• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

b10 relevan cost prodution

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "b10 relevan cost prodution"

Copied!
50
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Chapter 10

Relevant Information

and Decision

Making:

(2)

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 2

Learning Objective 1

Use opportunity cost to

analyze the income

(3)

Costs

An opportunity cost is the maximum available contribution to profit forgone (or passed up)

by using limited resources for a particular purpose.

(4)

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 4

Costs

Differential cost and incremental cost are

(5)

Learning Objective 2

(6)

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 6

Make-or-Buy Decisions

 The basic make-or-buy question is whether

a company should make its own parts to be used in its products or buy them from

(7)

Make-or-Buy Decisions

Qualitative Factors: Control quality

Protect long-term relationships with suppliers

(8)

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 8

Make-or-Buy Example

GE Company Cost of Making Part N900:

Total Cost for Cost

(9)

Make-or-Buy Example

 Another manufacturer offers to sell GE the

same part for $10.

 The essential question is the difference in

expected future costs between the alternatives.

(10)

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 10

Make-or-Buy Example

 If the $4 fixed overhead per unit consists of

costs that will continue regardless of the decision, the entire $4 becomes irrelevant.

 If $20,000 of the fixed costs will be

(11)

Relevant Cost Comparison

Make Buy

Total Per Unit Total Per Unit

Purchase cost $200,000 $10

Direct material $ 20,000 $ 1 Direct labor 80,000 4 Variable overhead 40,000 2 Fixed OH avoided by

(12)

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 12

Learning Objective 3

Decide whether a joint product

should be processed beyond

(13)

Joint Products

Joint products have relatively significant sales values.

They are not separately identifiable as

individual products until their split-off point.

The split-off point is that juncture of

(14)

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 14

Joint Products

Separable costs are any costs beyond the split-off point.

(15)

Illustration of Joint Costs

 Suppose Dow Chemical Company produces

two chemical products, X and Y, as a result of a particular joint process.

 The joint processing cost is $100,000.

 Both products are sold to the petroleum

(16)

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 16

Illustration of Joint Costs

1 million liters of X at a

selling price of $.09 = $90,000

500,000 liters of Y at a

selling price of $.06 = $30,000

Total sales value at split-off is $120,000

Joint-processing cost is $100,000

(17)

Illustration of

Sell or Process Further

 Suppose the 500,000 liters of Y can be

processed further and sold to the plastics industry as product YA.

 The additional processing cost would be

$.08 per liter for manufacturing and distribution, a total of $40,000.

 The net sales price of YA would be $.16 per

(18)

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 18

Illustration of

Sell or Process Further

Revenue $30,000 $80,000 $50,000

Separable costs beyond split-off

@ $.08 – 40,000 40,000

Income effects $30,000 $40,000 $10,000

Sell at Split-off

as Y

Process Further and

(19)

Learning Objective 4

Identify irrelevant information

in disposal of obsolete inventory

and equipment replacement

(20)

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 20

Irrelevance of Past Costs

 Two examples of past costs that we can

consider, to see why they are irrelevant to decisions, are:

1 The cost of obsolete inventory

(21)

Example of Irrelevance of

Obsolete Inventory

 Suppose General Dynamics has 100

obsolete aircraft parts in its inventory.

 The original manufacturing cost of these

(22)

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 22

Example of Irrelevance of

Obsolete Inventory

 General Dynamics can...

1 remachine the parts for $30,000 and then

sell them for $50,000, or

2 scrap them for $5,000.

(23)

Example of Irrelevance of

Obsolete Inventory

Remachine Scrap Difference

Expected future revenue $ 50,000 $ 5,000 $45,000

Expected future costs 30,000 0 30,000

Relevant excess of

revenue over costs $ 20,000 $ 5,000 $15,000

Accumulated historical

inventory cost* 100,000 100,000 0

Net loss on project $(80,000) $ (95,000) $15,000

(24)

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 24

Irrelevance of Book Value

of Old Equipment

The book value of equipment is not a relevant consideration in deciding

whether to replace the equipment.

Why?

(25)

Irrelevance of Book Value

of Old Equipment

Depreciation is the periodic allocation of the cost of equipment.

The equipment’s book value (or net book value)

(26)

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 26

Example of Book Value

Computation

Suppose a $10,000 machine with a 10-year life has depreciation of $1,000 per year.

What is the book value at the end of 6 years?

Original cost $10,000

Accumulated depreciation (6 × $1,000) 6,000

(27)

Keep or Replace an Old

Machine?

Old Replacement

Machine Machine

Original cost $10,000 $8,000

Useful life in years 10 4

Current age in years 6 0

Useful life remaining in years 4 4

Accumulated depreciation $ 6,000 0

Book value $ 4,000 N/A

Disposal value (in cash) now $ 2,500 N/A

(28)

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 28

Keep or Replace an Old

Machine?

 What is a sunk cost?

 A sunk cost is a cost that has already been

(29)

Relevance of Equipment Data

 In deciding whether to replace or keep

existing equipment, we must consider the relevance of four commonly encountered items:

1 Book value of old equipment

2 Disposal value of old equipment

3 Gain or loss on disposal

(30)

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 30

Book Value of Old Equipment

 The book value of old equipment is

irrelevant because it is a past (historical) cost.

 Therefore, depreciation on old equipment is

(31)

Disposal Value of Old Equipment

 The disposal value of old equipment is

relevant (ordinarily) because it is an

(32)

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 32

Gain or Loss on Disposal

 This is the difference between book value

and disposal value.

 It is therefore a meaningless combination of

irrelevant (book value) and relevant items (disposal value).

(33)

Cost of New Equipment

 The cost of the new equipment is relevant

because it is an expected future outflow that will differ among alternatives.

 Therefore depreciation on new equipment is

(34)

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 34

Comparative Analysis

of the Two Alternatives

Four Years Together

Keep Replace Difference

Cash operating costs $20,000 $12,000 $ 8,000

Old equipment (book value)

depreciation, or 4,000 – –

lump-sum write-off 4,000 –

Disposal value – (2,500) 2,500

New machine

acquisition cost – 8,000 (8,000)

(35)

Learning Objective 5

(36)

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 36

Beware of Unit Costs

 There are two major ways to go wrong

when using unit costs in decision making:

1 The inclusion of irrelevant costs

2 Comparisons of unit costs not computed on

(37)

Example of

Volume Basis Decision

 Assume that a new $100,000 machine with

a five-year life can produce 100,000 units a year at a variable cost of $1 per unit, as opposed to a variable cost per unit of $1.50 with an old machine.

 Is the new machine a worthwhile

(38)

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 38

Example of

Volume Basis Decision

Old New

Machine Machine

Units 100,000 100,000

Variable cost per unit $1.50 $1.00

Variable costs $150,000 $100,000

Straight-line depreciation 0 20,000

Total relevant costs $150,000 $120,000

(39)

Example of

Volume Basis Decision

 It appears that the new machine will reduce

costs by $.30 per unit.

 However, if the expected volume is only

(40)

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 40

Example of

Volume Basis Decision

Old New

Machine Machine

Units 30,000 30,000

Variable cost per unit $1.50 $1.00

Variable costs $45,000 $30,000

Straight-line depreciation 0 20,000

Total relevant costs $45,000 $50,000

(41)

Learning Objective 6

Discuss how performance

measures can affect

(42)

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 42

Performance Measures Can

Affect Decision Making

 To motivate managers to make the right

choices, the method used to evaluate

(43)

Example of Affect on

Decision Making

 Consider the replacement decision,

discussed earlier, where replacing the machine had a $2,500 advantage over keeping it.

 Because performance is often measured by

accounting income, consider the accounting income in the first year after replacement

(44)

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 44

Example of Affect on

Decision Making

Year 1 Years 2, 3, and 4

Keep Replace Keep Replace

Cash operating

costs $5,000 $3,000 $5,000 $3,000

Depreciation 1,000 2,000 1,000 2,000

Loss on disposal

($4,000 – $2,500) 0 $1,500 0 0

Total charges

(45)

Example of Affect on

Decision Making

If the machine is kept rather than replaced, first-year costs will be $500 lower

(46)

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 46

Learning Objective 7

Construct absorption and

contribution format income

(47)

Absorption Approach

 The absorption approach is a costing

approach that considers all factory overhead (both variable and fixed) to be product

(inventoriable) costs.

 Factory overhead becomes an expense in

(48)

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton 6 - 48

Contribution Approach

 In contrast, the contribution approach is

used by many companies for internal (management accounting) reporting.

 It emphasizes the distinction between

variable and fixed costs.

 The contribution approach is not allowed

(49)

Comparing Contribution and

costs Nonmanufacturingcosts

A. Variable

(50)

10 - 50

©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Penelitian yang berhubungan dengan reaksi terhadap market shock dilakukan oleh Galariotis, Kasimatis, dan Spyrou (2006), hasilnya menunjukan bahwa terjadi underreaction

[r]

Sehubungan dengan telah dilakukan evaluasi penawaran administrasi dan teknis pekerjaan Penyusunan Rencana Detail Tata Ruang (RDTR) Kawasan Agropolitan Kabupaten

14 Rahmat Safari Yusnai. 15

Berdasarkan Berita Acara Penetapan Pemenang Pemagaran Gedung Kantor Pengadilan Agama Tanjung Selor Tahun Anggaran 2015 Nomor W17-A6/11/PL.01-PGR/VI/2015 tanggal 3

Pada hari ini Rabu, tanggal Tiga bulan Juni tahun Dua ribu lima belas, kami yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini Pokja Panitia Untuk Pekerjaan Rehabilitasi Berat Gedung

Tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu pembangunan sistem komputerisasi untuk penentuan status daya dukung lingkungan berbasis neraca lahan dan mengidentifikasi keseimbangan lahan

Faktor yang mengakibatkan pandangan masyarakat multikultural terhadap suatu yang tidak dapat dijadikan alasan untuk hidup berdampingan secara harmonis adalah ….. beragamnya