of Internal Medicine, 148(10), 776–782.
HANDBOOK OF EHEALTH EVALUATION
<>>
Handbook of eHealth Evaluation - Chapter 9.qxp_Chapter 9 2017-02-21 3:16 PM Page 180
<#<
Chapter 10
Methods for Comparative Studies
Francis Lau, Anne Holbrook