DAFTAR PUSTAKA. Bassham, G. et al. (2008). Critical Thinking A Student s Introduction. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

(1)

Muslim, 2014

PENGEMBANGAN PROGRAM PERKULIAHAN FISIKA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI KEMAMPUAN BERARGUMENTASI CALON GURU FISIKA

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Acar, O. & Patton, B.R. (2012). “Argumentation and Formal Reasoning Skills in an Argumentation-Based Guided Inquiry Course”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 46, (12), 4756-4760.

Albe, V. (2008). “When Scientific Knowledge, Daily Life Experience, Epistemologygical and Social Considerations Intersect: Students’ Argumentation in Group Discussions on a Socio-Scientific Issue”. Research in Science Education. 38, (1), 67-90.

Anderson, L. et al. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assesing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Addison Wesley Longman.

Asterhan, C.S.C. & Schwarz, B.B. (2009). Argumentation and Explanation in Conceptual Change: Andications from Protocol Analyses of Peer-to-Peer Dialog. Cognitive Science. (33), 374-400.

Aufschnaiter, C. (2009). Argumentation About and Understanding of Science: Research Exploring How To Interrelate These Two Different Perspectives. Paper presented at ESERA 2009 Conference. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.

Bassham, G. et al. (2008). Critical Thinking A Student’s Introduction. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Blake, B and Pope, T. (2008). “Developmental Psychology: Incorporating Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s Theories in Classrooms”. Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in Education. 1, (1), 59-67.

Burden, P.R. & Byrd, D.M. (1999). Methods for Effective Teaching. 2nd Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Cakir, M. (2008). “Constructivist Approaches to Learning in Science and Their Implications for Science Pedagogy: A Literature Review. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education. 3, (4), 193-206.

(2)

Muslim, 2014

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of Proximal Development in Vygotsky’s Analysis of Learning and Instruction, in Vygotsky’s Educational Theory and Practice in Cultural Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chang, S. N., & Chiu, M. H. (2008). “Lakatos’ Scientific Research Programmes as a Framework for Analysing Informal Argumentation about Socio-Scientific Issues”. International Journal of Science Education. 30, (13), 1753-1773.

Chen, C.H., & She, H.-C. (2012). “The Impact of Recurrent On-line Synchronous Scientific Argumentation on Students' Argumentation and Conceptual Change”. Educational Technology & Society. 15 (1), 197–210.

Chen, J., Lin, H., Hsu, Y & Lee, H. (2011). “Data and Claim: The Refinement of Science Fair Work Through Argumentation”. International Journal of Science Education. 1, (2), 147 – 164.

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. Dagher, Z. R. (1994). “Does the Use Analogies Contribute to Conceptual

Change?”. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 78, (6), 601-614.

Dawson, V.M. & Venville, G. (2010). “Teaching Strategies for Developing Students’ Argumentation Skills About Socioscientific Issues in High School Genetics”. Research in Science Education. (40), 133-148.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2007). Lampiran Permendiknas No.16 Tahun 2007: Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Derri. (2000). Argumentatif Reasoning Assessments. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.alnresearch.Org/HMTL/Assessmentstutorial/Strategis/

Argumen.html. [12 September 2011].

Driver, R. (1995). Constructivist Approaches to Science Learning. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in Education (pp. 385-400). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Driver, R., Newton, P. & Osborne, J. (2000). “Establishing The Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms”. Science Education. 84, (3), 287-312.

(3)

Muslim, 2014

Duschl R.A. & Osborne, J. (2002). “Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education”. Studies in Science Education.(38), 39-72.

Duschl, R. (2008). Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals. Review of Research in Education. (32), 268-291.

Eisenhart, M.A.(1991). Conceptual Framework for Research. Proceeding of The Thirteenth Annual Meeting: Psychology of Mathematics Education. Virginia:USA.

Elena, S. et al (2012). Promoting Argumentation Skills through a web-based learning environment on the topic of Climate Change. ICEM 2012: Learning in Science Group, University of Cyprus.

Engelhardt, P.V and Bechner, R.J. (2004). “Students’ Understanding of Direc Current Resistive Electrical Circuits”. American Journal Physics.72, (1), 98-115.

Erduran S., Sımon, S. & Osborne, J. (2004). “Tapping into Argumentation: Developments in The Application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for Studying Science Discourse”. Science Education. 88, (6), 915-933.

Erduran, S., Ardac, D., and Guzel, B.Y. (2006). “Learning To Teach Argumentation: Case Studies Of Pre-Service Secondary Science Teachers”. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2, (2).

Erduran, S. & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.P., Eds. (2007). Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer

Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2008). Argumentation in Science Education. Florida State University-USA: Spinger.

Etkina, E. (2010). “Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Preparation of High School Physics Teachers”. The American Physical Society. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research. 6, (2), January 2010. Fensham, P. J. et al. (1994). The Content of Science: A Contructivist Approach to

its Teaching & Learning. Washington DC: The Falmer Press.

(4)

Muslim, 2014

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu Problems for Critical Thinkers. Harlow, UK: Pearson.

Griffin, P., McGraw, B. & Care, E. (2012). Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills . Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer

Hake, R.R (1998). “Interactive-Engagement versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses”. American Journal Physics. 66, (1), January 1998.

Hannon, V. (2009). A New Paradigm for Learning Innovation in The 21st. Century. Centre for Strategic Education. Victoria.

Herron, J. Dudley. (1977). “Problems Associated With Concept Analysis”. Journal of Science Education. 61, (2), 185-199.

Inch, E. S., & Warnick, B., Endres, D. (2006). Critical Thinking and Communication (5th Ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Jamaludin, A., Caloline, H.M.L., and San, C.Y. (2007). “The Impact of Structured Argumentation and Enactive Role Play on students’ Argumentative Writing Skills”. Proceeding Ascilite Singapore 2007.

Jumadi. (2003). Wawasan Keilmuan IPA/Fisika. Makalah Disajikan pada Pelatihan PKG-C yang Diselenggarakan oleh Dinas Pendidikan Propinsi DIY pada Tanggal 28 Juni sampai dengan 3 Juli 2003 di Yogyakarta. [Online]. Tersedia: http://staff.uny.ac.id/system/files/pengabdian/jumadi-mpd-dr/wawasan-keilmuan-ipa.pdf (15 September 2012).

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2013). Rasional Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2013). Elemen Perubahan Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Keraf, G. (1981). Argumentasi dan Narasi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Kolsto, S. D., & Ratcliffe, M. (2008). Social Aspects of Argumentation. In S.

Erduran & M.P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research (pp.114-133). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

Kozulin, A. (2004). “Vygotsky's Theory in The Classroom”. European Journal of Psychology of Education. XIX , (13), 3 -7.

(5)

Muslim, 2014

Kuhn, D. (1993). “Science Argument: Implications for Teaching and Learning Scientific Thinking”. Science Education. 77, (3), 319-337.

Lamb, K. L. (1998). “Test-retest Reliability in Quantitative Physical Education Research”. European Physical Education Review. (4), 145-152.

Lee, E., & Luft, J. (2008). “Experienced Secondary Science Teachers’ Representation of Pedagogical Content Knowledge”. International Journal of Science Education. 30, (10), 1343 – 1363.

Lewis, J., & Leach, J. (2006). “Discussion of Socioscientific Issues: The Role of Science Knowledge. International Journal of Science Education. 28, (11), 1267-1287.

Luft, J. A., & Patterson, N. C. (2002). “Bridging The Gap: Supporting Beginning Science Teachers” .Journal of Science Teacher Education. (13), 267–282.

Maloney, J., & Simon, S. (2006). “Mapping Children’s Discussion of Evidence in Science to Assess Collaboration and Argumentation”. International Journal of Science Education. 28, (15), 1817-1841.

Manurung, S.R. (2013). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Dengan Media Hiperteks Berdasarkan Skema Pemecahan Masalah Berintikan Argumentasi Toulmin. Disertasi Doktor pada Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: tidak diterbitkan.

Marttunen, M., Leena, L., Litosseliti, L., & Lund, K. (2005), “Argumenation Skills as Prerequisites for Collaborative Learning among Finnish, French, and English Secondary School Students”. Educational Research and Evaluation. 11, (4), 365–384.

Matlock, S & Hetzel. (1997). Basic Concepts in Item and Test Analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Austin, January 1997.

McAlister, S.R. (2001). Argumentation and A Design for Learning. [Online]. Tersedia: http://İet.Open.Ac.Uk/Pp/S.R.Mcalister/Personal/197.Pdf [21 Oktober 2011].

McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., & Krajcik, J. (2006). “Supporting Students’ Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in Instructional Materials”. The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 15, (2), 153-191.

(6)

Muslim, 2014

McNeill, K. L. (2009). “Teachers’ Use of Curriculum to Support Students in Writing Scientific Arguments to Explain Phenomena”. Journal of Science Education. (93), 223-268.

McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). “Scientific Discourse in Three Urban Classrooms: The Role of The Teacher in Engaging High School Students in Argumentation”. Journal of Science Education. 9, (2), 203 – 229.

McNeill, K. L., Knight, A. M. (2013). “Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Scientific Argumentation: The Impact of Professional Development on K–12 Teachers”. Journal of Science Education. 97, (6), 936-972.

Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (2008). “Deliberative Discourse Idealized and Realized: Accountable Talk in The Classroom and in Civic Life”. Studies in Philosophy and Education. 27, (4), 283 – 297.

Montaña, G., González, J., & Castillo, F.D. (2012). Argumentation in the Science Classroom. [Online]. Tersedia: http://ikit.org/SummerInstitute2012/ Papers/2998-Gonzalez.pdf (20 November 2011).

Muslim. (2011). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Sekolah untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Calon Guru Fisika. Laporan Penelitian Hibah Disertasi Doktor. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: tidak diterbitkan.

Nasional Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

National Science Teachers Association. (2003). Standards for Science Teacher Preparation.

Newton, P. (1999). “The Place of Argumentation in The Pedagogy of School Science”. International Journal of Science Education. 21, (5), 553-576. Niaz, M. et al. (2002). “Arguments, Contradictions, Resistances and Conceptual

Change in Students’ Understanding of Atomic Structure”. Science Education. 86, (4), 505-525.

Nussbaum, E.M. & Sinatra, G.M. (2003). Argument and Conceptual Engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology. (28), 384-395.

(7)

Muslim, 2014

Nussbaum, E.M. (2008). Collaborative Discourse, Argumentation and Learning: Preface and Literature Review. Contemporary Educational Psychology. (33), 345–359.

OECD/UNESCO-UIS. (2003). Literacy Skill for the World of Tomorrow: Further results from PISA 2000. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.oecd.org/ publications. (10 Juni 2011).

Oluwatayo, J.A. (2012). “Validity and Reliability Issues in Educational Research”. Journal of Educational and Social Research. 2, (2), May 2012. Ormrod, J. E. (2008). Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development. [Online]. Tersedia: http://people.uncw.edu/caropresoe/EDN203/203_Fall_07/ Chapter%202_edit2.ppt (25 September 2012).

Osborne, J., Erduran, S., Simon, S and Monk, M. (2001). Enhancing The Quality of Argument in School Science. School Science Review.

Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). “Enhancing The Quality of Argumentation in School Science”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 41, (10), 994-1020.

Osborne, J. (2007). “Science Education for the Twenty First Century”. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. 3, (3), 173-184.

Park, S., & Oliver, S. (2008). “Revisiting the Conceptualisation of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): PCK as a Conceptual Tool to Understand Teachers as Professionals”. Research in Science Education. 38, 261 – 284. Piaget, J. (1985). The Equilibration of Cognitive Structures. Chicago: University

of Chicago Press.

Riduwan. (2012). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Riemeier, T. et al. (2009). The Quality Of Students’ Argumentation And Their Conceptual Understanding – An Exploration Of Their Interrelationship. Paper presented at ESERA 2009 Conference. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.

Roshayanti, F. (2012). Pengembangan Model Asesmen Argumentatif untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Argumentasi Mahasiswa Pada Konsep Fisiologi Manusia. Disertasi Doktor pada Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: tidak diterbitkan.

(8)

Muslim, 2014

Rustaman, N.Y. (2012). Trend Penelitian Pendidikan: Kasus Penelitian Pendidikan Sains. Proceeding Seminar Nasional IPA III Tahun 2012-Peningkatan Kompetensi Profesionalisme Guru Sains Berkelanjutan Melalui Penelitian dan Publikasi Ilmiah. Prodi Pendidikan IPA FMIPA Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). “The Significance of Content Knowledge for Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues”: Applying Genetics Knowledge to Genetic Engineering Issues”. Science Education. (89), 71-93.

Sadler, T. D. (2006). “Promoting Discourse and Argumentation in Science Teacher Education”. Journal of Science Teacher Education. (17), 323-346. Sagir, S.U., & Kihc, Z. (2012). “Analysis of the Contribution of

Argumentation-Based Science Teaching on Student Success and Retention”. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education. 4, (2), 139-156.

Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of The Ways Students Generate Arguments in Science Education: Current Perspectives and Recommendations for Future Directions.

Sampson, V. & Gerbino, F. (2010). “Two Instructional Models That Teachers Can Use to Promote and Support Scientific Argumentation in the Biology Classroom”. The American Biology Teacher. 72, (7), 427-431.

She, H.C. & Liao, Y.W. (2010). “Bridging Scientific Reasoning and Conceptual Change through Adaptive Web-based Learning”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 47, (1), 91-119.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching”. Educational Researcher. 15, (2), 4 – 14.

Siegel, H. (1989). “The Rationality of Science, Critical Thinking and Science Education”. Synthese. 80, ( 1), 9-42.

Simon, S., Erduran, S. & Osborne, J. (2006). “Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and Development in The Science Classroom”. International Journal of Science Education. 28, (2), 235-260.

Simon, S. (2008). “Using Toulmin's Argument Pattern in The Evaluation of Argumentation in School Science. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 31, (3), 277-289.

(9)

Muslim, 2014

Slavin, R.E. (1994). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice. 5th Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Solomon, J., Duveen, J. & Scott, L. (1992). Exploring The Nature of Science: Key Stage 4. Hatfield, UK: Association for Science Education.

Suparno, P. (2010). Filsafat Konstruktivisme Dalam Pendidikan.Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Suyatno. (2010). Peran Pendidikan Sebagai Modal Utama Membangun Karakter Bangsa. Makalah disampaikan dalam Sarasehan Nasional “Pengembangan Pendidikan Budaya dan Karakter Bangsa” oleh Kopertis Wilayah 3 DKI Jakarta, 12 Januari 2010. [Online]. Tersedia: http://anannur. blogspot.com /2011/02/peran-pendidikan-sebagai-modal-utama.html. (12 Oktober 2012). Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D.S., & Semmel, M. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exeptional Children. Source Book. Bloominton: Center for Innovation on teaching the Handicapped.

Toulmin, S. (1969). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Trent, R. (2009). “Fostering Students’ Argumentation Skills in Geoscience Education”. Journal of Geoscience Education. 5, (1), 224-232.

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. (2010). Re-Desain Pendidikan Profesional Guru. Bandung: UPI Press.

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. (2011). Kurikulum Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Tahun 2011. Bandung: UPI Press.

Uyanto, S.S. (2009). Pedoman Analisis Data dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Venville, G., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). “Exploring Conceptual Change in Genetics”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 35, (9), 1031-1055. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). “Mind in Society: The Development of Higher

Psychological Processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wenning, C. J. (2006). “A Framework for Teaching The Nature of Science.” Journal of Physics Teacher Education. 3, (3), 3-10.

(10)

Muslim, 2014

Wheatley, G.H. (1991). “Constructivist Perspectivists on Science and Mathematics Learning”. Science Education. 75, (1), 9-22.

Xie, Q and Mui So, W.W. (2012). Understanding and practice of argumentation: A pilot study with Mainland Chinese pre-service teachers in secondary science classrooms. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching.

Yan, X. & Erduran, S. (2008). “Arguing Online: Case Studies of Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Perceptions of Online Tools in Supporting The Learning of Argument’s”. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 5, (3), 2-31.

Yu Chi, C.et al. (2010). Content Analysis of Argumentation in Middle School Science Textbooks in Korea, Mainland China, and Taiwan. EASE: East Asian Association Science Education.

Zohar, A. & Nemet. F. (2002). “Fostering Student’s Knowledge and Argumentation Skills through Dilemmas in Human Genetics”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 39, (1), 35-62.

Zhou, G. (2010). “Conceptual Change in Science: A Process of Argumentation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. 6, (2), 101-110.