• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Stormwater Discharge Acceptance

Dalam dokumen ASSESSMENT UNIT (Halaman 51-56)

Tenancy 6 Child Care Centre

32. Stormwater Discharge Acceptance

Where the engineering works included in the scope of this approval necessitate the discharge of stormwater onto adjoining land, written consent from all affected adjoining property owners must be obtained and submitted to Council before a Construction Certificate is issued.

Specifically, this relates to the stormwater works/ connection to Sydney Water’s land adjacent to Pasquale Avenue.

Purpose:

Integrated

Housing Purpose: Credit No. of Lots: 60 No. of Credits: 2 Total S7.11 Open Space - Land $ 25,153.96 $ 25,153.96 $ 1,509,237.60 $ 50,307.92 $ 1,458,929.68 Open Space - Capital $ 6,675.78 $ 6,675.78 $ 400,546.80 $ 13,351.56 $ 387,195.24 Transport Facilities - Capital $ 4,753.49 $ 4,753.49 $ 285,209.40 $ 9,506.98 $ 275,702.42 Community Facilities - Land $ 497.44 $ 497.44 $ 29,846.40 $ 994.88 $ 28,851.52 Community Facilities - Land $ 2,037.91 $ 2,037.91 $ 122,274.60 $ 4,075.82 $ 118,198.78 Administration $ 349.13 $ 349.13 $ 20,947.80 $ 698.26 $ 20,249.54 Drainage Facilities - Capital $ 532.29 $ 532.29 $ 31,937.40 $ 1,064.58 $ 30,872.82 Total $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 2,400,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 2,320,000.00

DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 04 JUNE, 2019

PAGE 52 33. Engineering Works and Design

The design and construction of the engineering works listed below must be provided for in accordance with Council’s Design Guidelines Subdivisions/ Developments and Works Specifications Subdivisions/ Developments.

Engineering works can be classified as either “subdivision works” or “building works”. Works within an existing or proposed public road, or works within an existing or proposed public reserve can only be approved, inspected and certified by Council in accordance with the Roads Act 1993 and the Local Government Act 1993 respectively.

The following engineering works are required:

a) Full Width Road Construction

The full width construction of the roads listed below is required, including footpath paving and other ancillary work to make this construction effective:

Road Name: Formation:

(Footpath/ Carriageway/ Footpath) (m)

Ernesta Place Road Type:

DCP Local Street

3.5m/ 8.5m/ 3.5m (15.5m) Pavement Design:

Local/ Access (Design Guidelines Section 3.12) Pasquale Avenue (1) Road Type:

DCP Local Street

3.5m/ 8.5m/ 3.5m (15.5m) Pavement Design:

Local/ Access (Design Guidelines Section 3.12) Road 3/ Elena Avenue Road Type:

DCP Local Street

3.5m/ 8.5m/ 3.5m (15.5m) Pavement Design:

Local/ Access (Design Guidelines Section 3.12) The following additional requirements apply:

The design must incorporate a standard kerb return radius of 7.5m based on a 4m splay corner unless otherwise directed by Council.

Pasquale Avenue (1) relates to the section of this road that fronts the creek corridor.

Pasquale Avenue (2) relates to the section of this road adjacent to the southern site boundary, shown on as Road 2 on the concept engineering plan prepared by C&M Revision 03.

Roll kerb is to be used for all roads other than sub-arterial roads or roads fronting a park or creek corridor. Barrier kerb is required along the eastern edge of Pasquale Avenue fronting the creek corridor.

DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 04 JUNE, 2019

PAGE 53 All roads are to have a two-way cross fall with a crown in the middle of the carriageway.

Specifically, the concept engineering plan prepared by C&M Revision 03 needs to be amended to provide for this for Pasquale Avenue.

With respect to the partial width construction of Road 2/ Pasquale Avenue (2); where partial width construction exists opposite, the completed road must comply with the overall requirements outlined in the table above. Where partial width construction does not exist opposite, you will be responsible for the formation of the footpath verge, kerb and gutter and the construction of 6m of road pavement.

The temporary retaining wall along the southern edge of Pasquale Avenue (Road 2) will need to be adjusted in response to above two points.

The verge along the eastern edge of Pasquale Avenue needs to have a reverse cross fall towards the creek corridor, to limit the height and extent of the batter into the creek corridor, contrary to the concept engineering plan prepared by C&M Revision 03.

The alignment of Pasquale Avenue and Ernesta Place needs to match that built to the north by 421/2017/ZB. Specifically, the horizontal alignment/ curve of Pasquale Avenue must consider the bend which extends across the boundary.

Pasquale Avenue does not extend south along the creek corridor into the adjoining lot.

Rather, Pasquale Avenue returns west and heads along the southern boundary to Ernesta Place; as per Road 2 (Pasquale Avenue (2)) below. The design and construction of Pasquale Avenue needs to be amended from that shown on the concept engineering plan prepared by C&M Revision 03 to reflect this.

The subdivision works have been designed/ conditioned so as to not require consent for works on the adjoining property to the south. If consent from that landowner was obtained however, the temporary retaining wall along the southern edge of Pasquale Avenue (Road 2) could be replaced with a temporary batter, subject to separate consent first being obtained for the removal of any trees and the clearing of vegetation affected by those works.

The street drainage in Ernesta Place needs to be extended to the northern site boundary to pick up the constructed street drainage to the north, generally as shown on the general arrangement plan Revision 04 dated 06/12/2018 by C&M subject to the actual pit and pipe sizing/ calculations with the detailed design at the Construction Certificate stage. This connection is needed so that the temporary stormwater draining this road now along the northern site boundary can be removed when the road is extended into the subject site.

b) Partial Width Road Construction

The partial width construction of the roads listed below is required, including footpath paving and other ancillary work to make this construction effective:

Road Name: Formation:

(Footpath/ Carriageway/ Footpath) (m) Road 2/ Pasquale Avenue

(2)

Road Type:

DCP Local Street

3.5m/ 8.5m/ 3.5m (15.5m) Pavement Design:

Local/ Access (Design Guidelines Section 3.12) The following additional requirements apply:

DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 04 JUNE, 2019

PAGE 54 The design must incorporate a standard kerb return radius of 7.5m based on a 4m splay

corner unless otherwise directed by Council.

Pasquale Avenue (1) relates to the section of this road that fronts the creek corridor.

Pasquale Avenue (2) relates to the section of this road adjacent to the southern site boundary, shown on as Road 2 on the concept engineering plan prepared by C&M Revision 03.

Roll kerb is to be used for all roads other than sub-arterial roads or roads fronting a park or creek corridor. Barrier kerb is required along the eastern edge of Pasquale Avenue fronting the creek corridor.

All roads are to have a two-way cross fall with a crown in the middle of the carriageway.

Specifically, the concept engineering plan prepared by C&M Revision 03 needs to be amended to provide for this for Pasquale Avenue.

With respect to the partial width construction of Road 2/ Pasquale Avenue (2); where partial width construction exists opposite, the completed road must comply with the overall requirements outlined in the table above. Where partial width construction does not exist opposite, you will be responsible for the formation of the footpath verge, kerb and gutter and the construction of 6m of road pavement.

The temporary retaining wall along the southern edge of Pasquale Avenue (Road 2) will need to be adjusted in response to above two points.

The verge along the eastern edge of Pasquale Avenue needs to have a reverse cross fall towards the creek corridor, to limit the height and extent of the batter into the creek corridor, contrary to the concept engineering plan prepared by C&M Revision 03.

The alignment of Pasquale Avenue and Ernesta Place needs to match that built to the north by 421/2017/ZB. Specifically, the horizontal alignment/ curve of Pasquale Avenue must consider the bend which extends across the boundary.

Pasquale Avenue does not extend south along the creek corridor into the adjoining lot.

Rather, Pasquale Avenue returns west and heads along the southern boundary to Ernesta Place; as per Road 2 (Pasquale Avenue (2)) below. The design and construction of Pasquale Avenue needs to be amended from that shown on the concept engineering plan prepared by C&M Revision 03 to reflect this.

The subdivision works have been designed/ conditioned so as to not require consent for works on the adjoining property to the south. If consent from that landowner was obtained however, the temporary retaining wall along the southern edge of Pasquale Avenue (Road 2) could be replaced with a temporary batter, subject to separate consent first being obtained for the removal of any trees and the clearing of vegetation affected by those works.

Any requirements relating to partial width road construction from the relevant section of Council’s DCP must also be complied with. All works must be carried out in accordance with a traffic safety statement that needs to accompany the detailed design.

c) Turning Heads

A cul-de-sac turning head must be provided at the end of all blind/ dead-end roads. The cul- de-sac must have a diameter of 19m measured from the face of kerb.

A turning head is required at the northern end of Road 3/ Elena Avenue.

d) Signage and Line Marking Requirements/ Plan

A signage and line marking plan must be submitted with the detailed design. This plan needs to address street name signs and posts, regulatory signs and posts (such as no parking or

DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 04 JUNE, 2019

PAGE 55 give way signs), directional signs and posts (such as chevron signs), speed limit signs and posts and line marking, where required.

Thermoplastic line marking must be used for any permanent works. Any temporary line marking must be removed with a grinder once it is no longer required, it cannot be painted over.

Details for all signage and line-marking must be submitted to Council’s Construction Engineer for checking prior to works commencing. For existing public roads, signs and line marking may require separate/ specific approval from the Local Traffic Committee.

Street name signs and posts must be provided in accordance with the above documents and Council’s Standard Drawing 37.

e) Concrete Footpath

A 1.2m wide concrete footpath, including access ramps at all intersections, must be provided on the western side of Pasquale Avenue (1), the northern side of Road 2/ Pasquale Avenue (2) and on one side of Road 3/ Ernesta Place in accordance with the DCP and the above documents.

f) Concrete Cycleway/ Shared Path

A 2.5m wide concrete cycleway/ shared path, including access ramps at all intersections, must be provided on the eastern side of Pasquale Avenue (1) in accordance with the DCP and the above documents.

The rehabilitation of this creek corridor is currently being constructed by Sydney Water.

Those plans may include the relocation of the cycleway from the western side of the creek along Pasquale Avenue (1) to the eastern side of the creek to coincide with the rock wall required as part of those rehabilitation works. This cycleway will likely be relocated if this design intent proceeds. Before finalising the detailed design/ Construction Certificate drawings, contact Council’s Construction Engineer for details and a status update on the Sydney Water works.

g) Gutter Crossings

Gutter crossings to each of the proposed new lots are required.

Gutter crossings are not required where roll kerb has been provided/ permitted.

h) Disused Layback/ Driveway Removal

All disused laybacks and driveways must be removed and replaced with full kerb and gutter together with the restoration and turfing of the adjoining footpath verge area.

i) Service Conduits

Service conduits to each of the proposed new lots, laid in strict accordance with the relevant service authority’s requirements, are required. Services must be shown on the engineering drawings.

j) Earthworks/ Site Regrading

Earthworks are limited to that shown on the approved plans. Where earthworks are not shown on the approved plan the topsoil within lots must not be disturbed.

Retaining walls are limited to those locations and heights shown on the concept engineering plan prepared by C&M Revision 03 subject to the following additional requirements:

The retaining wall across the back of lots 46 to 60 must be no higher than 1m.

The retaining wall across the back of lots 22 to 45 must be no higher than 1.5m.

DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 04 JUNE, 2019

PAGE 56 The temporary retaining wall along the southern edge of Pasquale Avenue (Road 2) will need to be adjusted in response to the conditioned amendments to that road design (see partial width road construction earlier/ above).

Retaining walls between lots must be located on the high side lot that is being retained, save the need for easements for support on the low side lot adjacent.

k) Stormwater Drainage – Temporary Works

Grassed swale drains or temporary piped drainage must be installed to intercept, control and redirect surface stormwater runoff from upstream undeveloped properties.

l) Stormwater Drainage – Creek Outlets

Piped stormwater outlets/ connections to a natural watercourse must comply with the requirements of Council, the Department of Primary Industries – Water and Sydney Water, in the case of stormwater management land. Specifically, the creek outlet from Pasquale Avenue needs to be extended to the low flow channel in Strangers Creek; different to the extent shown on the concept engineering plan prepared by C&M Revision 03.

m) Inter-allotment Stormwater Drainage

Piped inter-allotment stormwater drainage catering for the entire area of each lot must be provided. Each lot must be uniformly graded to its lowest point where a grated surface inlet pit must be provided. All collected stormwater is to be piped to an approved constructed public drainage system.

Dalam dokumen ASSESSMENT UNIT (Halaman 51-56)

Dokumen terkait