6-
3 *qA
lNn -./
The Factory-Made House
A Critique
of Factory-Made Housesfrom
the Early Twentieth Centurywith
Reference to the Philosophy of Technology
Thesis submitæd
for
Master of Architectureby
Samuel
Ridgway
The Department of Architecture The
University
of AdelaideMarch
1995@ S.
Ridgway,
L995Table of Contents
Abstract
Acknowledgments
Chapter One
Introduction
Chapter
Two
Destination
ttHouse-Machine"
Introduction
Origins and ExemPlars of ModemitY
Time
PerceptionDescartes Durand
The Bauhaus and the
Logical
PositivistsChapter Three
Use-Meaning
Nineteenth Century
Prefabrication
49Prefabrication
in
the Early TwentiethCentury
53Systems
Building
57Walter
Segal:An
OpenSystem
64Konrad'Wachsmann and Walær Gropius:
A
ClosedSystem
76I m
1
9 24 26 34 36 43
Chapter Four
The Essence of TechnologY
Symbolic Value and
Cultural
Meaning The Human-Technolo gy Relation Technology as a Measure ofModernity
Being TechnologicalAssembly
The Destining of Revealing
The Danger and the Saving Power
Conclusion
90 92 97 100 105 r07 108
tt4
Bibliography
IT7Abstract I
This
thesis is a critiqueof
the factory-made buildings, mainly houses,which
appearedin
Europe, England and America during thefirst half
of the twentiethcentury.
Its aim is tolook
beyond conventional, technical reviewsof
these buildings, to investigate underlying causesfor
their development and to place the phenomenonin
a cultural and historicalcontext. Additionally,
a theoretical and philosophical interpretation of these technologised buildings is proposedwhich
questions the conventional conception of technology as instrumental and neutral.The central aim of chapter one, Destination House-Machine, is to situaæ the appearance
of
the factory-made housewithin
the context of the Moderntechnologically textured
world of
the early twentiethcentury.
Several exemplars throughout the development of the Modern era which indicaæimporønt
paradigmatic shifts are
highlighted.
For example, the developmentof
a Modern conceptionof
time and consequent appearanceof
the mechanicalclock
a¡e shown to indicate the shift towards a technologically mediatedview
of the naturalworld.
This
may be seen as a manifestation of the deeper fascinationwith
quantification and measurement responsiblein
partfor
the emergence of early modern science.Chapter two, Use-Meaning, describes several early twenúeth-century
building
systems, and locaæs the material settingof
thework.
Conceptual and practical differences between nineteenth and twentieth-century prefabrication arehighlighted. V/hile
hundreds of European, American and English factory-made, industrialisedbuilding
systems were developed, only a verylimited
number are discussed here but their social, historical andto
a lesser degree theirpolitical
contexts are highlighæd.Chapter three, The Essence of Technology, contains the major theoretical and philosophical elements
of
thethesis. It
proposes two interpretations of Modern technology and therefore of technologised, factory-made architecture. Thefirst, by
referring to thework
of philosopher Don Ihde and anthropologist Marshall Sahlins, argues that technology isculturally
embedded and cannot be properly understood outside its culturalsetting.
The second,with
reference toMartin
Heidegger's essay "The Quesúon Concerning Technology," reveals Modern technology to be the manifestationof
technologically enframed thinking.The conclusion drawn
from
this study of technologised architecture is thatwhile
making dwellings is a definingquality
of human-kind, some Modern modesof
making actually diminish ourhumanity.
Factory-made houses represented such a threat by obscuring other more meaningful ways of making buildings.II
This work contains no material
which
was been accepted for the awardof
any other degree or diplomain
anyuniversity or other tertiary
institution
and to the bestof
my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been madein
the text.I
give consent to this copy of my thesis, when depositedin
theUniversity Library,
being availablefor
loan andphotocopying.
Roger Samuel
Ridgway
m
Acknowledgments
I would like
to thank all those people who have helped and encouraged me throughout thewriúng
of this thesis. Special thanks go to my supervisors Professor Antony Radfordfrom
theUniversity
of Adelaide andDr. Adrian
Snodgrass from the Universityof Sydney.
Throughout my candidature Professor Radford has been generouswith
his time,providing
enthusiastic encouragement and constructivecriticism. Dr
Snodgrass provided guidance ondifficult
theoretical issues and helped
with
encouraging rema¡ks atcritical times.
Thanks go also to SusanColdicutt
from Adelaide who supervised the thesisfor
a yearwhile
Professor Radford was on study leave.