• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Propagation of Actinidia chinensis (Planch.) by stem and root cutting : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Horticultural Science at Massey University

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Propagation of Actinidia chinensis (Planch.) by stem and root cutting : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Horticultural Science at Massey University"

Copied!
13
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for

a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and

private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without

the permission of the Author.

(2)

PROPAGATION OF ACTINIDIA CHINENSIS (PLANCH.) BY STEM AND ROOT CUTTING

A Thesis Submitted in partial lulfilment of the requirements for the degree of

Master in Horticultural Science at Massey University

SIM BOON LIANG

1979

(3)

(ii)

ABSTRACT

Basal wounding, bottom heat, light with IBA treatments were found to be beneficial for rooting of

_Actinidia chinensis (Planch.). IBA treatment was effective only when there was a high natural ability to initiate root in Summer and Spring.

Seasonal fluctuations in rooting ability was pronounced. This seasonal variation seems to be related to the levels of endogenous IAA, ABA and cofactor 2. No correlation between root initiation and bud activity or

IAN level was established.

IAA seems to be the fundamental physiological promoter of adventitous root formation. IBA plays only a supporting role in promoting root formation, by protecting the endogenous IAA level in the cutting base.

Leaf tissue is an important factor for rooting to be successful. The role of leaf tissue is not just to

produce auxin or synthesize nutrients but rather some unknown factor in the leaf can produce a synergistic interaction with auxin in root formation processes.

Root cuttings of Abbott variety were sequentially harvested and planted over a period from late Autumn

(1.4.77) until mid Summer (8.1.78). Root cuttings of different thickness and length were compared to evaluate their effect on regeneration. The effect of various growt regulators was investigated too.

Root diameters of 0.5 - 1.5 cm. out performed that of the thinner or thicker ones. Shorter cuttings (5 cm) of equivalent total length were found to be more productive than a single long cutting (15cm). Strong polarity was observed with shoots only arising from the proximal end of the cutting.

Regenerative capacity was highest in late Autumn and Winter and lowest in Summer. This seasonal fluctuation

(4)

(iii) can be altered by exogenous application of growth

regulators. IBA suppressed shoot regeneration, whereas cytokinin and sucrose promoted it, while GA3 did not have any significant effect.

For commercial use, the practical and economic aspects of this techique require further investigation.

(5)

IAA IAN IBA

ABA

GA3

GA

BAP

DNA RNA

PPM

p

~

IX

~ll

Glossary of Abbreviations

=

::

=

:a

=

=

:z

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

indoleacetic acid indoleacetic nitrile indolebutyric acid abscisic acid

gibberellic acid gibberellin

benzylaminoptlrine

deoxyribonucleic acid ribonucleic acid

parts per million probability

0 .196 0.0596 0.00196

(iv)

(6)

(v)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The author would like to thank Professor

J.A. Veale, Mr. G.S. Lawes and Dr. D.J. Woolley for their guidance and assistance in their capacity as supervisors.

My sincere thanks to Mr. G. Vander Mespel of Horticultural Research Centre in Levin for supplying cutting materials.

I would like to express my gratitude to A. Watson and D. Anderson for their technical assistance.

(7)

C O

=========•=====

N T E N T S

Chapter

1 Review of Literature 1.1 Introduction

1.2 Propagation of Stem Cuttings

1.2.1 Anatomical Development of Roots Cuttings

1.2.1.1 Mechanical hinderance 1.2.2 Environmental Factors Affecting

Rooting Ability of Cutting 1 .2.2.1 Seasonal Variation 1.2.2.2

1.2.2.3

Photo period

Other Light Effect

1.2.2.4 Physical Envirorunent for Rooting 1.2.3 Physiological Aspects

1.2.3.1 Juvenility

1.2.3.2 The Effects of Leaves 1.2.3.3 The Effects of Buds

1.2.3.4 The Effects of Flowering Buds 1.2.4 Hormonal Basis of Rooting

1.2.4.1 1.2.4.2 1.2.4.3 1.2.4.4 1.2.4.5

Endogenous Auxins Oytokinin

Gibberellins and Rooting Abscisic Acid

Ethylene 1.2.5 Role of Cofactors 1.2.6 Nutrition

1.2.6.1 Carbohydrate 1.2.6.2 Nitrogen

1.2.6.3 Other Nutritions

1.2.7 Type of Wood Selected for Cuttings 1 .3 Root Cuttings

1 1 1

2 4

5 5 9 11 13 15 15 17 20 22 23 24

28

29 35 37 38 40 41 43 44 45

46

(8)

Chapter

2 Rationale of the Pre sent Work

3 General Material s and Methods 3.1 Plant Materials

3.2 Collectjon and Preparation of Cutting Materials

3,3 Treatment and Planting of Cutting 3.3.1

3.3.2 3.3.3

Wounding and Rooting Condition Indole Butyric Acid Treatment Application of Indole-Acetic Acid 3.4 Plast ic Tent

'3.5 Sampling of Material for !Iorrnone Extraction

'3.1; Extraction of PJant Mater.ial for Hormone Annlysis

·-s.6 .1 Initial Extract ion for Auxin and Inhibitors

3.6.2 Extraction of PJant Material for Root ing Cofactors

7

7 C~1rcmatography of Extr'tcts for Hormone Analysis

3. 7. 1 Paper Chromatogrc111hy of Auxin and Inhibitors

3.7.2 Paper Chromatography of Rooting Cofactors

3.8 Bioassay Procedures

3.8.1 Triticum Coleoptile Bioassay 3.8.2 Avena Coleoptile Bioassay

3.8.3 Mung Bean Root Initiation Bioassay 3.9 Root Cuttings

49 50 50 50 50 50 51 52 52

53 53 53

57 57 57 58 58 58 59 64 66

(9)

Chapter

4 Propagation of Actinidia chinensis by Stem Cuttings

4.1 The Effect of Wounding on H.ooting Actinidia chinensis

4.2 Varietal and Sexual Difference in the Pro-pagation of Actinidia e}1incnsis 4. 3 Propagation of Leafy r:11: t i r,r u.1der

Polythene-Tent

4 .4 The Effect of Bxop-enou., Tl" ,u1 Rooting of Actinidia chinensi s

4.4.1 The Influence 8t' T// n·l Bar.ml Temperature on t.11, tlc•otj np; of Actinidia chine •:;; .·

4.4.2 The Effect of V r:ous Concentration of IBA on Root h1·r1'llf'!'i1tion of

67 67

70 72

76

Actinidia chinen:::;is 79

5

r ;.

5 Sec1sonal Chanres in Hoot Ini ti8.tion of Actinidia chinensis

4. ,-; The Relationship Between dud Dormancy and Root Initiation

·1 . 7 Seasonal Changes of Endogenous Growth Regulators of Actinidln chincnsis

.t . r3 E:xcJ.mination of the Rol e of I/IA and IBA in Root Formation of Bruno Cuttings 4.9 Effects of Leaves

Propagatin,£? Actinidia chinensis by Root Cutting

5. 1 Introduction

5.2 The Shoot Regeneration Potential of Roots of Different Diameter

5.3 Root Length and Polarity 5.4 Seasonal Effects

5.5 Applied Growth Regulators

89

95 101 113 130

137 137 137 140 145 147

(10)

Chapter

6 Gener al Discussion and Conclusion 6.1 Stem Cuttings

6.2 Root Cuttings

7 Anpend.ices

Appendix 1 Standard Buffer Solution

Appendix 2 ANOVA for Stem Cutting Experiments Appendix 3 ANOVA for Root Cutting Experiments

8 8j bliography

Page

152 152 161

165 165 166 174

177

(11)

Fig. 3. €1.1

Fi.f. 3.8. i

Fir. 3.8.2

Fir-. 3.8.3

·r

c1 b10 /4 1 • 1

rr ~, b J e 4 • 2 • 1

'I ; 1 \J 1 ,, •I ':5 1

LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES

= ===== ==== === ===--===~== ======

Summary of hor:none extraction procedure

Standard curve for whent coleoptile response to ARi\

St andard curve ~·or oat coleoptile response to IAA

Standard curve for oat coleoptile response to IM,

The percentage of rooting, and callusing of H'l.YW8rd cuttings treated with IHA and woundinc

The percentage rootin~ of Hayward, Abbott and Matu~ ~ropaeated under standard conditions

Hesul ts for J e 1 (y lin ,·w,lrd cutting proµagated Ull(l1'r mi~! or polythene tent

T: l'le 4. 4. 1 . 1, Results showi nf tr..e pffect of bottom

56

61

62

63

68

71

74

4. 4. 1. 2, h<::at and IBA 0.1 Jlr-'.{W,ird stem cutting 80

[l r~ri 4 . 4 . 1 . 3

•:· ., ble 4. 4 . 2. 1 Tables showi n[ the effect of

different IBA -c-oncentration on the

rooting of Abbott, stem cuttings 81 Fi['. 4.4.2.1 Percentage rootinf; of Abbott cutting 82 Fip. 4.4.2.2 The effect of v~rJous concentration

of IAA on root regeneration of

Actinidia chinensjs 83

Table 4. 5. 1 Percentage rooting on successive

harvest date 90

Fig. 4.5.1 Seasonal fluctuation in the rooting ability of Hayward ann Abbott stem

cuttings 91

Table 4.6.2.1 Percentage bud break and days to 50% bud break of cuttings of

Abbott variety 96

Fip. 4.6.2.1 Seasonal bud activities 97

(12)

Table 4.6.3.1

Fir;. 4. 7. 1

Pig. 4. 7.2

Fii-~. 4.7.3

F Lr:. 4. 7 •4

'I.',qble 4.8.1 T,ibJ.c 4.8.2

}'i:"'". :1 .0 .1

Fig. 4.8.3

Fip. t,.8.4

r.r a b 1 e 4 • 8 • 3

Table 4.9.1

Table 5. 2. 1

Percentage rooLing of bud and budless Abbott cuttinr,s treated with or without IRA nt various harvests

Seasonal chanr.es in rtn acidic

99

growth promoter, similar to IAA 104 Seasonal chanrcs of a neutral

growth promoter, similar to IAN 105 Seasonal changes of an acidic

growth inhibitor, s i m iJ.ar to ABA 1 06 Seasonal changes oJ' rooting

promoters from Hayw::ud cuttings as determined by the Mung Bean

Bioassay 107

Treatment for Uruno cuttinrs Precentage rootinr of Bruno cuttlng,J treated with IAA, IBA and centrifue;ai ion singly or in combination

Histograms of IAA-like growth pro:noters from stem tissue and centrifugate of Bruno

Histograms of lAN extracted from stem tisciue and centrifueate of Bruno

Histograms of ABA extracted from stem tiosue and centrifueate of Bruno

Rooting cofactors extracted from stem tissues of Bruno

Extractable Level of endogenous growth regulators from the excised bases, c1 ttings and centrifugate Bruno after centrifugation

Percentage rooting of Abbott leafy and leafless cuttings in response to IAA

Table showing the percentage shoot regeneration and number of shoot per root cutting

114

115

117

119

121 123

125

1 31

138

(13)

Fip. •,.?.1

Fig . '5.2.2

Fir-. r .2 .3

'l'ab]e r:."3.3

FiC". ' .4 .1

'l': b 1 e ~ '1-1

Tab}e

5 . 5. 4

Tabel

5 .5 . 5

Table

5 . 5. 6

Fhotos showing the shoot

regeneration cc11iaci ty of roots of different di ·11neter and length Photo showing the shoot

regenernUon cnn;icity of roots with different rlinmetcr

CJ.o se-up phot o ::;how i

nr:

loc:a tion of shoot emergence from cortex of cut end.

Shoot regeneration cn.·)acity of Abbot t root cutt inps taken on 11/7/77

Shoot regeneration cnpacity of Abbott root c utti :l[S tc=tken on '31/9/77

Percentage of shoot regeneration of Abbott root cuttinpo at various harvesting dater.

J>crcentage of shoot rerrencration i::1 Abbott root t·uttings at various h2rvestir1p; datP~·

Treatmerits of vc1rio•;s hormone on Abbott root cuttinrs

•rrea tments of ill\ t> and :rncrose on Abbot t ruot cut t i nr·:_;

Effect of IBA ( 1

r,o

•1wl -1 ) treatment

on Abbott root ~uttinrs

Ef .feet of GA ( SO :npl - 1

) treatment on Abbott root cuttirws

Effect of BAP ( '/?

m,

1 - 1 ) treatment

on Abbott root cuttinRs

Effect of BAP an1 sucrose on shoot regeneration

141

142

143

144

144

146

147

148

148

149

149

149

150

Referensi

Dokumen terkait