0
• •
0 A S A
• 0
o A
A
• 0
o298.f5K .303.15K 308.15K A313.15K o318.15K •323.15K
1 2
3 4 5 6
ni carbon number
Figure 4.50: Dependence of the excess molar volume (V') with carbon number (n) of n- alcohols with different temperature at 0.5 mole fraction.
1
0
0.6
M
. 0.4
>
0.2
o 298.15K .303.15K t308.15K A313.15K o318.15K .323.15K o
A A
• • o A
o298.15K .303.15K 308.15K &313.15K o318.15K 9323.15K
0
• 0 A
0
.1.4 1.2
E 0.8
If C.)
0.6
> 0:4 0.2 0
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
1 2 3 4 5 6
-'
ni carbon number
Figure 4.51: Dependence of the excess molar volume (V) with carbon number (n) of n- alcohols with different temperature at 0.8 mole fraction.
1 2 3 4 5 6
ni carbon number
Figure 4.52: Dependence of the excess molar volume (V) with carbon number (n) of iso - alcohols with different temperature at 0.2 mole fraction.
2.5 2
1
0 1.5
C.,
E C.)
0.5
o298.15K .303.15K 308.15K A313.15K
0 o318.15K .323.15K
S 0
S
A
o298.15K •303.15K 308.15K A313.15K 0318.15K .323.15K
0
A S
0
A
0
Results and Discussion Chap fer IV
1 2 3 4 5 6
ni
carbon numberFigure 4.53: Dependence of the excess molar volume (Vt) with carbon number (n) of iso -
alcohols with different temperature at 0.5 mole fraction.
2.5 2 EI.5 0 E C.,
>
0.5
0 i I I I
1 2 3 4 5 6
ni
carbon numberFigure 4.54: Dependence of the excess molar volume (yE) with carbon number (ii) of iso - alcohols with different temperature at 0.8 mole fraction.
Results and Discuss ion Chapter IV
1.8 1.6 1.4
1.2 E 0.8 0 0.6
>0.4 0.2
Oethanol
• n-propanol on-butanol
•n.amyl alcohol
290 300 310 320 330 T/K
Figure 4.55: Comparison of excess molar volume (yE) vs temperature (T) of Ethanol, n- Propanol, n-Butanol, n-Amyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 0.5 mole fraction.
I 0.9 0.8 0.7
0
0.6 EO.5
0.4
00.3
o ethanol0.2
• n-propanolo n-butanol
0.1
• n-amyl alcohol0
290 300 310 320 330 T/K
Figure 4.56: Comparison of excess molar volume (1/) vs temperature (T) of Ethanol, n- Propanol, n-Butanol, n-Amyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 0.2 mole fraction.
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
['11
o ethanol
['XI
• n-propanol0.7 o n-butanol
0.6 • n-amy I alcohol
0.5 E
0.3
>0.2 0.1
0 -i-
290
300 310 320 330EI T/K
Figure 4.57: Comparison of excess molar volume (V) vs temperature (T) of Ethanol, n- Propanol, n-Butanol, n-Amyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 0.8 mole fraction.
2.50
2.00
1.50
0
E
1.00
0.50
0.00 +- 290
o iso-propanol
• iso-butanol o iso-amy I alcohol
300 310 320 330
TIK
Figure 4.58: Comparison of excess molar volume
(VE)
vs temperature (T) of iso-Propanol, iso-Butanol and iso-Amyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 0.5 mole fraction.Results and Discussion Chapter IV
1.6 1.4 1.2
0
E0.8 E 0.6
0.4
0.2
0 1- 290
cr~~
o iso-propanol
• iso-butanol oiso-amyl alcohol
300 310 320 330
p.'
T/K
Figure 4.59: Comparison of excess molar volume (1/') vs temperature (T) of iso-Propanol, iso-Butanol and iso-Amyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 0.2 mole fraction.
3
o iso-propanol
2.5 • iso-butanol o iso-amy laIcohcl FA
I-
0
EI.5
C.,
E C-)
0.5
0 -!--
290 300 310 320 330
T/K
Figure 4.60: Comparison of excess rno!ar volume (V) vs temperature (T) iso-Propano!, iso- Butanol and iso-Amyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 0.8 mole fraction.
1
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0
—c-- 298.15K
-.-- 303.15K
-&- 308.15K
313.15K 318.15K
-.- 323.15K
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
-&
x
2Figure 4.61: Plots of viscosity (j) vs mole fraction (x2) of Ethanol +Nitrobenzene system at 298.15K, 303.15K, 308.15K, 313.15K, 318.15K and 323.15K respectively.
2.0 1.8 1.6 -14
1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6
-0-- 298.15K
-4-- 303.15K -h- 308.15K -1--- 313.15K
—e— 318.15K
-•-- 323.15K
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 x2
Figure 4.62: Plots of viscosity (ii) vs mole fraction (X2) of n-Propanol + Nitrobenzene system at 298.15K, 303.15K, 308.15K, 313.15K, 318.15K and 323.15K respectively.
-
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
2.7
2.2
U)
a- Et7
-K-298.15K -4-303.15K
-a--
308. 15K-A--- 313. 15K --318.15K
H. - 323.15K
1.2
4.
0.7 1 1 I
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
x2
Figure 4.63: Plots of viscosity
(ii)vs mole fraction
(X2)of n-Butanol
+Nitrobenzene system
at 298.lSK3O3.lSK,3O8.15K,313.15K31815K and 32315Krespectively
1
3.7
3.2
2.7
U)
c2.2
a- E 1.7 1.2 0.7 02
-o--298.15K -'--303.15K
-a--
308. 15K -*--313.15K -e--318.15K -1-323.15K0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
x2
Figure 4.64: Plots of viscosity ('1) vs mole fraction (12) of n-Amyl alcohol
+Nitrobenzene
system at 298.15K, 303.15K, 308.15K, 3 13.15K, 318.15K and 323.15K respectively.
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6
°-14 E
1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
-&
x2
Figure 4.65: Plots of viscosity (i) vs mole fraction (x2) of iso-Propanol + Nitrobenzene system at 298.15K, 303.15K, 308.15K, 313.15K, 318.15K and 323.15K respectively.
3.2 2.7
Co2.2
1.7
1.2 0.7
-0-- 298.15K 303. 15K -z2-- 308.15K 313.15K 318.15K
-.-- 323.15K
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
x2
Figure 4.66: Plots of viscosity ('1) vs mole fraction (x2) of iso-Butanol + Nitrobenzene system at 298.15K,303.15K,308.15K,313.15K,318.15K and 323i5Krespective1y.
-<>- 298.15K
—.-303.15K
. 308.15K
-k- 313.15K 318.15K
-.- 323.15K
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
3.7 3.2 2.7 2.2
1.7
1.2
0.2 ¶ I I I
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
x2
Figure 4.67: Plots of viscosity ()vs mole fraction (X2) of iso-Amyl alcohol + Nitrobenzene system at 298.15K, 303.15K, 308.15K, 313.15K, 318.15K and 323.15K respectively.
40.0
—i-298.15K
A
35.0 --303.15K
—o--308.15K
30.0 —A--313.15K
—e-318.15K
II
U)
25.0
—--323.15K 20.015.0 10.0 5.0 0.0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
x2
Figure 4.68: Plots of viscosity ('1) vs mole fraction x2) of Propylene glycol + Nitrobenzene system at 298.15K, 303.15K, 308.15K, 313.15K, 318.15K and 323.15K respectively.
1.5
U) 0
0.5
ro.i .0.2 x 0.3
o0.5 oO.7 0.9
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
4
-0.1 10.2 x0.3 x 0.4 o0.5 •0.6 00.7 •08Cl) 0.9
0
1
il
1 2 3 4 5 6
ni carbon number
Figure 4.69: Dependence of the viscosity
()
with carbon number (n) of n-alcohols with different mole fraction at 298.15K.I I
1 2 3 4 5 6
ni carbon number
Figure 4.70: Dependence of the viscosity (ii) with carbon number (n) of n-alcohols with different mole fraction at 3 13.15K.
-0.1 .0.2 x0.3 i0.4 o0.5 •0.6 o0.7 •0.8
0.9 Al
3
0.
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
04
I 2 3 4 5 6
I'
ni
carbon numberFigure 4.71: Dependence of the viscosity (ii) with carbon number (n) of n-alcohols with different mole fraction at 323.15K.
4
U)
0 c3
I 0
r-0.1
.0.2I
xo.3 r0.4
- o0.5 •0.6 I
A nO.7 •08
1 2 3 4 5 6
ni
carbon numberFigure 4.72: Dependence of the viscosity () with carbon number (n) of iso-alcohols with different mole fraction at 298.15K.
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
4
3 2.5
(I) Ci 0 15
F 1
0.5
-0.1 .0.2 x0.3 x 0.4 o0.5 •0.6 00.7 .08
0.9
1 2 3 4 5 6
ni
carbon numberFigure 4.73: Dependence of the viscosity
(ii)
with carbon number (n) of iso -alcohols with different mole fraction at 3 13.15K.2.5
1.5 0
:-
0.5
-0.1 10.2 x0.3 0.4
E
*0.8
1 2 3 4 5 6
ni
carbon numberFigure 4.74: Dependence of the viscosity () with carbon number (n) of iso -alcohols with different mole fraction at 323.15K.
1'
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
1.7
A 298.15K
A 303.15K A A
1.5
•308.15K o313.15K•318.15K
o 323.1 -
U)
CL
0.9
0
0.7
0
.5 I I I I1 2 3 4 5 6
-4'
ni carbon number
Figure 4.75: Dependence of the viscosity (i) with carbon number (n) of n-alcohols with different temperature at 0.5 mole fraction.
A 298.15K
3.5
- A303.15K.308.15K a 313.15K .318.15K
0. 2.5
• o323.15K A1.5
0 . 5
1 2 3 4 5 6
ni carbon number
Figure 4.76: Dependence of the viscosity (ii) with carbon number (n) of n-alcohols with different temperature at 1.0 mole fraction.
I -
*298.15K
AL3o3.15K
.308.15K
A /Lo313.15K
.318.15K
/o323.15K
0I I I
3.5
a. 2.5
1.5
0.5
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
- A298.15K I /A
3O3.15K
A
•308.15K
-
+318.
o313.1
ø A
o323.
.
- I I
1.9
-k
1.7
•_ 1.5
U)
1.3
•1.1 0.9 0.7 0.5
1 2 3 4 5 6
ni carbon number
Figure 4.77: Dependence of the viscosity
(ii)with carbon number (n) of iso -alcohols with different temperature at 0.5 mole fraction.
1 2 3 4 5 6
ni carbon number
Figure 4.78: Dependence of the viscosity
(ij)with carbon number (n) of iso -alcohols with
different temperature at 1.0 mole fraction.
Results and Discussion chapter IV
-4
1.8 1.6 1.4
-
1.2
Cl) 0
0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2
—.—ethanol -0- n-propanol -*- n-butanol -—n-amyI alcohol
290 300 310 320 330 T/K
Figure 4.79: Comparison of viscosity (i) vs temperature (T) of Ethanol, n-Propano!, n- Butanol, n-Arnyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 0.5 mole fraction.
1.5
1.6 1.4
-
1.2
Cl)
Q-
I
E
0.80.6 0.4 0.2
290 300 310 320 330 T/K
Figure 4.80: Comparison of viscosity
()
vs temperature (T) of Ethanol, n-Propanol, n- Butanol, n-Amyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 0.2 mole fraction.Results and Discussion Chapter IV
2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2
0
0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2
—'—ethanol -0- n-propanol -A--- n-butanol
—e--n-amyl alcohol
290 300 310 320 330
-&
T/K
Figure 4.81: Comparison of viscosity ('i) vs temperature (T) of Ethanol, n-Propanol, n- Butanol, n-Amyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 0.8 mole fraction.
3.7 3.2 2.7 22
0
1.7
1.2 0.7
[.—othanoI
—o-- n-propanol -*--- n-butanol
—e—n-amyl alcohol
a-
0.2 ! I I
290 300 310 320 330 T/K
Figure 4.82: Comparison of viscosity (q) vs temperature (T) of Ethanol, n-Propanol, n- Butanol, n-Arnyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 1.0 mole fraction.
1'
a-
1.8
1.7 1.6
1.5 W1.4
°- 13
E
1.21.1
I
0.9
0.8
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
2.2 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2
ZZ
0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2
-4--- iso-propanol -0-- iso-b uta nol
—*--iso-amyl alcohol
290 300 310 320 330 T/K
Figure 4.83: Comparison of viscosity (ij) vs temperature (T) of iso-Propanol, iso-Butanol and iso-Amyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 0.5 mole fraction.
SUU 310 320 330
T/K
Figure 4.84: Comparison of viscosity (ii) vs temperature (T) of iso-Propanol, iso-Butanol and iso-Amyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 0.2 mole fraction.
-41
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
PRA
-.-- iso-propanol
—a— iso-b utanol
2.2
—*--iso-amyl alcoholCl)
1.7 E 1.2
I!
LAA
0.2 1
I290 300 310 320 330 T/K
Figure 4.85: Comparison of viscosity (ii) vs temperature (T) of iso-Propanol, iso-Butanol and iso-Amyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 0.8 mole fraction.
A #
3.7 3.2
U)
2.7 2.2 E
1.7 1.2 0.7 0.2
290 300 310 320 330 T/K
Figure 4.86: Comparison of viscosity (i) vs temperature (T) of iso-Propanol, iso-Butanol and iso-Arnyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 1.0 mole fraction.
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1
a-
•- -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 -0.5
0.003 0.0031 0.0032 0.0033 0.0034
I ITlK 1
Figure 4.87: Comparison of in ,, vs lIT of Ethanol, n-Propanoi, n-Butanol, n-Amyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 0.5 mole fraction.
0.5
0.4
0.2 U)
a.
0.1
(
-0_1
0.003 0.0031 0.0032 0.0033 0.0034 I ITIK 1
Figure 4.88: Comparison of In ,,i vs l/T of Ethanol, n-Propanol, n-Butanol, n-Amyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 0.2 mole fraction.
VM
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
• ethanol o n-propanol A n-butanol on-amyl alcohol 0.2
U,
:- -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 -0.8 -!---
0.003 0.0031 0.0032 0.0033 0.0034
El I ITIK 1
Figure 4.89: Comparison of In q vs l/T of Ethanol, n-Propanol, n-Butanol, n-Amyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 0.8 mole fraction.
•ethanol 1 1.2 o n-propanol
An-butaflol on-amylalcohol
LIVA
U)
0
-0.3
-0.8 I
0.003 0.0031 0.0032 0.0033 0.0034
11T1K 1
Figure 4.90: Comparison of viscosity (iq) vs temperature (T) of Ethanol, n-Propanol, n- Butanol, n-Amyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 1.0 mole fraction.
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
E
0.2
0.1
0
• iso-propanol o iso-b utanol
A isom11I ,iIt'thrI
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
0.7 • iso-propanol o iso-butanol 0.5 A iso-amy I alcohol
U)3
(
0
-0.1
-0.3
-0.5?
0.003 0.0031 0.0032 0.0033 0.0034
lIT IK 1
Figure 4.91: Comparison of In , vs lIT of iso-Propanol, iso-Butanol and iso-Amyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 0.5 mole fraction.
-0.1
0.003 0.0031 0.0032 0.0033 0.0034
l/T IK 1
Figure 4.92: Comparison of In , vs l/T of iso-Propanol, iso-Butanol and iso-Arnyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 0.2 mole fraction.
I
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
1
0.8
• iso-propanol o iso-butanol
A iso-amy I alcohol 0.003 0.0031 0.0032 0.0033 0.0034
lIT IK 1
Figure 4.93: Comparison of In ij vs 1!T of iso-Propanol, iso-Butanol and iso-Amyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 0.8 mole fraction.
)c
0.6
U)
02 t •0
-0.2 -0.4 -0.6
1.2
0.7
(J)
0.2 0
-0.3
-0.8
• iso-propanol o iso-butanol
A iso-amy I alcohol
0.003 0.0031 0.0032 0.0033 0.0034 l/T /K 1
Figure 4.94: Comparison of In , vs lIT of iso-Propanol, iso-Butanol and iso-Amyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 1.0 mole fraction.
Results and Discussion chapter
iv
0
298.15K .303.15K s308.15K A313.15K
-
-0.1
0318.15K .323.15KU, -.
CD
E -0.3
w
-0.4
-o.5r
I I0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
-4
x 2
Figure 4.95: Plots of excess viscosity (it) vs mole fraction (x2) of Ethanol + Nitrobenzene system at 298.15K, 303.15K, 308.15K, 313.15K, 318.15K and 323.15K respectively.
o298.15K .303.15K
-0.1
A308.15K A313.15K 0318.15K .323.15K-0.2
a. -0.3
-
-0.4 -0.5
-0.6 1
I I I0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
x 2
Figure 4.96: Plots of excess viscosity (it) vs mole fraction (x2) of n-Propanol + Nitrobenzene system at 298.15K, 303.15K, 308.15K, 313.15K, 318.15K and 323.15K respectively.
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
x
-0.1 -0.2
U)
.0.4 -0.5 -0.6 -0.7 -0.8
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
-4 "2
Figure 4.97: Plots of excess viscosity (i/) vs mole fraction (x2) of n-Butanol + Nitrobenzene system at 298.15K, 303.15K, 308.15K, 313.15K, 318.15K and 323.15K respectively.
0
298.15K .303.15K 308.15K A313.15K o318.15K .323.15K-0.2 -0.4
c
i -0.6
0.
-1 -1.2
-1.4
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
x2
Figure 4.98: Plots of excess viscosity (qE) vs mole fraction (x2) of n-Amyl alcohol + Nitrobenzene system at 298.I5K,303.15K,308.15K,313.15K,318.15K and 323.15K
respectively.
Results and Discussion (7zapter IV
-0.1 -0.2 -0.3
CL
-0.4 -0.5
I.
-0.7
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
4
x2
Figure 4.99: Plots of excess viscosity (17E) vs mole fraction (x2) of iso-Propanol + Nitrobenzene system at 298.15K, 303.15K, 308.15K, 313.15K, 318.15K and 323.15K
respectively.
-0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4
0
E°•5
A A-flU .',
o298.15K
-0.7
•303.15KA 3O8.15K
A 313.15K
• o318.15K
•323.15K
-1 I
I I0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
x2
Figure 4.100: Plots of excess viscosity (i) vs mole fraction X2) of iso-Butanol+
Nitrobenzene system at 298.15K,303.l5K,308.l5K,313.15K,318.15K and 323.15K respectively.
Results and Discussion Cli apter IV
-0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4
CL
E° 5
Lu 1.6
o 298.15K
-0.7
.303.15K-0.
8 A313.15K 308.15K-0.9
o318.15K• 323.15K
-1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
x2
Figure 4.101: Plots of excess viscosity (ij' ) vs mole fraction x2) of iso-Amyl alcohol + Nitrobenzene system at 298.15K,303.15K,308.15K,313.15K,318.l5K and 323.15'<
respectively.
-1
--2 -3
U) - -
-5
-E
-.7 o298.15K +303.15K
-8
308.15K.9 A313.15K 0318.15K
IV 0323.15K
-11
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
x2
Figure 4.102: Plots of excess viscosity (1 1E) vs mole fraction (x2) of Propylene glycol + Nitrobenzene system at 298.15K, 303.15K, 308.15K, 313.15K, 318.15K and 323.15K
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
0 -0.2 -0.4
U) -.
-1.2 -1.4
1 2 3 4 5 6
ni carbon number
Figure 4.103: Dependence of the excess viscosity (,/S) with carbon number (n) of n-alcohols with different mole fraction at 298.15K.
Li
-0.1 -0.2 -0.3
U)
c -0.4
a.
-0.5 -0.6 -0.7 -0.8
1 2 3 4 5 6
ni carbon number
Figure 4.104: Dependence of the excess viscosity (to)with carbon number (n) of n-alcohols with different mole fraction at 3 13.15K.
-.4
0 . .
0
0
I A
9
t - i1
.0.1 00.2 £0.3 i0.4 90.5 00.6 x0.7 .0.8 00.9 x
I I I
0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3
°- Ci
04 -0.5 -0.6 -0.7
; A
A
.0.1 o0.2 £0.3
I
0.4 00.5 00.6 0 xO.7 •0.8
I
00.9
I I
.
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
1
2 3 4 5 6
ni carbon number
Figure 4.105: Dependence of the excess viscosity (,1E) with carbon number (n) of n-alcohols with different mole fraction at 323.1 5K.
U
-0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4
U)
c
-0.5
01 2 3 4 5 6
ni carbon number
Figure 4.106: Dependence of the excess viscosity (,7E) with carbon number (n) of iso-alcohols with different mole fraction at 298.15K.
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
U
-0.1
'1
-0.2
Cd)
o- -0.3
-
-0.4 -0.5 -0.6
1 2 3 4 5 6
-
ni carbon number
Figure 4.107: Dependence of the excess viscosity (11) with carbon number (n) of iso-alcohols with different mole fraction at 3 13.15K.
0
. .
0
I 0
a
o0.2 £0.3 0
0.4 90.5 DO.6
xO.7 00.8 00.9
I I I I
-0.1 -0.2
CL
-0.4 -0.5
1 2 3 4 5 6
ni carbon number
Figure 4.108: Dependence of the excess viscosity
('?)
with carbon number (n) of iso-alcohols with different mole fraction at 323.15K.I ,'
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
-0.1
U).
a-
.0.3
-0.5 Ii
2
A•
•
A
• r 0 298.15K •303.15K
A308.15K a313.15K o318.15K •323.15]
I I I I
1 2 3 4 5 6
ni carbon number
Figure 4.109: Dependence of the excess viscosity
(,1E)with carbon number (n) of n-alcohols with different temperature at 0.2 mole fraction.
U -0.1 -0.2 -0.3
U)
c -0.4 a-
-0.5
;-
-0.6 -0.7 -0.8 -0.9 -1
1 2 3 4 5 6
ni carbon number
Figure 4.110: Dependence of the excess viscosity (it) with carbon number (n) of n-alcohols with different temperature at 0.5 mole fraction.
WO
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
•
0
o
A
r98.15K
•303.15K .i3O8.15K A313.15K 0
2318.15K •323.15K
I I I
Figure 4.111: Dependence of the excess viscosity (ifL. ) with carbon number (n) of n-alcohols with different temperature at 0.8 mole fraction.
-0.1 -0.3
0.7
1 2 3 4 5 6
ni carbon number
0 -0.1
U).
0.3
e :
0.4
-0.5 -0.6
*
o .
0
r0 298.15K •303.15K
1 308.15K a313.15K o318.15K •323.15J1 2 3 4 5 6
ni carbon number
Figure 4.112: Dependence of the excess viscosity (i') with carbon number (n) of iso - alcohols with different temperature at 0.2 mole fraction.
I -41
-0.1 -0.3
j
--0.5 -0.7
w
-0.9 -1.1 -1.3
2
0
A A
0
•
o 0
o298.15K •303.15K 308.15K a313.15K o318.15K •323.15K I
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
0 -0.2
0
-0.4
A Ao •
-0.6
0 0
-0.8
o298.15K .303.15K 308.15K A313,15K o318.15K 9323.15K-1
1 2 3 4 5 6
ni carbon number
Figure 4.113: Dependence of the excess viscosity ('i') with carbon number (n) of iso-alcohols with different temperature at 0.5 mole fraction.
1 2 3 4 5 6
ni carbon number
Figure 4.114: Dependence of the excess viscosity (i) with carbon number(n) of iso-alcohols with different temperature at 0.8 mole fraction.
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
0 -0.1 -0.2
-0.4
• ethanol o n-propanol
• n-butanol c:n-amvlalcohol
U
0
-~
0• •
Do
-0.5 -!-
290 300 310 320 330 T/K
Figure 4.115: Comparison of excess viscosity (,7E) vs temperature (T) of Ethanol, n-Propanol, n-Butanol, n-Amyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 0.2 mole fraction.
0.1
--0.1 -0.3
-
0.5
U)
0.9 -1.1 -1.3 -1.5
-290
13
• ethanol o n-propanot
• n-butanol
0 n-amyl alcohol
300 310 320 330 T/K
Figure 4.116: Comparison of excess viscosity
(,()
vs temperature (T) of Ethanol, n-Propanol, n-Butano!, n-Amyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 0.5 mole fraction.-4'
Results and Discussion Ghapter IV
0.1 -0.1 -0.3 -0.5
-0.9 -1.1 -1.3
U ethanol 0 n-propanol
o • n-butanol o n-amy I alcohol
290 300 310 320 330 T/K
Figure 4.1 17: Comparison of excess viscosity (,/) vs temperature (T) of Ethanol, n-Propanol, n-Butanol, n-Amyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 0.8 mole fraction.
-0.1
U)..02
U
-0.4 so-propanol
o iso-butanol
• iso-amy I alcohol
-0.5 4—.
290 300 310 320 330
hJA NI rd U
Figure 4.118: Comparison of excess viscosity (11E) vs temperature (T) of iso-Propanol, iso- Butanol and iso-Amyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 0.2 mole fraction.
-4'
Results and Discussion Chapter IV
ME
-0.1 (n-.
-0.5
i iso-propanol
o
iso-butanol• iso-amy I alcohol
-0.9 4-
290 300 310 320 330 T/K
Figure 4.119: Comparison of excess viscosity (i) vs temperature (T) of iso-Propanol, iso- Butanol and iso-Amyl alcohol in Nitrobenzene at 0.5 mole fraction.
U.' A
-0.1 -0.3 -0.5
LU