• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

SIMULATION OF HEAVY RAINFALL EVENTS USING MM5 AND WRF MODELS

4.1 Simulation of Heavy Rainfall Events of 1-3 July 2008 using WRF and MM5 To analyze the convective system of 1-3 July 2008 with their vertical structure, the models

4.1.2 Study of Rainfall with Wind

During summer monsoon period, one of the main synoptic conditions for occurrence of heavy rainfall over Bangladesh and neighborhood is the southwesterly flow streaming from the head Bay of Bengal into Bangladesh [110]. In this case, westerly wind comes from the Arabian Sea into the Indian region and south westerly wind comes from the Bay of Bengal enter into the Bangladesh region. This southwesterly wind carry moisture from the Bay of Bengal and convergence occurred in the southeastern part (hilly region) of Bangladesh. A well marked

Bangladesh and the Bay of Bengal. The detailed analyses of the system are given below using both the MM5 and WRF models and shown in Figures 4.1.2.1 (a-d), 4.1.2.2 (a-b) and 4.1.2.3 (a-b).

15N IN \

tE

1:

- 101 4 8E 76C 3c aôc (lilt 0(C (lC 6(l 75C 7ilZ e& ilo Dot

- 1012 MSLP;rnrn5 ;00Z.Ju103 LLP:rnr :002JuI04

1010 I OOB 1 006 551

1004

I31 305

- (002 251-

999 201

996 181

993

105 I 01-I 000

5'-

I?

Fig. 4.1.1.1a: MM5 Model simulated MSLP (hPa) from 00 UTC of 01 —04 July 2008

Is1SLPwrf ;ODZJUIDI MSLP;wrt ;O0ZJuIO2

.1

-

208 j

108

SI 1101 81-1- 901-

1SLP;wrf ;OOZJuIO.

25

20+ 7~1 11,

105

75E 1101: 1151 501: 951:

-

251'

201-

IS?'

'SF 11(11 1151 5(11 551

MSLP;wrf ;OOZJuIO

20?

205

(55

IL

1 1101 (1(11: 9(11: 951

II

1 01 9 101 B 1016 1014

—1012 1010 1 008 1 006 1 004 1 002 999 996 993 991

Fig. 4.1.1.1b: WRF Model simulated MSLP (hPa) from 00 UTC of 01 —04 July 2008

Using MM5 model, the distributions of low level wind at 850 hPa and upper level wind at 500 and 200 hPa levels valid from 00 UTC of 01 July to 00 UTC of 04 July 2008 are presented in Figures 4.1 .2.1 (a-b), 4.1 .2.2a and 4.1 .2.3a respectively. The prominent feature is a strong southwesterly (SW'ly) flow transporting high magnitude of moisture from the Bay of Bengal into southeast and central Bangladesh during the whole simulation period. From the Figure 4.1.2. l(a-b), it is seen that the area of convergence (i.e., zone of high convective activity) observed over Bangladesh and neighborhood especially in the northeastern sector of the low pressure region. At time 00 UTC on 02 July, 2008, at level 850 hPa, the amount of moisture is very low. Due to convergence, small cells merge with others cells make clusters.

With the advancement of time other cells make another cluster. Clusters merge to form mesoscale convective system (MCS) and rainfall occurs in and outside of Bangladesh. It is seen that vary developed MCS form near the foot hills of Himalayan Mountain and hence heavy rainfall occurred in the north-eastern part of Bangladesh. The cyclonic circulation is observed at 850 hPa level through Out the simulation (Figure 4.1.2.1(a-b)). Figures make us clear that rainfall happens because of the combined effect of SW'ly and southerly wind which carrying moisture from Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal respectively. The southwesterly is prevailed over North Bay of Bengal and southern part of Bangladesh up to 500 hPa level with cyclonic circulation (Figure 4.1.2.2a). Anti-cyclonic circulation is observed at 200 hPa level (Figure 4.1 .2.3a). The maximum wind speed for the levels 850, 500 and 200 are 20, 30 and 50 m/s respectively.

Using WRF model, the distributions of 850 hPa, 500 hPa and 200 hPa level wind valid from 00 UTC of 01 July to 00 UTC of 04 July 2008 are presented in Figures 4.1.2.1(e-h), 4.1.2.2b and 4.1.2.3b respectively. Similar features are observed using both the models with different amount of moisture contained and wind speed. The simulation of MCS using WRF model is more than that using the MM5 model. The maximum wind speed at the levels 850, 500 and 200 are 20, 10 and 30 m/s respectively. This maximum wind speed is smaller than those obtained using MM5 model. From the above figures it is clear that the rainfall occurred due to the combined effect of southwesterly and southerly wind which carrying moisture from Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal respectively.

Figures 4.1.2.4a and 4.1.2.4b are obtained using ilmer most Domains i.e. Domain 3 of MM5 and WRF models respectively. It is noted that resolution of Domain 3 is 10 km for both the models. Figures show the development of cloud (accumulated rainfall in every 3 hours) with the advancement of time from 00 UTC of 02 July to 21 UTC of 03 July, 2008. It is clear from the Figures 4.1.2.4a and 4.1.2.4b that simulated rainfall obtained from WRF model is more than that obtained from MM5 model.

155

-'.4-----

iON

S 4SF 5:1

354 301 254 204 154 101 54 ROirl with wind;850hPo:00ZJuIO2 SON

36N 536 356

2714 1

245. - /1

: ---

OOF 951

20

Roir, with wind :8$0hPc06ZJuIO2 396

386

ON

20

Roin with wind:85OhPo412ZJulO2

Rain with wind:5OhF: 03ZJs 422

274

1514

214 350

OSE 70E LI 310

205 20

2:15

Rain with wind :850hFo :09ZIWt02

210

39W

3614 t

J

150

I 120

24Wt_

E

2114 v

C.

12W OW 614

20

Rain with wind:R50hFo-10ZjuIO2

I

350 330 310

- 285

—260

20 70

235 Rr,ir-i with '4ir4J;8F'Pc18ZJ.102 Rain with wir,-1 :tt&0hPo 421 ZJ14l02 210 180

::: ::

120

255 . 25W . 90

Ir

;\J ::

105 - ¶044

4-

544 ___._____-_.____.- 54-4

544 4,5 -54 5:L 04.44:1 411 20

Figure 4.1.2.1a: MM5 Model simulated rain with wind flow (m/s) at 850 hPa valid for time 00 to 21 UTC of 02 July 2008

it

Rain with r,d:S'hP,;('ZII03

::

,y•,

2L)

Rain with wd;850hPa:067J,',I03

30N /

25N /

20N

ISN

f

iON-I

SN

-

20

Rain ih '11: 850 hF :0•c?

-.

\ 4_

20

Rain with wfrid ;650hFo ;09ZJul0

20

350 330 310 285 260 235 210 180 150 120 90 60 30 0

ROir, sith wind:B50hFa: 1 5'ZJutOO

30

- . -

,--;

- .TC

,-__- j•

•.:•\

651 701 /SF SN? 55? 510 55F

-- —2

2 Rain,-?? I', ('hPo:15ZJ,',I03 ROir, •- -li3OhPc;2 1ZJu103 2

25N

E I

iON I I

20 20

Figure 4.1.2.1b: Same as Figure 4.1.2.1a but valid for 00 to 21 UTC of 03 July 2008

Rain with win1:850hPa:12ZJul03

35,' 3D,' 25,' 20?

15c 1 O'

mu ;umr cc0 551 ,sr mu

150 30 00 85 :60 -35

•10

80 50 20

4 th "ird:850hF:O0ZJI02

- -

-4 -

- -.---4 - - -4---- -

-

12N I

ION

20

Rar1 111ith ird;850hP;06ZJuIO2

3Cm

no

Roirl .,ith sin:650hPz1; 1 2ZJu102

.,

- /

Sm

/

2

126

-

106

10

:::

Rir 111d;.,l3hl-'o

I

270 245 220

_L 200

- 180 20

Roir, with wird :80hFc :0923IO2 160 140 120

00 25

-

80 60 40 20 ISN

its]

RairI with wind:850hPo:157ju102

I

270 245 220

0i 656 90E 95E

180 20

180

10 140

I5N

ION 306

25 F

206

I SN

ION

31

SUN

156

ION

1120 100 60 60 40 20 0

20 20

Figure 4.1.2.1c: WRF Model simulated rain with wind flow (m/s) at 850 hPa valid for 00 to 021 UTC of 02 July 2008

13N

ION

20

Ro 850hPo;06ZJul03

3

2N

ION

10

Rir ird:850hPs;12Z,JuI03

306

206

12N

ION

10 I.. -

206

20

2O

V

•\

20

Ror1 with wind ;l430hF., :00726,10.3

2011

I5N

ION

111

I

Roir, ,,,ith ,2r,-;B50hro 157J,ICl3

JT 25

2o )

ION - - -

9O 5C 20

'03

25(.

20

270 245 220 200 I 80 150 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0

270 245 220 200 1 BC 160 140 120 100 60 60 40 20 0

Figure 4.1.2.ld: Same as Figure 4.1.2.lc but valid for 00 to 21 UTC of 03 July 2008

Ror1 'itO ,r,d;500IP:;C'07J,IO2 R, 1 -

:

10__

/l 801 5.1 - 65E 7 E75E 8 E 8 E 9 E 0 E -

20 30

Ilhl-'o;ZlZJ,,IOO sic

11 150

30N

, ' ../ 120

.1 . 90

60 30

20W

\

2 I

, T T .JJ

o

20

Figure 4.1 .2.2a: MMS Model simulated rainfall with wind flow (m/s) at 500 hPa valid for 00 UTC of 02 July to 21 UTC of 03 July 2008.

Rain I' r' 0ZJI02 12

I

::: ::.

lEE

10

Pair, auth ad500Puj02JaIO2

'3

R-,1,,,ajlt,',,i,,- 1

301-I

251.

261,

1 SN

iON

10 10

Figure 4.1 .2.2b: WRF Model simulated rainfall with wind flow (m/s) at 500 hPa valid for 00 UTC on 02 July to 21 UTC of 03 July 2008

301

2I)

30I

251.

2011

ION

ION

200 180 1 60 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0

Rain with wir1d;200hPa;00ZJI02 Rain with w -,1J;200hP0 1 2Z.II02

z

'5E 80E 85 40

Rain with wind;200hPa;00ZJuI03

2

350

---•-.---

j 330

6 7& 7C thE 85E OQE hOE - 285

50 —200

21 235 Rohn oith wind 200hPa;21ZJW03 210 1 50 150 120

90 60 30 0

4 1

Figure 4.1 .2.3a: MM5 Model simulated rainfall with wind flow (m/s) at 200 hPa valid for 00 UTC on 02 July 02 to 21 UTC of 03 July 2008.

th rd;200hF'o:00ZJil02 Roir 1hr d;20OhPi;0,1Zjil02

2011

12W

lOW

-

Pr '..th d;200hPon067.J.IO2

30N 1

ION IN

30 .30

Figure 4.1 .2.3b: WRF Model simulated wind flow (m/s) at 200 hPa valid for 00 UTC on 02 July 02 to 21 UTC of 03 July 2008.

ION

I.E

200 1 50 1 00 140 120 100 60 60 .40 20 0

00ZduIO2 26W

24W

22W

20W 22W 1 I I I 20W T' 1 1 20W r-'

8eE QOE 92E 88E 90E 92E 88E 90E 92E 88E 90E 92E

122Ju1O2 15ZJuIO2 18ZJuIO2 217JuIO2

26W 2N 26W 26W

en

:::

do

:::

20W 20W 20W

8E YQE 92E 6E 90E 92E BEE 90E 92E BEE 90E 92E

OOZJuIO3 032Jul03 062JuI03 092Ju103

26W 2N 26W 26W

::

:::

2W 20W 20W 20W

BE goE 92E BEE 90E 92E BEE 90E 92E BEE 22E 221

1 21Jul23 1 :jr3 1 EJ ul[3 21

25W IR 26W 26W 26W

::

T

::: :::

::: 1

20W 20W 20W 20W

BBE SUE 92E BEE 90E 92E BEE 90E 92E BEE YGE 92E

I I

0 10 20 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 130 145 160

Figure 4.1.2.4a: MM5 Model simulated precipitation field valid for 00 UTC on 02 July to 21 UTC of 03 July 2008 (sequence is top left to right).

24

22J

O52u 102 26

O6ZJ UI 02

26N

W

24W

22W

2 4 N

22W

09 ZJ UI 02 26NNFT

0Zd'jIO2 092JulO2

26W ic I 26W

OOZJul02 26W

24W

22 N

2 N

8!E 90E 92E 12ZJu 102 26 N

24W

22W

2d N

86E 90E 92E

2N

::>

2QN

O3ZJu 102

EE 90E 92E 152JuIO2

2N

-,

:::

23W

66E ME 92E CL3J UI 3

26W

24W

22W

j

20WBSE 9C'E UE

24W

22W

8E 90E 92E I ZJ ul 02

26W r

20W 90E 92E 0;2.Juk)3 26W

24W

22W

B8E 90E 92E 182JulO3 26W

E 9DE 92E

24W

22W

88E 90E 2 12Jul02 26W

24W

22W

20W

68E 90E 92E 0JuI'J3 26W

:4j

2OWE gGE 92E 2 12Jul03 26W

20 E E

1i2JuICL3 152Jul03

- I I

0 15 30 60 90 120 160 200 240 280 .320 360 400

Figure 4.1.2.4b: WRF Model precipitation field valid for 00 UTC on 02 July to 21 UTC of 03 July 2008 (sequence is top left to right).