IMPOLITENESS IN CRITICISM IN VLOG Impoliteness In Criticism In Vlog.

(1)

IMPOLITENESS IN CRITICISM IN VLOG

THESIS

Submitted to the Department of Language Studies, Graduate School of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta

In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Education

Written by : IKA RATNA ROSANTI

S 200100039

DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE STUDIES GRADUATE SCHOOL

(2)

ii

APPROVAL

IMPOLITENESS IN CRITICISM IN VLOG

THESIS

Proposed by: Ika Ratna Rosanti

S 200100039

Approved by:

Primary Supervisor Second Supervisor

(3)

iii

SUPERVISOR’S APPRO

SVAL FORM

The student submits the thesis for examination:

Name : Ika Ratna Rosanti ID Number : S 200100039 Department : Languages Studies Field of Study : English Education

Thesis Title : Impoliteness in Criticism in Vlog

Suppervisor’s Approval:

I confirm that the thesis written by the above-named student meets the scholarly standard for the degree and is therefore eligible to proceed to an examination by the board of examiners of the Department od Language Studies, the Graduate School of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.

Surakarta, April 2017 Primary Supervisor,

(4)

iv

SUPERVISOR’S APPROSVAL FORM

The student submits the thesis for examination:

Suppervisor’s Approval:

I confirm that the thesis written by the above-named student meets the scholarly standard for the degree and is therefore eligible to proceed to an examination by the board of examiners of the Department od Language Studies, the Graduate School of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.

Surakarta, April 2017 Second Supervisor,

(5)

v

APPOVAL OF THESIS FOR SUBMISSION

IMPOLITENESS IN CRITICISM IN VLOG

Submitted by:

Ika Ratna Rosanti

Has been examined by the board of examiners on April 2017. All feedback, corrections, and suggestions recommended by the examiners have been

considered and revision has been accordingly made by the student.

The boards of examiners certify that the thesis is eligible for submission.

The Board of Examiners Primary Supervisor

Agus Wijayanto, Ph.D

Co-Supervisor

Mauly Halwat Hikmat, Ph.D

Examiner

Dr. Anam Sutopo, M.Hum

Surakarta, April 2017 The Director of Graduate School

(6)

vi

STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP

I hereby confirm that the thesis entitled “Impoliteness in Criticism in Vlog” is an

original and authentic work written by myself and it has satisfied the rules and regulations of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta with respect to plagiarism. I certify that all quotations and the source of the information have been fully referred and acknowledged accordingly.

I confirm that this thesis has not been submitted for the award of any previous degree in any tertiary institution in Indonesia or abroad.

Date : April 2017

(7)

vii

MOTTOS

“Man Jadda Wa Jadda.”

“Those who do it seriously will be successful.”

-Arabian Proverb-

“Do your best and let God do the rest.” -Ben Carson-

“I am thankful for all of those who said NO to me. It’s because of them I’m doing it myself”

(8)

viii

DEDICATION

(9)

ix

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Assalamu’alaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh

Alhamdulillahirabbil’alamin, all praises just for Allah SWT, the lord of universe,

the one who sent the messenger Muhammad SAW to guide human to safest religion, Islam. Thanks for blessing her in the thesis entitled “Impoliteness in Criticim in Vlog”.

The writer would like to express her great gratitude and appreciation to:

1. Prof. Dr. Markhamah, M.Hum., as the head of language study

department of graduate program in Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.

2. Agus Wijayanto, Ph.D., the academic supervisor and the primary

supervisor, who has given great help, guidance, advice, and correction from the beginning up to the completion of this research paper.

3. Mauly Halwat Hikmat, Ph.D., as the co-supervisor who patiently gave

her guidance and motivation.

4. Her beloved husband, who always accompany, support, and pray with

love.

5. Her beloved parents, who always pray, love, and give support.

6. Her beloved friends, who always pray and give support.

Last but not least, the writer realizes that this research is still far from being perfect. Therefore, suggestion and positive criticism are hoped and needed to make this research better.

The writer hopes that this research paper can contribute to useful reading for the esteemed readers.

Wassalamu’alaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh.

Surakarta, April 2017 The Writer,

(10)

(11)

xi

5. Computer Mediated Communication ... 37

6. Language Gender ... 41

C. The Differences of Impoliteness Strategies used by Male and Female .... 77

(12)

xii

ABSTRAK

Ika Ratna Rosanti. S 200100039. IMPOLITENESS IN CRITICISM IN VLOG. Thesis. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. 2016.

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penggunaan strategi ketidaksantunan pada komentar di vlog. Penulis mendeskripsikan apa saja strategi ketidaksantunan yang digunakan pada komentar di vlog dan apa saja perbedaan strategi ketidaksantunan yang digunakan oleh komentator laki-laki dan perempuan pada komentar di vlog. Ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif. Penulis menganalisis ketidaksantunan secara deskriptif berdasarkan teori ketidaksantunan yang dikemukakan oleh Culpeper (1996) untuk menilai perbedaan frekuensi strategi ketidaksantunan oleh laki-laki dan perempuan. Penelitian ini menggunakan Pearson Chi-Suare pada 0.05% dari perbedaan yang signifikan. Data dari penelitian ini adalah penulisan ujaran yang mengandung strategi ketidaksantunan yang digunakan pada komentar di vlog. Sumber data yang digunakan adalah komentar dari video blogging pada acara The Late Late Show. Penulis memperlihatkan hasil penelitian dengan tabel presentase dari setiap sub strategi yang diantaranya adalah 10,8% ketidaksantunan secara langsung, 59,7% ketidaksantunan positif, 20% ketidaksantunan negatif, 5,2% penggunaan sindiran, dan 4,3% ketidaksantunan kombinasi. Penulis menemukan 230 total data dari keseluruhan analisis ketidaksantunan pada komentar di vlog The Late Late Show. Dari analisis data dapat disimpulkan bahwa laki-laki lebih banyak melakukan ketidaksantunan dibandingkan perempuan.

(13)

xiii

ABSTRACT

Ika Ratna Rosanti. S 200100039. IMPOLITENESS IN CRITICISM IN VLOG. Thesis. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. 2016.

This research aims to analyse the use of impoliteness strategies in vlog comment. The writer describes the types of impoliteness strategies used in the vlog comments and the differences of impoliteness strategies used by male and female viewers in vlog comments. This research is qualitative. It is analysed descriptively

based on related theory of Culpeper’s (1996) impoliteness strategy to assess the

differences in frequency of impoliteness strategies by male and female. This study

employed Pearson’s Chi-Square (X2) in the 0,05% of significant differences. The

data in this research are written utterance containing impoliteness strategies used in vlog comments published in 2016. The data source of this research is comments of video blogging The Late Late Show. The writer shows the result of the data by table percentages of each super strategy they are bald on record impoliteness 10.8%, positive impoliteness 59.7%, negative impoliteness 20%, sarcasm or mock politeness 5.2%, and combination of impoliteness 4.3%. There are 230 cases of impoliteness in the vlog comments in The Late Late Show. From the data analysis can be concluded that male is more impolite than female.

(14)

xiv

LIST OF TABLE

2.3 Table the Types of Criticism

4.C Table The Differences between Male and Female using Impoliteness Strategies

(15)

xv

LIST OF APPENDIXES

1. Bald-On Record Impoliteness 2. Positive Impoliteness