• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

ADvErTIsEr Of THE MONTH - ACER Research Repository

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "ADvErTIsEr Of THE MONTH - ACER Research Repository"

Copied!
1
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

EDITOrIAL

Whatever you teach, one thing that’s certain is that the stuff you teach, and the curriculum that informs what and how you teach, is fixed and immutable – or not. Paleontologists, for instance, now believe that Triceratops ‘never really existed.’ It was just the juvenile form of a less well-known dinosaur called Torosaurus. Early years teachers rest assured, though: Torosaurus will be reclassified as the better-known Tricera­

tops, so all the three-horned playdough models still out on display are safe. After all, Triceratops, is one of the big three rock stars of the dinosaur world, along- side Tyrannosaurus rex and Bronto­

saurus. Mind you, if you’re still referring to Brontosaurus instead of Apato­

saurus, it might be time to do a little revision. Remember it was once thought that, with its small head, Bronto saurus okay, Apatosaurus – couldn’t chew enough food to fuel its huge body?

That’s where we got the idea that it sup- ported its massive weight by hanging out in swamps. Turns out, this small-headed dinosaur didn’t chew its food. It had a gizzard, like birds. Paleontologists have even found grinding stones in fossil remains. The whole Brontosaurus or Apatosaurus thing goes back to 1877, when Othniel Charles Marsh of Yale University discovered a specimen that he named Apatosaurus and then a larger one that he thought was an entirely new species and named Brontosaurus. Elmer Riggs of the Field Museum in Chicago in 1903 argued that Apatosaurus was a juvenile Brontosaurus – and the Bronto­

saurus name was abandoned because Apatosaurus was named first. Things change, but the more things change, the more they stay the same – which brings us back to the new national curriculum.

Stand by for plenty of argument and dis- cussion about this. T

4  teacherseptember2010

fAsT fACTs

Average age for primary teachers in 2007:

43 years.

Average age for secondary teachers: 44 years.

Proportion of female and male primary teachers: 79 and 21 per cent respectively.

Proportion of female and male secondary teachers: 56 and 44 per cent respec- tively.

Proportion of females and males in leader- ship positions in primary schools: 57 and 43 per cent respectively.

Proportion of females and males in leader- ship positions in secondary schools: 41 and 59 per cent respectively.

Proportion of primary teachers and school leaders of Indigenous origin: one to two per cent – given some missing data.

Proportion of secondary teachers and school leaders of Indigenous origin: less than one per cent.

Proportion of the Australian population of Indigenous origin: three per cent.

Source: McKenzie, P., Kos, J., Walker, M. & Hong, J.

(2008). Staff in Australia’s Schools 2007. Canberra:

Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.

QUICk QUIZ

1. Does parent occupation make a dif- ference when it comes to the percent- age of students reaching the Year 6 and 10 proficient standard identified by experts as an indication of what students should be able to do using infotech?

2. Steve Dinham says students need and want answers to four questions. What are they?

3. A motion graph activity is far too complex to implement with primary classes. True or false?

4. What do school sport and digital games have in common?

5. What does HTML stand for?

6. Is too much television bad for you?

7. If there’s a crisis for your school, the first crisis-management step is to duck for cover. True or false?

8. What does Tim Hawkes suggest would maintain the current ‘cease-fire’ on school funding?

9. When is World Teachers’ Day?

10. Who said ‘high-stakes accountability does not produce better education’?

An sw ers : 1.

yes , ac co rd in g to th e Nat io na l A sse ssm en t P ro gra m – IC T L ite rac y Y ear s 6

& 10 Rep ort 20

; 2 08 . w hat can I do , w hat

can

’t I d o, how do es my wor k co mp are wit h th at of oth ers , an d h ow can I d o b ett er?

3.

fal se, acc ord in g to pre -P rep tea ch er Su san

Har ris on

; 4.

bo th are go al- dir ect ed an d co mp eti tiv e ac tiv iti es co ndu cte d w ith in a fr am ew ork of agr eed ru les

; 5.

Hyp erT ex t M ark Up

Lan gu age

; 6 . ac co rd in g to th e re sea rch , ap par en tly not

; 7.

ah em , fa lse

; 8 . a Co mm onw eal th gov ern men t g uar an tee th at no sch oo l

wil l hav e its f un din g fro zen

; 9. 2 9 Oct ob er; 1 0. D ian e Rav itc h in h er b lo g at h ttp ://

blo gs.

ed wee k.o rg /ed wee k/B rid gin g-D iff ere nce s

ADvErTIsEr Of THE MONTH

1 Holden: Editorial

Produced by the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER), 2010

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Explained Commonwealth Minister for School Education Peter Garrett in Feb- ruary, that’s to enable non-government schools to transition to any new funding arrangements the government

Sources: United Nations Millennium Development Goals report for Afghanistan; Revolutionary Asso- ciation of the Women of Afghanistan News, 21 April, 2009; Hamid Shalizi, Harassment

Some state school principals and council members have asked why they’re only permitted to spend the money they’ve received through the Commonwealth government’s $14.7 billion

The panel does not intend it to mean that all stu- dents are the same or will achieve the same outcomes, but rather that they will not be prevented from achieving their maximum

T 4 teacheraugust2010 fAsT fACTs Percentage of Year 6 students in 2008 who reached the Year 6 proficient standard identified by experts as an indication of what students should be

One of the important messages from these trage- dies is that all of us can make a differ- ence.’ So said Prime Minister Julia Gillard on 15 March, commending the work of SchoolAid, a

AITSL will use its new National Professional Standards for Teachers and National Professional Standard for Prin- cipals as the basis for judging the awards across five award categories:

Following an analysis of existing performance-based pay systems for teachers, the report points out that while the best systems are national, they have a local focus on improving