MCOM 1.666.388 1.419.627 MCOM MKAP 376.681 340.144 MKAP
25 November 2013 di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat
permohonan Peninjauan Kembali kepada Mahkamah Agung. Sebagaimana informasi yang diperoleh dari website resmi Mahkamah Agung, Mahkamah Agung telah mengeluarkan putusan terkait perkara ini dengan Putusan No. 64/PK/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2015, tanggal 2 September 2015 yang pada intinya menolak permohohan Peninjauan Kembali yang diajukan oleh MCOM. Sampai dengan saat ini, MCOM belum menerima Salinan resmi atas putusan tersebut.
In this case, MCOM (Plaintiff) filed for cancellation lawsuit on the award of the ICC International Court of Arbitration No. 16772.CYK through the Central Jakarta District Court against KT Corporation (Defendant). The Supreme Court has issued a ruling that essentially upheld the verdict of the Central Jakarta District Court which in favour of KTC Corporation. Therefore, MCOM filed a Reconsideration to the Supreme Court. As the information obtained from the official website of the Supreme Court, that the Supreme Court has passed a decission on
this matter through Decision
No. 64/PK/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2015 dated September 2, 2015 that contains the decision which essentially rejected the request for Reconsideration filed by MCOM. Up to now, MCOM have not received an official copy of the aforesaid decision.
i. Gugatan Perkara Perdata No. 534/PDT.G/2013/PN.JKT.PST tertanggal
25 November 2013 di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat
i. Civil Case Lawsuit
No. 534/PDT.G/2013/PN.JKT.PST dated November 25, 2013 at the Central Jakarta District Court
Pada perkara ini, MCOM (Penggugat) mengajukan gugatan pembatalan putusan arbitrase Internasional ICC International Court
of Arbitration No. 18062/VRO melalui
Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat terhadap
Qualcomm Incorporated (Tergugat).
In this case, MCOM (Plaintiff) filed for cancellation lawsuit on the award of the ICC International Court of International Arbitration No. 18062/VRO through the Central Jakarta District Court against Qualcomm Incorporated (Defendant).
Pada pokoknya MCOM mengajukan gugatan tehadap Qualcomm mengenai pelaksanaan
Put and Call Option Agreement tertanggal
9 Juni 2006 (“Objek Sengketa”). Pada tanggal 22 April 2015, Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat telah mengeluarkan putusan yang pada intinya menolak gugatan yang diajukan oleh MCOM dan untuk itu MCOM telah mengajukan banding ke Mahkamah Agung. Sampai dengan penerbitan laporan keuangan konsolidasian ini, kasus masih dalam proses pemeriksaan di Mahkamah Agung.
Substantially, MCOM filed the lawsuit against Qualcomm regarding the performance of the Put and Call Option Agreement dated June 9, 2006 ("Object Dispute"). On April 22, 2015 the Central Jakarta District Court has passed a decision on this matter that essentially rejected the lawsuit filed by MCOM and for that MCOM has appealed to the Supreme
Court. Until the issuance of these
consolidated financial statements, the case is currently in the process of examination at the Supreme Court.
Sebagaimana informasi yang diperoleh dari website resmi Mahkamah Agung, Mahkamah Agung telah mengeluarkan putusan terkait perkara ini dengan Putusan No. 49 B/Pdt.Sus- Arbt/2016, tanggal 12 Mei 2016, yang pada intinya menolak permohohan Kasasi yang diajukan oleh MCOM. Sampai dengan saat ini, kami belum menerima salinan resmi atas putusan tersebut.
As the information obtained from the official website of the Supreme Court, that the Supreme Court has passed a decission on this matter with Decision No. 49 B/Pdt.Sus- Arbt/2016, dated May 12 2016, and contains the decision that essentially rejected the request for Cassation Appeal filed by MCOM. Up to now, we have not received an official copy of the aforesaid decision.
j. Gugatan Hak Cipta No. 08/HKI.Hak
Cipta/2015/PN/NIAGA/SBY j. Copyrights Case Lawsuit No. 08/HKI.Hak Cipta/2015/PN/NIAGA/SBY
Pada tanggal 12 Oktober 2015 MNCSV dalam hal ini diwakili oleh kuasa hukum dari kantor advocat dan penasehat hukum HSAP & Rekan, mengajukan gugatan hukum pelanggaran Hak Cipta dan ganti kerugian terhadap Joko Sutanto (tergugat I), PT. Plus Media (tergugat II) dengan Surat No. 08/HKI.Hak Cipta/2015/PN/NIAGA/SBY atas tindakan dari tergugat I dan tergugat II yaitu tanpa izin dengan itikad tidak baik dan melawan hukum telah menyiarkan dan/atau mendistribusikan siaran – siaran Indovision milik penggugat selaku pemegang hak siar.
On October 12, 2015, MNCSV which is represented by attorney HSAP & Rekan, advocates and legal advisors, filed lawsuits concerning copyrights violations and compensation against Joko Sutanto (Defendant I) and PT. Plus Media (Defendant
II) with Letter No. 08/HKI.Hak
Cipta/2015/PN/NIAGA/SBY because of the Defendants in bad faith and with the unlawful act have been broadcasting without permission and/or distributing the Indovision channel which is property of the Company as the rights holders.
Pada tanggal 6 April 2016, Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya telah mengeluarkan putusan yang menghukum tergugat untuk mengganti kerugian MNCSV sebesar Rp. 4.452.230.000 secara tunai dan sekaligus.
On April 6, 2016 Surabaya District Court has issued a ruling that sentenced the defendant to indemnify MNCSV in amount of Rp. 4.5 billion in cash and at once.
k. Arbitrase SIAC, Arbitrase No. 247/2015 k. SIAC Arbitration, Arbitration No. 247/2015
Blutether Limited (Pemohon) mengajukan gugatan kepada MNCSV (Termohon), terkait
Sale and Purchase Agreement tanggal 23
September 2014, mengenai penjualan modul yang memungkinkan set top box untuk mengakses internet dan server dari costumer
service melalui telepon genggam konsumen.
B lutether Limited (Applicant) filed a lawsuit against MNCSV (Respondent), related to Sale and Purchase Agreement dated September 23, 2014, regarding the sale of modules that allow the set top box to access the server from the Internet and customer service by customer’s mobile phone.
Pada pokoknya Pemohon mengajukan
gugatan kepada MNCSV untuk membayar tagihan yang belum dibayarkan untuk
enginering service, expenses dan fee sebesar
USD. 274.807,17 (termasuk bunga), sebesar USD. 2.874.000 (tidak termasuk bunga) untuk pembelian 600.000 design 1 modul dan sebesar USD. 9.000.000 untuk 3.000.000 modul.
In essence, the Applicant filed a lawsuit against MNCSV to pay the unpaid bills for engineering services, expenses and fees of USD. 274,807.17 (including interest), amounting to USD. 2.874 million (excluding interest) for the purchase of 600,000 1 module design and USD. 9,000,000 of 3,000,000 modules.
Sampai dengan tanggal diterbitkannya laporan keuangan ini, gugatan ini masih diproses pada Arbitrase SIAC.
As of the date of issuance of these financial statements, the lawsuit was still being processed at SIAC Arbitration.
- 165 -