Ç 0 FIG. 4
4.2.2 Southern Flinders Ranges
The "southern Fllnders canyon series"
(Fig.4.1) trends in
an east-southeasterly direction from
the
Waukarie Creek Canyon Complex andthe
Yarra88
FIGTJR,E 4.2
Extract
fromthe
COPLEY 1:250 000 geological sheer (Coates, 1973), showingthe locality of the
maps presentedtn Fig.4.3
(Salt Creek Canyon),Fig. 4.4
(Puttapa Canyon),Fig.
4,6 (Nankabunyana Canyon) and Fig.4,6
(slump induced intraformationaltruncation
surfaces and possible canyontributary
southwestof
Beltana Township),withln the
Beltana andMt,
Scott Range areas.Fig.4.5
Fig.4.3
ì
Bwa
BELTANA DIAPIR
Wonoka
Formationo
K ILOM E TR ES
10
Vale Canyon Complex (new name) near
the
western edgeof the
Fllnders Ranges,through
the
Pamatta Pass Canyon (new name)to the
Yunta Canyon Complex (new name), nearthe
eastern edgeof the
ranBes;a total of
l7O km.The Waukarie Creek Canyon Complex, described
briefly by
Jenkins (1981),is a structurally
repeatedfeature
incisedtip to
800 m (Jenkins&
Gostin,1983) through
the
Bunyeroo Formation andinto the
ABC Range Quartzite,l3
kmsouth
of Quorn,
The canyonfiil
sequence bearsa
close resemblanceto
that developedin the northern
canyons, consistingof
basal calcareous sandstonesand coarse debris
flow
material, which gradesup into a
carbonate dominated sequence. Palaeocurrent data fromturbidites is variable,
suggestingin-
canyon meandering,
but
generally suBgestan
easterlyflow
direction.The Yarra Vale Canyon Complex comprises
a
seriesof three
incisions throughthe
Bunyeroo Formation andinto the
ABC Range Quartzite about 20 kmnorth of Quorn.
The structures are repeated onboth flanks of a
north-south orientated syncline,two
incisions onthe
west and one broader incision tothe east.
Someof
these were notedby
Plummer (1978), who mappedpart
of oneof the
structures near BuekaringaGorge.
Outcropis very
poor anddeeply weathered, leading Plummer (1978)
to
concludethat the
incisions wereinfilled with
Bunyeroo Formation, andhe
suggestedthat a
major pre-Bunyeroo erosiveevent
had occurredin this
regionof the geosyncline.
Recentinvestigations
indicate that the fill is
Wonoka Formation(V.4.
Gostin &R.J.F. Jenkins, pers. com. 1984) and
that the
strueturesare of
similardimension
to the
Waukarie Creek Canyon Complex, 30 kmto the south.
Nopalaeocurrent data er¿ availâble
but the repetition of
incisions indicates aneast-west axial trend,
andthe
suggestionof bifurcation of the
system tothe
west arguesin favour of
aneasterly flow
direction.The
identification of the
following canyonfills ls
basedlargely
ondiscordances mapped
on l:260
000 scale sheets, andthus their
identification remainstentative at this stage,
Becauseof their structural setting
these89
do
not
dlsplaythe typical
canyon morpliology,but
are pÌeservedonly
asisolated patches
of
unconformable outcropwlthin
synclines,interpreted
as representingonly the
deepestparts of
incislons.The Pamatta Pass Canyon, 13 km northeast
of
Carrieton, urasfirst briefly
describedby
Binks (1971), who noted Wonoka Formation resting unconformably on Bunyeroo Formation, ABC Range Quartzite and Brachina Formation equivalentsin the keel of the
White ValleySyncline.
Binks (1971) described breccia beds and consideredthe structure to
beof
slump origin.The Yunta Canyon Complex
is a
seriesof four
separate massesof
WonokaFormation
resting
unconformably on Brachina Formation equivalents,that
have been mapped onthe
eastern sideof the
ORROROO 1:250 000 geological sheet (Binks, 1968) and western sideof the
OLARYl:250
000 preliminary geologicalsheet. All of
these structureslie within the
Ulupa Syncline.The contact between
the
Wonoka Formation and underlying sediments inthe
easternhalf of the
Waroonee Syncline 30 kmnorth of the
Yunta Canyon Complex appearsto
be unconformable as mapped onthe
OLARY 1:250 000preliminary geological sheet, and may represent
a further
outcropof
canyonfill
sediments.4.3
SALT CREEK CANYONThe
Salt
Creek Canyon (new name)(Fie. 4.3), largest and deepestof
the newly discoveredstructures
describedin this
chapter,is situated
about17.5 km
north
northeastof the old
Beltana township and 12,5 km southeast ofthe
Leigh Creek South township (30o 40'S, 138o29'E)'
Accessis
readily affordedby
several unseaied roads which crossthe structure.
Outcrop isgenerally poor and
of
lowrelief,
and muchof the
lower canyonfill
isoverlain by
Quaternaryalluvium
and scree, and remnantsof a
gravel terrace probabtyof Tertiary age.
The exposed outcropof the
canyonis 6
km lnwidth, but
asthe
northwestern sideof the structure
doesnot
cropout
at90
Geologlcal map
of the Salt
CreekCanyon. All units
arereferred
to in the text.
Coarse materialrefers
toconglomerates and diamictites (largely debris
flows)
with c.lastsof
cobble size andlarger.
Palaeocurrents from flutes, separatelyplotted for
canyonunits A
andB,
are presented atbottom.
Notethat the
mapis
orientedwith
respectto
the e¿rnyon andnorth is
towardsthe
lowerright
eorner....=,:.
Rormtey
0u
iÌe...Bo
Sondstone2km
Urit F...
udr E...
Unit 0...
Unit C...
Unit 8...
Unit 4...
Unit 3...
Unit 1,2...
ra
¡
Atluviun ond scree....
Terroce grovel Yonoko
Fo¡notion
Bunyeroo
Fa
ion...ABC Ronge Ouortzite . ... ..
Brochino Fornotion . ... ...
Roqd,
trock. a:
=====Oip of beddirP Foutt..
unconfocnity
Coorse debris .. ...1r' ,|
'.'
Polqeocurrents
f¡on ftufes
Unit A Unit B
all, the true wldth is
possiblysignificantly greater.
The canyonfill
isstructurally
uncomplicated, aìthougha
beddingparallel thrust fault
repeatspart of the
post-canyon lVonoka Formation abovea portion of the
structure.Bedding dips
vertically
nearthe
baseof the incision
and steeplyto
the south higherin the
sequence.Aerial
photographs andfield
observationsindicate that the wall
andbase
of the
eanyon representan
angular unconformityof local extent,
andare
unrelatedto faulting,
The southeasternwall
hasa
maximum slope of about 3Oo nearthe
baseof the incision. This is a
minimumvalue for
thetrue
slope, whichwill vary
depending onthe orientation of the
cross- sectionwith
respectto the orientation of the
canyonaxis.
To the southeastof the
canyonthe entire
sequence appearsto
be conformable,However, poor outcrop and cover preclude recognition