• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

1et al.: ReferencesProduced by the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER), 2010

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "1et al.: ReferencesProduced by the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER), 2010"

Copied!
2
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

CurriCulum & Assessment – technology and mathematics teaching and learning: What counts?

Ellington, A. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effects of calculators on students’ achievement and attitude levels in precollege math- ematics classes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 34: 433-463.

Geiger, V. (2009). Learning mathematics with technology from a social perspective: A study of secondary students’ individual and collaborative practices in a technologically rich mathematics classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Brisbane: University of Queensland.

Geiger, V., Faragher, R. & Goos, M. (in press). CAS-enabled technologies as ‘agents provocateurs’ in teaching and learning math- ematical modelling in secondary school classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal.

National Curriculum Board (2009). Shape of the Australian curriculum: Mathematics. Available at http://www.acara.edu.au/

verve/_resources/Australian_Curriculum_-_Maths.pdf Retrieved 6 September, 2010.

Olive, J. & Makar, K., with V. Hoyos, L.K. Kor, O. Kosheleva, & R. Straesser. (2010). Mathematical knowledge and practices result- ing from access to digital technologies. In C. Hoyles & J. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology – Rethinking the terrain. The 17th ICMI Study (133-177). New York: Springer.

Pierce, R. & Stacey, K. (2010). Mapping pedagogical opportunities provided by mathematics analysis software. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning. 15(1): 1-20.

FURTHER READING

Farrell, A.M. (1996). Roles and behaviours in technology-integrated precalculus classrooms. Journal of Mathematical Behavior.

15: 35-53.

Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P. & Geiger, V. (2003) Perspectives on technology mediated learning in secondary school math- ematics classrooms. Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 22: 73-89.

Hembree, R. & Dessart, D. (1986). Effects of hand-held calculators in pre-college mathematics education: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 17: 83-99.

Makar, K. & Confrey, J. (2006). Dynamic statistical software: How are learners using it to conduct databased investigations? In C.

Hoyles, J. Lagrange, L.H. Son & N. Sinclair (Eds.) Proceedings of the 17th Study Conference of the International Commission on Mathematical Instruction. Hanoi Institute of Technology and Université Paris 7 – Denis Diderot.

Penglase, M. & Arnold, S. (1996). The graphics calculator in mathematics education: A critical review of recent research. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 8: 58-90.

Steinbring, H. (2005). The Construction of New Mathematical Knowledge in Classroom Interaction: An epistemological perspec- tive. New York: Springer.

CurriCulum & Assessment – Getting it right: standardised testing and educational improvement

Australian Secondary Principals Association. (2006). 2006 Survey – Teacher Supply. Available at www.aspa.asn.au/index.

php?option=com_content&view=article&id=51:2006-survey-teacher-supply&catid=18:teacher-supply-and-demand&Itemid=40 Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the Black Box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan. 80(2):

139-49.

Bolon, C. (2000), School-based standard testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, Volume 8(23): 1-43.

Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). The Right to Learn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives. 8(1): 1-50.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2003). Standards and assessments: Where we are and what we need. Stanford University. Teachers College Record. 11: 109.

Darling-Hammond, Linda (2006). Standards, assessments and educational policy: In pursuit of genuine accountability, The William H Angoff Memorial Lecture Series. Educational Testing Service. Available at www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/

PICANG8.pdf

Dietel, R.J., Herman, J.L. & Knuth, R.A. (1991). What Does Research Say about Assessment? Oak Brook: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.

Donnelly, K. (2010). NAPLAN denies kids an Education Revolution. ABC, The Drum Unleashed (10 May, 2010). Available at www.abc.net.au/unleashed/stories/s2894663.htm

Hawk, P., Coble, C. & Swanson, M. (1985). Certification: It does matter. Journal of Teacher Education. 36(3): 13-15.

Lee, V.E., Smith, J.B., & Croninger, R.G. (1995). Understanding High School Restructuring Effects on the Equitable Distribution of Learning Mathematics and Science. Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.

Linn, R., Baker, E. & Dunbar, S. (1991). Complex performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria.

Educational Researcher. 20(8): 15-21.

Linn, R. (2000) Assessment and accountability. Educational Researcher. 29(2): 4-16.

Owen, D., & Doerr, M. (1999). None of the Above: The truth behind the SATs Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

1 et al.: References

Produced by the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER), 2010

(2)

Popham, W.J. (2003). The seductive allure of data. Educational Leadership. 60(5): 48-51.

Ravitch, D. (2010). The Death and Life of the Great American School System. New York: Basic Books.

Rose, J. (2009). Independent Review of the Primary Curriculum: Final Report. London: DCSF. Available at http://www.numicon.

com/Assets/Downloadablefile/Primary_curriculum-report-15921.pdf

Sacks, P. (1999). Standardised Minds: The high price of America’s testing culture and what we can do change it. Cambridge MA:

Perseus.

Stern, S. (2010). Can New York clean up the testing mess? City Journal. 20(2). Available at www.city-journal.org/2010/20_2_ny- education-testing.html

Valencia, S. (1997). Understanding Authentic Classroom-Based Literacy Assessment. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Wenglinksy, H. (2000). How Teaching Matters: Bringing the classroom back into discussions of teacher quality. Princeton, NJ: ETS.

Geiger, V. (2009). Learning mathematics with technology from a social perspective: A study of secondary students’ individual and collaborative practices in a technologically rich mathematics classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Brisbane: University of Queensland.

2 Teacher journal archive (2008-2011), Vol. 2010 [2010], No. 215, Art. 6

https://research.acer.edu.au/teacher/vol2010/iss215/6

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Achieving the object of this research the researcher uses a classroom action research (CAR) each cycle of this research consists of four steps; planning, acting,

The greatest praise and thank to Allah who has blessed the writer to finish his research paper, entitled “ IMPROVING VOCABULARY MASTERY BY USING SONGS ( A CLASSROOM

Improving the Students’ Writing Ability by Using Peer Exchange (A Classroom Action Research at the Third Semester of English Department Students of IKIP PGRI Madiun

The Center for Science and Technology Development Studies – Indonesian Institute of Sciences (PAPPIPTEK-LIPI) is one of the government R&D institutes under Indonesian Institute

ACER literature review Indigenous Higher Education November 2011 Page 5 Strait Islander postgraduate students, in 2010, 96 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students commenced