•
Test
REDD
implementation
system
•
Achieve
readiness
for
national
l
Outcome 2: Demonstration of establishing
a REL MRV and fair payment systems
a REL, MRV and fair payment systems
1 Measuring Reporting Verification (MRV)
1. Measuring, Reporting, Verification (MRV)
2. Reference Emission Level (REL)
3. Harmonized Fair and Equitable payment
3. Harmonized Fair and Equitable payment mechanism
Outcome 3: Capacity established to
implement REDD at decentralized levels
implement REDD at decentralized levels
1 Capacity for spatial socio‐economic
1. Capacity for spatial socio economic
planning incorporating REDD at district level
2. Empowered stakeholders are able to benefit from REDD
l k h ld d d d l
1 Deforestation is on going but significant
1. Deforestation is on‐going, but significant forest cover remaining
2. Carbon density is relatively high
2. Carbon density is relatively high
3. Local political support is strong
4. Local capacity is reasonably strong
4. Local capacity is reasonably strong
5. Drivers can be addressed easily
6. REDD can bringg co‐benefits
7. Location of other REDD initiatives
Province will be selected from:
Province will be selected from:
• Central Sulawesi • North SulawesiNorth Sulawesi
• Around 60% forest coverAround 60% forest cover
• 2% rate of deforestation and forest degradation
• Relatively high carbon density
• Detailed research has been done in Sulawesi by STORMA project
• Governors are forward thinking
L d C M Land Cover Map
2005/2006
•
Main drivers:
– Small‐scale agriculture – Logging
•
Co‐benefits:
– Low scores on MDG, high poverty. – Very high biodiversity.
• Other REDD initiatives taking place in
K li t d S t S l i d
