OSTEOGH{ESTS T}T
TI{E
HEAI,ING OFlHE
Ð(IBACTION I,{OU}TDCIIAU Kaí-Kin o B.D.S.ïlons .
*resis
subnitted.for the
d.egreeof
MASTER OF DEISTAT SURGEFY
DEPARTIITE},II¡ OF DEI.ÍIAT, SCÏE1\TCE
UNTVERSITY OF ADE,ATDE
.
1968l-
TABLE
OF
CO}TTHSTSPRECTS
DECLAR.LTIO}T
ACKITOI,lLEÐGEMENTS
T¡MRODUCTION
CHAPIER
1:
0STEOGENESTSIN
BONE REPAIRHistorícal
and.turrent
Concepts
of
Bone FepairA.
Periosteum a¡d. bonecelIs
Page
viii
l_x
0.1
1.1
1.3
1.1+
1.7
1.13
1.15
1.16 1.1?
9
pages20 pages
vI
T
ïï
B. Induetion of
eonnectivetissue
Tosfaplasi-aMatrix
Synthesís andMineralization
A.
Osteoblasts a,nd ground substanceB.
Osteoblasts and- collagenÌ formatíon
0. CalcifÍcation
CITAPIER 2: TTTE TTÏSTOIOGY OF BOI$E FEPATR
f.
Healingin Fractures of
BoneA.
Thehistological
ser¿ueneeB.
Bone fo:mationC. Cartílage
formationD. O¡antity of
callusff. IÏealing of
Cortical- DefeetsA. Periosteal
and. endosteel callusesB. Remodelling
,C.
Role and.fate of
theperiosteaL
call-usGrA]ltffi
3:
HEALII{Gï}I
THE EXTRAüIION WOUIIID2.t 2.t 2.I
2.6 2.9 2.L2
2.r5 2.r5
2,U
2 .18
11
20 pages
I.
II.
ITI.
The Sequence
of
PepairA. ïn
dogsB. ïn rats
C. ïn
rhesus monkeysD. fn
manLocaL Factors
Influencing
HealingDela¡r
in
liealíng( t'D4r soeketst')
3.r.
?l
3.1 3.2 3.h
?q
3.8
X.5 pages
CI{AT{TER
I+:
OBJECTS .A}TD }4ETTTODOIOGYT.
CeLlProliferation II.
Gror¡nd. Substance andIntercellular
FibresIII.
New Bone FomationA.
TetracyclínesB.
Chl-orazol- Fast ?ínkCHAFTER
5:
MASENTAI.S A}TD METHOÐ$I.
Ctroiceof
Experimental- AnirnalsLr
l+.3
4.6 l+.ro
l+.
fe
h. 16
5. l-
5.t
5.3
5.1+
5.8 5.9
6. r_
6.3
L11
18 pages
9
pages90
pagesIÏ.
TTT.
C$.APÍER
6:
RESüLTSOperative Procedures E'xperÍment
al
ProceduresTable 5.1 Table 5.2
I. Tnterpretation
II. I{ealing ín the
Extra.ction SocketCHAPTER
7:
DTSCUSSÏON ?.1-?.1
?.h
7.5 7.6 7.8
7.rt
?.11
"f t¿
7.18 T. t9
7.2Ð '7 r;'1
B.r
iv
23 pages
2
pqgesï.
Healingin the
Extra.ctíon SocketA.
Granulation Tissue andIntereellular
FibresB.
Period.ontal Membrane RemnantsC.
Resorptíonin
Alveol-ar SoeketD.Osteogenesis
E.
Bonein the
SoehetF.
Endosteal BoneG. Periosteal
BoneII. Correlation wÍth
HealingÍn
Fractures and.Cortical
Defeets
A. Periosteal
ReactionB.
Endosteal ReactionC.
Osseousvepair of injured
Bone
Ir.
RemodellíngCTÍAPTER
B:
SUMMÁ3Y .A}.ID CONCLUSTOSSAPPMMCS
RE¡I'EREISCES
ï. nat Dentition
ïï.
Dietïïï.
Instntvrents and.operative
ProeeduregïV.
DrugsV. Ijltra-rrioLet
I'luores eence micros copyVï.
Preparation and. Sectioníngof
Undeealcifíed. BoneVIï.
HistoJ-ogical and.'IIisto-
chemical Techniques
App. i App. iii
¡p,p. v
App.t¡:iiÍ
x
xií
App. xvi
9
23 pages App
App
28 pages
vt
PREgTS
In
a preJ-ininarrystuðy, it vas
formdlthat certaín features in tbe healÍng of the
e:ctractíon wound.in experi-
mental animals wereinconsÍstent with
eonventioaaL descrip-tions. In
ad.dÍtionto the
formationof
ner¡ bonewithín
thealveol-ar socket, bone was
also
forrned suboeriosteaLly on the buccalsurface.
Ttrepresent investígation is
an extensionof the
aþove study.A hooded
strain of the
$forwegía,nrat in rrhÍdr
analclllary
molar was removed. has been
used,
artdthe
healinel proeessthat follor¡ed
l¡asstutlied wÍth the
useof:-
1. Intra-vítaL staining of
ner¡ bonerríth
(
a) Ae¡ethyl-chlortetraeyeline, (t)
chLorazolfast pink.
2, Localization of mitotic activíties with
coLchicíne.3.
Sonehisto-eherlical
observationsof extra-eeLlular
eorcponents vhieh were also mad.e along
with routine histologica.i-
technio-ues .The
results
índ.ícatethai there is a
closeparallel
between
heating in fractures, ln corbical
clefectsin
boneand
in the alveolar extraction
wound, bythe fonratÍon of
ttperiostealtt
r
ttendostealrf and rrunitingtteallus.
vÍí
Hovever,
the
formationof
buccalperiosteal
bonein
theextraction
wound was avariable feature
and appearedto'be
reLatedto the
Þreseneeof inflainnatÍon.
Inf1q¡rmationÍn the
perioster¡n could.asise fron
(a) a d:ireet
extensionfrm the oral
wound,or (b) ind.ireetly
acrossthe alveolar
socketwal.l.
Ttlelack of periosteal
bone formationin the
nasaland. palataL surfaces
of the
rna:<ilJ.a cannotbe
explaineil.Ccrrnparison
with repair of
bonein other sltuations
suggeststhat
undercertain
eireumstanees, ÍnflamtrationviLl
leadto periosteal
bone for¡aation.Food.
ínpaetion
end sequestrationof necrotic
bone anrL/orroot
fra€ments leaclsto intensive
infl-qr¡rnationin the
soeket.lhis intensive
infla¡mnation d.el4yecL wound. heal-ing and. bone fo:¡mationín the
socket.End.osteal bone
fo:mation,
analogousto the
endostealcallus in the healÍng of a fracturer
wâs aLso notedÍn
somesneei¡ens.
vÍii
DECLARATIOlV
fhis thesis ís
submittedin fu]-filnent of the require-
mentsfor the
Degreeof
Masterof
Dental Surgeryin
theUniversit¡¡ of Adelaid.e.
Cand.idaturefor the
Degree nassatisfied by obtaining the
Honours Ðegree(¡'irst
Class)of
Bachelorof
Dental Surgeryin
1965.Ttris thesis
contains nomaterial which,
except where duenention is
made, has been aecepted,for the
at¡ard.of
anyother
d.egreeor
d.iplcmaÍn
anyUniversity.
Tothe best of
my knowl-ed.geo
this thesis
contains nomaterial
previously publishetLor lrrítten by
another person, exeept where clueref erenee has been mad.e
in the text.
Ttre
results of the present investigatÍon
have been presented.in part to the
meetingof the
International- Assoeiationfor
Dental Researeh(Australian Section) tg6l.
CIIAU Kai-Kin
1X
A CKI\TOI'ILÐG$ IEÌ\TTS
The author wishes
to
recordhis
sÍnceregratitude to his
supervÍsoroDr. J.A.
Cran, Readerin
0ra1 Pathology and 0ra1 Surgery,the University of
Aclelaide,for the o¡porbunities
he has madear¡ailable for thís
study andfor his
constant aclvíce'
eneouragement and patience.
To
the staff of the
Histo-pathologyLaboratory, of
theDivísion of Oral
Pathology ar¡dOral
Surgery,Ðd in parbicular to l¡fr.
D.E. Smale,the
autlroris very
mueh indebtedfor their
eo-operatíon and
technieal assistance.
To these persons,&d to
MissK.
Shertoek, who preparedthe
photogfaphicillustrationst the author
also wishesto
recordhís
appreciation.Thanks
are also
dueto Prof. E.
Storeyothe
UníversÍtyof
Melbourne,for the
opportunit-r¡for learning the
techniquesof intra-vital
bonestaíning
and.the preparation for
sectíoningof
und.eealcified. tissues .Lastly, the.author
wishesto
thank MissE.B.
James andMrs. R.
Scantleburyfor their
care takenin the typing of
this
manuscript.INTRODUCTION
Although r,¡ound
healing is the basis of
surgíca1 seiencethe intricate
meehanismsof this essential
process areby
no meansund.erstood.. It is not until recently that
atte¡rpts have been madeto correlate the histological,
bioetremical andphysical
aspectsof
wound healing.Becar:se
of its
hard.nhysieal nature,
bonetissue
posesspecial
problerns whiehhave, for a long
tÍme, d.efÍed. theapplication of
experimental methods r,rhich haveyielded results in investigations in healing of soft tissues.
Under nor:mal
conditions,
woundsof the
mouthheal ranídly
and
without
measurable systemiceffects. Relatively for detailed investigations, eÍther clinical or
experi:nental, have been concernedwith this
subject.DiscrepancÍes
in the literature
regard.ingthe
histogenesísof various tissues
associ.a,ted-with
al-veolar socket woundhealíng
pronpted, a prelímínar¡rinvestigation
bythe
author.As an outcorne
of this, certain features in the healing of
theerçtraetion wound rn¡ere noted. r,rhich called.
for further
inves-tigation.
The present
investigation is
anattanpt at ap¡lying
someteehniques
of studying ealcified. tÍssues to the healing of
o .2.
extraetion wor¡nd,s. At the
sanetime, the
r¡ound has al.so beenstudied frcn the histological
and. histochenícaL ângle.An
attenpt
uas madeto
ecrnpare and eorrel-atethe healíng of this intra-oral-
woundwíth the healing of a fracture in
long bones and-healing of eortieal
clefectsin
bone.fhe effect of
feeding mad.d.erroot
onthe
bonesof pigs, first
observed duríngthe niddle of the
eigbteenth centurXr, gave anatcmistsof that period a tool for follorÍng
the developmentof
and"repair
processesin bone. ïhe
basie observationsof early
workersare stil1 vaIid.,
andconstitute the
formd.atíonof eellul-ar
bone ¡ürysÍology asit exists
today.
The teehniquesof intra-r¡:itaI staíning of
bone using varÍor¡s markersare
refinementsof the
sameprinciple
andthese fomr
the first part of the
presentinvestigation.
ïn
recent years rnan¡r methodsof tagging
and label-ling ceI1s have beccmeavaileble with the
useof
::ad-io-aetiveisotopes
and. haveafforded
a meonsof
studyingthe origin
andfate of
eelluJ.ar ccrrponentsin
tíssues"
Less aecurate and.sorplistieated. methods have aJ-so been avaíIab1e which enerble a
lÍnited insight into cellular activities.
Oneof
theselatter
methods,
the
useof coldri.cine,
has beenapplied in the
presentinvestÍgation to
observethe ¡ritotLc activities of
variouseellular
eomponentsin
bonerepair.
0.3.
Ttre rol-e
of the
ground substances and.the extra- eellular
cæponents have been emphasised.in recent
stud.ies on woundhealing.
Histoehenical raethodsafford
a meansof íctentifying
varlor.s bioehemical ccmponents presentÍn
thehealing
r,¡ouncl and.fóm a
subsid.iar¡r approachto the
presentstudy of
osseousrepair.
ïn the first seetion of this thesís, the
rel-evantLiterature
onvarious
aspectsof
bonerepaír
and. osteo- genesisare revie'wed..
Thetheoretical basis of
methottsused
in the
presentinvestigation is d-iscussed.
The seeond.seetion
reporbsthe
methocts and.findings.