Peran Laboratorium Prodi dalam Akreditasi

(1)

Peran Laboratorium Prodi

dalam

Akreditasi

Workshop Umsida

Sidoarjo, 25 Januari 2016

Budi Santosa

(2)

AKREDITASI

NASIONAL PT

• Internal PJM

• BAN-PT

(3)

Akreditasi

BAN PT

7- standar

prodi &

institusi,5

tahun, wajib

ABET

8 criteria,

prodi,6

years, tidak

wajib

AUN-QA

15 standar

Perlukah

semuanya?

(4)

BAN-PT

, AUN

&

ABET

• BAN-PT:

akreditasi nasional

• ASEAN

University Network

• AUN Actual Quality Assesment

• ABET:

Accreditation Board of Engineering and

Technology

(5)

3. Mahasiswa dan Lulusan

BAN-

PT

1. Visi, Misi, Tujuan &

strategi

5.

KURIKULUM

2. Tata Pamong, Kepemimpinan dan Penjaminan Mutu

4. SDM

6. Pembiayaan, Fasilitas dan Sistem Informasi

7. Penelitain, PKM dan

Kerjasama

(6)

BAN -

PT

• Standar 1

: Visi, Misi, Tujuan dan Strategi

• Standar 2

: Tata Pamong, Kepemimpinan, Sistem

Pengelolaan, dan Penjaminan Mutu

• Standar 3

: Mahasiswa dan Lulusan

• Standar 4

: Sumberdaya manusia

• Standar 5

: Kurikulum

• Standar 6

: Pembiayaan, Prasarana, Sarana, dan

Sistem Informasi

(7)

Laboratorium

dalam

Borang Prodi

• Standar 4

: Sumberdaya manusia

• Butir 4.6.1

, Kualitas laboran, teknisi, operator,

programer

– KURANG DALAM JUMLAH ATAU TERLALU BANYAK SEHINGGA KURANG

KEGIATANNYA.

(8)

Laboratorium

dalam

Borang

• Standar 5

:

Kurikulum

• Butir 5.1.4

, Substansi praktikum dan pelaksanaan

praktikum

– PELAKSANAAN MODUL PRAKTIKUM KURANG DARI MINIMUM.

– PELAKSANAAN MODUL PRAKTIKUM LEBIH DARI CUKUP (DITAMBAH

DENGAN DEMONSTRASI DI LABORATORIUM ) DI PT SENDIRI.

(9)

Laboratorium

dalam

Borang

• Standar 5

:

Kurikulum

• Butir 5.3.1.b

, Mekanisme penyusunan materi

perkuliahan

– MATERI KULIAH HANYA DISUSUN OLEH DOSEN PENGAJAR TANPA

MELIBATKAN DOSEN LAIN.

– MATERI KULIAH DISUSUN OLEH KELOMPOK DOSEN DALAM SATU

BIDANG ILMU, DENGAN MEMPERHATIKAN MASUKAN DARI DOSEN

LAIN ATAU DARI PENGGUNA LULUSAN.

(10)

Laboratorium

dalam

Borang Prodi

• Standar 5

:

Kurikulum

• Butir 5.7.4

, Interaksi akademik antara

dosen-mahasiswa

– UPAYA DINILAI KURANG DAN HASILNYA TIDAK NAMPAK, ATAU TIDAK

ADA UPAYA.

– UPAYA BAIK DAN HASILNYA SUASANA KONDUSIF UNTUK

MENINGKATKAN SUASANA AKADEMIK YANG BAIK.

(11)

Laboratorium

dalam

Borang Prodi

• Standar 6

: Pembiayaan, Prasarana, Sarana,

dan Sistem Informasi

• Butir 6.3.2

, Prasarana (kantor, ruang kelas, ruang

laboratorium, studio, ruang perpustakaan, kebun

percobaan, dsb. kecuali ruang dosen) yang

dipergunakan PS dalam proses pembelajaran

– PRASARANA KURANG LENGKAP DAN MUTUNYA KURANG BAIK.

– PRASARANA LENGKAP DAN MUTUNYA SANGAT BAIK UNTUK PROSES

PEMBELAJARAN.

(12)

Laboratorium

dalam

Borang Prodi

• Standar 6

: Pembiayaan, Prasarana, Sarana,

dan Sistem Informasi

• Butir 6.4.3

, Ketersediaan, Akses Dan Pendayagunaan

Sarana Utama Di Laboratorium

– SANGAT KURANG, KEGIATAN PRAKTIKUM PRAKTIS TIDAK PERNAH

DILAKUKAN.

– SANGAT MEMADAI, TERAWAT DENGAN SANGAT BAIK, DAN PS

MEMILIKI AKSES YANG SANGAT BAIK (MEMILIKI FLEKSIBILITAS DALAM

MENGGUNAKANNYA DI LUAR KEGIATAN PRAKTIKUM TERJADWAL).

(13)

Laboratorium

dalam

Borang Pengelola

• Standar 6

: Pembiayaan, Prasarana, Sarana,

dan Sistem Informasi

• Butir 6.2.2

, Rencana investasi untuk pengadaan

sarana dalam lima tahun ke depan.

(14)

AUN-

Fee

•

Item Member Associate Member

Honorarium for Lead Assesso USD 600 per programme (borne by host)

USD 600 per programme (borne by host)

Honorarium for Assessors USD 300 per programme (borne by host)

USD 300 per programme (borne by host)

Airfare for Assessors and two AUN Secretariats

Borne by host(economy class).

Borne by host(economy class)

Accommodation for Assessors and two AUN Secretariats.

Borne by host Borne by host

Administrative Fee to AUN Secretariats USD 1,000 per assessment (borne by host) USD 1,000 per assessment(borne by host)

Local Hospitality (meals and transportation)

Borne by host Borne by host Borne by host

Dvelopment fund none USD 1000 per programme (borne by host)

(15)

ABET -Fee

Readiness Reviews $1000/program

Base fee for an on-site review $8,000 Fee for each program evaluator (PEV) $8,000

On-Site Reviews

One evaluator reviewing two programs $340 Extra day, per program evaluator $340 Visit to off-campus location, per location $340 Travel Expense Reimbursement Expenses incurred

(16)

ABET

- Schedule

• January 31

,

R

equest for

E

valuation

• July 1,

Self Study Report

,

provided to

ABET

• September-December,

on site visit

(17)

AUN

QA-

ABET

• _{Expected Learning Outcomes} • Programme Specification

• Programme Structure and Content • Teaching and Learning Strategy • Student Assessment

• Academic Staff Quality • _{Support Staff Quality} • Student Quality

• Student Advice and Support

• Facilities and Infrastructure

• Quality Assurance of Teaching and

Learning Process

• _{Staff Development Activities}

• Stakeholders Feedback • Output • Stakeholders Satisfaction

• CRITERION 1. STUDENTS

• CRITERION 2. PROGRAM

EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES

• CRITERION 3. STUDENT

OUTCOMES

• CRITERION 4. CONTINUOUS

IMPROVEMENT

• CRITERION 5. CURRICULUM

• CRITERION 6. FACULTY

• CRITERION 7. FACILITIES

• CRITERION 8. INSTITUTIONAL

SUPPORT

• PROGRAM CRITERIA

(18)

ABET

1. STUDENTS

– Student Admissions

– Evaluating Student Performance

– Transfer Students and Transfer Courses – Advising and Career Guidance

– Work in Lieu of Courses – Graduation Requirements

– Transcripts of Recent Graduates 2. PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES

– Mission Statement

– Program Educational Objectives

– Consistency of the Program Educational Objectives with the Mission of the Institution – Program Constituencies

(19)

ABET

3. STUDENT OUTCOMES – Student Outcomes

– Relationship of Student Outcomes to Program Educational Objectives

4. CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

– Student Outcomes (SO) – Continuous Improvement – Additional Information 5. CURRICULUM – Program Curriculum – Course Syllabi 6. FACULTY – Faculty Qualifications – Faculty Workload – Faculty Size – Professional Development

(20)

ABET

7. FACILITIES

– Offices, Classrooms, and Laboratories – Computing Resources

– Guidance

– Maintenance and Upgrading of Facilities – Library Services

– Overall Comments on Facilities

8. INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT

– Leadership

– Program Budget and Financial Support – Staffing

– Faculty Hiring and Retention

– Support of Faculty Professional Development

PROGRAM CRITERIA

• Appendix A. Course Syllabi ... • Appendix B. Faculty Vitae ... • Appendix C. Facilities ... • Appendix D. Institutional Summary...

(21)

CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT:

THE HEART OF ACCREDITATION

• The true benefits of accreditation lie in the

ongoing process of assessment that lays the

foundation for programmatic success. The

program assessment planning process is related

to the following

ABET Accreditation Criteria

:

• ABET Criterion 2: Program Educational Objectives

• ABET Criterion 3: Student Outcomes

(22)

Decision

• No Accreditated

• Deficiencies

• Weakness

(23)

AUN

-

SAR

• Part 1 :

Introduction

:

Executive summary, Organisation and approach of self-assessment carried out, Brief description of the university, faculty and department – outline the history, mission, vision, objectives and quality policy of the university followed by a brief description of the faculty and department.

• Part2: AUN-QACriteriaRequirements This section contains the write-up on how the university, faculty or department addresses the requirements of the AAUN-QA criteria. Follow the

criteria listed in the self-assessment checklist.

• Part3: StrengthsandWeaknessesAnalysis Summary of strengths - Summarise the points that the department considers to be its strengths and mark the points that you are proud of.  Summary of Weaknesses - Indicate which points the department considers to be weak and in need of improvement. Completed checklist Improvement plan – recommendations to close the gaps identified in the self-assessment and the action plan to implement them. • Part4: Appendices Glossary, supporting documents and evidences

(24)

24

AUN-QA Criteria Possible Evidences 1 Expected Learning

Outcomes

Programme & module specifications, course brochure & prospectus, skills matrix, stakeholders’ inputs, university & faculty website, communication media & plans to

stakeholders, curriculum review minutes, accreditation & benchmarking reports

2 Programme Specification

3 Programme Structure & Content

4 Teaching & Learning Strategy

Teaching & learning strategy, evidence of action learning, student feedback, online learning portal, module

specification

5 Student Assessment Assessment criteria, samples of in-course assessment, project work, final examination, marking scheme, moderation process, appeal procedure

6 Academic Staff Quality Recruitment criteria, staff qualifications, peer review & appraisal system, career plan, student feedback, award & recognition systems, staff workload, allocation of roles and duties, termination & retirement schemes

(25)

25

AUN-QA Criteria Possible Evidences

7 Support Staff Quality Number, type and qualification of support staff, career plan, training plan, appraisal system, award &

recognition schemes, student/faculty feedback

8 Student Quality Student selection process, trend of student intakes, credit system, student workload, student performance reports

9 Student Advice and Support

Mechanisms to report and feedback on student progress, coaching, mentoring and counselling schemes, student feedback

10 Facilities and Infrastructure

Number and type of facilities, utilisation rates,

downtime/uptime, maintenance plan, new facilities and upgrading plans, safety & health policy, facilities booking system

11 Quality Assurance of Teaching & Learning Process

Curriculum design, review & approval process and minutes, QA of assessments/examinations,

stakeholders’ inputs, external examiners, students feedback

P 53-66 Do

(26)

26

AUN-QA Criteria Possible Evidences 12 Staff Development

Activities

Education, training and development policy and plan, training places & hours, scholarships, job rotation & deployment scheme

13 Stakeholders Feedback Regular & ad-hoc and formal & informal surveys and feedback, uses of reports

14 Output Pass/drop-out rates, employment statistics, entry-level salary, employers feedback, average time to graduate, research

15 Stakeholders Satisfaction Process for measuring stakeholders satisfaction, stakeholders satisfaction trends, perceptions of graduates & university