• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

PTPP Moment to Carry on Effective Strategy 20180412 NHKS Company Report (English)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Membagikan "PTPP Moment to Carry on Effective Strategy 20180412 NHKS Company Report (English)"

Copied!
5
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Please consider the rating criteria & important disclaimer

highest revenue figures as of 1Q14

. 2Q17 and 3Q17 soaring new contracts

of IDR13.5 trillion and IDR11.7 trillion were the potent drivers for 4Q17. In

contrast to the soaring figures of 4Q17 revenue, 4Q17 net profit moved

little by IDR463 billion (+2.2%) attributable to

escalating interest expense

of IDR415 billion.

Secured Growth of New Contracts

PTPP enjoyed 2017 new contracts accomplishment worth IDR40.9 trillion

(+25.5%)

higher than the growth of 20.4% in 2016 new contracts

accomplishment

. It sets the target of 2018 new contracts worth IDR49

trillion (+19.8%). We oversee that its determined growth of around 20% is

realistic in light of

its success in securing 1Q18 new contracts worth IDR9.5

trillion surging 42.4% y

-

y.

Setting A Way More Effective Strategy

PTPP sets strategies

to receive no turnkey projects and eye only at

contracts worth higher than IDR300 billion

. We analyze that the strategies

are effectively solves the cash flow issue: common project headwind

looming stated

-

owned constructors. In fact, these strategies are key

takeaways for

taking hold higher rhythm of margin growth

.

Target Price IDR3,850

(2)

A Glance at PTPP

PTPP is one of state

-

owned enterprises (BUMN) whose expertise is in a construction

service sector. Based on contracts value it receives, PTPP is the second

-

biggest stated

-owned constructor after WSKT. Virtually 55.5% contracts it handles are projects -owned

by BUMN, the remaining 37.5% are private projects, and 7.0% is the Indonesian’s

government projects.

PTPP is well

-

acknowledged for its expertise in building and residential constructions.

Along with the massive infrastructure construction in Indonesia, it furthers to diversifies

its construction contracts into toll roads, power plants, airports, and other

infrastructures. It categorizes its revenues segments as follows: construction, EPC

(engineering, procurement

-

construction), property & realty, energy, precast, and

equipment rental.

Indonesia–based Construction Sector in ASEAN

Paradoxical backdrop of vast economic development yet lack of infrastructure progress

in ASEAN is logical takeaway for the flourishing growth of construction sector in ASEAN.

Indonesia–based construction companies are notable for having larger a vast amount of

asset than its ASEAN’s peers have. Of note, Indonesia and Vietnam–based construction

companies averagely are higher

-

profit growth makers than are its peers.

ASEAN Constructor

Source: Bloomberg, NHKS research

Company

Market Cap

(USD mn)

Total Asset

(USD mn)

Net Profit

Growth

Net Profit

Margin

Debt to

Equity

ROE

P/E

P/BV

PTPP

1,265

3,075

42%

6.8%

62%

11.6%

9.7x

1.1x

WSKT

2,465

7,205

127%

8.6%

188%

31.0%

6.0x

2.4x

WIKA

1,111

3,362

14%

4.6%

62%

8.2%

12.8x

1.0x

ADHI

553

2,085

64%

3.4%

142%

9.1%

14.8x

1.3x

Thailand

CH. KARNCHANG PUBLIC

1,309

2,434

-

9.6%

5.0%

164.6%

8.1%

22.6x

1.7x

UNIQUE ENGINEERING

444

846

0.8%

7.1%

107.8%

12.7%

15.5x

1.9x

Philippine

MEGAWIDE CONSTRUCTION

884

1,030

12.7%

8.8%

158.9%

8.7%

40.0x

3.1x

HOUSE OF INVESTMENTS

81

679

-

18.9%

1.6%

49.7%

6.2%

6.9x

0.4x

Vietnam

COTECCONS CONSTR.

543

699

16.2%

6.1%

0.0%

23.2%

7.7x

1.7x

HOA BINH CONSTRUCTION

270

616

51.5%

5.4%

187.0%

44.5%

7.1x

2.7x

Malaysia

GAMUDA BHD

3,268

3,683

8.6%

18.7%

66.8%

9.3%

18.3x

1.7x

IJM CORP BHD

2,583

4,721

24.4%

10.8%

55.2%

6.2%

17.4x

1.1x

(3)

New Contracts (IDR bn)

Source: Company, NHKS Research

Revenue (IDR bn)

Source: Company, NHKS Research

Revenue Breakdown

Source: Company, NHKS Research

Net Profit (IDR bn)

Source: Company, NHKS Research

Margin Ratios

Source: Company, NHKS Research

Total Debt (IDR bn)

(4)

Multiple Valuation

Forward P/E band

| Last 1 year

Source: NHKS research

Dynamic Forward P/E band

| Last 1 year

Source: NHKS research

Rating and target price update

Target Price Revision

Date

Rating

Target Price

Last Price

Consensus

vs Last Price

vs Consensus

04/13/2017

Buy

4,960 (Dec 2017)

3,380

4,846

+46.7%

+2.4%

09/01/2017

Buy

4,060 (Dec 2018)

2,770

4,374

+46.6%

-

7.2%

11/15/2017

Buy

4,770 (Dec 2018)

2,750

4,131

+73.5%

+15.5%

1/23/2018

Buy

4,770 (Dec 2018)

2,960

4,002

+61.1%

+19.2%

4/12/2018

Buy

3,850 (Dec 2018)

2,770

3,971

+39.0%

-

3.1%

Source: NHKS research, Bloomberg

Closing and Target Price

Source: NHKS research

Analyst Coverage Rating

Source: Bloomberg

NH Korindo Sekuritas Indonesia (NHKS) stock ratings

1.

Period: End of year target price

2.

Rating system based on a stock’s absolute return from the date of publication

Buy

: Greater than +15%

Hold

:

-

15% to +15%

(5)

Summary of Financials

DISCLAIMER

This report and any electronic access hereto are restricted and intended only for the clients and related entity of PT NH Korindo Sekuritas Indonesia. This report is only for information and recipient use. It is not reproduced, copied, or made available for others. Under no circumstances is it considered as a selling offer or solicitation of securities buying. Any recommendation contained herein may not suitable for all investors. Although the information here is obtained from reliable sources, it accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. PT NH Korindo Sekuritas Indonesia, its affiliated companies, respective employees, and agents disclaim any responsibility and liability for claims, proceedings, action, losses, expenses, damages, or costs filed against or suffered by any person as a result of acting pursuant to the contents hereof. Neither is PT NH Korindo Sekuritas Indonesia, its affiliated companies, employees, nor agents liable for errors, omissions, misstatements, negligence, inaccuracy arising herefrom.

In IDR bn 2016/12A 2017/12A 2018/12E 2019/12E EBITDA/As s ets 7.9% 7.1% 8.5% 8.6%

Revenue 16,459 21,502 25,526 30,785 Ca s h Di vi dend (IDR bn) 307 437 530 681

Growth (% y/y) 15.8% 30.6% 18.7% 20.6% Di vi dend Yi el d (%) 1.3% 2.7% 3.1% 4.0% Cos t of Revenue (14,002) (18,251) (21,632) (25,934) Pa yout Ra ti o (%) 30% 30% 30% 30%

Gross Profit 2,457 3,251 3,894 4,851 DER 58% 62% 61% 60%

Gross Margin 14.9% 15.1% 15.3% 15.8% Net Gea ri ng 176% 188% 160% 138%

Opera ti ng Expens es (571) (903) (1,072) (1,405) LT Debt to Equi ty 29% 38% 37% 37%

EBIT 1,886 2,348 2,822 3,446 Ca pi ta l i za ti on Ra ti o 37% 38% 38% 37%

EBIT Margin 11.5% 10.9% 11.1% 11.2% Equi ty Ra ti o 35% 34% 35% 33%

Depreci a ti on 96 238 880 844 Debt Ra ti o 20% 21% 21% 20%

EBITDA 1,983 2,587 3,701 4,289 Fi na nci a l Levera ge 316% 292% 290% 297%

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Adapun masalah yang dialami para pembuat kue ini adalah dapur yang kecil dan perabotan yang kurang memadai sehingga alat dan bahan untuk memproduksi kue

h e results indicate that saprotrophic fungi in tropical montane rain forests are mainly limited by carbon whereas gram positive and negative bacteria benefi t from

[r]

Pembelaannya terhadap LHPL pada pokoknya membantah tidak pernah bersaing, sebagaimana diuraikan dalam butir 25.4 dan 27.2 bagian Tentang Duduk Perkara;--- 1.4.4 Bahwa

Ketika saya kelas 2 SD saya menggunakan sepatu kakak perempuan saya, entah kenapa pada waktu itu saya hanya ingin menggunakan sepatu kakak saya yang sudah lama tidak terpakai..

Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa untuk dokumen yang sama terdapat kemiripan 100%, untuk dokumen yang berbeda dihasilkan prosentase kemiripan yang berbeda-beda,

Metode pemeriksaan dengan mengoles serviks atau leher rahim dengan asam asetat. Kemudian diamati apakah ada kelainan seperti area

An even more significant difference was found under natural forest and sugarcane without burn for MB-C, which was 222% higher under native forest and 102% higher under sugarcane