A S AT T OF
SCHO
MUH
STUDY ON THE SECON F MUHAMM I Submitted a for GOOL OF T
HAMMAD
N THE MET ND SEMES
MADIYAH N 2011/201
RESE as a Partial Getting Bach in Eng DEWI PR A
TEACHER
DIYAH U
THOD OF T STER OF EN H UNIVERS 2 ACADEM EARCH PAP Fulfillment helor Degre glish Depart by RIHATINI
320 080 024
R TRAINI
NIVERSI
2012
TEACHING NGLISH D SITY OF SU MIC YEAR
PER t of the Req ee of Educat tment
NGSIH 4
ING AND
ITY OF SU
APPROVAL
A
STUDY ONTHE METHOD
OFTEACHING READING
AT
TITE SECOND SNMESTER OFENGLISH DEPARTMENT
OF
MUHAMMADIYAH T]MVERSITY
OT'SURAKARTA
IN
2011/2012ACADEMIC YEAR
RESEARCH PAPER
by
DEWI
PRIHATII\INGSIH
A 320 080 024Approved to be Examined by Consultant
Consultant
I
,')
(- /' -t \1/-5
\-(?
.h,^
Drs.
Dioko
Sriiono.M.Hum.
NrP. 19s90601 195803 1 003Consultant
II
l\
rn
\YT
V
ACCEPTANCE
A STUDY ON TI{E METHOD OF TEACHING READING AT THE SECOND SEMESTER OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
OF MUHAMMADIYAH UNWERSITY OF SURAIA{ITTA
TN 2OI T/2012 ACADEMIC YEAR
by
DEWI PRIHATININGSIH A 320 080 024
Accepted and Approved by Board of Examiners
School of Teacher Training and Education
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta on
November
,2012Team of Examiner:
1.
Drs. Djoko Srijono. M.Hum.(Chair Person)
2.
Dra. Dwi Har.vanti. M.Hum. (Member I)3.
Drs. Maryadi" M.A.(Member
II)
W
*-a&
-\
{r?
tffli
-; \? tl
t,.R,
a:ffi
TESTIMOI{Y
Oa this
opportuaif,
I
state that &ereis
no proposedwork
kfore
in &is
research to get bachelor degree in a certiain university, and as far as I know there is
no also
work or
idea that has been written or publishedby
other people, exceptthose
which
arereferre#written
in
this
research paper and meationedin
thebibliography.
If
it
is proved therewill
be something wrong in my statement above in the firture, I E'ill wholly be rpspnsible.Surakarta, November 20 1 2
Dewi Prihatininssih A32B 080 024
v MOTTO
“ Ya Allah, kasihilah kedua orang tuaku sebagaimana mereka telah mengasuhku ketika aku masih kecil”.
( QS.Al Israa: 24)
“If there is a difficulty, there must be away to finish it”.
vi DEDICATION
This research paper is proudly dedicated to:
♥ My wonderful parents,
♥ My beloved older sisters and brothers,
♥ My lovely nephews and nieces,
♥ My dearest friends, and
vii
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Alhamdulillah, praise and gratitude for Allah SWT, the Glorious, the Lord,
and the Almighty, who has blessed the researcher to finish the research paper
entitled “A STUDY ON THE METHOD OF TEACHING READING AT THE
SECOND SEMESTER OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT OF MUHAMMADIYAH
UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA IN 2011/2012 ACADEMIC YEAR” as a
partial fulfillment of the requirements to get the Bachelor Degree in English
Department of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
The writer would like to thank all the people who have helped and supported
her so that she can accomplish the research paper. They are as follows:
1. Drs. H. Sofyan Anif, M. Si. as Dean of School of Teacher Training and
Education of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta, for giving permission
to write the research paper,
2. Titis Setyabudi, S.S., M.Hum., as Head of English Department UMS, for
giving permission to do this work,
3. Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M.Hum., as the writer’s Academic Advisor of
English Department UMS,
4. Drs. Djoko Srijono, M.Hum., as the first consultant who guides patiently and
gives her advice during the making of this research,
5. Dra. Dwi Haryanti, M.Hum., as the second consultant who has given the
guidance and advice,
ix
SUMMARY
Dewi Prihatiningsih. A320080024. A STUDY ON THE METHOD OF
TEACHING READING AT THE SECOND SEMESTER OF ENGLISH
DEPARTMENT OF MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
IN 2011/2012 ACADEMIC YEAR. Research Paper. School of Teacher
Training and Education. Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. 2012.
The objectives of this study are (1) to describe the methods used in
teaching-learning process of Reading at the second semester of English Department at
UMS, (2) to describe the strengths and weaknesses of the methods used by the
lecturer, and (3) to describe the strengths and weaknesses of the methods for the
students. The study was done at English Department of UMS in 2011/2012
academic year.
In this research, the data are derived from event, informant and document.
There are three techniques in collecting data, namely: documentation, observation,
and interview.
The study shows that (1) the method used by lecturer is active learning. The
lecturer also used some methods, namely wall poster, Jigsaw learning, and
drilling. (2) the strengths of the methods used by the lecturer includes; the lecturer
should be creative in transferring material to students, the lecturer can unearth the
students’ skills, and the lecturer has reference to the next teaching.
The
weaknesses of the methods used by the lecturer includes; the preparation of
materials and the preparation of instructions. (3) the strengths of the methods for
the students includes; students do not feel bored, students get experiences in
teaching, students’ motivation, increasing vocabulary.
The weaknesses of the
methods for the students are; reading class is a big class, students are
uncomfortable in the big class, student and lecturer needs much time in the class.
Conclusion, the use of active learning method on the teaching Reading at the
second semester students of English Department of UMS are successful.
Key words: method, teaching, reading.
Consultant I
Consultant II
Drs. Djoko Srijono, M.Hum.
Dra. Dwi Haryanti, M.Hum.
NIP. 19590601 198503 1 003
NIK. 477
Dean
Drs. H. Sofyan Anif, M.Si.
x
TABLE OF CONTENT
page
TITLE ……….……. i
APPROVAL ……… ii
ACCEPTANCE ……….. iii
TESTIMONY ……….. iv
MOTTO ………... v
DEDICATION ……… vi
ACKNOWLEDGMENT ……… vii
SUMMARY ………. ix
TABLE OF CONTENT ………. x
CHAPTER I : INTRODUCTION ……… 1
A.Background of the Study ………. 1
B. Limitation of the Study ………. 4
C. Problem Statement………. 5
D.Objective of the Study ……….. 5
E. Benefit of the Study ………. 5
F. Research Paper Organization ……… 6
CHAPTER II : REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE ……… 8
A.Previous Study ……….. 8
B. Notion of Reading ………. 8
C. Notion of Teaching Reading ………. 10
D.Principles of Teaching Reading ……… 11
xi
F. Active Learning ………..………..…. 14
G.Wall Poster ………..………..….… 16
H.Jigsaw Learning ……….…… 18
I. Drilling ……….…….……… 19
CHAPTER III : RESEARCH METHOD ……….. 21
A.Type of the Study ………. 21
B. Object and Subject of the Study ………... 21
C. Data and Data Sources ……….. 22
D.Technique of Collecting Data ………... 22
E. Technique for Analyzing Data ……….. 23
CHAPTER IV : RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION …… 25
A.Research Finding ………... 25
B. Discussion ……….. 41
CHAPTER V : CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION …………... 58
A.Conclusion……….. 58
B. Suggestion ………. 61