CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
B. Suggestions
CHAPTER V
Anggraini, D (2014). Correlation between Students’ Academic Self-efficacy and Their Engagement in Speaking English Class at SMA Sugar Group Lampung Tengah. (Published thesis).Retrieved from http://digilib.unila.ac.id/3694/14/CHAPTER%201.pdf
Anwar, D. I. A. (2010). Hubungan antara Self-efficacy dengan Kecemasan Berbicara di Depan Umum. (Published thesis). Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia.
Anyadubalu, C. (2010). Self-efficacy, anxiety, and performance in the English language among middle-school students in English language program in Satri Si Suriyothai, Bangkok. International Journal of Social Science, 5(3), 193-198. Retrieved from http://lib.dtc.ac.th/article/dtc/ 0035.pdf
Awaliyah, N. (2015). The Correlation Between Students’ Self-efficacy and Achievement at English Education Department of Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. (Published Thesis). Retrieved from http://thesis.umy.ac.id/datapublik/t52743.pdf
Bandura, A. (1994). Self‐efficacy. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge university press.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Second Edition. New York: Longman
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assesment:Principles and Classroom Practice. San Francisco: Pearson Education.
Bygate, M. (1987). Speaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Byrne, D. (1986). Teaching oral English: Longman handbooks for English teacher.
beliefs and English performance. Retrieved from http://www.ijllalw.org/ finalversion6437.pdf
Hamouda, A. (2012). An exploration of causes of Saudi students' reluctance to participate in the English language classroom. International Journal of English Language Education, 1(1), 1-34. Retrieved from http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijele/article/view/2652 , 21, 61-71. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu
/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.485.2420&rep=rep1&type=pdf Hornby, A. S., Cowie, A. P., & Lewis, J. W. (1974). Oxford advanced
learner's dictionary of current English (Vol. 4). London: Oxford University Press.
Khalidah, U. (2013). A study on the speaking ability of second year students of SMA N 2 SIAK HULU. (Published thesis). Retrieved from http://repository.unri.ac.id/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/2162/J URNAL%20Ummi%20Khalidah.pdf?sequence=1
Lestari, M. (2013). A Study on the Speaking Ability of the Second Year Students of MTS Darul Hikmah Pekanbaru. (Published thesis).
Retrieved from
http://repository.unri.ac.id/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/3923/
7.MELA%20LESTARI.pdf?sequence=1
Mazouzi, M. S. (2014). Analysis of Some Factors Affecting Learners‟ Oral Performance. Retrieved from http://dspace.univ-biskra.dz:8080/jspui /bitstream/123456789/4772/1/PEOPLE1.pdf
Murad Sani, A., & Zain, Z. (2011). Relating Adolescents' Second Language Reading Attitudes, Self Efficacy for Reading, and Reading Ability in a Non-Supportive ESL Setting. Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal,11(3).
and Heinle.
Rahimi, A., & Abedini, A. (2009). The interface between EFL learners' self-efficacy concerning listening comprehension and listening proficiency.Novitas-Royal, 3(1), 14-28. Retrieved from http://pegem.net /dosyalar/dokuman/124476-20110815121542-2.pdf Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking. Cambridge
University Press.
Sadighi, F., Alavi, S., & Samani, S. Journal of Social Sciences &Humanities of Shiraz University.
Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and Academic Motivation. Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), 207-231.
47
1. Researcher introduces himself to students and explain about his research.
2. Researcher asks the students to come in front of class one by one.
3. Researcher gave them a speaking performance about a story of themself , their vision and mission.
a. Students explain about themself (name, address, hobby)
b. Students explain about their vision and mission (what they do right now and what will they do for their future)
c. Students close their story with the wise words , eg. There is not a successfull without praying to Allah.
4. The researcher gave mark based on the Harris theory. The highest mark is 5 and the lowest is 1.
No Criteria Scale Description
1 Pronounciation 5 Has little foreign pronounciation 4 Clear enough to be understood
3 The pronounciation leads to misunderstanding
2 Very hard to understand. Must frequently be asked to repeat
1 Unclear ronounciation
2 Grammar 5 Makes only little error on grammar and word order
4 Occasionally makes errors and unclear meaning
3 Makes frequent errors of grammar and
word order
2 Grammar and word-order errors make comprehension difficult
1 Makes some errors in grammar which leads to unclear meaning
3 Vocabulary 5 Use of vocabulary and idioms like native speakers
4 Sometimes uses inappropriate terms 3 Frequently uses wrong words /
Inadequate vocabulary
2 Misuse of words and very limited vocabulary
1 Vocabulary limitations so extreme and imossible to make conversation
4 Fluency 5 No hesitation in speaking like the native speakers
4 Speed of speech seems to be slighty affected by language problems
3 Speed and fluency are rather strongly affected by language problems
2 Usually hesitant: often forced into silence
1 Speech is so halting (stop moving) and impossible to make conversation
5 Comprehension 5 Appears to understand everything without difficulty
4 Understand nearly everything at normal speed, although occasional reetition may be necessary
3 Understanding with slower than normal
speed with repetition
2 Has great difficulty following what is said and needs frequent repetition 1 Can not be said to understand even
simple conversational English (Harris, 2008)
Appendix 2
Self Efficacy Questionaire sheet Nama :
Kelas :
Petunjuk pengisian angket :
1. Bacalah setiap pernyataan dengan baik dan teliti.
2. Jawablah setiap pernyataan dengan sejujur-jujurnya sesuai dengan pendapat anda sendiri.
3. Berilah tanda ( √ ) pada salah satu pilihan yang menurut anda sesuai dengan diri anda.
Keterangan :
SS = Sangat Setuju TS = Tidak Setuju
S = Setuju STJ = Sangat Tidak Setuju
N = Netral/ragu-ragu
no Pernyataan SS S N TS STS
1
When I say a simple sentence, I can pronounce almost all words correctly
2
When I say a simple sentence, I can recite all words smoothly
3
I am sure that I will get good grades in the speaking category.
4 I mastered almost all the vocabulary given by the
lecture
5 I can say a sentence in the correct grammar
6 I am not afraid to make mistakes in speaking English.
7
I'm sure I can have
conversations in front of my classmates.
8 I can recite every vocabulary given by the teacher easily.
9
When I say a simple sentence, I can distinguish between verbs, nouns, adjectives, etc.
10
When the lecturer uses everyday conversation sentences to ask questions, I can answer them using English easily.
11
When the teacher instructs students to randomly make a sentence, I am the first person to do it
12
In my opinion, saying a sentence in English is not difficult..
13 I feel confident in my ability to learn English.
14 In my opinion, memorizing vocabulary is difficult, but
I'm sure I can do it.
15
I am not confident when I pronounce vocabulary in English
16
I feel confident when
answering questions from the lecturer in class
17
With the shortcomings that I have, I am pessimistic that I can do assignments from lecturers
18
Compared to other students, I am a weak student in English, especially speaking
(speaking).
19
I am not afraid to ask the teacher if there is something I do not understand or know 20 However I try, I'm not sure I
can speak English (Bandura, 2011)
Appendix 3
Result of Speaking scores and Self Eficacy Participants Speaking Scores
(X)
Self-efficacy Scores (Y)
Student 1 76 90
Student 2 80 98
Student 3 84 77
Student 4 84 77
Student 5 72 76
Student 6 60 72
Student 7 80 72
Student 8 84 90
Student 9 80 78
Student 10 80 81
Student 11 80 81
Student 12 72 71
Student 13 64 70
Student 14 72 85
Student 15 76 72
Student 16 84 86
Student 17 76 78
Student 18 60 62
Student 19 64 67
Student 20 84 76
Student 21 80 79
Student 22 84 82
Student 23 76 68
Student 24 80 79
Student 25 76 73
Student 26 80 75
Student 27 84 81
Student 28 72 79
Student 29 80 77
Student 30 76 82
Student 31 80 76
Student 32 84 89
Appendix 4
Result of speaking performance
No pronunciation grammar vocabulary fluency comprehension total skor
1 3 5 4 4 3 19 76
2 3 5 4 5 3 20 80
3 4 4 4 4 5 21 84
4 4 4 4 4 5 21 84
5 3 4 4 4 3 18 72
6 4 3 2 3 3 15 60
7 3 5 4 5 3 20 80
8 3 4 4 5 5 21 84
9 3 5 4 5 3 20 80
10 3 5 4 5 3 20 80
11 3 5 4 5 3 20 80
12 2 3 4 4 5 18 72
13 2 3 3 4 4 16 64
14 4 4 4 3 3 18 72
15 3 4 4 4 4 19 76
16 4 4 4 5 4 21 84
17 4 4 4 4 3 19 76
18 3 2 3 3 4 15 60
19 3 3 3 3 4 16 64
20 4 5 4 4 4 21 84
21 3 5 4 5 3 20 80
22 5 3 4 5 4 21 84
23 3 4 4 4 4 19 76
24 3 5 4 5 3 20 80
25 3 4 4 4 4 19 76
26 3 5 4 5 3 20 80
27 4 4 4 5 4 21 84
28 3 3 4 4 4 18 72
29 3 5 4 5 3 20 80
30 3 4 4 4 4 19 76
31 3 5 4 5 3 20 80
32 4 4 4 4 5 21 84
Appendix 5