ASSESSMENT UNIT

(1)

DEVELOPMENT

ASSESSMENT UNIT

Tuesday, 29 October 2019

T O S T R I V E F O R B E T T E R T H I N G S

(2)

DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 29 OCTOBER, 2019

ITEM SUBJECT PAGE

ITEM-1 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 3

ITEM-2 DA 703/2015/HC/A - SECTION 4.55 (1A) MODIFICATION TO AN APPROVED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT - LOT 22 DP 1201600, NO. 25 REGENT HONEYEATER GROVE, NORTH KELLYVILLE

6

(3)

PAGE 3 MINUTES OF THE DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING HELD AT THE HILLS SHIRE COUNCIL ON TUESDAY, 22 OCTOBER 2019

PRESENT

Cameron McKenzie Group Manager – Development & Compliance (Chair) Paul Osborne Manager – Development Assessment

Gannon Cuneo Senior Town Planner

Angelo Berios Manager – Environment & Health Craig Woods Manager – Regulatory Services Nicholas Carlton Manager – Forward Planning Kristine McKenzie Principal Executive Planner APOLOGIES

Benjamin Hawkins Manager – Subdivision & Development Certification

TIME OF COMMENCEMENT 8:30am

TIME OF COMPLETION 8:35am

ITEM-1 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

RESOLUTION

The Minutes of the Development Assessment Unit Meeting of Council held on 8 October 2019 be confirmed.

ITEM-2 DA 1376/2019/HA - CHILD CARE CENTRE AND MEDICAL CENTRE WITH BASEMENT CARPARK - LOT 40 DP 1229900 OLD PITT TOWN ROAD, BOX HILL PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF THE DETERMINATION PURSUANT TO ITEM 20(2)(c) AND (d) OF SCHEDULE 1 OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING & ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979

DECISION:

The Development Application be refused for the following reasons:

(4)

PAGE 4 1. The proposed development is considered to be incompatible with the amenity of a low density residential environment due to its proposed scale and the proposed hours of operation and is therefore inconsistent with the objectives of the R2 Low Density Residential Zone in State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Region Growth Centres) 2006.

(Section 4.15(1)(a)(i), (b) and (c) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979).

2. The proposed development does not satisfy the requirements of SEPP (Education Establishments and Child Care Centres) 2017 since it does not comply with Clause 23 (Compliance with Child Care Planning Guideline) including Part 2 Design quality principles (context, built form, landscape, amenity and safety), Part 3 Matters for consideration relating to site selection, local character, streetscape, building design, landscaping, visual and acoustic privacy, traffic, parking and pedestrian circulation and Part 4 Applying the National Regulations to development proposals in relation to fencing, laundry and storage.

(Section 4.15(1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979).

3. The proposed development does not satisfy the requirements of SEPP (Education Establishments and Child Care Centres) 2017 since it does not comply with Clause 26 Centre-based child care facility—development control plans due to various non- compliances with relevant development control plans including Box Hill Development Control Plan, The Hills Development Control Plan 2012 (Part B Section 6 – Business, Part C Section 1 – Parking and Part C Section 3 – Landscaping.

(Section 4.15(1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979).

4. The proposed development does not satisfy the relevant provisions of Section 2.3 Character Areas (Ridge Character Area), Section 4.2.5 Dwelling massing and siting and General Requirements (9) and (10) of the Box Hill Development Control Plan with respect to non-residential development in residential zones, due to its size, scale and hours of operation.

(Section 4.15(1)(a)(iii) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979).

5. The proposed development does not satisfy the relevant provisions of Development Control Plan 2012 Part B Section 6 – Business with regard to landscaping and hours of operation.

6. The proposed development does not satisfy the relevant provisions of Development Control Plan 2012 Part C Section 1 – Parking due to insufficient landscaping and non-compliance with the required parking rates outlined in Table 1.

7. The proposed development does not satisfy the relevant provisions of Development Control Plan 2012 Part C Section 3 - Landscaping due to insufficient details and planting proposed in the landscape plan.

8. The proposed built form is inconsistent with the natural, built, social and economic environment of the locality.

(Section 4.15(1)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979).

(5)

PAGE 5 9. The proposal is not in the public interest due to the incompatible character and scale of the development with regard to the locality and its departure from the requirements under State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Region Growth Centres) 2006, State Environmental Planning Policy (Educational Establishments and Child Care Centres) 2017, The Box Hill Development Control Plan 2017 and Development Control Plans (Part B Section 6 – Business, Part C Section 1 – Parking and Part C Section 3 – Landscaping).

(Section 4.15(1)(d) and (e) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979).

10. The proposal has not adequately addressed subdivision engineering, environmental health, tree management and planning concerns raised by Council Officers.

(Section 4.15(1)(a)(i), (ii), (iii), 1(b) and 1(c) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979).

REASONS FOR THE DECISION:

 Section 4.15 (EP&A Act) – Unsatisfactory

 SEPP Growth Centres – Unsatisfactory

 SEPP (Educational Establishments and Child Care Centres) 2017 – Unsatisfactory

 SEPP (Infrastructure) 2007 – Satisfactory

 SEPP No. 55 – Remediation of Land - Satisfactory

 Box Hill DCP – Variation, see report

 DCP Part B Section 6 – Business – Variation, see report

 DCP Part C Section 1 – Parking – Variation, see report

 DCP Part C Section 3 – Landscaping – Variation, see report

 Section 7.12 Contribution: $233,559.79

HOW COMMUNITY VIEWS WERE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN MAKING THE DECISION:

The development application was notified and two (2) submissions were received. The issues raised were discussed in the report.

END MINUTES

(6)

PAGE 6 ITEM-2 DA 703/2015/HC/A - SECTION 4.55 (1A) MODIFICATION TO AN APPROVED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT - LOT 22 DP 1201600, NO. 25 REGENT HONEYEATER GROVE, NORTH KELLYVILLE

THEME: Valuing our Surroundings OUTCOME:

9 Our natural surroundings are valued, maintained and enhanced and impacts are managed responsibly through education and regulatory action.

STRATEGY:

5.1 The Shire’s natural and built environment is well managed through strategic land use and urban planning that reflects our values and aspirations.

MEETING DATE: 29 OCTOBER 2019

DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT

AUTHOR: SENIOR TOWN PLANNER

HARRISON DEPCZYNSKI

RESPONSIBLE OFFICER: PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE PLANNER KRISTINE MCKENZIE

Applicant Revelop Building And Developments Pty Ltd Owner The Churches Of Christ Property Trust Notification 14 days

Number Advised 189 Number of Submissions Two

Zoning R4 High Density Residential

Site Area 5000m²

List of all relevant matters Section 4.55 (EP&A Act) - Satisfactory

SEPP No. 65 – Design Quality of Residential Apartment Development - Satisfactory

SEPP Educational Establishments and Child Care Facilities 2017 - Satisfactory

State Environmental Planning Policy No 55—Remediation of Land - Satisfactory

Local Environmental Plan 2012 - Satisfactory Development Control Plan 2012 - Satisfactory Political Donation None Disclosed

Reason for Referral to DAU More than one submission received to a modification application.

Recommendation Approval subject to conditions

(7)

PAGE 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Development Application 703/2015/HC for a mixed use development was approved by the Development Assessment Unit (DAU) on 28 April 2015. The approved works included construction of 43 residential units, a 104 place childcare centre and basement car parking for 128 vehicles.

The proposed Section 4.55(1A) Modification Application is for retrospective approval for a series of structural and architectural changes. The applicant states the changes reflect ongoing modification undertaken through design development and construction of the

development. No changes are proposed to the height of the buildings, setbacks, landscaping, parking arrangements or the childcare centre operations.

The scale and type of development remains as approved under the proposed modification which is considered to be of minimal environmental impact and substantially the same development.

The application was notified and two submissions were received. No specific issues relating to the proposed modifications were raised in the submissions rather a general opposition to unit developments in the area. The site is zoned R4 High Density Residential and apartment developments and childcare centres are a permissible use in the zone.

The proposed modification is recommended for approval.

BACKGROUND

Development Application 703/2015/HC for a mixed use development was approved by the Development Assessment Unit (DAU) on 28 April 2015. The approved works included construction of 43 residential units, a 104 place childcare centre and basement car parking for 128 vehicles.

The subject application was lodged on 13 May 2019. Additional information was requested throughout the assessment of the application with respect to fire safety and BCA matters, engineering and waste matters.

PROPOSAL

The Section 4.55(1A) Modification Application seeks retrospective approval for a series of structural and architectural changes to a mixed use development. The modifications sought as outlined by the applicant are as follows:

Structural Changes

 Staircase at the rear amended to accommodate the OSD changes.

 OSD design/ layout amend to avoid impact on the existing sewer main. The capacity remains unchanged.

 Exposed slab edges for structural and fire compliance. The exterior finish is now an acrylic rendered finish and colour matched to the existing face brick.

(8)

PAGE 8

 Exposed concrete roof slab is to be acrylic render finish (cream colour), and colour is to match the existing rendered walls. (Refer to schedule of finishes).

 Awning at ground level remains as concrete but the design has been amended to accommodate the pad mount substation (easement) and access for waste collection vehicles.

 The entire roof is to be concrete (removal of the colour-bond roofing elements) and replaced with face brick parapets to retain the design features of the building.

 Main switch board room and store room in lower ground and basement level have been reduced in size to accommodate the easement area of the substation.

Architectural Changes

 One highlight window in Unit 14 and Unit 28 sliding door from living areas were removed and replaced with structural wall.

 Unit 7, 12, 13, 26, 27, 40, 41, 43 ensuite windows have had the bottom half of the fixed panel removed so now the window sits 1500mm off the floor.

 Unit 8 study changed to a store room.

 Resident gym (east elevation) and child care centre windows on the North Elevation have been reduced in size.

 Unit 29 kitchen window and island bench changes.

 Unit 42 and 43 laundries to be relocated into existing storage area.

 Additional glazing on the east elevation in the bedrooms of Block C.

 Window elements on the south elevation have been redesigned.

Other Changes

 Shaft sizes and lift sizes for lift 1 has been reduced as there is no requirement to accommodate a stretcher lift.

 Former pump areas located in the lower ground level and basement are to be used as storage areas.

 Childcare lobby door to be changed to hinged door.

 Provision of a letter box 1914mm wide, 334mm thick and 1000mm in height at the front of the site.

No changes are proposed to the height of the buildings, setbacks, landscaping, parking arrangements or childcare centre operations.

All the above works have been completed and retrospective approval is sought.

(9)

PAGE 9 Conditions of Consent

As a result of the modifications it is proposed to amend the following conditions of development consent:

a. Amend Condition 1 – Approved Plans

The approved plans are referenced in condition No.1. It is proposed to modify the condition to reflect the current submitted plans.

b. Amend Condition 70 – Construction and Fitout of Food Premises

The condition is to be amended so that the Occupation Certificate can be issued for the residential component whilst the Child Care Centre fit‐out is completed.

c. Amend Condition 88 – Food Shop Registration Requirements

d. Amend Condition 89 – Food Premises Final Inspection

ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION

1. Section 4.55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979

Under the provisions of Section 4.55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979, a consent authority may, on application being made by the applicant or any other person entitled to act on a consent granted by the consent authority and subject to and in accordance with the regulations, modify the consent if:

(1A) Modifications involving minimal environmental impact

(a) it is satisfied that the proposed modification is of minimal environmental impact, and

(b) it is satisfied that the development to which the consent as modified relates is substantially the same development as the development for which the consent was originally granted and before that consent as originally granted was modified (if at all), and

(c) it has notified the application in accordance with:

(i) the regulations, if the regulations so require, or

(ii) a development control plan, if the consent authority is a council that has made a development control plan that requires the notification or advertising of applications for modification of a development consent, and

(d) it has considered any submissions made concerning the proposed modification within any period prescribed by the regulations or provided by the development control plan, as the case may be.

Subsections (1), (2) and (5) do not apply to such a modification.

(10)

PAGE 10 (3) In determining an application for modification of a consent under this section, the consent authority must take into consideration such of the matters referred to in section 4.15 (1) as are of relevance to the development the subject of the application. The consent authority must also take into consideration the reasons given by the consent authority for the grant of the consent that is sought to be modified.

The development to be modified includes a series of structural and architectural changes to a mixed use development. The development remains a mixed use development comprising 43 residential units, a 104 place childcare centre and basement car parking for 128 vehicles.

The height, bulk and scale of the development remains consistent with that approved.

With respect to Section 4.55(1A):

 The modification is considered of minimal environmental impact;

 The development is considered substantially the same development as originally approved;

 The application was notified for 14 days in accordance with The Hills Development Control Plan;

 The two submissions received during the notification period were considered as part of the application.

With respect to Section 4.55(3), the relevant matters referred to in section 4.15(1) of the Act have been taken into consideration in the assessment of this modification application and considered satisfactory.

2. Compliance with Local Environmental Plan 2012 (i) Permissibility

The land is zoned R4 High Density Residential under Local Environmental Plan 2012. The proposed use of the land is best classified as mixed use development comprising a residential flat building and a child care centre. Both developments are permissible in the zone.

(ii) Compliance with LEP 2012 – Zone Objectives

The site is zoned R4 High Density Residential under LEP 2012. The objectives of the zone are:

R4 High Density Residential Objectives

 To provide for the housing needs of the community within a high density residential environment.

 To provide a variety of housing types within a high density residential environment.

 To enable other land uses that provide facilities or services to meet the day to day needs of residents.

 To encourage high density residential development in locations that are close to population centres and public transport routes.

(11)

PAGE 11 The proposal is considered to be consistent with the stated objectives of the zone, in that the proposal will provide for a land use to meet the needs of the surrounding residents and is also considered to provide an alternative housing option for future residents.

As such the proposal is considered satisfactory in respect to the LEP 2012 objectives.

(iii) LEP 2012 - Development Standards

The following addresses the principal development standards of the LEP relevant to the subject proposal:

CLAUSE REQUIRED PROVIDED COMPLIES

4.1A Minimum Lot Size for Residential Flat Buildings

R4 Zone – 4000m² 5000m² Yes

4.3 Height of buildings 16 metres 16 metres Yes

3. Compliance with Development Control Plan

The proposal has been assessed against the provisions of The Hills Development Control Plan (THDCP) particularly:-

 Part B Section 5 – Residential Flat Buildings

 Part B Section 6 – Business

 Part B Section 8 – Shop Top Housing and Mixed Use Development

 Part C Section 1 – Parking

 Part C Section 3 – Landscaping

 Part C Section 4 – Heritage

 Part D Section 5 – Kellyville Rouse Hill Release Area

The original development achieved compliance with the relevant requirements of the Development Control Plan with the exception of Clause 3.1(a) – Site Frontage which remains unchanged under this modification application.

The original development was determined prior to the introduction of Part B Section 8 of the DCP which relates to the overall site planning and design of mixed use developments. The provisions of this Section are not considered relevant to the scope of the proposed modification.

As such, the proposal is considered satisfactory with respect to the DCP.

4. Compliance with SEPP No. 65 – Design Quality of Residential Apartment Buildings

The proposal has been reviewed under the provisions of SEPP 65 and the Apartment Design Guideline. The amendments are minor and the proposal remains consistent with the provisions of the SEPP and Apartment Design Guide.

5. Issues Raised in Submissions

The modification application was notified for 14 days and two submissions were received.

The following issue was raised:

(12)

PAGE 12

ISSUE/OBJECTION COMMENT

No specific issues relating to the proposed modifications were raised in the submissions rather a general opposition to unit developments in the area and traffic congestion.

Residential flat buildings and childcare centres are permitted with consent in the R4 High Density Residential Zone under Local Environmental Plan 2012. The traffic report submitted with the original application considered development within the North Kellyville precinct and adjoining developments. No changes to unit yield or childcare capacity are proposed under this modification application.

6. Internal Referrals

The application was referred to following sections of Council:

Fire Safety

The proposed changes, already constructed, raised a number of concerns from Fire Safety with respect to compliance with the BCA, fire emergency egress, and retrospective performance solutions. Throughout the course of the assessment the Applicant provided clarification on these matters. As the majority of proposed amendments have already been constructed, Fire Safety has conditioned the requirement for a Building Information Certificate to consider the changes already constructed (Condition 1A). The garbage bay roof will also be required to be demolished and rebuilt with a construction certificate (Condition 1B).

Engineering

Changes to the OSD design were undertaken contrary to the approved plans. The applicant provided details to engineering demonstrating the OSD volume capacity remains as approved under the original application. Engineer’s certification of the modified OSD system will be required with the Building Information Certificate (Condition 1A).

Waste Management

Waste management recommended amendments to Conditions 14 and 92 in response to changes to the garbage bin enclosure.

No objections were raised to the proposal subject to conditions.

7. External Referrals

The application is classified as ‘Integrated Development’ pursuant to Section 4.46 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 as the development required approval from the NSW Rural Fire Service (RFS). This is due to the inclusion of a childcare centre within the development which is identified as a Special Fire Protection Purpose (SFPP) pursuant to Section 100B of the Rural Fires Act 1997.

The scope of changes proposed under the modification application does not warrant a further referral to RFS. The development as modified is capable of compliance with General Terms of Approval issued by RFS under the original approval (Condition 3 of original consent).

(13)

PAGE 13 CONCLUSION

The Modification Application has been assessed against the relevant heads of consideration under Section 4.55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979, Local Environmental Plan 2012 and The Hills Development Control Plan 2012 and is considered satisfactory. The issue raised in the submissions has been addressed in the report and does not warrant refusal of the application.

Approval is recommended subject to conditions.

IMPACTS Financial

This matter has no direct financial impact upon Council's adopted budget or forward estimates.

The Hills Future Community Strategic Plan

The proposed development is consistent with the planning principles, vision and objectives outlined within “Hills 2026 – Looking Towards the Future” as the proposed development provides for satisfactory urban growth without adverse environmental or social amenity impacts and ensures a consistent built form is provided with respect to the streetscape and general locality.

RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 4.55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the modification be approved as follows:-

Conditions Nos. 1, 14, 70, 88, 89 be deleted and replaced.

Condition Nos. 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D be added.

GENERAL MATTERS

1. Development in Accordance with Submitted Plans

The development being carried out in accordance with the following approved plans and details, stamped and returned with this consent except where amended by other conditions of consent.

REFERENCED PLANS AND DOCUMENTS

DRAWING NO. DESCRIPTION REVISION DATE

DA001 Site Analysis B 04 March 2015

DA002 Site Plan 04 March 2015

S4.55_01 Basement Plan D 30 April 2019

S4.55_02 Lower Ground Floor Plan F 30 April 2019

S4.55_03 Ground Floor Plan H 15 May 2019

S4.55_04 First Floor Plan E 17 July 2019

S4.55_05 Second Floor Plan D 30 April 2019

(14)

PAGE 14

S4.55_06 Third Floor Plan D 30 April 2019

S4.55_07 Roof Plan E 15 May 2019

S4.55_08 Elevations – North and South F 31 July 2019 S4.55_09 Elevation – East and West F 31 July 2019

S4.55_10 Sections EE & FF E 31 July 2019

S4.55_11 Sections AA and BB D 30 April 2019

S4.55_12 Section CC and DD D 30 April 2019

DA310 Section through Winter Gardens

A 20 November 2014

SK00 Landscape Site Plan F -

SK01 Landscape Planting Plan

Lower Ground Floor

F

SK02 Landscape Planting Plan

Ground Floor

F

No work (including excavation, land fill or earth reshaping) shall be undertaken prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, where a Construction Certificate is required.

1A. Application for Building Information Certificate

An application for Building Information Certificate is to be lodged within 30 days of the determination date of the Modification Application to consider the works already built prior to the modified consent being issued. The information that is required to be submitted with the Building Information Certificate application includes:

i. Survey report

ii. Register of each variation that is being considered under the application for Building Information Certificate

iii. Plans that clearly delineate the works already undertaken that will form part of the application.

iv. Documentation indicating certification of the development as it has been built, this being certification that would be required to be relied upon in order to issue an occupation certificate, such as:

a) Structural certification of the apartment buildings, lift shafts, external stairways, balconies & retaining walls

b) Fire resistance levels of exposed slab edges c) List of critical stage inspections and dates

d) Glazing certificates for modified windows and doors

e) Slip-resistance classification certification of external stairs and landings v. OSD system Certification:

a) Works as executed plans for the system as built.

b) A certificate of hydraulic compliance (Form B.11) from a suitably qualified engineer or surveyor verifying that the constructed OSD system will function hydraulically.

c) A certificate of structural adequacy from a suitably qualified structural engineer verifying that the structures associated with the constructed OSD system are structurally adequate and capable of withstanding all loads likely to be imposed on them during their lifetime.

(15)

PAGE 15 1B. Demolition of Garbage Bay Roof

The existing garbage bay roof is to be demolished within 30 days of the determination date of the Modification Application. A valid construction certificate is required to be issued prior to reconstruction of the roof.

1C. Egress Path of Travel

The egress path of travel from the building externally to the road is not to be directed through the garbage bay enclosure.

1D. Separate OC for Childcare Centre Fit-out

A separate occupation certificate is required for the childcare centre fit-out.

14. Construction of Separate Waste Storage Areas

The development must incorporate separate waste storage areas constructed in accordance with Council’s ‘Bin Storage Facility Design Specifications’, to facilitate the separation of commercial waste and recycling from residential waste and recycling. Additionally the waste storage area must be roofed. Storage facility for the residential component of the development must be provided for a minimum of 5 x 1100 litre garbage bins and 5 x 1100 litre recycling bins. A copy of Council’s design specifications is available at www.thehills.nsw.gov.au

DURING CONSTRUCTION

70. Construction and Fit-out of Childcare Centre

During construction and fit-out of the childcare centre and prior to issue of occupation certificate for the child care centre, to ensure that adequate provision is made for the cleanliness and maintenance of all food preparation areas, all work involving construction or fitting out of the premises shall comply with the requirements of Australian Standard AS 4674-2004 – Design, construction and fit-out of food premises and the provisions of the Food Standards Code (Australia). This includes, but is not limited to:

The intersection of floors with walls and exposed plinths in food preparation, storage and servery areas are to be coved.

All walls are to be solid construction. Solid construction is defined as brick, concrete blocks, structural fibrous cement or preformed panels that are filled with suitable material.

Pipes and conduits adjacent to walls are to be set a minimum of 25mm off wall face with brackets. Pipes and conduits entering floors, walls or ceilings are to be fitted with a flange and all gaps fully sealed.

Hand wash basins:

o Must be provided, not obstructed and accessible at bench height and no further than 5 metres from any place where open food is handled or prepared;

and

o Must be fitted with a tap that operates hands free with a permanent supply of warm running potable water delivered through a single outlet.

Note: Copies of AS 4674-2004 may be obtained from www.saiglobal.com by visiting the website: www.saiglobal.com and copies of the Food Safety Standards Code (Australia) may be obtained from Food Standards Australia New Zealand by visiting the following website www.foodstandards.gov.au.

(16)

PAGE 16 PRIOR TO ISSUE OF AN OCCUPATION CERTIFICATE

88. Food Shop Registration Requirements – Childcare Centre Occupation of the childcare centre shall not occur until:

a) The food business is registered with Council by completing and submitting the Registration of Food Business form available from Council’s website; and

b) Notification to the NSW Food Authority under Food Safety Standard 3.2.2 Division 2 Section 4 Notification is completed. This requirement is to be met by notifying via website www.foodnotify.nsw.gov.au.

89. Food Premises Final Inspection - Childcare Centre

Prior to the issue of an occupation certificate for the childcare centre, the food premises shall be inspected by an Authorised Officer of The Hills Shire Council under the Food Act 2003, to determine compliance with the Food Act 2003, Food Safety Standards and Australian Standard 4674:2004: Design Construction and Fit-out of Food Premises.

THE USE OF THE SITE

92. Commercial Waste and Recycling Collection

All waste generated onsite must be removed at regular intervals and not less frequent than once weekly for garbage and once fortnightly for recycling. The collection of waste and recycling must not cause nuisance or interfere with the amenity of the surrounding area. A service must be provided to empty childcare centre bins from inside the bin storage room located on the lower ground floor. Alternatively, childcare centre staff must transport bins to the waste collection vehicle upon its arrival, and return the bins back to their storage point onsite immediately after collection of waste has occurred. Garbage and recycling must not be placed on public property or other locations on site for collection without the formal written approval of Council. Waste collection vehicles servicing the development are not permitted to reverse in or out of the site.

ATTACHMENTS 1. Locality Plan 2. Aerial Photograph

3. Original Approved Plans (703/2015/HC) 4. Proposed Plans

5. Photographs

(17)

PAGE 17 ATTACHMENT 1 – LOCALITY PLAN

(18)

PAGE 18 ATTACHMENT 2 – AERIAL MAP

(19)

PAGE 19 ATTACHMENT 3 – ORIGINAL APPROVED PLANS (703/2015/HC)

(20)

PAGE 20

(21)

PAGE 21

(22)

PAGE 22

(23)

PAGE 23

(24)

PAGE 24

(25)

PAGE 25

(26)

PAGE 26 ATTACHMENT 4 – PROPOSED PLANS

(27)

PAGE 27

(28)

PAGE 28

(29)

PAGE 29

(30)

PAGE 30

(31)

PAGE 31

(32)

PAGE 32 ATTACHMENT 5 – SITE PHOTOS

(33)

PAGE 33

(34)

PAGE 34

(35)

PAGE 35

(36)

PAGE 36