• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

PDF Military Institute of Science and Technology (Mist) Dhaka, Bangladesh 2021

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "PDF Military Institute of Science and Technology (Mist) Dhaka, Bangladesh 2021"

Copied!
121
0
0

Teks penuh

35 Table 3.8 Average relative humidity, H (%) of the investigated locations 36 Table 3.9 Average maximum TEC of the investigated locations. 55 Table 4.11 General comparison between the locations on the parameters. 56 Table 4.12 Overall comparison between the locations for accuracy. 72 Table 4.18 SFD value of Dhaka using L1 for different elevation angles 75 Table 4.19 SFD value of Dhaka using E5 for different elevation angles 76 Table 4.20 SFD value of Chattogram using L1 for different elevation angles.

79 Table 4.22 SFD value for Rajshahi using L1 for different elevation angles 81 Table 4.23 SFD value for Rajshahi using E5 for different elevation angles 82 Table 4.24 SFD value for Khulna using L1 for different elevation angles 84 Table 4.25 SFD value for Khulna with using E5 for different elevation angles 85 Table 4.26 SFD value for Sylhet using L1 for different elevation angles 87 Table 4.27 SFD value for Sylhet using E5 for different elevation angles 88 Table 4.28 Average comparison of SFD between locations per year.

Fig. 4.17  Galileo  values  over  Sylhet  (a)  MDB,  (b)  MDE  and  (c)
Fig. 4.17 Galileo values over Sylhet (a) MDB, (b) MDE and (c)

Introduction

  • Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)
  • Limitations of GNSS Operation
  • GNSS Augmentation System
  • Types of Augmentation System
    • Ground Based Augmentation System (GBAS)
    • Satellite Based Augmentation System (SBAS)
  • Operation of SBAS
  • Necessity of SBAS
  • Motivation
  • Objectives of the Thesis
  • Organization of the Book

The reference station receives the position data from the satellites and corrects the data since the location of the reference station is precisely known. One of the best operational GBAS systems is Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS), developed by the USA. It describes different GNSS constellations as well as some of the operational SBAS around the world.

This chapter also makes some recommendations for continuing research in the future.

Fig. 1.1:  Operation of SBAS (Source: https://www.researchgate.net/publication)
Fig. 1.1: Operation of SBAS (Source: https://www.researchgate.net/publication)

Literature Review

  • Introduction
  • GNSS Constellations
    • Global Positioning System (GPS)
    • Galileo
    • GLONASS
    • BeiDou
    • Other constellations
  • Different Operational SBAS in the World
    • Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS)
    • GPS Aided GEO Augmented Navigation (GAGAN) …
    • African Satellite Augmentation System (ASAS)
    • SBAS for Australia
  • SBAS Implementation Recommendations
  • GNSS Parameters
    • MDB and MDE
    • Bias-to-Noise Ratio (BNR)
    • Number of in view satellites
    • Dilution of Precision (DOP)
    • User Equivalent Range Error (UERE)
    • Accuracy
  • SBAS Reference Station Antenna
    • Antenna parameters
    • Beam scanning of phased array antenna …
  • Environmental Factors and Signal Loss
    • Tropospheric scintillation
    • Ionospheric delay
    • Rainfall attenuation
    • Uplink and downlink loss

Three of the constellation's seven satellites are in geostationary orbit (GEO) and four are in inclined geosynchronous orbit (IGSO). 17. e) The SBAS signals are broadcast at the center frequency of the GNSS signals for which the receiver/user device must be built. Ionosphere is the uppermost part of the Earth's atmosphere that is ionized with electrons.

The radio signal would be further affected if there are more electrons in the direction of the radio wave.

Fig. 2.1: Coverage area map of WAAS (Source: https://www.boldmethod.com/)
Fig. 2.1: Coverage area map of WAAS (Source: https://www.boldmethod.com/)

Methodology

  • Introduction
  • Segmentation of the Objectives
  • Analysis on GNSS Augmentation System and GNSS Parameters 25
  • Comparison of GNSS Parameters over Different Locations …
  • Design of Reference Station Antenna and Observation of the
    • Improved 2x3 phased array patch antenna to enhance the
  • Analysis on the Environmental Factors
    • Tropospheric scintillation model …
    • Ionospheric delay …
    • Rainfall attenuation
    • Simulation setup and data collection
  • Uplink and downlink loss estimation
  • Software Support

After selecting the surveyed locations, the simulation was done to observe the results of the parameters over the five locations. The design of the array antenna begins by designing a single patch antenna with the specified dielectric constant (εr) and. To design a rectangular microstrip patch antenna for a specific resonant frequency (fr), the width (W) and length (L) of the patch must be calculated.

The final structures of the patch antenna with three different rotation angles are shown below in Fig. This antenna is a modified and improved version of the previous antenna which is designed to improve the overall performance. The troposphere is the lowest layer of the atmosphere and the reason for the signal delay in this region is due to the change in refractive index.

The longer a signal is in the ionosphere, the greater the influence of the ionosphere on it. Taking 𝜔 = 2 To calculate the ionospheric delay and rain attenuation, the average maximum TEC data and the rainfall rate of the surveyed areas are recorded in Table 3.9 and Table 3.10.

A number of simulation softwares have been used to observe the outcomes of the GNSS parameters. To study the simulation results of the GNSS parameters, an extension tool of MATLAB called Visual was used.

Table 3.1.  Typical GPS C/A – code UERE budget  Error Sources  GPS 1σ Error (m)
Table 3.1. Typical GPS C/A – code UERE budget Error Sources GPS 1σ Error (m)

Results and Discussion

Simulation Results of GNSS Parameters over Different Locations 39

  • Chattogram (22.3569 0 N, 91.7832 0 E)
  • Rajshahi (24.3745 0 N, 88.6042 0 E)
  • Sylhet (24.8949 0 N, 91.8687 0 E)
  • Khulna (22.8456 0 N, 89.5403 0 E)
  • Discussion on the results
  • Evaluation of the outcomes

The simulation results are listed in Table 4.1 below to display some of the most important outputs from the graphs. The table shows the highest and lowest value of the simulated parameters for both the constellations. From the graphical representations of the simulated parameters, Table 4.2 has been compiled to show the important observables.

From the graphical representations of the simulated parameters, Table 4.6 is constructed to show the important observables. From the comparison between the results for Rajshahi, it is shown that the combined constellation gives the best result with good parameter values. From the graphical representations of the simulated parameters, Table 4.8 is constructed to show the important observables.

The simulation results are listed in Table 4.9 below to show some of the key outputs from the graphs. Based on the graphical representations of the simulated parameters, Table 4.10 is constructed to show the important observables. By comparing among the results for Khulna, it is found that combined constellation gives the finest result with decent values ​​of the parameters.

We can mainly observe variation in the results of GPS and Galileo, but most of the parameter values ​​of Galileo are. Finally, the outputs of combined GPS-Galileo provide the best results in terms of the measured parameters for each simulated location.

Fig. 4.1:  GPS values over Dhaka (a) MDB, (b) MDE and (c) GDOP
Fig. 4.1: GPS values over Dhaka (a) MDB, (b) MDE and (c) GDOP

Simulation Results of GNSS Accuracy

  • Dhaka (23.8103 0 N, 90.4125 0 E)
  • Chattogram (22.3569 0 N, 91.7832 0 E)
  • Rajshahi (24.3745 0 N, 88.6042 0 E)
  • Sylhet (24.8949 0 N, 91.8687 0 E)
  • Khulna (22.8456 0 N, 89.5403 0 E)
  • Discussion on the results
  • Evaluation of the outcomes

By analyzing the data, it has been observed that GPS has the best accuracy in the range from 1.33 to 2.38 meters, while the worst accuracy is between 2.45 and 10 meters. On the other hand, Galileo has the best value which is 1.46 meters observed in October and November. For GPS, the best value is 1.42 meters, which is slightly higher than the previous two observations.

In contrast, the best accuracy value for Galileo is 1.55 meters and the worst value is 3.49 meters. 4.29 (a ~ b) showing the accuracy results over Sylhet for both the surveyed GPS and Galileo constellations. From the graphical data, a variety in accuracy can be observed over Sylhet.

In contrast, the best accuracy value for Galileo is 1.49 meters and the worst value is 3.51 meters. The above simulation results show the variation of accuracy in the surveyed regions for the GPS and Galileo constellations. The region where the highest GDOP is recorded in the previous section, the worst accuracy is estimated there.

For GPS the accuracy fluctuates between 1.34 and 10 meters, while for Galileo the value is between 1.4 and 3.51 meters. In Dhaka, the best accuracy is calculated for Galileo, which is 1.46 meters in October and November due to low GDOP values.

Fig. 4.27:  Accuracy results over Chattogram (a) GPS and (b) Galileo
Fig. 4.27: Accuracy results over Chattogram (a) GPS and (b) Galileo

Simulation Results of Ground Station Phased Array Antenna for

  • Results analysis of a 2x2 slotted microstrip patch antenna
  • Simulation results of improved 2x3 phased array patch

First, the simulation results of the single-insertion U-hole microstrip patch antenna are observed, varying the aperture angle for GPS (L1, L2 and L5), Galileo (E5, E6) and GLONASS (L3) signals. GPS (L1, L2 and L5): The variation in antenna length and width due to slot rotation and the main parts from the radiation patterns are listed in Table 4.13 below to simplify the analysis. The S-parameter curves of the antenna for GPS frequencies show a good resonance in all cases shown in Fig.

Of the many simulation results of Phased Array antennas for GPS signals, some important results are listed below in Table 4.15. Now similarly using Galileo and GLONASS frequency the performance of the Phased Array antenna has been analyzed and the main results are shown below in Table 4.16. In a nutshell: an FR-4 substrate to examine the antenna performance for GPS, Galileo and GLONASS signal frequencies by rotating the angle of the slot.

Each element is fed with a different phase angle signal and the main results are listed in Table 4.17 below. Among the results, the image shows the radiation pattern of the maximum positive scan angle, which is 240. To show one of the results from the mean value, the image shows the radiation pattern for the -150 scan angle.

To show the minimum value of the range, the radiation pattern of the scan angle -250 is shown in Fig. If the number of elements is increased, then the directivity of the antenna will increase as well as the scanning angle.

Table 4.13: Parametric study of antenna for GPS signals
Table 4.13: Parametric study of antenna for GPS signals

Estimation of Atmospheric Factors of GNSS Signals over

  • Tropospheric Scintillation Fade Depth (SFD)
  • Discussion on the results
  • Ionospheric delay estimation
  • Discussion on the results
  • Rainfall attenuation
  • Discussion on the results
  • Evaluation of the outcomes

The calculated value of SFD both using maximum and minimum temperature using L1 signal for the selected elevation angle is carried out and listed in table 4.18. It is also evident from both graphs that the value of SFD is less for an increased value of the elevation angle. The minimum value of SFD, if we consider all the results, is 9.3 dB, which is slightly higher than the minimum value of SFD for L1 signal.

For Chattogram, the estimated value of maximum and minimum SFD using L1 signal for the selected elevation angle is performed and listed in Table 4.20. The change in the value of SFD due to the change in angle is also observed to be the same as before. The maximum value of SFD is 20.2 dB and the minimum value of SFD is 8.8 dB, which is also the lowest value of SFD so far.

Also, the elevation angle has been found to be an important factor as it controls the value of the SFD. The higher the angle, the better the value of SFD in all the studied locations. The value of SFD for Galileo constellation is also on the better side than GPS constellation.

The average value of the ionospheric delay in Sylhet is 16% lower than Dhaka which has the highest average value followed by Rajshahi which is 12.9% lower. The value of TEC is not the same throughout the day as well as the month.

Table 4.18:  SFD value of Dhaka using L1 for different elevation angle
Table 4.18: SFD value of Dhaka using L1 for different elevation angle

Estimation of Uplink and Downlink Loss over the Locations

  • Discussion on the results

The calculated losses shown in the graphs above show that due to fluctuating atmospheric conditions, the losses also change. The losses of different constellations also differ from each other, since the frequency of the signals is not the same. GPS signal loss is lower than other signals, while Galileo signal loss is on the higher side.

Fig. 4.56:  Uplink loss over different locations
Fig. 4.56: Uplink loss over different locations

Conclusion and Future Recommendation

Conclusion

Significance of the Research 98

As in several areas of communications such as satellite and radar, beam steering not only provides superior performance, but also increases the overall integrity of the communications system. This antenna array can be used in constructing the ground station antenna for larger scanning angle. e) The analysis of tropospheric scintillation, ionospheric delay and attenuation of rainfall has shown the fluctuation in values ​​and based on the result it can be said that Rajshahi has the best results among the others. The results can also be used to analyze which type of model should be used to reduce the delay and where it should be used. f) The maximum loss is recorded at Sylhet followed by Chattogram.

As link budget calculation is one of the most essential jobs in SBAS design, loss estimation in this job can be tricky. A more widespread research can be done in the future to make the whole system feasible as well as validated by international authorities. More constellations like GLONASS, BeiDou etc. can be explored. to have a clear picture of the GNSS situation over Bangladesh.

Not only that, the number of analytical parameters can be increased, making the research more effective and effective. In addition, the interoperability of different types of SBAS could be another future application area. Parallel to the development of the SBAS for Bangladesh, a study can be initiated on the established SBAS of the neighboring countries to understand the mechanism of merging the two systems. e).

Research on other components of ground station such as power system, control system, communication system between reference stations etc. is also recommended. f) Finally, research can be done on the rules and regulations aspect of creating an SBAS. Singh “Comparison of tropospheric scintillation prediction models of the Indonesian climate,” Earth, Planets and Space, vol.

Gambar

Fig. 1.1:  Operation of SBAS (Source: https://www.researchgate.net/publication)
Fig. 1.2:  Map of SBAS owned countries (Source: https://www.euspa.europa.eu/europe)
Fig. 2.1: Coverage area map of WAAS (Source: https://www.boldmethod.com/)
Fig. 2.2: Availability map of EGNOS (Source: https://gssc.esa.int/navipedia)  2.3.3  GPS Aided GEO Augmented Navigation (GAGAN):
+7

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Microbiology Viqarunnisa Noon School and College, Dhaka 2009 HSC Science Employment Experience Independent University, Bangladesh IUB, Bashundhara, Dhaka School of Life Sciences