Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=vjeb20
Journal of Education for Business
ISSN: 0883-2323 (Print) 1940-3356 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/vjeb20
Student Perceptions of Online Homework in
Introductory Finance Courses
Joseph C. Smolira
To cite this article: Joseph C. Smolira (2008) Student Perceptions of Online Homework in Introductory Finance Courses, Journal of Education for Business, 84:2, 90-95, DOI: 10.3200/ JOEB.84.2.90-95
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.84.2.90-95
Published online: 07 Aug 2010.
Submit your article to this journal
Article views: 52
View related articles
echnology has expanded rapidly into the classroom. For example, Cudd, Tanner, and Lipscomb (2004) reported that 40% of finance depart-ment faculty use intranet-based soft-waresuchasWebCTorBlackboardto augmentclassroominstruction.Inaddi-tion, they found that 67% of finance departmentfacultyusetheInternetfor education. Other researchers, such as MichelsonandSmith(2004)andPeng (2006) have reported that students haveapositiveviewofInternet-based resources and believe that Web-based enhancements can improve the learn-ing experience for students. Technol-ogy now allows faculty to create new learning experiences that were not practicalafewyearsago.Forexample, investment simulations such as Stock Trakhavebecomepopularadditionsto investmentclasses.
Anewentrantinthisarenaisonline homework created by textbook pub-lishers. Online homework can benefit students because they receive immedi-ate feedback, which increases student performance (Kulik & Kulik, 1986). Onlinehomeworkalsofreesfacultyand teachingassistantresourcesbyreducing time spent in manually grading home-workassignments.Akeydeterminantof thebenefitanduseofanytechnologyis theperceptionofthattechnologybythe end user. This article offers a glimpse
intostudentperceptionsofonlinehome-work assignments in an introductory financeclass.
Several previous researchers have cast doubt on the ability of assigned homework to improve student perfor-mance in the classroom. A difference betweenthepresentstudyandprevious research on homework assignments is themetricused.Ratherthanevaluating the success of assigned homework by relating it to student grades, I exam-ined student perceptions of whether homeworkisvaluable.Ialsoexamined student perceptions of online home- workcomparedwithtraditionalhome-workassignments.
SelectedLiterature
Research concerning the augmen-tation of the traditional face-to-face learning experience with technology is relativelynew.Ingeneral,researchindi-catesthattheadditionofonlinematerial can increase students’ performance in theclassroom.
Biktimirov and Klassen (2008) examinedtheuseofaclassWebpage that includes homework solutions, PowerPointslides,andexamsolutions in an introductory finance class.They found a positive relation among stu-dentperformance,accesstohomework solutions, and hit consistency. They found no support for the hypothesis that access to PowerPoint slides and
StudentPerceptionsofOnlineHomework
inIntroductoryFinanceCourses
JOSEPHC.SMOLIRA BELMONTUNIVERSITY NASHVILLE,TENNESSEE
T
ABSTRACT.
Theauthorexamined studentperceptionsconcerningonline homeworkassignmentsinanintroduc-toryfinanceclass.Ingeneral,students feltthatonlinehomeworkwaspreferable totraditionalhomeworkassignmentsthat areturnedintotheinstructor.Inaddition, studentsreportedthatthehomeworkassign-mentsincreasedtheirunderstandingofthe materialandthetimetheyspentinprepar-ingfortheclass.Overall,graduatestudents reportedahigherlevelofsatisfactionthan didundergraduates.Keywords:classroomtechnology,home-work,Web-basedinstruction
Copyright©2008HeldrefPublications
exam solutions increases student per-formance. King and Jennings (2004) examined the use of an online trad-ing simulation to augment a personal finance class. They found increased studentperformanceattributabletothe onlinecontent.
Whether homework increases stu-dentperformanceandlearninghasbeen debatedineducationalliterature.Atone end of the debate, several researchers have found that homework does not increase student performance. Peters, Kethley, and Bullington (2002) exam-ined whether required homework increases student performance on a multiple-choice exam in an introduc-toryoperationsmanagementclass.They foundthatnotonlydidrequiredhome-work not increase student performance on multiple-choice exams, but the stu-dentswhowereinclasseswithrequired homeworkactuallyhadaloweraverage examscore.
Several other researchers have also found no evidence that homework increased student performance but did find other benefits to homework. AlthoughJohnson(1989)foundnoevi-dencethathomeworkincreasedstudent performanceinacollegealgebraclass,he didfindthathomeworkledtoincreased long-term retention of the material. Weems (1998) found no evidence that collected homework increased student performance in an intermediate alge-braclass.Inherstudy,aclassthathad required homework collection did not performsignificantlybetterthanacon-trol class that did not have homework. However, she did find that the number of A grades earned by students in the classwithrequiredhomeworkwassig-nificantly larger than the number ofA grades earned by students in the class without required homework. Although required homework did not improve the average student exam performance in Weems’s study, required homework didimprovetheperformanceofabove- averagestudents.
Other researchers have found that homeworkdoesimprovestudentperfor-manceintheclass.L.G.RayburnandJ. M.Rayburn(1999)foundthatstudents who complete homework assignments in an accounting class perform better than their peers who do not complete
homework. Lefcort and Eiger (2003) examinedwhetherstudentperformance in an introductory biology class was affectedbythetimingofthehomework assignments. They found that home-work increased student performance regardless of whether it was prepara-tory (assigned before the material was discussedinclass)orpractice(assigned afterthematerialwasdiscussedinclass). Paschal,Walberg,andWeinstein(1984) provided a synthesis of research about theeffectsofhomeworkonstudentper-formanceforelementaryandsecondary students.Their synthesis indicated that student performance increases when homework is assigned and that graded homeworkincreasesperformancemore thanungradedhomework.
Empirical research has supported theviewthatonlineancillarymaterials can enhance student performance.The researchontheeffectofassignedhome- workismixed.Onereasonwhyhome-work assignments may not enhance learning is their lack of timeliness. Homework assignments turned in to theinstructoraretypicallynotreturned tothestudentuntilthenextclassperi-od or possibly later.When the student receives the graded homework back, it may not be analyzed by the student until a later date. By the time the stu-dentlearnswhetherthehomeworkwas correct,theclassmaybecoveringother topics. In other words, the long turn-aroundtimeforhomeworkassignments mayreduceitsvalueasalearningtool. The availability of homework assign-ments online provides instantaneous feedback and may make the assign-mentmorerelevantandtimely,thereby enhancingstudentperformance.
HomeworkManagerDescription andSurvey
Homework Manager is an online homework site designed by McGraw-Hill/Irwin for use with the company’s textbooks.Becausethiswastheproduct usedbythestudentswhomIsurveyed, the discussion of the assignments and optionsinthisarticlenecessarilyrelate to this Web site. Other textbook pub-lishershavesimilarsitesavailable.For example, Thomson/South-Western has ThomsonNOW, an ancillary Web site
for its textbooks that also has online homeworkavailable.
The students surveyed in the present studywereenrolledinthreeclassesdur- ingthespring2006semesterattheuni-versityatwhichIteach.Twoclasseswere undergraduate introductory corporate finance classes required of all business majors.Oneoftheclasseswastaughtby me(n=23)andtheotherbyafirst-time adjunct instructor (n = 27). The third classwasaMasterofBusinessAdmin-istration (MBA) prerequisite corporate financeclasstaughtbyme(n=30).The MBA prerequisite course is required of allincomingstudentswithoutaprevious undergraduate finance course and stu- dentswhohavenottakenanundergradu-atefinancecourseinthelast5years.As apracticalmatter,morethan95%ofall incoming MBA students enroll in the prerequisiteclass.Thetextbookusedfor the undergraduate class wasEssentials of Corporate Finance by Ross,Wester-field, and Jordan (2007). The textbook usedfortheMBAprerequisiteclasswas FundamentalsofCorporateFinanceby Ross, Westerfield, and Jordan (2006). The problems assigned for the under-graduate and MBA prerequisite classes differed, with the problems assigned to the MBA students being more detailed anddifficult.
HomeworkManagerusestheend-of-chapterproblemsinanonlinehomework format.Thedifferencebetweenthetext-book version of the problem and the onlineversionoftheproblemisthatthe onlineversionmayberewordedfroman open-ended problem to create a fill-in-the-blankproblem.Mostend-of-chapter problemsareavailableinstaticandalgo-rithmicformat.Thestaticversionclosely replicates the end-of-chapter problem, withtheexactnumberspresentedinthe textbookproblem.Thealgorithmicprob-lem is the same probtextbookproblem.Thealgorithmicprob-lem with different numbers.Becausethealgorithmicprob-lems have ranges for several different numericvalues,itishighlyunlikelythat twodifferentstudentswouldreceivethe same numbers. This randomizing helps reducethepossibilityofastudent’scopy-ing from a peer. The students in these classes were assigned the algorithmic versionoftheproblems.
At the beginning of the semester, each student who was enrolled in the
classwasrequiredtopurchaseanaccess codeforHomeworkManageratacost ofapproximately$12.75.Studentswere also required to complete a homework assignment for each chapter discussed inclass.Toencouragecompletionofthe homework, the homework scores were included as part of their final grade. Online homework accounted for 13% ofthefinalgradefortheMBAclassand 23%intheundergraduateclass.
HomeworkManagerhasvariouspol-icy settings that are determined by the instructor.Foreachchapterdiscussedin class,theinstructorchoseend-of-chapter problems.Thenumberofproblemsfor eachhomeworkassignmentwaschosen withtheexpectationthatthehomework for each chapter would take approxi-mately45mintocomplete.Inaddition, students were given optional practice homework for each chapter. The prac-tice homework included every end-of-chapter algorithmic problem, although thestudentdidnothavetoanswerallof the problems. The practice homework grades were not included as part of the grade for the class but allowed the students an opportunity to work on as manyproblemsastheydesired.
For each homework assignment, the instructor can allow students to trythe homeworkone–fivetimesoranunlim- itednumberoftimes.Inthiscase,stu-dents were given five opportunities to try each homework assignment. To receive credit for the assignment, the gradeonthehomeworkhadtobe70% or higher. A homework grade below 70%wascountedasthesameasagrade of0.Thispolicyencouragedstudentsto reworktheproblemsthattheymissedto master the concepts discussed in class. Tocomputethefinalhomeworkgrade, the highest homework scores for each chapterwereaveraged.
In the beginning, the entire home-workassignmenthadtobereworkedif studentsscoredlessthan70%orwant-ed to retake the homework to improve theirgrade.Forexample,iftherewere 10 problems and the student correctly answered 6, the student would have to rework all 10 problems.After the sec-ond homework assignment, this policy was changed, and students were only required to rework the problems that theyhadansweredincorrectly.Although ing the policy to require students to reworkonlytheproblemsthattheyhad answeredincorrectly,Iencouragedstu-dents to spend more time on concepts withwhichtheywerehavingdifficulty. Inaddition,theoriginalimplementation meant that students were discouraged fromretakingthehomeworktoimprove their grade. For example, if students earnedan80%thefirsttimetheycom-pleted a homework assignment, they were less likely to retake the home-workbecauseitwouldgenerallyrequire another45minormoretodoso.Thus, these students were discouraged from reworking the problems that they had answeredincorrectly.
The instructor is given the oppor-tunity to set the time frame for each homeworkassignment.Inthiscase,the start date for a homework assignment was the 1st day on which the material was discussed in class. The end date for each homework assignment was originallyassignedtobeapproximately 1 week after the expected completion of the chapter material. This schedule encouraged students to complete the homeworkwhilethematerialwasfresh and reinforced the concepts discussed in the classroom. During the semes-ter, the deadline for completion was extended on two occasions because of schedulingconflicts.
Thehomeworkassignmentsareavail-able as timed homework or unlimited- timehomework.Mypolicywastoper-mitstudentsunlimitedtime.Inaddition, students were allowed to log in to the Website,printoutthehomeworkprob- lems,andlogoutoftheWebsitewith-outgradingthehomework.Thestudents couldthencompletetheprintedversion of the homework offline and, when it wasdone,logbackintothehomework andentertheanswers.Severalstudents expressedthattheypreferredthismeth-od rather than having to complete the homeworkinfrontofthecomputer.
To assist student learning, the Solu-tionsManualforthetextbookwasmade availabletothestudentsatthebeginning
of the semester.The Solutions Manual contains the solutions for all the end-of-chapter problems. The solutions are detailed,withstep-by-stepinstructions. Since the problems assigned in the onlinehomeworkwerealgorithmicver-sions of the end-of-chapter problems, the students could not simply enter the answer in the Solutions Manual. AlthoughmakingtheSolutionsManual available to students may allow them tosolvetheproblemswithacopy-and-pastemethodology,ithasbeenfoundto increaseperformanceintheclass(Bik-timirov&Klassen,2008).
There were two common problems thatstudentsexperiencedwiththehome- work.First,manyoftheassignedprob-lems had multiple steps. Because the answersfortheproblemswerecalculat-edbyacomputer,therewasnorounding inintermediatesteps.Forexample,ifthe problemwas,“Whatis100dividedby3 times3?”thefinalanswercalculatedby the computer would be 100. If students rounded the first step to 33, their final answer would be 99, which could be graded as incorrect. To allow for small rounding errors, Homework Manager has a built-in range for each answer. However, if students rounded too much during an intermediate step, they could worktheproblemcorrectlybutenteran incorrect answer because of rounding. Manystudentsinitiallyworkedproblems with rounding in intermediate steps but soonlearnedtoavoidrounding.
The second common problem that arose was students’ misreading the answer format. For example, the stu-dent instructions might state, “Enter youranswerinwholedollars,notmil-lions of dollars.” In this case, espe-ciallyforthefirsthomework,students might enter 5 million as “5” rather than “5,000,000.” These problems were alleviated after students became more familiar with Homework Man-ager and after reinforcement from the instructor. It should be noted that the instructormayexaminethecompleted homeworkforeachstudentandmanu-ally regrade any problem. This step occurred a limited number of times duringthesemesterwhentheinstructor felt that the student had correctly answeredtheproblembuthadentered theanswerincorrectly.
SurveyResults
Aquestionnairewasadministeredto students at the end of the semester to elicittheirperceptionsoftheeffective-ness of online homework as part of thelearningprocessinanintroductory finance class (for abbreviated results, seeTable1).Overall,studentsthought that the online homework as admin-istered was valuable and contributed to their learning. Because the under-graduate students have grown up with technology and are often assumed to bemorecomputersavvy,itwassome-whatsurprisingthattheMBAstudents generally had a more positive view of onlinehomework.
The most important question asked of students was whether the online homework assignments were helpful in improving their understanding of finance. Students felt that the home-work did improve their understanding, with 8 (16%) undergraduates and 10 (33%) graduate students reporting that itwasextremelyhelpful,and34(68%) undergraduates and 16 (53%) graduate studentsreportingthatitwassomewhat helpful.
One of the challenges of introduc-ing online homework is reluctance to change.Studentshavetraditionallybeen assigned homework that was turned in to the instructor, graded, and handed back to the student. To be valuable to instructorsandstudentsalike,theimple-mentation of online homework should helpbothparties,anditshouldbeeasy to use. Students overwhelmingly felt that online homework was beneficial tothem,with32(64%)undergraduates and21(70%)graduatestudentsreport-ingthattheonlinehomeworkwasmore valuable than traditional homework. In addition, 40 (80%) undergraduates and 100%ofgraduatestudentsreportedthat itwaseasytouse.
Homeworkhasseveralgoals.Firstand foremost,homeworkshouldimprovethe student’s knowledge and retention of the material. Because the knowledge and retention of the material was mea-sured by exams in this class, how well online homework prepared the student for exams is an important measure of success.Inall,23(46%)undergraduates and23(77%)graduatestudentsreported
the homework was at least somewhat helpfulinexampreparation.Partofthe feeling of increased preparedness for examscanbetracedtoincreasedstudy time. Accordingly, 34 (68%) under-graduates and 22 (73%) graduate
stu-dentsreportedthattheyspentmoretime studying for the class because of the onlinehomework.
Asecondimportantgoalofpractice homework is to encourage students to worktomasterconceptsatthetimethey
TABLE1.AbbreviatedResultsFromtheQuestionnaireAdministered toStudents
n
Graduate
Question Responseoptions Undergraduate (MBA)
HowhelpfulwasHomework Extremelyhelpful 8 10 Managerinimprovingyour Somewhathelpful 34 16
understandingoffinance? Noeffect 3 3
Slighthindrance 3 1
Didnothelp 2 0
Wasonlinehomeworkmore Lotmore 5 14
valuablethantraditional Somewhatmore 27 7
homeworkassignments? Nodifference 2 7
Somewhatless 9 1
Lotless 7 0
HoweasywasHomework Veryeasy 7 17
Managertouse? Relativelyeasy 19 7
Easy 14 6
Somewhatdifficult 9 0
Verydifficult 2 0
DidHomeworkManager Lotmore 10 11
increasetheamountof Somewhatmore 24 11
timeyouspentstudying Noeffect 15 7
forthisclass? Somewhatless 1 0
Lotless 0 0
HowhelpfulwasHomework Extremely 11 9
Managerinpreparingfor Somewhat 12 14
exams? Alittle 12 4
Minorhelp 13 2
Nohelp 2 1
Didyoucramlessbecause Alotless 3 13
ofHomeworkManager? Alittleless 16 13
No 26 3
Alittlemore 3 1
Alotmore 2 0
Wastheabilitytotake Extremely 5 8
practicehomeworkbefore Somewhat 12 6
thegradedhomework Alittle 10 6
helpful? Minor 7 3
Nohelp 14 3
Howoftendidyoureferto Often 20 18
theSolutionsManualwhile Occasionally 2 6 youdidtheonlinehomework? Afewtimes 6 3
Rarely 6 1
Never 16 2
ShouldtheSolutionsManual Definitely 31 23
fortheonlinehomework Probably 15 3
beavailabletostudents? Irrelevant 3 1
Probablynot 0 1
Definitelynot 0 0
areoriginallypresented.Thistimeliness isanimportantdeterminantofsuccess inanintroductoryfinanceclassbecause of the ordering of topics covered. For example,intheclassessurveyed,bond pricing follows immediately after the discussionoftimevalueofmoneycon-cepts.Ifastudentdoesnotunderstand basic time value of money concepts andcalculations,bondpricingbecomes extremely difficult to understand. As such,19(38%)undergraduatesand26 (86%) graduate students reported that they crammed less for exams because oftheassignedhomework.
In addition to the graded homework, studentswerepermittedtotakeoptional practicehomeworkforeachchapterthat did not count toward their final grade. The practice homework could be taken beforeorafterthegradedhomework.In largepart,studentsdidnotutilizeprac-tice homework. Only 15 (30%) under-graduatesreportedtakingmorethansix practice homework assignments during the semester. Being able to take the practice homework before the graded homework was helpful to 27 (54%) undergraduates and 20 (66%) gradu-ate students. Students were required to completethegradedhomeworkwithina weekoftheclassdiscussionofthemate-rialinthechapter.Thisschedulemeant that the graded homework assignment was not available for the students to reworkbeforetheexamonthematerial. However, the practice homework was stillavailabletostudents.
Previous research has indicated that havingthesolutionstoproblemsavail-able increases student performance in theclass(Biktimirov&Klassen,2008). Consistent with this concept, the solu- tionsmanualtoallend-of-chapterprob-lems was made available to students. It is surprising that only 20 (40%) undergraduates and 18 (60%) gradu-ate students indicated that they often referredtotheSolutionsManualwhile theyworkedonthehomework,whereas another 2 (4%) undergraduates and 6 (20%) graduate students indicated that they occasionally referred to the
solu-tions.Although many students did not use the Solutions Manual, 31 (63%) undergraduates and 23 (76%) graduate students felt that the solutions should definitely be made available to future classes, whereas 15 (31%) undergrad-uates and 3 (11%) graduate students indicated that the solutions probably should be made available. It appears that although students may not make extensiveuseofthesolutions,theyfeel thesolutionsshouldbeavailable.
Conclusion
In the present study, I examined a new technology, online homework. Onlinehomeworkbenefitstheinstructor because of the reduced time needed to gradehomework.However,forittobe atrulyeffectiveteachingtool,students must also accept and benefit from the technology. I administered a question-naire to undergraduate students in an introductoryfinanceclassandgraduate studentsinaprerequisiteMBAfinance class to determine student perceptions ofonlinehomework.
Students reported that online home-work increased the time spent in study-ingfortheclassandtheirunderstanding of the material. Perhaps as important, students preferred online homework to traditional homework assignments, pos-siblybecauseoftheimmediatefeedback. Althoughthesolutionstosimilarhome-work problems were made available to students,manyreportedthattheydidnot
This study corroborates the poten-tial value of technology in enhanc-ing learning. An advantage of online homework is that it offers immediate feedbacktostudents.Itispossiblethat the time lag inherent in administering manuallygradedhomeworkisareason why some previous researchers have foundthathomeworkdidnotimprove studentlearning.
NOTE
Joseph C. Smolirais an associate professor of finance at Belmont University. His research interests include pedagogy, financial planning, andmutualfunds.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Dr. Joseph C. Smolira, Belmont University, School of Business, 1900 Belmont Boulevard,Nashville,TN37221,USA.
E-mail:smoliraj@mail.belmont.edu
REFERENCES
Biktimirov,E.N.,&Klassen,K.J.(2008).Rela-tionship between the use of online support materials and performance in the introductory finance class.Journal of Education for Busi-ness,8,153–158.
Cudd,M.,TannerJ.,&Lipscomb,T.(2004).An empiricalanalysisofacumulative/reworktest-ingstrategy:Itseffectonstudentperformance in principles of finance.Journal of Financial Education,30(Winter),16–31.
Johnson, C.W. (1989).The association between testing strategies and performance in college algebra, attitudes toward mathematics, and attritionrate.SocialScienceandMathematics, 89,468–477.
King, D. R., & Jennings, W. W. (2004). The impact of augmenting traditional instruction with technology-based experiential exercise.
Journal of Financial Education, 30(Summer), 9–25.
Kulik,C.C.,&Kulik,J.A.(1986).Effectiveness ofcomputer-basededucationincolleges.AEDS Journal,19(Winter/Spring),81–108.
Lefcort, H., & Eiger, S. M. (2003). Preparatory versus practice homework.Journal of College ScienceTeaching,33(1),16–18.
Michelson,S.,&Smith,S.D.(2004).Webusage in financial education.Advances in Financial Education,2(Spring),10–21.
Paschal, R., Walberg, H. J., & Weinstein, T. (1984). The effects of homework on learning: Aquantitativesynthesis. TheJournalofEduca-tionalResearch,78,97–104.
Peng, Z. (2006). Applying internet-based tech-nologies to teaching corporate finance and investments.JournalofEducatorsOnline,3(6), 1–18.
Peters,M.,Kethley,B.,&Bullington,K.(2002). The relationship between homework and per- formanceinanintroductoryoperationsmanage-mentcourse.JournalofEducationforBusiness,
77,355–366.
Rayburn,L.G.,&Rayburn,J.M.(1999).Impact ofcourselengthandhomeworkassignmentson studentperformance.JournalofEducationfor Business,74,325–331.
Ross,S.A.,Westerfield,R.W.,&Jordan,B.D. (2006).Fundamentals of corporate finance.
NewYork:McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Ross,S.A.,Westerfield,R.W.,&Jordan,B.D. (2007).Essentials of corporate finance. New York:McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Weems,G.(1998).Theimpactofhomeworkcol-lectiononperformanceinintermediatealgebra.
ResearchandTeachinginDevelopmentalEdu-cation,15(1),21–25.
ADVERTISING
SPACE NOW
AVAILABLE
�������������
������������������������������������������������ ������������������������������������������� ����������������������������������������������� ����������������������������������������������������� ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������
�������������������������� ����������������
������������������������������ ������������������������������ �������������������������������� ����������������������������������� ����������������������������������
����������������������������������������������������������������
������������������������������������������������������
�����������������������������������������������������������������
�����������������
������������������������
�������������������������������������� ����������������������������������������������� ���������������������������
�����������������
���������������������������������� �����������������������������������