ERROR ANALYSIS IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXT BY THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 4 SURAKARTA ACADEMIC YEAR OF Error Analysis in Writing Recount Text by The Eighth Grade Students of SMP Muhammadiyah 4 Surakarta Academic Year of 2015/2016.

(1)

ERROR ANALYSIS IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXT BY THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 4 SURAKARTA ACADEMIC YEAR OF

2015/2016

Research Paper Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Getting Bachelor Degree of Education

in English Department

By TRI AGUSTINA

A320120106

ENGLISH DEPARTMENT

SCHOOL OF TEACHER TRAINNING AND EDUCATION MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA

(2)

PRONOUNCIii\'IENT

I, vhosc

autolEpli

sisncd bclow,

Nme

: Tn

Asustim

NIM

A320120106

Proglm

r E.glish Educotion Dcpannent

Tille

:

ERROR

ANILYSIS

IN WRITINC RXCOUNI

TT

XT

BY

,IIII'

EICHTII

GRADD

S'IUDENTS

OF

_STI?

MUIIAMIIADIYAII

4 SLTK{KARTA

AC]\'IiINC

VEAR

OI

Testiry that lhe research paper is thc real wo&

ol

rhc

$nler

and no plagiaris'n of lhe

pBiols

lilqory

vo&

which navc

6m.

raised to obt0ln bacnelo.dcsrcc

ol!

cLn.in

nnivmily.

nor lhe.e

lre

opinions

or

manerpieccs

which

lave

bcm

lvnrd

or

publisled

ty

otheu, excepr lnose in which tne Lyrnins was

refetrql

in rbe m0nuscript

and mmlion review dnd bibliosraphy.

Hcnce later.

ilit

is

prclen

lhal lhere arc sone unrrue srarments nr dris

tesdno.y,

I

Surakaaa,llMarch:016

(3)

TIIE

IIIIPLEMENTATION

OF INQUI RY.BASED

LEARNING

FOR

1III

TEACIIING ENGLISII AT SMPMUSAMMADIYAH

6

SURAXARTA

IN

APPROVAL

2015,'OI6

ACADEMIC

YEAR

Approvcd to be

Exmined

by

Consulldl

TRI ACUSTINA

A320120106

@

(4)

AC(]EPTANCI,:

TEE

TMPLf,MEN

IA

_TION

OF INQUIRY.BASED

_{LEA RN}

ING

FOR TE E

TEACIIINC ENCLISE AT

SIITP

NTTIEAMMADIYAII6

SUI{.\I'AR.r,,r

IN

201t2016

AcADElrtC

rTnR

TRI

AGUSTINA

A€cepted and Appoved by

BMd

ofExmioer

School

Edu(alron

Mun@drlah

U

ve6it,

of

1.

Pmt

Dn

Erda@

Fluzi.ri.

M.IIrp.

2.

An

ti Pmsetv,ritri

_S.P.r.

M.pd.

3.

M.olvE.l*aaqikorr

_Pb.

p

(5)

v

MOTTO

“He it is Who gathereth you at night and knoweth that which ye commit

by day. Then He raiseth you again to life therein, that the term

appointed (for you) may be accomplished. And afterward unto Him is

your return. Then He will proclaim unto you what ye used to do.”(Q.S. al-

An’am 6: 60)

“Learning is the beginning of wealth. Learning is the beginning of health.

Learning is the beginning of spirituality. Searching and learning is where

the miracle process all begins.”

(Jim Rohn)

“Don’t be lazy, because it can obstruct your success. And something what

you do now is the future invesment.”

(6)

vi

DEDICATION

I gratefully dedicate this research paper to:

¾ My dearest mother, “Suti”, and my dearest father, “Cipto Utomo Warimin”

¾ My beloved brother, “Sulistianto” and his wife, “Sukesih”.

¾ My beloved sisters, “Dayu Lestari”, and her husband, “Sulasno”

¾ My beloved niece, “Raisha Aliya Qaisara, Xena Nanda Aulia, Sheila Aulia Ramadani”

¾ My consultants and lecturers, and

(7)

vii

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Alhamdulillahirobbil ‘alamin_{, All praises to Allah SWT, the Lord of the}

universe, King of the king, who does always give us mercy and blessing to complete

this research paper entitled “The Implementation of Inquiry-Based Learning for the

Teaching English at SMP Muhammadiyah 4 Surakarta in 2015/2016 Academic

Year” as one of the requirements for getting bachelor degree of English Education

Department of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. Peace and mercy be upon to

our prophet Muhammad SAW the last messenger who guides us from the darkness to

the lightness.

The researcher realized that many people had given their help and useful

suggestion for finishing the research paper. Therefore, she would like to express her

greatest gratitude to the following people:

1. Prof. Dr. Harun Joko Prayitno, M.Hum., the Dean of school of teacher

training and education of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta, for

approving this research paper.

2. Mauly Halwat Hikmat, Ph.D., Head of English Education Department who

has already given a large of help, and clear information in conducting the

research paper.

3. Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M.Hum., as the first consultant who always gives

great spirit to finish the research paper, and who has already guided and

advised patiently in correcting this research paper.

4. Aryati Prasetyarini, S.Pd, M.Pd., as the second consultant who already gave

a large of help and guidance to improve on writing this research paper.

5. All lecturers in English Education Department of Muhammadiyah University

of Surakarta Mr. Fitri, Mrs. Fatimah, Mr. Titis, Mrs. Dewi, Mr. Giri, Miss

Susi, Mr. Maryadi, Mrs. Zuhriah, Mr. Nur Hidayat, Mr. Azhari, Mrs. Laila,

Mrs. Rini, Mr. Anam, Mr. Thoyibi, Mr. Abdillah, Mr. Sigit, Mr. Djoko, Mr.

Srijanto, Mr. Fathoni, Mr. Wahdan, Mr. Agus, Mr. Suranto, Mrs. Taurat,

(8)

viii

Muamaroh, and Mr. Richardson who have given their knowledge, support,

and experience, thanks for useful knowledge and guidance.

6. Drs. Sukendar, M. Pd., as the Headmaster of SMP Muhammadiyah 4

Surakarta for giving the writer permission to have research in her institution.

7. Henny Septinawati, S.Pd. as the English teacher at SMP Muhammadiyah 4

Surakarta for giving complete information and allowing the writer to observe

the teaching learning process.

8. Her beloved, precious, and great parents, Cipto Utomo Warimin, as her

beloved father and Suti, as her beloved mother thanks a lot for always give

support, pray, motivation, advice, attention, love, time, materials, care, and

guidance. “I do love you, you are my everything.”

9. Her beloved brother, “Sulistianto” and his wife, “Sukesih”. My beloved

sisters, “Dayu Lestari”, and her husband, “Sulasno”, who always support,

love, care, and motivation for me. Your struggle is never forgotten in my

life. Thank you so much and I do love you.

10.Her second family “Wisma Ceria”, Miss. Eni Widiyastuti. Thanks for your

love, care, happiness and sadness that we’ve passed through together. Our

memory is always in my heart.

11.Her best, beloved, and unforgettable friends, Jessy Setya Ariani, who always

help, support, accompany, advice, and force that make her better. “Big

thanks for your love, care, happiness, and sadness that we’ve passed through

together. Our memory is always in my heart. You are my best partners in my

life.”

12.Her friends in Campus:, Amina Khansa, Oktavia Dwi Munika, Neti Isnaini,

Dwi Pradika Yulianti, Karlina Arum Etami, Kharisma Indah Purbasari,

DinarRizqi Amalia, Yunia Dwi Prasetyowati, Kholeyoh Mali, Yuli Setiani,

Meisinta Nur Afani, Menik Erawati, Endang Lestari, who make her cheer up.

13.All of the writer’s friends in English Department 2012 academic year.

Thanks for this warm and meaningful friendship.

14.All of her families, friends and lecturers that cannot be mentioned one by

(9)

ix

The writer realizes that this research paper is still far from being perfect, so

the writer welcomes any constructive comment, criticism, and suggestion from

anyone. Finally, she hopes that this research paper would help the other researchers

who are interested in studying English, especially in the implementation of teaching

English and enrich the reader’s knowledge.

Wassalamu’alaaikumWarohmatullahiWabarokatuh.

Surakarta, March 2016

The Writer,

(10)

x

SUMMARY

Tri Agustina. A320120106. ERROR ANALYSIS IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXT BY THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 4 SURAKARTA ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2015/2016. Research Paper. Teacher Training and Education, Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. February, 2016.

The study aims to identify the types of morphological, syntactic, discourse error in writing recount text by the eighth grade students of SMP Muhammadiyah 4 Surakarta. In addition, it is to know the frequency of each type of errors, to know the dominant type of error and to know the sources of the errors.The type of research is qualitative research. The method of collecting data is elicitation method, which is divided into four steps: first steps are requesting the learner to make recount text with the theme that has given; second step is reading the recount text made by students; third step is finding and marking error in the recount text; and last step is dividing the error into the types of error based on linguistic category and surface strategy taxonomy. For analyzing the data, the writer takes six steps, namely: identification of errors, classifying into error types, describing the frequency of error, describing the dominant type of error, analysis of the sources of error and describing the purposed remedial teaching. The result of research shows that lexical errors is 22,2% including false friends, wrong spelling and use of Indonesian word. Syntactical error is 64% which include verb (omission of verb, misuses of verb in past tense, addition of to in verb of present tense addition of verb), noun (omission of {-s} plural marker, addition of {-s}), BE (omission of be, misuses of be), phrase (misordering (noun phrase)), article (addition of article), preposition (addition of preposition, omission of preposition), sentence construction (omission of subject, literal translation of Indonesian). Discourse error is 7,7% which include generic structure. The dominant type of error is wrong spelling and misuses of verb in past tense.

(11)

xi

RINGKASAN

Tri Agustina. A320120106.ANALISIS KESILAPAN DALAM PENULISAN TEKS RECOUNT OLEH SISWA KELAS DELAPAN SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 4 SURAKARTA TAHUN AJARAN 2015/2016. Research Paper. Teacher Training and Education, Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. February, 2016.

Tujuan studi ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi jenis kesilapan morphologi, sintax dan discourse dalam penulisan teks recount oleh siswa kelas delapan dari SMP Muhammadiyah 4 Surakarta. Kemudian untuk mengetahui frekuensi dan sumber setiap jenis kesalahan.Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif. Metode pengambilan data adalah metode elicitation. Itu dibagi menjadi empat langkah: meminta siswa untuk membuat teks recount dengan tema yang telah diberikan. Membaca teks recount yang telah di buat siswa. Mencari dan menandai kesilapan dalam teks recount. Membagi kesilapan ke dalam jenis kesilapan berdasarkan kelompok linguistik dan surface strategy taxonomy. Penulis membagi teknik untuk menganalisis data menjadi enam langkah, yaitu: mengidentifikasi kesilapan, mengelompokkan ke dalam jenis kesilapan, mendeskripsikan frekuensi kesilapan, mendeskripsikan dominan kesalahan, menganalisis sumber kesalahan dan mendeskripsikan tujuan remedial teaching.Hasil dari penelitian adalah kesilapan lexical sekitar 22,2% termasuk false friends, wrong spelling dan use of Indonesian word.Kesalahan syntactical sekitar 64% termasuk verb (omission of verb, misuses of verb in past tense, addition of to in verb of present tense addition of verb), noun (omission of {-s} plural marker, addition of {-s}), BE (omission of be, misuses of be), phrase (misordering (noun phrase)), article (addition of article), preposition (addition of preposition, omission of preposition), sentence construction(omission of subject, literal translation of Indonesian). Kesilapan discourse sekitar 7,7% termasuk generic structure. Dominan dari jenis error adalah wrong spelling, dan misuses of verb in past tense.

(12)

xii

TABLE OF CONTENT

page

COVER i

PRONOUNCEMENT ii

APPROVAL iii

ACCEPTENCE iv

MOTTO v DEDICATION vi

ACKNOWLEDGMENT vii

SUMMARY x

TABLE OF CONTENT xii

LIST OF TABLE xv

LIST OF APPENDIX xvi

CHAPTER I : INTRODUCTION 1

A. Background of the Study 1 B. Scope of the Study 4 C. Problem Statement 4

D. Objective of the Study 4

E. Significance of the Study 4 F. Research Paper Organization 5

CHAPTER II : REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE 7

A. Underlying Theory 7

1. An Error Analysis 7

a. Notion or Error Analysis 7 b. Significantof Error ... 8

c. Algorithm ... 8

d. Error Classification ... 9

(13)

xiii

f. Error and mistake ... 14

g. Remedial teaching ... 15

2. English text ... 16

a. Notion of Text ... 16

b. Type of Text ... 16

c. Recount text ... 18

B. Previous Study ... 19

CHAPTER III : RESEARCH METHOD 26 A. Type of the Study 26

B. Subject of the Study 26 C. Object of the Study 26 D. Data ... 26

E. Data Source 27 F. Method of Collecting Data 27 G. Technique for Analyzing Data 27

CHAPTER IV : RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION 29 A. Research Finding 29

1. The Type of Lexical Error 29

2. The Type of Syntactical Error 31 3. The Type of Discourse Error 36 4. The Frequency of Each Types of Error 36 5. The Dominant Type of Error 38 6. The Sources of Error 38 B. Discussion 42

CHAPTER V : CONCLUSION, IMPLICATION, SUGGESTION 47

A. Conclusion 47

B. Pedagogical Implication 48

C. Suggestion 48

(14)

xiv

LIST OF TABLE

1. Table 2.1 Error Identification ... 15

2. Table 2.1 The differences between previuos studies with current study ... 23

3. Table 4.1 Frequency of Error ... 36

4. Table 4.2 Source of Error ... 41

5. Table 4.3 Similarities between Current Study and Previous Study ... 44

6. Table 4.4 Differences between Current Study and Previous Study ... 45