• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

SangatSetuju 1.O

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Membagikan "SangatSetuju 1.O"

Copied!
13
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

LA M PIR AN 1

A Jenis kelam in

valid C um Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Laki -l aki # k t ' ' 139 63. 8 63.8 63. 8

Perem puan 2.0 79 36.2 36.2 100.0

Total 218 10Q.0 100.0 B Usia

Valid C um Value Lébel Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent

25 - 30 th 1.0 53 24.3 24.3 24.3

30 - 35 th 2.Q 61 28.0 28.0 52.3

35 - 40 th 3.0 59 27.1 27.1 79.4

diatas 40 th 4.0 45 20.6 20.6 1œ .0 Total 218 100.0 1œ .Q

'

C Peker jaan

Valid C um Value Label Value Frequèncy Percent Percent Percent

Pegawai Negeri 1.0 26 11.9 11.9 11.9

Pegawai Swasta 2.0 107 49.1 49.1 61.0 W irasw asta 3.G '80 36.7 36.7 97.7

'Lainnya 4.0 5 2.3 2.3 100.0

Total ' 218 10Q.0 ' 100.0 D Perusahaan yang bonafit

Valid C um Value Label Value . Frequenoy Percent Percent Peroent

Sangat Setuju 1. O 45 20.6 20. 6 20.6

F setuju 2. 0 154 70. 6 70. 6 91.3

Tidak Tahu 3.0 19 8.7 8.7 100.0

Tot l 218 100.0 100.0

E Mempunyai jari ngan yang I uas

'

Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Sangat Setuju 1.0 89 40. 8 40.8 40. 8

Setùju 2. 0 96 44. 0 44. 0 84. 9

Tidak Tahu 3.0 26 11.9 11.9 96.8

Ti dak Setuju 4. 0 7 3. 2 3. 2 1œ . 0

218 100 0 100 0

Total . .

(2)

F Pelayanannya m emuaskan

Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Sangat Setuju 1. 0 54 24. 8 24.8 24. 8 Setuju 2. 0 135 . . 61. 9 61. 9 86. 7

Tidak Tahu 3.0 15 6:9 6.9 93.6

Ti dak Setuju 4. 0 14 6. 4 6. 4 100. 0

Total 218 1œ .0 1œ .Q ,

G Mem punyai.hubungan baik dengan klien

Valid C um

Value Label Val ue Fr e4uency Percent Percent Percent

Sangat Setuju 1. 0 44 20.2 20. 2 20.2

Setuju 2. 0 145 66. 5 66. 5 86.7

Tidak Tahu 3k,0 15 6.9 6.9 93.6

Tidak Setuju 4. O 14 6.4 6. 4 1002 0

Total 218 100.0 100.Q H Proses pem buat n polisnya oepat dan rapi

Vali d Cum

Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Sanjat Setuj u 1. 0 59 27. 1 . 27. 1 27. 1

Setulu 2.0 91 41.7 41.7 68.8

Tidak Tahu 3.0 59 27.1 27.1 95.9

Tidak Setuju 4. 0 9 4.1 4.1 100. 0

Total 218 100.0 100.0 l Pembayaran klaim nya baik dan cepat '

Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Sàngat Setejg 1: 0 76 34. 9 34. 9 34. 9

Setuju 2. 0 76 34. 9 34. 9 69.7

Tidak Tahu 3.0 55 25.2 25.2 95.0

Ti dak Setuju 4. 0 11 5.0 5.0 1œ . 0

7*nta1 218 10Q.0 100.G J M enarik

Vatid Cum Value Label Value Frm uency Percent Percent Percent

Sangat Setuju 1 . 0 26 1 1. 9 11. 9 11 . 9

Setuju 2. 0 168 77.1 N .1 89. 0

T idak Tahu 3.0 .24 11.0 11.0 1'00.0 Total 218 100.0 100.0

(3)

K M enguntungkan

Valid Cpm Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Sangat Setuju 1. O 22 10. 1 10. 1 10.1

Setuju 2. 0 13é 59. 6 59. 6 69. 7

Tidak Tahu 3.0 57 26.1 26.1 95:9

Ti dak Setuju 4. 0 9 4. 1 4.1 100. 0

Total 218 100.0 100.0 L Banyak variasi / m acamnya

Valid 'C um Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Sangat Setuju 1. 0 44 20.2 20. 2 20. 2

' Setuju 2. 0 124 56. 9 56. 9 77.1

m dak Tahu 3.O 47 21.6 21.6 98.6

Ti dak Sett jt l 4. 0 3 1. 4 1.4 100. 0

Total 218 100.0 1Q0.0 M Pelayanannya m em uaskan

Valid C um Value Label Value Frequene Percent Percent Percent

Sangat Setuju 1. Q 37 17. 0 17. 0 17. 0

Setuju 2. 0 165 75. 7 75.7 92.7

Tidak Tahu 3.0 16 7.3 7.3 1X .0

Total 218 100.0 100.0 N Penampilannya menarik

Valid C um Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Sangat Setqju 1. 0 42 19. 3 19. 3 19. 3

Setuju 2. 0 133 61. 0 61. 0 30. 3

Tidak Tahu 3.0 14 ' 6.4 6.4 86.7

Mdak Setuju 4.0 29 13. 3 13. 3 1œ .0

ToG l 218 100.0 100.0 O Ram ah dan so> n

Valid C um Value tabel Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Sangatsetuju 1.0 58 26.6 26.6 26. 6

Setuju 2.0 133 61. 0 61. 0 87. 6

TidakTahu 3.0 20 9.2 9.2 96.8

Ti dak Setuju 4. 0 7 3. 2 3. 2 100.0

Tou l 218 1œ .0 100.0

(4)

P Mudah dihebungi Vatid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Sangat Setuju 1. 7 0 73 33.5 33.5 33.5

Setuju 2. O 124 56. 9 56. 9 90. 4

Tidak Tahu 3;f 14 6.4 6.4 96.8

Sangat Ti dak Setuju 5. O 7 3. 2 3.2 100. 0

Total 218 100.0 100.0 Q Pengetahuan dan 'penguasaan pçoduknya baik

Valid C um Value Label Value Frequency 'Pem ent Pement Percent

Sangat Setuju 1 . 0 61 28. h 0 2:. 0 28. 0

Setuju 2. 0 95 43. 6 43. 6 71. 6

Tidak Tahu 3.O 53 24.3 24.3 95.9

Ti dak ' Setuju 4. O 9 4.1 4.1 1X .0

Total 218 100.0 100.0

& Mampu menjadi pendengar yang bai k V

alid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Sangat Setuju 1. 0 30 13. 8 13.8 13. 8

.

Setuju 2. O 138 63, 3 63. 3 N . 1

Tidak Tahu 3.0 46 21.1 21.1 98.2

mdak Setuju 4. 0 2 0. 9 0. 9 99.1 Sangat Ti dak Setuju 5. 0 2 0. 9 0. 9 100. 0

Total 218 100.0 1()0.Q

S Kemampuan berkomuni kasi dan menjel askannya bai k

Valid G um Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Sanjat Setuj u 1. 0 37 17. 0 17. 0 17. 0

Setulu 2.0 149 68.3 68.3 85.3

Tidak Tahu 3.0 25 11.5 41.5 96.8

mdak Setuju 4. 0 7 3.2 3. 2 400.0

Total 218 100.0 1œ .0

T Mampu m enum buhkan m inat konsum en terhadap produk yang dihwarkan vajid cum Vasue Label Value Freqqency Percent Percent Percent

Sangat G tuju 1. b 47 21. 6 21.6 21. 6

Setuju 2. 0 138 63. 3 ' 63. 3 84. 9

Tidak Tahu 3.0 31 14.2 14.2 99.1

m dak Setuju 4.û '2 0.9 0.9 100.0 Too t 218 400.0 100.0

(5)

U S iap m endengarkan dan m em berikan tanggapan atas kebutuhan klien Valid Cum Value 'Label Value Frequency P ercent Perced PerO nt

Sangat Setuju 1. O 32 14. 7 14. 7 14.7

Setuju 2. 0 163 74. 8 74. 8 89. 4

Tidak Tahu 3.0 18 8.3 8.3 97.7

Tidak Setuju 4. 0 3 1.4 1.4 99.1

Sangat Ti dak Setuju 5. 0 2 0.9 0. 9 100. 0

Total 218 100.0 1X .0 V M am pu m énum buhkan kepercayaan klien kepada perusahaan

Valid C um Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Sangat Setuju 1. 0 56 25.7 25. 7 25.7

Setuju 2. 0 135 61.9 61. 9 87. 6

Tidak Tahu 3.0 25 11.5 11.5 99.1

Ti daksetuju 4. 0 2 0. 9 Q. 9 100. 0

? Total 218 100.0 1 œ .0

W Mam pu menawarkan alternatif produk asuransi yang paling dibutuhkan klien valid c um Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Sangat Setuju 1. 0 66 30. 3 30. 3 30. 3

Setuju 2. 0 114 52.3 52. 3 82. 6

Tidak Tahu 3.0 29 13.3 13.3 95.9

Ti dak Setuju 4. 0 9 4. 1 4.1 100. 0

Total 218 100.0 100.0

X Mampu menjal in hubungan bai k dengan kl i en I konsumen

. Valid Cum

Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Sangat Setuju 5. 0 80 36. 7 36.7 36.7

Setuju 2.0 125 57. 3 57. 3 94.0

Ti dak Tahu 3. 0 13 6. 0 6. 0 100. 0

Tni .1 . 21ô dcc. c 11 . c '

(6)

LAMPIPAN 2

ANALISA FAKTOR PADA CORPORATE , PRODUCT DAN AGENT IMAGE

Analysis Number 1 Listwise deletfon of cases vith missing values Extraction 1 for Analysis 1, Principal-components Analysis (PC)

Initlal Statistïcs:

Variable 'Communallty * Factor Eigenvalue Pct of Var Cum Pct

D 1.00000 * 1 8.29223 39.5 39.5

E 1.00000 * 2 1.94401 9 .3 48 .7

F 1.00000 * 3 1.59419 7.6 56 .3

G 1.00000 * 4 1.18235 5.6 62.0

H 1.00000 * 5 .98512 4.7 66 .7

I 1.00000 * 6 .93540 4.5 71.1

J 1.00000 * 7 .74268 3 .5 74.6

K 1.00000 * 8 .68127 3.2 77.9

L / 1 .00000 * 9 .64457 3 .1 81.0

M 1 .00000 * 1* .60305 2 .9 83.8

N 1.00000 * 11 .54248 2 .6 86 .4

O 1 .00000 * 12 .53149 2 .5 88 .9

P 1 .00000 * 13 .,45046 2.1 91.1

Q 1.00000 * 14 .38215 1.8 92.9

R 1 .OQ000 * 15 .35410 1.7 94 .6

S 1.00000 * l'6 .29657 1.4 96 .0

T 1 .00000 * 17 .22950 1.1 97.1

U 1 .00000 * 18 .20973 1.O 98 .1

V 1.00000 * 19 .15671 .7 98 .8

W 1.00000 * 2'0 .13622 .6 99 .5

X 1.00000 * 21 .10570 .5 A00 .0

Pc Extracted 4 factors.

(7)

Factor Matrfx :

FACTOR 1 FACTOR 2 ,FACTOR 3 FACTOR 4

F .78091 - .35550 .27110 - .11841

H .7:139 -.02535 .30497 -.04154

W .71688 .04687 -.42623 -.06928

'

G .71539 - .30557 .19824 -.03362

O .71106 - .17950 -.41082 - .01930

S .71,088 -.05202 - .18762 .19675

P .70571 -.33785 -.27172 .01935

E .69225 - .39356 .12707 .25023

Q .68171 .04147 -.16510 .38444

L .45349 .32428 .10565 -.07976

V .64475 .36082 .12992 -.10646

T .60273 .36597 -.09675 - .02460

K .58126 .09943 .,40272 -.27343

J .57920 -.07146 .02088 -.26737

X .57135 .40440 .38828 -.06426

I .57051 - .12562 .10841 - .04422

R .55545 .38839 -.13772 .53968

P .47849 .61083 .15185 .00835

D p .35172 -.51712 .38825 .35176

N .47649 .13502 - .48072 -. .02130

X .49935 - .20628 - .31484 - .5697.8

;

Final Statistics:

Varlable Communality * Factor Eigenvalue Pct of Var Cum Pct '

D .66559 * 1 8 .29223 39 .5 39 .5

E .71287 * 2 1 .94401 9 .3 48 .7

P .82372 * 3 1.59419 7 .6 56 .3

G .64558 * 4 1.18235 5.6 62.0

H *63030 *

I .35497 *

J .41250 *

K .58470 *

L .54973 *

M .64487 *

N .47681 *

O .70697 *

P .68638 *

Q .64150 *

R .76959 *

S .58196 *

T .50718 *

U .62519 *

M .57410 *

W .70258 *

X 71568 *

(8)

Varïmax Rotatlon 1, Extraction 1, Analysis 1 - Kalser

. Normalfzatfon .

Varimax 'converged ln 17 ïterations.

Rotated Factor Matrïx: .

FACTOR 1 PACTOR 2 FACTOR 3 FACTOR 4

M .76887 .19683 - .00533 .12221

U .72551 -.08170 .00247 .30356

V .67262 .13825 .22053 .23225

K .63693 .36392 .18227 -.11558

L .63533 .16273 .23173 .25671

T .52751 .02862 .28663 .38201

D -.06107 .79493 -.15402 .07889

F .34698 .75305 .36866 .01834

.1 E .11085 .75249 .20232 .30563.

G .28825 .67128 .31912 .10017

H .53091 .53854 .20522 .12766

19 .28868 .42970 .26840 .12299

X .14139 .12930 .81650 - .11088

O .08458 .31129 .64654 .43000

W .24154 .14382 .63789 .46546

P .03207 .48687 .57268 .34691

N .13110 -.05784 .50492 .44871

J .34727 .30549 .44514 .02091

R .34913 .10264 - .05046 .79663

Q .21947 .35408 .19672 .65518

S -21333 .37796 .35627 .51640

Factor Transformatfon Matrlx )

FACTOR 1 FACTOR 2 FACTOR 3 FACTOR 4

FACTOR 1 .54198 .53718 .48990 .42154

FACTOR 2 .65258 - .67063 -.22225 .27387 FACTOR 3 .45945 .45398 -.60097 -.47080 PACTOR & -.26328 .23579 - .59113 .72502

(9)

ANALISA FAKTOR PADA CORPORATE IMA GE

This FACTOR analysis requïres 5520 ( 5.4K) BYTES of memory.

Analysis Number 1 Listwise deletlon of cases with missing values Extraction 1 for Analysis 1, Princïpal-components Analysfs (PC)

Initial Statistics:

Varïable Communalliy * Factor Efgenvalue Pct of Var Cum Pct

D 1.00000 * 1 3.47948 58 .0 58.0

E 1.00000 * 2 .79876 13.3 71.3

F 1.00000 * 3 .72043 12.0 83.3

G 1.00000 * 4 .46100 7.7 91.0

H 1.00000 * 5 .33312 5.6 96 .5

I 1.00000 * 6 .20720 3.5 100 .0

PC Extracted 1 factors.

Factor Matrix :

FACTOR 1

F .87178

é .82638

G .78761

H .77357

' I .64185

D .63708

Final Statistïcs :

Varïable Communality * Factor Eigenvalue Pct of Var Cum Pct

D .40587 * 1 3.47948 58.0 58.0

E .68291 *

F .75999 *

G .62032 *

H .59841 *

I 41197 *

(10)

ANA LISA FA KTOR PA DA PRODU CT IM AG E

Analysis Number l Listwise deletion of cases with mïssïng values Extraction 1 for Analysis 1, Princfpal-components Analysis (PC) Inftfal Statlstfcsô

Variable Communality * Factor Eigenvalue Pc t of Var Cum Pct

*

J 1.00000 * 1 1.76847 58.9 58.9

K 1.00000 * 2 .65231 21.7 80 .7

L 1.00000 * 3 .57923 19.3 100.0

PC Extracted 1 factors.

Factor Matrix :

FACTOR 1

K .78954

J i .76503

E *?4821

Flnal Statistics :

Variable Communality * Factor Eigenvalue Pct of Var Cum Pct

J .58528 * 1 1.76847 58 .9 58.9

K .62337 *

L .55982 *

(11)

AXALISA FAKTOR PADA AGENT IM GE '

Analysis Number 1 Listwise deletion of cases with missinq vûlues Ex traction 1 #or Ana.lysis 1 , Prinicigal-componen ts Analysis (PC)

In i tial Statisti cs q '' '

Variable Communality % Factor Eigenvalue 'Pct oT Var Cum Pct

1$ 1.ûQûQû % % 1 5.17289 43.1 43.1

Q 1 .00000 # 2 1 .5757: 13. 1 58.2

0 1 .Q00Q0 % 3 1 .Q122# 8 .4 84 .7

P I.QQQGQ # 4 .8:339 7.4 72.1

9 1 .GQQQQ % 5 ..89553 5.8 . 77.9

R 1 .QQQOQ # 4 .60119 5.0 82.9*

S 1.Q0Q0Q A 7 .57213 4.8 87 .7

T 1.Q0000 # 8 .4Q399 4.1 *1.8

U 1 .ûQ0ûQ # 9 .359û1 3.Q 94.8

V 1.ûQû0Q * 10 .24980 2.1 Q4.Q

% 1.Q0070 A 11 . .2tQ12 1.8 98.7

X 1.û000Q A 12 . 180Q8 1.5 10û.0

PC . Extracted 5 Taactorsk F a c t o r Na t r i x l

F . AI bTnR 1 F -AcToR 2 F' . AcTcR z

kl .78347 -.244û5 -.00821

0 *75178 - .39527 .01014

S .72840 -.t2883 -.24981

Q .72505 .00538 -.33214

. .'A .

P .886$5 -.41308 -.Q9717

T .88807 .23101 .Q8559

V .64128 .37423 .38509

R .44441 .29586 -.58214

R .58391 -.147:5 .24388

N .54181 .52482 .28249

X .5û3:8 -.4:1Q5 .459:3

U .:2891 .6Q11? .11754

(12)

Fînal Statîstics :

Variaeble Communality A Factor Eiçenvalue Pz't o: Var Cum Pct

N .63789 % % 1 5.17280 43.1 45.1

t1 .42219 A 2 1 .57576 13.1 58.2

(3 .72149 A 3 1 .*1229 8.4 64.7

P ,65223 #

0 .63623 %

R .84169 A

S .$û957 A

T .52390 $ '

V .65423 %

V .71058 #

@ .:7444 #

X .89$75 %

Varimax Rotatîon 1, Extraction 1y Analysis 1 - Kûiser Normalizûtîon.

Varimax converqed in 8 iteration>r

Rotated ractor Matrix:

FACTOR 1 FACTOR 2 FACTOR 5

X .8215$ .Q98î4 -.11:29

0 .74022 .10216 .4Q390

P .88875 .0û934 .452:8

: .8533û .22188 .44544

N .5:317 .29666 .13û49

N .û9545 .78250 .12821

V .31221 .77588 .10553

U -.û2195 .77118 .24255

T .2:214 .54725 .34518

R -.:2517 .31198 .86272

9 .329$2 .24û72 .88941

S .44382 .17881 .41695

Factcr Transformation Natrixl

Fi ' cT0R 1 FàcTna 2 FAclnR z

FACTOR 1 .128$2 . .52995 .97745 FACTOR 2 -.$$:85 . .74512 .05553 FACTOR 3 .40Q1? .41998 -.81453

(13)

,,,? ,

't.;'''

, t x . t x> k

,z)s,,

.y,,

PT. ASURANSI Q BE PO O L IN DO NESI A

. , :('Li

,.tjy'k,..:' ;' 7

s j j k

:

j

2

j

'

j j j , j j

.

j

xn

, j j

x

j

k

j j r j l j r j k y . j . : , ' 4 , ; 2 . . , . .

. 1

.

: j y . ' . x j . . j . j ' t j : y j y . j j j p y u , y j g g y j g j j w x x j . . j j y y g x k y j r j , , . .

. 1 ..b ...L..hk). .jj .;():,.j,;. N o o N s s I #

.

Q ; p j Jal an Muafa Kar ang Raya 293-301 Tet ephone : (62 21) 660 4747

> V : % Jakarla 14450, Indonesia Fax. . : (62 21) 660 3375

. . . '. z: . ..

Yarzcg bertarzda tangan d lbawah in i :

N a m a : Hosea Prasetyo

Jakaatan : W aki l Kepa l.a Cab ang

menerangkan dengan sebertarnya bahwa m ahasiswi Faku ltas Ekonom i Un iversitaa Kristerz Petr'a Surabay a

H a m a : Jeany Tand J'ung : r p : 3 1492 139

: i r m -. '92 .7 .002 . 1302 1 .0 1035 Jurusan : Hanaa' emen

te lah melaksanukan Wawanoara di P T . Asuransi QBE Pool Indonesia 'su z.abaya -

Demlk-ian surat keterangan 1n1 cdan dapat dlgunal<an seb agalmana m e atiny a e

.& = u ,

.

k L. %w. . ' w. ) x baya > El Jun i 1 996

z .

@- uq j . t . q y , . I

''

k @ ( ! E ! '

: - r s r r - : 1 : : ; : , : . - . ) , r - . ' ' t h 5 k ' :

-

3-

;

h)'t. :' '.

Q-S'C .zm--.y..s, ..l- . . .

îp-

.h$. :1t$

,1j. . .'(t-tkrzfi-il . . .

. x.

xoN'? .. .wQ.- o.. j . o svo

.LL - r'e H o Ste a F '1 a Mu

Hp/Yy .

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

[r]

Berdasarkan Berita Acara Pembuktian Klarifikasi Nomor : 03/BA.K/ULP-DHKIBP/2015 tanggal 17 April 2015, maka Pokja ULP IV Dinas Perhubungan, Komunikasi,

Surat pernyataan bahwa tidak dalam pengawasan pengadilan, tidak pailit, kegiatan usahanya tidak sedang dihentikan.. Pengurus tidak masuk dalam daftar hitam

In Durban, Parties should mandate SBSTA to revise the review guidelines for adoption by COP18, expanding the mandate of the Expert Review Teams (ERT) to review the biennial

Sehubungan dengan pelaksanaan Seleksi Umum Jasa Konsultansi Pengawasan Renovasi Aula Peruntukan Gedung Laboratorium Pengujian Mikrobiologi, kami Panitia Pengadaan

Anak adalah genera si penerus bangsa dan penerus pembangunan, yaitu generasi yang dipersiapkan sebagai subyek pelaksana pembangunan yang berkelanjutan dan pemegang

2 Dinas Komunikasi dan Informatika Tenaga Ahli Integrasi Aplikasi Pelayanan Publik Berbasis Website. 3 Dinas Pemuda dan Olahraga Belanja Jasa Konsultansi Pengawasan Pembangunan

Ada perbedaan yang bermakna antara proporsi umur berdasarkan jenis komplikasi (p = 0,006), tidak ada perbedaan yang bermakna antara proporsi jenis kelamin