Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) perkara No. 26/KPPU-L/2007 sehubungan dengan adanya dugaan pelanggaran Pasal 5 Undang-undang No. 5 tahun 1999 (UU No. 5/1999) tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat mengenai penetapan tarif pesan singkat (SMS), yaitu sebagai berikut:
a. The Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition (KPPU) had issued decision No. 26/KPPU-L/2007 in relation to the alleged violations of the Law No. 5 year 1999 act. 5 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business in determination of the short message service (SMS) tariff, for the following:
- Bahwa KPPU telah memberikan laporan Pemeriksaan Perkara
No. 26/KPPU-L/2007, yang
menyimpulkan PT Mobile-8 Telecom Tbk terbukti melanggar pasal 5 UU No. 5/1999.
- KPPU had given the investigation report case No. 26/KPPU-L/2007, which concluded that PT Mobile-8 Telecom Tbk has proven to violate the Law No. 5 year 1999 act 5.
- Bahwa selanjutnya, pada tanggal 18 Juni 2008, perkara aquo telah diputus oleh KPPU, dengan putusan yaitu:
- PT Mobile-8 Telecom Tbk terbukti melanggar pasal 5 Undang-undang No 5 tahun 1999.
- Furthermore, on June 18, 2008, the aquo case has been decided by KPPU, with decision:
- PT Mobile-8 Telecom Tbk proved violating the Law No. 5 year 1999 act 5.
- PT Mobile-8 Telecom Tbk dikenakan denda sebesar Rp 5.000.000.000 dan dituduh
mengakibatkan kerugian
konsumen periode tahun 2004 sampai dengan 2007 sebesar Rp 52.300.000.000.
- PT Mobile-8 Telecom Tbk was fined to pay Rp 5,000,000,000 and being suspected of creating customers loss for the years 2004 to 2007 amounting to Rp 52,300,000,000.
Perusahaan telah mengajukan keberatan terhadap putusan KPPU tersebut yang terdaftar dalam register perkara No. 03/KPPU/2008/PN.JKT.PST dan sampai dengan tanggal penyelesaian laporan keuangan ini, Perusahaan masih menunggu proses persidangan lebih lanjut.
The Company filed an objection on such decision with case registration No. 03/KPPU/2008/PN.JKT.PST and as of the date of completion of the consolidated financial statements, the Company is still waiting for further court process.
b. Pada tanggal 14 Juni 2011, Perusahaan telah memenangkan gugatan di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara terhadap tagihan kekurangan pembayaran BHP ISR dan BHP pita frekuensi tahun pertama dari Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika (Kemenkominfo).
b. On June 14, 2011, the Company has won the lawsuits at Administrative Court against under payment of BHP ISR and BHP frequency band for the first year filed by Minister of Communication and Information Technology (Kemenkominfo).
Kemenkominfo telah melakukan upaya banding terhadap keputusan PTUN tersebut. Pengadilan Tinggi TUN, melalui Putusan tertanggal 5 Desember 2011, menguatkan putusan PTUN. Pada tanggal 20 Januari 2012, Kemenkominfo mengajukan permohonan kasasi ke Mahkamah Agung.
The Minister of Communication and Information Technology submitted an appeal on the Administrative court decision. The High Court of Justice, through a verdict dated December 5, 2011, uphold the Administrative court decision. On January 20, 2012, Minister of Communication and Information Technology filed a cassation to the Supreme Court.
Mahkamah Agung telah menolak permohonan kasasi dari Kemenkominfo. Salinan Keputusan Kasasi di MA telah dikirimkan oleh PTUN pada tanggal 6 September 2013.
The Supreme Court has rejected the cassation filed by Minister of Communication and Information Technology. Copy of the Supreme Court decision has been delivered by Administrative Court on September 6, 2013.
Pada tanggal 4 Nopember 2011, Perusahaan mengajukan gugatan baru terhadap keputusan Kemenkominfo tentang penetapan besaran dan waktu pembayaran BHP pita frekuensi tahun kedua. Pada tanggal 22 Pebruari 2012, PTUN telah mengeluarkan salinan putusan yang mengabulkan seluruh gugatan, menunda pelaksanaan keputusan kemenkominfo sampai ada putusan berkekuatan hukum tetap, membatalkan objek gugatan dan memerintahkan Kemenkominfo mencabut objek gugatan dan menerbitkan kepmen baru.
On November 4, 2011, the Company filed a new lawsuit against the decision from Minister of Communication and Information Technology on determination of the amount and timing of BHP frequency band payment for the second year. On 22 February 2012, the Administration court issued a copy of a verdict in which granting all the lawsuits, delaying the execution of the decision from Minister of Communication and Information Technology until there is an incracht
verdict, aborting the object of the lawsuits and ordering Minister of Communication and Information Technology to repeal the object of the lawsuits and issue the new ministerial decree.
Pada tanggal 25 April 2012, Kemenkominfo
mengajukan keberatan dengan
mengajukan banding kepada Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara.
On April 25, 2012, The Minister of Communication and Information Technology submitted an appeal to the State Administrative High Court.
Pada tanggal 10 Juli 2012, Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara mengeluarkan keputusan yang menguatkan keputusan PTUN. Atas putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara ini Kemenkominfo tidak mengajukan Kasasi ke Mahkamah Agung, sehingga Putusan ini telah menjadi keputusan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap.
On July 10, 2012, the State Administrative High Court issue a decision in which strengthening the Administrative Court decision. Upon this State Administrative High Court’s decision, Minister of Communication and Information Technology did not submit the cassation to the Supreme Court which made this decision became an incracht verdict. Pada tanggal 6 Desember 2012,
Perusahaan mengajukan gugatan baru di PTUN terhadap penetapan Kemenkominfo tentang besaran dan waktu pembayaran BHP pita frekuensi tahun ketiga. Pada tanggal 11 Desember 2012, PTUN telah mengeluarkan salinan penetapan yang mengabulkan seluruh gugatan, menunda pelaksanaan keputusan Kemenkominfo sampai ada putusan berkekuatan hukum tetap.
On December 6, 2012, the Company filed a new lawsuit the State Administrative High Court against the determination of the amount and timing by the Minister of Communication and Information Technology of payment for cost of frequency spectrum usage (BHP) in the third year of implementation of the frequency band. On December 11, 2012, the State Administrative High Court has approved all the case/claim, delay execution of Minister of Communication and Information Technology decision. Pada tanggal 5 Maret 2013, Kemenkominfo
mengajukan banding ke Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara.
On March 5, 2013, The Ministry of Communication and Information Technology submitted an appeal to the State Administrative High Court.
Pada tanggal 26 Agustus 2013, Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara mengeluarkan keputusan yang menguatkan keputusan PTUN.
On August 26, 2013, the State Administrative High Court issued a decision concurring with the Administrative Court Decision.
Mematuhi keputusan-keputusan Kasasi MA dan Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara terhadap gugatan-gugatan yang dimenangkan oleh perusahaan, pada tanggal 6 November 2013 Kemenkominfo telah menerbitkan empat Kepmen mengenai tagihan BHP pita frekuensi tahun pertama, tahun kedua, tahun ketiga dan tahun keempat. Perusahaan telah melunasi tagihan BHP Pita Frekuensi sesuai dengan Kepmen tersebut. Sebagai hasil dari pembayaran BHP frekuensi ini, Perusahaan telah mendapatkan sertifikat izin pita spektrum frekuensi radio dari Kemenkominfo.
Comply with cassation decisions of the Supreme Court and the State Administrative High Court against claims that won by the Company, on November 6, 2013 Ministry of Communication and Information has published four ministerial Decree regarding the first year, second year, third year, fourth year frequency spectrum usage bills. The Company has paid the frequency spectrum usage bills in accordance with the ministerial Decree. As result of this payment, the Company obtained frequency spectrum license from Kemenkominfo.
c. Smartel, Entitas anak telah mengupayakan peninjauan kembali atas pengenaan Biaya Hak Penggunaan (BHP) spektrum frekuensi oleh Kemenkominfo. Hal ini terkait dengan perbedaan interpretasi penerapan Peraturan Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika karena alokasi pita frekuensi yang dimiliki Smartel tidak secara jelas tercakup dalam peraturan tersebut.
c. Smartel, a subsidiary, has requested to conduct review on charging of cost of frequency spectrum usage (BHP) by the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology. This is in relation to a different interpretation of the implementation of the Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology for the allocation of frequency bands in which Smartel is not clearly covered by this regulation.
Smartel telah mengajukan gugatan melalui PTUN atas masalah ini. Pada tanggal 27 Desember 2011, PTUN telah mengeluarkan salinan putusan yang
mengabulkan seluruh gugatan,
membatalkan objek gugatan dan memerintahkan Kemenkominfo mencabut objek gugatan. Kemenkominfo mengajukan banding ke Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara pada tanggal 5 Januari 2012.
Smartel filed lawsuits through Administrative court decision on this matter. On December 27, 2011, the Administration court issued a copy of a verdict in which granting all the lawsuits, aborting the object of the lawsuits and ordering Minister of Communication and Information Technology to repeal the object of the lawsuits. The Minister of Communication and Information Technology Submitted an appeal to the State Administrative High Court on January 5, 2012.
Pada tanggal 16 Mei 2012, Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara menolak banding dari Kemenkominfo, dan memutuskan menguatkan keputusan PTUN.
On May 16, 2012, the State Administrative High Court rejected the appeal and strengthening the Administrative Court decision.
Pada tanggal 20 Juli 2012, Kemenkominfo mengajukan permohonan kasasi ke Mahkamah Agung. Pada tanggal 6 Agustus 2012, Smartel memasukkan kontra memori kasasi ke Mahkamah Agung melalui PTUN.
On July 20, 2012, the Minister of Communication and Information Technology filed a cessation to the Supreme Court. On August 6, 2012, Smartel submitted contra of memory cassation to Supreme Court through the Administration Court.
Pada tanggal 6 Mei 2014, Mahkamah Agung menolak permohonan kasasi dari Kemenkominfo. Dengan demikian putusan PTUN telah menjadi Ketetapan Hukum (putusan hukum tetap). Namun demikian proses pelaksanaan Ketetapan Hukum tersebut sampai dengan akhir September 2014 ini belum bisa dilaksanakan, mengingat perlu dibuatnya peraturan baru oleh Kemenkominfo untuk menetapkan besarnya BHP frekuensi yang harus dibayarkan oleh Smartel.
On May 6, 2014, the Supreme Court has rejected the cassation filed by Minister of Communication and Information Technology. Therefore, the Administrative Court decision become an inchracht verdict. However, implementation of Administrative Court decision is not yet implemented till end of September 2014, due to the necessity of Minister of Communication and Information Technology to set out new regulation for determining the cost of frequency spectrum usage (BHP) that should be paid by Smartel.
46. Kelangsungan Usaha 46. Going Concern