Study on the Spirality and Shrinkage of Weft Knitted Fabric: An Impact of Tumble Drying and Line drying
Habibur Rahman 1, Rezaul
Karim
2*, Bidhan KumarMitra
3lDepartment of Textile Engineering, Bangladesh University of Business and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh
2Department of Textile Engineering, Sonargoan
University
(SU), Dhaka, Bangladesh 3Department of Textile Engineering, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University,T angall- | 9 02, B an glade sh
*Corresponding Author: Lecturer; Sonargaon
University
(SLI), Dhaka, Bangladesh Email : r ezatex9 9 @su. edu.bdAbstract
Spirality
and shrinkageare
the most common problemsfor
knittedfabric
dueto their
asymmetrical loopformatton. Spirality is a
dimensionaldistortion in circular knitted fabrics and has an obvious
influenceon the
aesthetic andfunctional
performance.Shrinkage is the process
in
which afabric
becomes smallerthan
itsoriginal
size while washing anddrying.
This studyexplicitly
determined the theoretically approachof
the causes and remedies ofspirality
and shrinkage and the maindffirence
between tumble andline drying.
The tumbledrying
was more responsiblefor
shrinkage contrary to theline
drying. Among the samples thefull
feederlycra
single jersey shows the best resultin
shrinkage andspirality
and doublepique
shows theworst result
duelo
more tuck loopin
its structure.Finally,
this study illustrated that line drying was the bestfor
usingthe garments with assured quality and dimensional stability.
Keywords:
LineDrying,
Tumble Drytng, Spirality, Shrinkage, Weft Knitted Fabric etc.1.0.
Introduction
The
ever-increasing demandof knitted
apparelshas
athactedattention in global
niche market. Knitted fabrics are used in manufacturing of fashion garments and evenit
has the potentialin the formal wear
segmentsalso (Afroz,
2012).The
dimensionalstability of knitted fabrics is
an important factorof
theknitting
industry (Hossain, 2012). On theknitted fabric, it is
necessary that the wale be perpendicular to the course' but Weft knitted fabrics tend to undergo certain dimensional change rthat causes distortionin
which there is a tendencyof
the knitted loops to bend over, causingthe
walesto be at
diagonal in-steadof
perpendicularto the
courses. However, the wales are not always perpendicularto the
course and skewto
theright or left, forming a spirality
angle which creates a serious problem, especially in the apparel industry(Afroz, 2012).lt
iswell
known thatweft knitted
fabrics tendto
undergo large changesin
dimensions such asspirality
and shrinkage. Thisoften
directedto distortion
upon repeated washing.A
large numberof
factors are responsiblefor
Sonargaon University Journal Vol. I, No-
I
143,i
a
Study on the Spirality and Shrinkage of Weft Knitted Fabric: An Impact of Tumble Drying and Line drying causing these dimensional changes
in weft
knittedfabric
structures; these areall
associatedwith
the yarntwist
and hardness,knitting, finishing
and making-upof
the knitted fabrics. The residual torquein the
componentyarn
causeddue to bending and twisting is the most important
phenomenonconkibuting to spirality.
The residual torqueis
shownby its twist
liveliness. Hence the greater thetwist
liveliness, the greater is the spirality.Twist
livelinessof
yarnis
affectedby
thetwist
factor ortwist
multiple. Besides the torque,spirality
is also govemedby fibre
parameters, cross-section, yarnformation
system,yarn geometry, knit structure and fabric finishing. Machine
parameters do contributeto
spirality. For instance,with
multi-feeder circularknitting
machines, course inclinationwill
be more, thus exhibit spirality.It
affects the garments as the displacement of the side seams and this causes an important quality problem. This problem is prevented during thefinishing
and dyeing processesby different methods, however these preventions are temporary and after
washing processes,on the
clothesthe
displacementof side
seamis
occurred.Spirality
dependson
feed density, machine cut, and loop shape, but the magnitudeof
spirality can be offset by the selectionof
yarn
twist
direction.In
addition, reductionin
yam "torque" can onlypartially
reducefabric
spirality, but the useof plied
yams andplaiting
techniques may completely eliminateit (Araujo,
1989).It
is alsoa fact that
consumers are becoming increasingly concerned and awareof fabric quality
and expecthigher
standardsof
performancethan
everbefore,
evenafter a
numberof
wash and dry cycles.A
tumble dryer is a powered household appliance that is used to remove moisture from a loadof clothing
and other textiles, usuallyshortly
after they are washedin
a washing machine. Clothes may also be driedby
natural evaporation and,if
available, sunlight on an outdooror
indoor clothes line or clothes horse. Many dryers consist of a rotating drum called a "tumbler" through which heatedair
is circulated to evaporate the moisture,while
the tumbler is rotated to maintainair
space between the articles. Using these machines may cause clothesto
shrinkor
become lesssoft
(dueto
lossof
short
soft fibers/lint). A simpler
non-rotating machinecalled a "drying
cabinet"may be
usedfor
delicate fabrics and other items not suitablefor
a tumble dryer.A
clothes line or washingline
is any typeof
rope, cord, ortwine
that has been stretched betweentwo
points (e.g.two
sticks) outside or indoors, iabove the level of the ground. Clothing that has recently been washed is hung along the line to dry, using clothes pegs or clothespins. Washing lines are attached either from a post or awall,
and are frequently located in back gardens, or on balconies(Wikipedia,2016).
The dimensionalstability of kniued fabrics is an important
areaof the knitted industry. Fabric
shrinkageis the
ultimateproblem if the
dimensionalstability of the knitted fabrics is not properly taken
care. There are various factors influencing the dimensionalstability
aswell
as the shrinkageof
theknitted
fabrics.Sonargaon University Journal Vol.
l,
No.I
144a 1I
l
J
';
\
\
t
:x
1
]
1 I
I .aI t
\
t
i 1j
'l
l
t
t
l
1
)
I .1
\
llI
i
)I
')i
1
\
I
Though the factors such as
fibre
characteristics,stitch
length, machine gauge, yarntwist, knitting
tension causes dimensional variations, the factor mostly responsible is relaxation of internal stressand the swelling of the yarn (Anbumani, 2007). Knitted fabrics often never
fully
recover from these strains and haveto
withstand the considerable wear and tear dueto
everyday use and laundering processes. To meet the demandsof
an increasing market, knitters have calledfor
increased researchinto
the dimensionalstability of knitted
cotton goods.With
therising popularity of
cotton, greater demandsin
termsof quality were
required asthe
customer becamemore
awareof the
negative properties, e.g. shrinkagefrom
laundering(Munsi,
1993). The propertiesof
Qotton arelimited
due toits
natural origins, therefore,if
the consumer continuesto
expect higherquality
and dimensionally stable garments,the
actualconskuction of the fabric
needsto be
investigated.Another
problem manufacturers have to contendwith
is the factors affectingvariability in
customer washing processes (Thomas, 1994). When the cotton yarn and the lycra yam are knitted parallel or side-by-sidein
every course,with
thelycra
yarn always kept on one sideof
the cotton yarn, the methodis
classified as"full
plating orfulI
feeder". When the Lycra is placedin
alternating courses, the method is classified as"half
plating orhalf
feeder" (Sadek, 2012). The effectof
lycrafibre
on the extension-at-peak load, immediate recovery, delayed recovery, permanent set and resiliencyof
cottonJycra blended knittedfabric. It
was observedthat the
immediate recovery, extension andresiliency of lycra fabric
arehigher than 100% cotton fabric
(Mukhopadhyay).Washing and drying
techniqueare the
most important taskin weft knitted fabric finishing. It
requires an in-depth knowledgeof
the geometry,stability and forces held within the fabric. The main aim of this work was to
systematically investigate the effectof
the washing and drying variables on the dimensionalstability
and distortionof
knittedfabrics.
Thework
demonstrated that changes occurring after laundering were largely dueto
alterationsin
theloop
shape, rather than loop length. The fabrics had taken uptheir fully
relaxed stateand
appropriateconditions for
laundering.The major aims of this study are to find
outdimensional changes of weft knitted fabrics due to different washing techniques.
2.0.
Materials
andMethod
Ebr
this
study seven typesof fabric
have been producedfrom
the same yarnof
count and samelot. Yarn from the
samelot is
placedin the
creelscarefully for knitting with
single jersey machine specification given (Tablel).
The fabrics were producedby
using the parameters (Table 2) and the yarn specification has been mentioned (Table 3).After knitting
Zkgof
each seven samples were taken and then swungto
make ropeform for
scouring, bleaching and dyeing. Thefabric
was pre-treated and dyedin Fong's
sample dyeing machine(Actual
capacity upto lSkg).
The nameof
145 Sonargaon University Journal Yol. 1, No.
I
1
Study on the Spirality and Shrinkage of Weft Knitted Fabric: An Impact of Tumble Drying and Line drying chemicals and dyes were used
in
scouring, bleaching and dyeing mentioned separately (Table 4).Then washed
at
40"Cfor
18 min. The whole washing was done by the ISO: 6330 method. Then the Tatrle 1.Knitting
machine specification.Brand name of machine Jiung Long
Origin
of machine TaiwanModel
JSLDiameter of machine 26"
Number of feeder 60
Number of needle 19607
Machine gauge E-24G
Machine speed 23
RPM
Table 2. Description of different fabric
with
yarn.Table 3. Yarn specification Ne 30/1 combed yarn used in the fabric manufacturing process'
Properties Test results
Twist factor 3.60
Tenacity (mN/tex) 169
Elongation at break(%) 4.2
Unevenness (U%) 10
Thick place/1 000m (+50%) 23
Thin place/1000m
(50%)
1Neps/1000m (200%) 40
146
t-
\
..1
I
"\
I
\
I:
1
1 { I
1
\
I
\
j-.!,
)
,t
\
I i\
I
-r
\
!
\
1r\
\
I
1
+
1
!l I
l
:
\ Il l I
ri
I
,1
:
Fabric Type Combed Yarn count (Ne) GSM Stitch length (mm)
Plain S/J 3011 115 2.80
Plain S/J
(Lycra4%: full
feeder)30/l with 40DLycra
220 2.5s Plain S/J (Lycra 2Yo:half
feedet) 30/1with 40DLycra
200 2.62Single lacoste
30ll
140 2.74Double lacoste
30/t
160 2.65Single pique
30lt t20
2.75Double pique
30/t
155 2.74Sonargaon (Jniversity Journal Vol. 1, No.
I
Table 4. Chemicals and dyes were used
in
scouring, bleaching and dyeing.samples were dried
with
line and tumble system for 4 hours at room temperature and 30 min at 60'C
temperature respectively
(Anand,
2002). After that the samples werefully
conditionedfor
48 hoursin a
standard atmosphereof 20 + 2
oC temperature and65 +
2o/orelative humidity.
Then those samples were testedto
measure the dimensionalstability or
shrinkage andspirality
percentage by ISO:16322 method. Thus, all the experimental data has been derived and discussed consecutively.3.0. Measurement of
Shrinkage
andSpirality
3.1.Materials
Template, Scissor, sewing machine, washing machine, washing Chemicals, dryer, tape.
3.2. Procedure
For calculating the shrinkage percentage samples were cut into 20 cm x 20 cm, then a rectangular area was marked 15 cm
x
15 cm on each. Then the fabric is treatedwith
0.5%owf
wetting agent for 2 hours at 30 to35'C with
a liquor ratioof
1:50. Then after drying the fabric the distance of the mark length and width are measured and shrinkage percentage is calculated by thefollowing
formula:ShrinkaSe
%:
[100x
(a-b)]/awhere,
a:
Distance between two ends before treatment, b:
Distance between two ends after treatment (Islam, 2014).In this way both the lengthwise and widthwise shrinkage percentage is calculated and they are shown in the Table 4. Spiraliry or twisting in a garment is appeared after washing. As a result, one of the
Sonargaon University Journal Vol.
l,
No.I
Chemicals for scouring and bleaching Chemicals and dyes for dyeing
Name Amount Name Amount
Wetting agent
l
Cm/L Glauber salt 40 gmlLSequestering agent
lcrtr/L
Soda ash 10g$/L
Detergent
l
gnt/L Acetic acidlcrtr/L
Caustic soda 5 gm/L JintexalateEco SQ- 1175CA (PJD*) 1gri,/L
Hydrogen per oxide 6 gn/I- Jinlev-Cl 225
(ND*)
1gnt/LStabilizer
2$rlL
pH 8.5Temperafure
90'c
Temperafure Up to 110'CTime
t
hour Time 1.5 hour147
Study on the Spirality and Shrinkage of weft knitted fabric: An impact of Tumble drying and Line drying side seams comes at front of the garment when wearer wears
it.
Spirality percentage depends on fabric torque and garment structure.{P} {Q}
A
Fig.
1. (P) Before wash sample, (Q)After
wash sample.For spirality
check,two fabric
samples are takenwhich
are30
cmx3Ocmin
dimension.They are stitched at three sides and one side is open. Then the fabric is washed in a washing machine and after that dried both
in
line and tumbler.Then the Spirality of fabric is measured using the formula- Spirality%
:
100*Bi A
Where,
B:
Displacementof
side seam at bottom after washA:
Side seam length (Islam, 2014).The results obtained from this experiment are shown in Table 4.
4.0. Result and discussion
By testing spirality
and shrinkage percentageof the
samples accordingto
the mentioned procedure and formula results are presentedin
Table 5.It
was expected that the results obtainedfor
the dimensionalstability
tests carried outwould
besignificantly different for
thefabric
structures, due to the distinct natureof
each structure.A
positive value indicates extensionof
tested fabrics and negative value represents shrinkage.It
was expected that the results obtained for the dimensional stability tests carried outwould be significantly different for the fabric
structures, dueto the distinct
natureof
each structure.A
positive value indicates extension oftested fabrics and negative value represents shrinkage'Sonargaon University Journal Vol. 1, No.
I
148Ij :,
; i
\\
i
I
\l
I
+ -)i
l
1I
)
\
:l'
\
)
l
.\
t
\ \
i
\
1
l
I
\
\ I
1 1 Iti
I
!
:
!I
II
I
i
I
Table 5. Tested results of shrinkage and spirality percentage of fabric samples.
From the above test result
it
is seen that the overall shrinkage and spirality percentageofthe
fabric samples were betterin
caseof
line drying system than tumble drying.If
we separate the results and placed in graph of thefollowing
graph may be appeared.Plai.sl.]
(fy(rrf!ll itr(r.h.li
4
Shdnkage%
z
t Shrink&96 L.!tti ei5.
-6
-8
'10
Sonargaon University Journal Vol.
l,
No.I
ltr
149 Fabric Type
wise wlse
Plain S/J Line
l+z.so l-+.:o lz.ts
Tumble
Fro
l-sso p zo
Plain S/J
(Lyua{%: full
feeder) Line Iro.so l-r.oo 12.oorumble l-t.oo l-z.oo lz.ts
Plain S/J (Lycra 2o/o:
halffeeder)
Linefrr.oo l-2.:o
lz.sorumbte l-t.so l-:.oo
lz.soSingle lacoste
Line l-:.+o l-+.+o lz.to
Tumble l-s.:o l-z.oo
13.4sDouble lacoste Line
l-z ao l-o.so lz.:o
rumble l-:.oo l-t.zo
lz.ssSingle pique Line
l+2.:o l-+.oo
p.oorumble l-t.zo l-+.ao p.:s
Double pique Line l-s.
ro l-z.so
lz.esrumble l-0.00 l-s.zo
13.60Study on the Spirality and Shrinkage of weft knitted fabric:
Ar
impact of Tumble drying and Line dryingFrom the
graphof
shrinkage percentage testresult, it's
clear that thereonly
length wisepositive
shrinkageor
extension has occurredin
caseof plain
single jersey, singlepique
and plain single jerseywith half
Feeder lycra fabric samplesfor line
drying and the restof
shows the negative value.Among
these the double pique, double lacoste and single lacoste has theworst
shrinkage towith
wisein
caseof
tumbledrying.
This is the result of presenceof
tuck loopin fabric
structure- In the fabric structwe ofplain
single jersey has the greater numberof knit
loop which is comparatively more stable oruniform in
structure thusit
shows the positive result.Additionally,
the present of morelycra in fabric
structurethe
amountof
shrinkage percentagelower this is the result for
elastic behavioroflycra
which tends to recoverit's
original position after releasing applied force due to line or tumble drying systemIt
is seen that the percentageof spirality
is morefor
double pique, single lacoste and single pique consecutively due to more number of tuck loops are present in the fabric structure. These loops are less stable thanknit
loopwhich
are presentin plain
single jerseyfabric
structure.Additionally,
thelycra fabric
hasthe lower spirality
percentage,the fulI
feederlycra fabric
haslower
spirality percentage than halffeeder lycra fabric.Finally,
it
is noted that the overall result is better in all typeoffabric
structure in caseofline
drying technique than the tumbledrying
dueto
amountof
applied forcefor
machine spinin
tumbledrying is
more and on the other handfor line drying
system thereis
not neededto
apply forcefor
fabric drying. For this reason, the loop deformation on tumble drying system is more than line drying andthe
course and wales displacementof knitted fabric
occurred more.Thus, the spirality
and shrinkage percentage is more in tumble drying system.Sonargaon University Journal Vol.
I,
No.l
1503.1 2.5
1 nq 0
SpiralityTo
I 5paralii/%
"g !
E
:
F
-
E Ft,
3
E
! F
! E F
€ F Flain 5{ Plain
tI
Pl*in Sl.i Singk{Lyqra lult {Lyrrr half I a(olte feedari feederI
0ouble bcos:e
0ouble pique Single
piquc
5.0. Conclusion
This study illustrated that the effect of vmious drying system used on garments washing made
of weft knitted fabric of different
structure.It is
observed thatthe line drying
system shows overall betterresult in
caseof spirality
and shrinkage percentageof the
dimensionalstability of
knitted fabric. The knitted structureofdifferent
loops such asknit
and tuck have alsoa
great effect on fabricspirality
and shrinkage.More
numberof tuck
loop presentin fabric
structure shows worse resultin
case
of
pique fabric. Thereis
aslight
impactof
lycra percentage onspirality
and shrinkageof weft knitted fabric. The larger
amountof lycra
preventin fabric
shows betterresult on spirality
and shrinkage thoughfabric
skuctureis
sameof
single jerseyplain fabric,
So, the designerof
garments manufacturerofknitted fabric
should be informed that the accurate selectionof definite
structured fabric may help alot
to desigrr the garmentsfor
specific purposewhile
need to washfor
further use.The users also need to wash their
garmentsand should prefer to dry in line drying
system.Dimensional
stability of knitted fabric
resultsfor
the varioussfuctures
indicated that there was asignificant
difference betweentumble
andline drying. The tumble-dried
sampleswere found
toshrink
and spiralof
loops (course and wales)to
a greater extent. The effectof tumble drying
was evident throughout the investigation.It
would appear that this methodof
fabric drying tends to cause the most displacementof
courses and wales changein
thefabric
dueto
a combinationof knit
and tuck loops alongwith
lycra. So, from this studyit
can be noted thatto
get acceptable shrinkage and spiralrty washwith
line drying is better than tumble drying system.References:
Afroz, N.; Alam, A.K.M.M.; Mehedi, H. (2012) Analysis on the Important
Factors Influencing Spirality of WeftIfuitted
Fabrics", Institutional Engineering and Technology(IET), Vol.
2, pp 8-14.Anand, S.C.; Brown,
K.S.M.;
Higgins,L.G.;
Holmes,D.A.; Hall, M.E.;
Conrad,D.
(2002)Effect of
laundering on the dimensionalstability
anddistortion of knitted fabric, AUTEX
Research Joumal,Vol.2,
No.2, @AUTEX
Anbumani,
D.N.
(2007)Ifuitting
Fundamentals, Machines, Structures and developments,I't
edition, 2007.Araujo, M.D.D.;
Smith,G.W. (1989) Spirality of Knitted
Fabrics PartI:
The Natureof
Spirality, Textile Research Journal,Vol.
59, pp 247 -256.Sonargaon University Journal Vol. 1, No.
I l5l
Study on the Spirality and Shrinkage of weft knitted fabric: An impact of Tumble drying and Line drying Hossain,
M.M.;Jalil, M.A.;
Saha,J.;Mia, M.M.;Rahman, M.M.
(2012) Impactof
VariousYarn of Different Fiber
Composition on the Dimensional Propertiesof Different
Structureof Weft
Knitted Fabric", International Journal of Textile and Fashion Technology,Yol.2,pp
34 -44.https ://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clothes_dry er, 20 7 6.
Islam,
M.A.;
Haque,A.N.M.A.
(2014) Selectionof
suitable machine gaugeby
considering the GSM,shrinkage and spirality of single jersey knit fabric",
ResearchJournal of Science and IT
Management,
Vol.
03, pp 50-55.Mukhopadhyay, A.; Mohanty, A. (2004) Impact of lycra filament on extension and
recovery characteristics of cotton knitted fabric, Indian J Fibre Text Res,Vol.
28, pp 423-430.Munshi,
V.G.; Ukidve, A.V.;
Raje, C.R.; Basker, P.; Pai, S.D. (1993) TheEffect of
Laundering on the Mechanical Properties of Apparel Fabrics, Colourage, part 1March
1993, part 2 Jurre 1993 .Sadek, R. (2012) Journal ofEngineered Fibers and Fabrics,
Vol.
7, pp I 1-16.Thomas,
K.
(1994)From Liable to Stable: Dimensionally
StableKnitted
Fabrics Today,Ituitting
Technique,
Vol.
16, pp 360-361.Sonargaon University Journal Vol.
l,
No.I t52
ri