• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

S ING 0706368 Bibliohraphy

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "S ING 0706368 Bibliohraphy"

Copied!
6
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

REFERENCES

Acevedo, C. & Rose, D. (2006). Closing the gap and accelerating learning in the middle years of schooling. Literacy learning: the middle years. vol. 14, no. 2.

Acevedo, C. & Rose, D. (2007). Reading (and writing) to learn. PEN 157. Primary English Teaching Association.

Alwasilah, C. (2010). Language, culture, and education: A portrait of contemporary Indonesia. Bandung: Andira

Anderson, M., & Anderson, K. (1997). Text types in English 1. Mmelbourne: Macmillan Education Australia.

Axford, B., Harders, P., & Wise. (2009). Scaffolding literacy: An integrated and sequential approach to teaching reading, spelling and writing. Victoria: ACER Press.

Badan Nasional Standar Pendidikan (2013). Standar isi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Depdikbud.

Bodrova, E. & Leong., D. J. (1998). Scaffolding emergent writing in the zone of proximal development. Literacy teaching and learning. Vol 3 (2) pp. 1 – 18.

Brown, D. (2001). Teaching by principles. New York: Pearson Education.

Brown, A.L., Brandsford, J.D., Ferrara, R.A., & Campione, J.C. (1983). Learning, remembering and understanding. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognitive development (Vol. 3, pp. 77-166). NY: John Wiley. Bruner, J. S. (1977). Early social interaction and language acquisition. in H. R. Schaffer (Ed.). Studies in infant-mother interaction (pp. 271-289). London: Academic Press.

Bruner, J. S. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. in Sinclair A., Jarvelle, R., J., & Levelt, W. J. M., (Ed.) The child’s concept of language. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Bruner, J. S. & Watson, R. (1983). Child’s talk: learning to use language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

(2)

Burch, (2005). A study examining the impact of scaffolding young children’s acquisition of literacy in primary grades. A dissertation. the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University Ana Agricultural and Mechanical College.

Bryman, A. (2006) Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Byram, M. (2004). Genre and genre-based teaching. The Routledge Encycopledia

of Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 234 – 237). London: Routledge. Chang, K. E., Chen, I. D., & Sung, Y. T. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to

enhance text comprehension and summarization. The journal of experimental education Vol 71 (1) pp. 5 - 23

Coolidge, F. L. (2000). Statistics: gentle introduction. London: Sage Publications. Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research design: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed

method approaches. London: Sage Publications.

Derewianka, B. (1990). Exploring how texts work. Newton: PETA.

Derewianka, B. (2003). Trends and issues in genre-based approach. SAGE RELC Journal.

Dewi, M. N. S., (2013). Scaffolding provided by a teacher in teaching news item text. S1 thesis. Bandung: Indonesia University of Education.

Dorn, L. J. & Soffos, C. (2001). Scaffolding young writers. Portland: Stenhouse Publisher.

Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Printer Publisher, Ltd.

Emilia, E., Hermawan, B., & Tati, D. (2008). Pendekatan genre based approach dalam kurikulum Bahasa Inggris tahun 2006: penelitian tindakan kelas di sebuah SMP di Bandung. Laporan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris FPBS UPI.

Emilia, E. (2010). Teaching writing: developing critical learners. Bandung: Rizqi Press.

(3)

Emilia, E. (2014). Introducing functional grammar. Bandung: Pustaka Jaya. Ferris, D. R. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing.

University of Michigan Press.

Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. In American Psychologist, Vol 34(10), October 1979, pp. 906 – 911.

Flynn, N., & Stainthorp, R. (2006) The learning and teaching of reading and writing. Chicester: Whurr Publisher Ltd.

Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (1993). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.

Gerrot, L. & Wignell, P. (1995). Making sense of functional grammar. Australia: Gerd Stabler Anpodean Educational Enterprises.

Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

Graham, S. (2010). Teaching writing. in P. Hogan (Ed.). Cambridge encyclopaedia of language sciences. (pp. 848 – 851). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Grami, M. A. (2005). The Effect of Teachers’ Written Feedback on ESL Students’

Perception: A Study at a Saudi ESL University Level Context. Retrieved

January 26th, 2014 from

http://research.ncl.ac.uk/ARECLS/vol2_documents/Grami/grami.htm

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Hammond, J. (2001). Scaffolding, teaching and learning in language and literacy education. Newton: PETA.

Harders, P. & Horarik, M. M. (2008). Scaffolding literacy and the year 9 boys: Developing a language centred literacy pedagogy. In TESOL in Context December 2008. Vol 18 No. 2, pp. 4 – 21.

Harmer, J. (2004). The practise of English language teaching. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Ltd.

(4)

Hyland, K. (2004). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (2009). Teaching and researching writing. Harlow: Pearson Ed. Ltd. Johnson, A. P. (2008). Teaching reading and writing: A guidebook for tutoring

and remediating students. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Education. Knapp, P. & Watkins, M. (2005). Genre, text, grammar: technologies for teaching

and assessing writing. Sydney: UNSW Press.

Kusumandasari, N. (2012). Teaching recount texts: using learning journals and

students’ perceptions. S1 Thesis. Bandung: Indonesia University of Education.

Laksmi, E. D. (2006). “Scaffolding” students’ writing in EFL class: implementing

process approach. TEFLIN Journal, Volume 17, Number 2, August 2006. Universitas Negeri Malang. 144 – 156

Martin, J. R. (2009). Text in the middle school. London: Equinox.

Martin, J.R., Rose, D. (2005). Designing literacy pedagogy. Continuing Discourse on Language. London: Continuum.

McKenzie, J. (1999). Scaffolding for success. [Electronic version] Beyond technology, questioning, research and the information literate school community. Retrieved October 12, 2013, from

http://fno.org/dec99/scaffold.html

Means, B. & Lindner, L. (1998). Teaching writing in middle school: tips, tricks, and techniques. Colorado: Teacher Ideas Press.

Mulianda, M.A. (2009). Teacher feedback in writing: A case study at an Islamic senior high school in Bandung. UPI Bandung: An unpublished paper Nation, I. S. P. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing. New York:

Routledge.

Nunan, D. (1992). Research method in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Riazi, M. & Rezaii, M. (2011). Teacher- and peer-scaffolding behaviors: Effects

(5)

Languages and ESOL (pp. 55-63). Retrieved January 20, 2014 from

http://www.tesolanz.org.nz/

Rodgers, A. & Rodgers, E. M. (2004). The role of scaffolding in teac hing. In Rodgers & Rodgers (Ed.). Scaffolding literacy instructions: strategies for K-4 classrooms (pp. 1 – 11). Portsmouth: Heinemann.

Roehlr, L. R. & Clanton, D. J. (1997). Scaffolding: a powerful tool in social constructivist classroom. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (1997). Scaffolding students learning: Instructional approaches and issues. Cambridge: Brookline Books, Inc.

Rose, D., et. al. (2003). Scaffolding academic reading and writing at KOORI centre. The Australian journal of indigenous education. Vol. 32, 2003. Rose, D. (2004). Sequencing and pacing of the hidden curriculum: How

Indigenous learners are left out the chain. in Muller, J., et. al. (Eds.).

Reading Bernstein, Researching Bernstein. London: Routledge Falmer, 91-107.

Sam, C. (2005).Purposeful scaffolding: beyond modelling and thinking aloud

[online]. Available at:

http://conference.nie.edu.sg/paper/Converted%20Pdf/ab00655.pdf

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What's all the fuss about metacognition? In A. H.

Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 189-215).

Sedgwick, F. (1999). Thinking about literacy: Young children and their language. London: Routledge.

Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research (3rd Edition). New York: Teacher College Press.

Van der Stuyf, (2002). Scaffolding as a teaching strategy. [online]. Available at:

http://www.condor.admin.ccny.cuny.edu/

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for english language learners: a

(6)

Watt, J. H. & Van den Berg, S. (2002). Research method for communication science. [Online]. Retrieved January 20, 2014 from

http://www.cios.org/readbook/rmcs/rmcs.htm

Williams, J. D. (2003). Preparing to teach writing: research, theory, and practices. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Wilson, P. & Glazier, T. F. (2009). the least you should know about English writing skills. Tenth Edition. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Berdasarkan analisis data dan pembahasan yang telah disusun dan telah diuji pada bagian sebelumnya, maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa kualitas interaksi sosial atlet karate nomor kata

Penelitian ini juga bersifat deskriptif yaitu penelitian untuk memberikan data yang seteliti mungkin tentang suatu gejala atau fenomena, dalam hal ini adalah seputar penerapan

Pachta, Andjar, dkk., 2005, Hukum Koperasi Indonesia , Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Depok. Pramono, Nindyo, 1985, Beberapa Aspek Koperasi pada Umumnya

MUSAWIR NASUTION:Perencanaan Program Interpretasi Lingkungan di Kawasan Wisata Danau Linting Kabupaten Deli Serdang, dibimbing oleh PINDI PATANA dan YUNUS AFIFUDDIN..

Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan kajian materi IPS pada buku tematik terpadu kurikulum 2013 kelas IV sekolah dasar secara keseluruhan telah menggambarkan ruang lingkup

MENYATAKAN BAHWA RINCIAN YANG DIPERLIHATKAN DALAM FORMULIR INI DAN DOKUMEN - DOKUMEN YANG MENYERTAI TEPAT DAN BENAR RINCIANNYA DAN MENGUNGKAPKAN PERNYATAAN YANG PENUH DAN

Penerapan Teknik Six Thinking Hats pada Isu – Isu Kontemporer dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas Siswa: (Studi Kasus di SMA Negeri 1 Cikarang

pada struktur teks anekdot, yaitu pada dua teks dari lima teks anekdot. 3) Pengembangan teks berbasis kearifan lokal untuk bahan ajar teks anekdot. merupakan salah satu