87
e-LKPD yang dikembangkan memuat IPK, tujuan pembelajaran, dan kegiatan pembelajaran yang sesuai dengan silabus dan RPP. Pengembangan e-LKPD menggunakan platform canva memfasilitasi peserta didik untuk menstimulus CPS dan numeracy skills. Masalah yang disajikan berupa grafik interaktif, video, artikel, dan simulasi bisa diakses langsung pada halaman yang sama.
Kebutuhan peserta didik dalam mengartikulasikan masalah, mengidentifikasi, brainstorming, menganalisis, memilih opsi, mengembangkan rencana, dan menetapkan rencana sesuai kebutuhan terfasilitasi dengan baik. e-Handout yang dikembangkan terdiri dari 1) e-Handout konseptual, 2) e-Handout investigasi, dan 3) e-Handout proyek. Tambahan atau melengkapi kegiatan pembelajaran yang termuat di dalam RPP dan e-LKPD. Program
pembelajaran dinyatakan valid dengan kategori sangat tinggi.
2. Program pembelajaran berbasis NOS praktis digunakan sebagai bahan ajar konsep pemanasan global pada peserta didik SMA kelas XI berdasarkan uji kepraktisan dengan keterlaksanaan program pembelajaran mendapat skor persentase 100%, uji keterbacaan mendapat skor persentase 98.08% dan uji kemenarikan mendapat skor persentase 97%.
3. Program pembelajaran berbasis NOS efektif digunakan sebagai bahan ajar untuk membangun CPS dan numeracy skills berdasarkan hasil uji beda, n gain, dan effect size. Keefektifan program pembelajaran berbasis NOS mendapat skor N gain sebesar 0.75 dengan effect size sebesar 0.811 dengan kategori tinggi serta sig. 0.000 < 0.05 yang menunjukkan adanya perbedaan rata-rata antar kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol.
5.2 Saran
Berdasarkan kesimpulan yang telah dibuat, peneliti memberikan saran sebagai berikut.
1. Peneliti maupun guru yang hendak mengadaptasi program pembelajaran berbasis NOS pada pembelajaran fisika diharapkan dapat mengalokasikan waktu dengan sebaik mungkin, untuk memaksimalkan complex problem solving dan numeracy skills.
2. Program pembelajaran berbasis NOS sebaiknya digunakan secara berkala, supaya peserta didik terbiasa sehingga output yang dihasilkan lebih maksimal.
3. Peneliti selanjutnya dapat mengembangkan bentuk media pembelajaran yang dapat diintegrasikan dalam program pembelajaran berbasis NOS, supaya dihasilkan produk yang lebih lengkap dengan harapan kemampuan yang dilatihkan lebih maksimal.
89
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Examining the sources for our understandings about science: Enduring conflations and critical issues in research on nature of science in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 353–374.
Akgun, S. (2020). How Do University Students Perceive the Nature of Science?
Science and Education, 29(2), 299–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00105-x
Akgun, S., & Kaya, E. (2020). How do university students perceive the nature of science? Science & Education, 29(2), 299–330.
Alatas, F., & Nurlela, A. (2015). Termodinamika 1. Jakarta: UIN Press.
Aldabbus, S. (2018). Project-based learning: Implementation & challenges.
International Journal of Education, Learning and Development, 6(3), 71–
79.
Alisir, Z. N., & Irez, S. (2020). The effect of replicating historical scientific apparatus on high school students’ attitudes towards science and their understanding of nature of science. Science & Education, 29(5), 1201–
1234.
Anderson, R. C., Spiro, R. J., & Anderson, M. C. (1978). Schemata as
Scaffolding for the Representation of Information in Connected Discourse.
American Educational Research Journal, 15(3), 433–440.
https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312015003433
Ardwiyanti, D., Jumadi, J., Puspitasari, H., & Rahayu, P. (2021).
Representations of Nature of Science in High School Physics Textbooks.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 17(1), 22–30.
Arikunto, S. (2011a). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Bumi Aksara.
Arikunto, S. (2011b). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Bumi Aksara.
Bodily, R., Ikahihifo, T. K., Mackley, B., & Graham, C. R. (2018). The design, development, and implementation of student-facing learning analytics dashboards. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30, 572–598.
Arikunto, S. (2021). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan edisi 3. Bumi Aksara.
Askew, M. (2015). Numeracy for the 21st century: a commentary. ZDM, 47(4), 707–712.
Barnes, M., & Cross, R. (2021). ‘Quality’at a cost: The politics of teacher education policy in Australia. Critical Studies in Education, 62(4), 455–
470.
Beatty, I. (2013). Improving physics instruction by analyzing video games. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1513, pp. 70–73).
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4789654Boersema, D. (2020). Using Real and Imaginary Cases to Communicate Aspects of Nature of Science. In Nature of Science in Science Instruction (pp. 283–294). Springer.
Bouman, T., Verschoor, M., Albers, C. J., Böhm, G., Fisher, S. D., Poortinga, W., Whitmarsh, L., & Steg, L. (2020). When worry about climate change leads to climate action: How values, worry and personal responsibility relate to various climate actions. Global Environmental Change, 62, 102061.
Brunner, J. L., & Abd‐El‐Khalick, F. (2020). Improving nature of science instruction in elementary classes with modified science trade books and educative curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(2), 154–183.
Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y.
(2021). 21st century skills development through inquiry-based learning from theory to practice. Springer.
Cofré, H., Núñez, P., Santibáñez, D., Pavez, J. M., Valencia, M., & Vergara, C.
(2019). A critical review of students’ and teachers’ understandings of nature of science. Science & Education, 28(3), 205–248.
Collins, J., Hammond, M., & Wellington, J. (2002). Teaching and learning with multimedia. Routledge.
Cunningham, W. P., & Cunningham, M. A. (2010). Environmental Science A Global Concern (Eleventh). Mc Graw Hill Companies.
di Salvo, V. S. (1980). A summary of current research identifying communication skills in various organizational contexts.
91
Dörner, D., & Funke, J. (2017). Complex problem solving: What it is and what it is not. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1153.
Dörner, D., & Kreuzig, H. W. (1983). Problemlösefähigkeit und Intelligenz.
Psychologische Rundschau.
Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science.
Eichmann, B., Goldhammer, F., Greiff, S., Pucite, L., & Naumann, J. (2019).
The role of planning in complex problem solving. Computers & Education, 128, 1–12.
Eisinga, R., Grotenhuis, M. te, & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?. International Journal of Public Health, 58, 637–642.
El Kharki, K., Berrada, K., & Burgos, D. (2021). Design and implementation of a virtual laboratory for physics subjects in Moroccan universities.
Sustainability, 13(7), 3711.
Erduran, S., Dagher, Z. R., & McDonald, C. v. (2019). Contributions of the family resemblance approach to nature of science in science education.
Science & Education, 28(3), 311–328.
Eseryel, D., Ifenthaler, D., & Ge, X. (2013). Towards innovation in complex problem solving research: An introduction to the special issue. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(3), 359–363.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9299-0
Fahrurrozi, M., & Mohzana, Z. (2020). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Tinjauan Teoretis dan Praktik.
Farida Yusuf, T. (2000). Evaluasi Program. Rineka Cipta, Yogyakarta.
Fenanlampir, A., Batlolona, J. R., & Imelda, I. (2019). The struggle of Indonesian students in the context of TIMSS and PISA has not ended.
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(2), 393–
406.
Festiyed, F., & Murtiani, M. (2019). Pembuatan lembar kerja peserta didik berbasis accelerated learning pada materi usaha, pesawat sederhana,
struktur dan fungsi tumbuhan untuk peserta didik SMP kelas VIII. Pillar of Physics Education, 12(3).
Field, A. (2009). Discopering Statistics Using SPSS, Thrid Edition.
Forgasz, H. J., & Hall, J. (2019). Learning about numeracy: The impact of a compulsory unit on pre-service teachers’ understandings and beliefs.
Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(2), 15–33.
Fox, N. (2009). Using interviews in a research project. The NIHR RDS for the East Midlands/Yorkshire & the Humber, 26.
Gal, I., Grotlüschen, A., Tout, D., & Kaiser, G. (2020). Numeracy, adult education, and vulnerable adults: a critical view of a neglected field. Zdm, 52(3), 377–394.
Galili, I. (2019). Towards a Refined Depiction of Nature of Science:
Applications to Physics Education. Science and Education, 28(3), 503–537.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00042-4
Gao, C., Tao, S., He, Y., Su, B., Sun, M., & Mensah, I. A. (2021). Effect of population migration on spatial carbon emission transfers in China. Energy Policy, 156, 112450.
Geiger, V., Goos, M., & Forgasz, H. (2015). A rich interpretation of numeracy for the 21st century: A survey of the state of the field. ZDM, 47(4), 531–
548.
Griffin, E. M. (2006). A first look at communication theory. McGraw-hill.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.
Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores” dalam www. physycs.
indiana. edu/~ sdi. AnalysingChange-Gain. Pdf.
Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., &
Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): a framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25–41.
Hernawan, A. H., Permasih, H., & Dewi, L. (2012). Pengembangan bahan ajar.
Direktorat UPI, Bandung, 4(11), 1–13.
Höttecke, D., & Allchin, D. (2020). Reconceptualizing nature‐of‐science education in the age of social media. Science Education, 104(4), 641–666.
Houghton, J. (2009). Global warming: the complete briefing. Cambridge university press.
93
Kemendikbud. (2016). Silabus Mata Pelajaran Sekolah Menengah Atas/Madrasah Aliyah (SMA/MA). Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Khishfe, R. (2014). Explicit Nature of Science and Argumentation Instruction in the Context of Socioscientific Issues: An effect on student learning and transfer. International Journal of Science Education, 36(6), 974–1016.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.832004
Khishfe, R., Alshaya, F. S., BouJaoude, S., Mansour, N., & Alrudiyan, K. I.
(2017). Students’ understandings of nature of science and their arguments in the context of four socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 39(3), 299–334.
Kivunja, C. (2015). Teaching students to learn and to work well with 21st century skills: Unpacking the career and life skills domain of the new learning paradigm. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(1), 1–11.
Kosasih, E. (2021). Pengembangan bahan ajar. Bumi Aksara.
Kurup, P. M., Levinson, R., & Li, X. (2021). Informed-decision regarding global warming and climate change among high school students in the United Kingdom. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 21(1), 166–185.
Lederman, N. G. (2019). Contextualizing the relationship between nature of scientific knowledge and scientific inquiry. Science & Education, 28(3), 249–267.
Lehnert, M., Fiedor, D., Frajer, J., Hercik, J., & Jurek, M. (2020). Czech students and mitigation of global warming: Beliefs and willingness to take action. Environmental Education Research, 26(6), 864–889.
Lundy, A. D., & Stephens, A. E. (2015). Beyond the literal: Teaching visual literacy in the 21st century classroom. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1057–1060.
Luschei, T. F. (2017). 20 Years of TIMSS: Lessons for Indonesia. | IRJE|
Indonesian Research Journal in Education|, 6–17.
Lüssenhop, M., & Kaiser, G. (2020). Refugees and numeracy: what can we learn from international large-scale assessments, especially from TIMSS? ZDM, 52(3), 541–555.
Malik, R. S. (2018). Educational challenges in 21st century and sustainable development. Journal of Sustainable Development Education and Research, 2(1), 9–20.
Mayer, R. E. (1999). based principles for the design of instructional messages:
The case of multimedia explanations. Document Design, 1(1), 7–19.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 107–119.
McDavid, J. C., Huse, I., & Hawthorn, L. R. L. (2018). Program evaluation and performance measurement: An introduction to practice. Sage Publications.
Megahed, N., & Osman, G. (2020). Examining 21st Century Student Outcomes in Teacher Education Programmes in Higher Education Reform in Egypt.
In Social and Emotional Learning in the Mediterranean (pp. 130–150).
Brill Sense.
Mullis, I. V. S., International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement., TIMMS & PIRLS International Study Center., & Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study. (2009). TIMSS advanced 2011 assessment frameworks. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
Mutasam, U., Ibrohim, I., & Susilo, H. (2021). Penerapan Pembelajaran Sains Berbasis Inquiry Based Learning Terintegrasi Nature of Science Terhadap Literasi Sains. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 5(10), 1467–1472.
Newman, M. J. (2005a). Problem based learning: an introduction and overview of the key features of the approach. Journal of Veterinary Medical
Education, 32(1), 12–20.
Newman, M. J. (2005b). Problem Based Learning: An introduction and overview of the key features of the approach. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 32(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.32.1.12
Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training, 125–135.
Nkomo, M. (2000). The national qualifications framework and curriculum development. Pretoria: South African Qualification Authorities.
Nukusheva, A., Ilyassova, G., Rustembekova, D., Zhamiyeva, R., & Arenova, L.
(2021). Global warming problem faced by the international community:
International legal aspect. International Environmental Agreements:
Politics, Law and Economics, 21(2), 219–233.
OECD. (2015). Results in Focus PISA 2015. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 insights and interpretations. In OECD Publishing.
95
Patel, N., Baker, S. G., & Scherer, L. D. (2019). Evaluating the cognitive reflection test as a measure of intuition/reflection, numeracy, and insight problem solving, and the implications for understanding real-world judgments and beliefs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(12), 2129.
Prabavathi, R., & Nagasubramani, P. C. (2018). Effective oral and written communication. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 3(S1), 29.
https://doi.org/10.21839/jaar.2018.v3is1.164
Prabawati, M. N., Herman, T., & Turmudi, T. (2019). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa Berbasis Masalah dengan Strategi Heuristic untuk
Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematis. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 37–48.
Pribadi, B. A. (2009). Desain sistem pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Dian Rakyat.
Purnamasari, A., Karoma, K., Bukhori, K. A., & Sairi, A. P. (2020). Analisis Persepsi Peserta Didik Terhadap Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Pembelajaran Fisika SMA Negeri 8 Palembang. Jurnal Ilmu Fisika Dan
Pembelajarannya (JIFP), 4(1), 6–15.
Rahayu, C., & Festiyed, F. (2019). Validitas perangkat pembelajaran fisika SMA berbasis model pembelajaran generatif dengan pendekatan open-ended problem untuk menstimulus keterampilan berpikir kritis peserta didik. JPF (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika) Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, 7(1), 1–6.
Ramadhani, R., Masrul, M., Nofriansyah, D., Abi Hamid, M., Sudarsana, I. K., Sahri, S., Simarmata, J., Safitri, M., & Suhelayanti, S. (2020). Belajar dan pembelajaran: konsep dan pengembangan. Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Ratumanan, T. G., & Laurens, T. (2011). Penilaian hasil belajar pada tingkat satuan pendidikan. Surabaya: Unesa.
Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of shapiro-wilk, kolmogorov-smirnov, lilliefors and anderson-darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21–33.
Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Nelson, W. A. (2007). Develomental Research:
Studies of Instructional Design and Development. Handbook of Research for Educational Communication and Technology. New York: MacMillan Simon & Schuster.
Riemer, M. J. (2007). Communication skills for the 21st century engineer.
Global J. of Engng. Educ, 11(1), 89–100.
Rohendi, D. (2019). Game-Based Multimedia for Horizontal Numeracy Learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(15).
Safitri, R., Haryanto, H., & Harizon, H. (2021). Development of PBL-STEM-based E-LKPD to improve students’ science literacy skills on reaction rate materials. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 13(2), 113–129.
Sarikhani, R., Salari, M., & Mansouri, V. (2016). The Impact Of E-Learning On University Students’academic Achievement And Creativity. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 8(1).
Schizas, D. (2016). Nature of Science or Nature of the Sciences? Science Education, 100(4), 706–733. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21216
Schmid, C. (2003). Energiequerschnittstechniken-Einsparpotentiale, Hemmnisse und Massnahmen zu ihrer Erschliessung. VDI-Berichte, 21–35.
Sejati, K. (2011). Global warming, food, and water: problems, solutions, and the changes of world geopolitical constellation. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Seyedmehdi, S. M., Yazdanparast, T., Salehpour, S., Masjedi, M. R., Boyes, E., Stanisstreet, M., & Attarchi, M. (2013). Original Report Global Warming:
Knowledge and Views of Iranian Students. In Acta Medica Iranica (Vol.
51, Issue 3).
Shields, R. (2019). The sustainability of international higher education: Student mobility and global climate change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 594–602.
Soliman, N. A. (2014). Using e-learning to develop EFL students’ language skills and activate their independent learning. Creative Education, 2014.
Stadermann, H. K. E. (2020). Secondary school students’ views of nature of science in quantum physics. International Journal of Science Education, 42(6), 997–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1745926
Sudjana. (2005a). Metode Statistik(6th Ed.). PT. Tarsito.
Sudjana. (2005b). Metode Statistik(6th Ed.). PT. Tarsito.
Sudjana, N. (2005c). Metode statistika. Bandung: Tarsito, 168.
Thomann, E., Trein, P., & Maggetti, M. (2019). What’s the problem? Multilevel governance and problem‐solving. European Policy Analysis, 5(1), 37–57.
97
Vincent-Ruz, P., & Schunn, C. D. (2018). The nature of science identity and its role as the driver of student choices. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–12.
Vojíř, K., & Rusek, M. (2019). Science education textbook research trends: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Science Education, 41(11), 1496–1516.
Wardhana, W. A. (2010). Dampak Pemanasan Global: Bencana Mengancam Umat Manusia. Sebab, Akibat Dan Usaha Penanggulangannya, Andi, Yogyakarta.
Weisberg, D. S., Landrum, A. R., Hamilton, J., & Weisberg, M. (2021).
Knowledge about the nature of science increases public acceptance of science regardless of identity factors. Public Understanding of Science, 30(2), 120–138.
Weise, J. J., Greiff, S., & Sparfeldt, J. R. (2020). The moderating effect of prior knowledge on the relationship between intelligence and complex problem solving–testing the Elshout-Raaheim hypothesis. Intelligence, 83, 101502.
Widiawati, L., Joyoatmojo, S., & Sudiyanto, S. (2018). Higher order thinking skills as effect of problem based learning in the 21st century learning.
International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 5(3), 96–105.
Wisdom, J., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Mixed methods: integrating quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis while studying patient-centered medical home models. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Yacoubian, H. (2018). Argumentation, critical thinking, nature of science and socioscientific issues: a dialogue between two researchers. International Journal of Science Education, 40(7), 796–807.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1449986
Yuenyong, C. (2020). Developing a tool to assess students’ views of nature of science in vietnam. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1), 135–145.
https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i1.22043
Yulando, S., Sutopo, S., & Franklin Chi, T. (2019). Electronic Module Design and Development: An Interactive Learning. American Journal of
Educational Research, 7(10), 694–698.
Yulia, S. R., Pratiwi, Y., & Ramli, R. (2021). Validity of physics e-handouts based on the STEM approach to improve students’ knowledge competency.
Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1876(1), 012035.