CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD
G. Technique of Analyzing Data
While, the calculation of it was as follow:
rtt=
( )
rtt=
( )
rtt= rtt=
rtt=
From result of calculation above, the inter-rater reliability in this research was 0.589. Thus, it was categorized into high level.
1. If the probability (sig)> 0.05 H0 is accepted, it means the data is normally distributed.
2. If the probability (sig)< 0.05 Ha is accepted, it means the data is abnormally distributed.
After knowing the data is normally distributed, the researcher needed to use Independent Sample T-test analysis in order to know whether or not there is a significant difference on students’ speaking performance between extroverts and introverts with SPSS 23.00 version.
78 CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
A. Conclusion
This research was conducted to find out if there is a significant difference between extrovert and introvert students on their speaking performance at MTs Al-Mujtahadah.
Based on the finding of the research, it can be concluded that first, extrovert students’ speaking performance at MTs Al-Mujtahadah was at very good category. Second, introvert students’ speaking performance at MTs Al-Mujtahadah was at good category. Third, the result of the difference between extrovert and introvert students’ speaking performance the sig. (2-tailed) was 0.010. If sig (2-tailed) < 0.05 then Ha is accepted, it means there is a significant difference between two groups. Meanwhile if sig (2-tailed) > 0.05 then Ho is accepted, it means there is no significant difference between two groups. Persuant to the table IV.43, it can be seen that the sig (2-tailed) 0.010
< 0.05. It indicates Ha is accepted and H0 is rejected. So, it could be concluded that “There is a significant difference between extrovert and introvert students in speaking performance at MTs Al-Mujtahadah”.
B. Suggestion
Considering the difference between extrovert and introvert students on their speaking performance, the researcher would like to give some suggestion to:
1. The teacher
The researcher suggests considering the different type of students’
personality; extrovert and introvert. Extrovert and introvert students will have different way in receiving the knowledge. Moreover, the teacher can apply different method in teaching speaking which is not only focus to extrovert students who tend to be active in the class but also to introvert students who tend to be quiet.
2. The students (extrovert and introvert).
Since extrovert students are good in socializing, they should motivate and encourage their classmates, and they love working on teams.
For extrovert students, it is suggested that be fluently in your speaking.
Performing a good speaking does not mean using the fast speed. Most extrovert students speak with fast speed and they feel so confident. So, they should maintain it well with no over confidence and arrogance. It occasionally makes them fail. For introvert students, becoming an introvert is not bad, the students only need a right time to speak. They can become better over time, and even though they are nervous. They should extend their limitations step by step that can help them grow become more fluent when meeting new people. The introvert students must have better
confidence in improving their English speaking. Confidence is the subject matter of the introvert students who tend to rise in teaching learning process.
Ary, D et al. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Canada: Nelson Education, Ltd.
Aziz, R. A. (2010). Extraversion-Introversion and the Oral Performance of Koya University EFL Students. The department of Teaching English as a Foreign Language, Bilkent University
Brown, H. D. & Abeywickrama, P. (2019). Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices Third Edition. London: Pearson. 157.
Brown, H. D. (2000) Principles of Language Learning & Teaching 4th Edition.
San Fransisco State University: Pearson Education. 155
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy Second Edition. San Fransisco: Pearson ESL. 276.
Clarry Sada, et al. (2015). Analysis on The Relationship of Extrovert –Introvert Personality and Students Speaking Performance. Journal of teacher training and education English study program. Vol. 4, No. 3.
Cohen, Louis et al. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th ed.). London and New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th Edition). New Jersey : Pearson Education,inc.
Erton, “Relationship Personality Trait Language Learning Style and Succes in Language Learning Achievement”, H. U. Journal of Education, Vol. 2, No. 2 (April, 2010), 117.
Eysenck, H. (1998). Dimensions of Personality. New Brunswick and London:
Transaction Publishers. 56-57.
Eysenck, J.E.H. & Wilson, G. (1991). Know Your Own Personality. London:
Penguine Group.
Friedman, H. S. & Schustack, M. W. (2008). Kepribadian teori klasik dan riset modern jilid 1. Jakarta: Erlangga
Gay, L. R, Geoffrey E. Mills and Peter W. Airasian (2012). Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Applications. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Longman. 269.
Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Khatleen Bailey & David Nunan, Practical English Language Teaching (PELT):
Speaking, (London: McGraw-Hill, 2004), 2.
Marvin Carlson, Performance: A Critical Introduction Third Edition, (London &
New York: Routledge, 2018), 55.
Matthews, G., Ian J. Deary and Martha C. Whiteman, Personality Traits, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009) 369.
Misti, A. (2018). The Correlation between Students’ Speaking Anxiety and Their Speaking Performance at The Junior High School 3 Tambang. Studies in English language and education Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia.
Nunan, D. (1991). Language Teaching Methodology. Sydney: Prentice Hall. 39.
Nunan, D. (2015). Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages an Introduction. New York and London: Routledge. 54.
Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survival Manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPPS. Australia: Allen & Unwin.
Rebecca Hughes, Teaching and Researching Speaking Second Edition, (London:
Longman, 2011), 6.
Richards, J. C. And Schmidt, R. (2010). Dictionary of Language Teaching &
Applied Linguistics Fourth Edition. London: Pearson, 2010. 428
Richards, J. C., & Schimdt R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistic. London: Pearson Education.
Rofi’I, A. (2017). A Comparative Analysis on Extrovert and Introvert Students towards Their Speaking Performance. Department of Enflish Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Majalengka.
Vol. 8. No. 1.
Ronald Carter and David Nunan, The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Language, (Cambridge: University Press, 2001), 3.
No. 1.
Shapiro, S.S. and Wilk, M.B. (1965) An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples). Biometrika, 52, 591-611.
https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591
Suryabrata, S. (2008). Psikologi pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Wulandari, D. S. (2017). Educational Research: Extrovert And Introvert Students In Speaking Ability Of English Department At IAIN Palangka Raya.
Yan Chen, et al., (May 2015). A Survey Study: The Correlation between Introversion/Extroversion and Oral English Learning Outcome. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 6, No. 3 , p. 584.
Yan Zhang, “The Role of Personality in Second Language Acquisition”, Asian Socioal Science www.ccsenet.org/journal.html, Vol. 4, No. 5, (May, 2008), 58.
Zoltan Dornyei, The Psychology of The Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. (New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, 2005), 15.