• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Discussion

Dalam dokumen Digital Soil Mapping with Limited Data (Halaman 49-52)

Digital Soil Mapping Technologies for Countries with Sparse Data Infrastructures

2.4 Discussion

28 B. Minasny et al.

constrained so as to control the false discovery rate (FDR, loosely, the expected pro-portion of rejected null hypotheses that are actually true). Lark et al. (2007) propose an approach to model selection that uses the FDR, in combination with an indepen-dent prior selection of variables based on expert knowledge. Expert judgement is used both to determine the size of the pool of models that is searched (matching it to the strength of evidence for the existence of good models) and to ensure that the searched subset of possible models includes those that make sense given our knowledge of the soil. In trials it was found that this method selected good pre-dictor models, and avoided overfitting in cases where uncontrolled model selection methods fell into this particular trap.

Another example is the incorporation of the soil taxonomic distance in the data-mining algorithm for spatial prediction of soil classes (Minasny and McBratney, 2007). Current methods for predicting soil classes only consider the minimisation of the misclassification error. Soil classes at any taxonomic level have taxonomic re-lationships between each other, and no statistical procedure so far has been utilised to account for these relationships. Incorporating taxonomic distance between soil classes in a supervised classification routine such as decision tree, allows more meaningful prediction and effective integration of soil science knowledge.

2 Digital Soil Mapping Technologies for Countries with Sparse Data Infrastructures 29

Barnes E.M., Baker, M.G., 2000. Multispectral data for mapping soil texture: Possibilities and limitations. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 16, 731–741.

Ben-Dor, E., 2002. Quantitative remote sensing of soil properties. Advances in Agronomy 75, 173–243.

Bie, S.W., Beckett, P.H.T., 1973. Comparison of four independent soil series by air photo interpre-tation, Paphos Area (Cyprus). Photogrammetria 29, 189–202.

Breiman, L., 2001. Statistical modeling: The two cultures. With discussion. Statistical Science 16, 199–231.

Brown, D.J., Shepherd, K.D., Walsh, M.G., Mays, M.D., Reinsch, T.G., 2006. Global soil charac-terization with VNIR diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. Geoderma 132, 273–290.

Bui, E.N., Henderson, B.L., Viergever, K., 2006. Knowledge discovery from models of soil prop-erties developed through data mining. Ecological Modelling, 191, 431–446.

Bui, E.N., Moran, C.J., 2001. Disaggregation of polygons of surficial geology and soil maps using spatial modeling and legacy data. Geoderma 103, 79–94.

Carr´e, F., McBratney, A.B., Minasny, B., 2007. Estimation and potential improvement of the qual-ity of legacy soil samples for digital soil mapping. Geoderma 141, 1–14.

Chikhaoui, M., Bonn, F., Bokoye, A.I., Merzouk A., 2006. Comparison of the ASTER and ETM plus captors for the cartography of the deterioration of soils with the help of the LDI index.

Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 32, 74–83.

Christakos, G., 2000. Modern Spatiotemporal Geostatistics. Oxford University. Press, New York.

Cole, N.J., Boettinger, J.L., 2007. Pedogenic understanding raster classification methodology for mapping soils, Powder River Basin, Wyoming, USA. In: Lagacherie, P., McBraney, A.B., Voltz, M. (Eds.), Developments in Soil Science 31. Digital Soil Mapping: An Introductory Perspec-tive. pp. 389–400. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Cook, S.E., Corner, R., Groves, P.R., Grealish, G.J., 1996. Use of airborne gamma radiometric data for soil mapping. Australian Journal of Soil Research 34, 183–194.

Corwin D.L., Lesch, S.M., 2005. Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture.

Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 46, 11–43.

Datt, B., McVicar, T.R., Van Niel, T.G., Jupp, D.L.B., Pearlman, J.S., 2003. Preprocessing EO-1 Hyperion hyperspectral data to support the application of agricultural indexes. IEEE Transac-tions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 41, 1246–1259.

Davis, J.L., Annan, P., 1989. Ground-penetrating radar for high-resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy. Geophysical Prospecting 37, 531–551.

EMBRAPA. 1981. Mapa de Solos do Brasil, escala 1:5,000,000. Servic¸o Nacional de Levantamento e Conservac¸ ˜ao de Solos, Rio de Janeiro.

Gomez, C., Delacourt, C., Allemand, P., Ledru, P., Wackerle, R., 2004. Using ASTER remote sensing data set for geological mapping, in Namibia. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 30, 97–108.

Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J., 2001. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference and Prediction. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York.

Huete, A., Justice, C., Liu, H., 1994. Development of vegetation and soil indices for MODIS-EOS.

Remote Sensing of Environment 49, 224–234.

Lark, R.M., Cullis, B.R., Welham, S.J., 2006. On spatial prediction of soil properties in the pres-ence of a spatial trend: The empirical best linear unbiased predictor (E-BLUP) with REML.

European Journal of Soil Science 57, 787–799.

Lark. R.M., Webster, R., Bishop, T.F.A., 2007. Using expert knowledge with control of false dis-covery rate to select regressors for prediction of soil properties. Geoderma 138, 65–78.

Li, J.H., Chen, W.J., 2005. A rule-based method for mapping Canada’s wetlands using optical, radar and DEM data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 26, 5051–5069.

Madeira Netto, J.S., Robbez-Masson, J-M., Martins, E., 2007. Visible–Nir hyperspectral imagery for discriminating soil types in the La Peyne watershed (France). In: Lagacherie, P., McBratney, A.B., Voltz, M. (Eds.), Developments in Soil Science 31. Digital Soil Mapping: An Introductory Perspective. pp. 225–240. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

30 B. Minasny et al.

Maindonald, J., 1999. An inquiry into data mining. The New Zealand Statistical Association Conference, Victoria University of Wellington, 4–7 July 1999. http://www.maths.anu.edu.au/

∼johnm/dm/dmpaper.html

McBratney, A.B., Mendonc¸a-Santos, M.L., Minasny, B., 2003. On digital soil mapping. Geoderma 117, 3–52.

McKenzie, N.J., Ryan, P.J., 1999. Spatial prediction of soil properties using environmental corre-lation. Geoderma 89, 67–94.

Minasny, B., McBratney, A.B., 2006. A conditioned Latin hypercube method for sampling in the presence of ancillary information. Computers & Geosciences 32, 1378–1388.

Minasny, B., McBratney, A.B., 2007. Incorporating taxonomic distance into spatial prediction and digital mapping of soil classes. Geoderma 142, 285–293.

O’Day, P.A., 1999. Molecular environmental chemistry. Reviews of Geophysics 37, 249–274.

Odeh, I.O.A., McBratney, A.B., 2000. Using AVHRR images for spatial prediction of clay content in the lower Namoi valley of eastern Australia. Geoderma 97, 237–254.

Pachepsky, Y.A., Rawls, W.J. (Eds.), 2004. Development of Pedotransfer Functions in Soil Hydrol-ogy. Developments in Soil Science 30. Elsevier.

Palacios-Orueta, A., Ustin, S.L., 1996. Multivariate statistical classification of soil spectra. Remote Sensing of Environment 57, 108–118.

Selige, T., B¨ohner, J., Schmidhalter, U., 2006. High resolution topsoil mapping using hyperspectral image and field data in multivariate regression modeling procedures. Geoderma 136, 235–244.

Tsvetsinskaya, E.A., Schaaf, C.B., Gao, F., Strahler, A.H., Dickinson, R.E., Zeng, X., Lucht, W., 2002. Relating MODIS-derived surface albedo to soils and rock types over Northern Africa and the Arabian peninsula. Geophysical Research Letters 29, 1353, 10.1029/2001GL014096.

Verhoef, A., 2004. Remote estimation of thermal inertia and soil heat flux for bare soil Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 123, 221–236.

Viscarra Rossel, R.A., Walvoort, D.J.J., McBratney, A.B., Janik, L.J., Skjemstad, J.O., 2006. Visi-ble, near infrared, mid infrared or combined diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for simultaneous assessment of various soil properties. Geoderma 131, 59–75.

Viscarra Rossel, R.A., Taylor, H.J., McBratney, A.B., 2007. Multivariate calibration of hyper-spectral␥-ray energy spectra for proximal soil sensing. European Journal of Soil Science 58, 343–353.

Waiser, T.H., Morgan, C.L.S., Brown, D.J., Hallmark, C.T., 2007. In situ characterization of soil clay content with visible near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. Soil Science Society of America Journal 71, 389–396.

Wang, N., Zhang, N., Wang, M., 2006. Wireless sensors in agriculture and food industry – Recent development and future perspective. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 50, 1–14.

Webster, R., Heuvelink, G.B.M., 2006. The Kalman filter for the pedologist’s tool kit. European Journal of Soil Science 57, 758–773.

Wilford, J.R., Bierwirth, P.N., Craig, M.A., 1997. Application of airborne gamma-ray spectrometry in soil/regolith mapping and applied geomorphology. AGSO Journal of Australian Geology &

Geophysics 17, 201–216.

Wong, M.T.F., Harper, R.J., 1999. Use of on-ground gamma-ray spectrometry to measure plant-available potassium and other topsoil attributes, Australian Journal of Soil Research, 37, 267–277.

Yamaguchi, Y. Kahle, A.B. Tsu, H. Kawakami, T. Pniel, M., 1998. Overview of Advanced Space-borne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER). IEEE Transactions on Geo-science and Remote Sensing 36, 1062–1071.

Chapter 3

A New Global Demand for Digital

Dalam dokumen Digital Soil Mapping with Limited Data (Halaman 49-52)